Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I: Communication in Engineering Disciplines

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Ekoniak, Virginia Tech; Molly Scanlon, Virginia Tech; M. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Paper ID #13867Teaching Peer Review of Writing in a Large First-Year Electrical and Com-puter Engineering Class: A Comparison of Two MethodsMr. Mike Ekoniak, Virginia TechMolly Scanlon Scanlon, Virginia Tech Molly J. Scanlon is an Assistant Professor at Nova Southeastern University where she teaches undergrad- uate and graduate writing courses. She received her PhD in Rhetoric and Writing from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include visual rhetoric, public rhetoric, and writing across the disciplines.M Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University Dr. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh is an assistant research professor with a

Conference Session

First-Year Activities and Peer Review Strategies in Civil Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Kuder, Seattle University; Nirmala Gnanapragasam, Seattle University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. Page 22.820.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Implementing Peer-Reviews in Civil Engineering LaboratoriesAbstractABET 2009-10 criterion 3 requires that all engineering graduates demonstrate an ability tocommunicate effectively at the time of graduation (criterion g of a-k outcomes). Technicalcommunication is a critical skill for Civil Engineering students to achieve. However,incorporating technical writing in many engineering courses is difficult. At Seattle University,laboratory reports are used to teach technical writing skills. Unfortunately, students often preparetheir reports at the last minute, rather than devoting the time necessary to compose and edit theirwriting. When the

Conference Session

Writers, Experts, and the Workforce in Civil Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cara N. Morton P.E, Washington State University; Anna Karin Roo, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

the students wrote theirexecutive summaries. With the submitted summaries, the students were split into small peerreview groups separating students by expertise (ie. students with one type of expertise withinthe field of civil engineering (i.e. structural) would review summaries written by students with adifferent expertise (i.e. water resources)). After the peer review portion of the class period, therewas a whole class discussion regarding the any action that students could take to improve theirsummaries. In the peer review session, students used non-evaluative feedback questions to helpguide their peer review sessions. The three questions came from Elbow’s (1998) non-evaluativesayback process for writing feedback: non-evaluative

Conference Session

Supporting the Capstone Experience

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kun Zhang P.E., California State University-Chico; Pablo K. Cornejo, California State University-Chico; Chris Fosen, California State University-Chico

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

to practicethe entire writing process (e.g. drafting, revising, and proofreading) and facilitating instructors tograde manageable reports to provide timely feedback. The specific objectives of this study are to(1) assess the effectiveness of one-page letter report assignments and associated activities, suchas technical writing instruction, individual practice, peer review, faculty feedback, and use of agood writing sample to improve students’ technical writing and (2) assess the improvement ofthe new ABET outcome 6 by using the one-page letter report at a Hispanic Serving Institution(HSI). Direct measurements were assessed based on scores of students’ reports following arubric, which was created according to the ABET outcome 6 and basic

Conference Session

First-Year Activities and Peer Review Strategies in Civil Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luciana Barroso, Texas A&M University; James R. Morgan, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

-STEM Center to Texas ISD teachers. Her research interests include structural health monitoring and control, structural dynamics, earthquake engineering, and engineering education.James R. Morgan, Texas A&M University Page 22.854.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Incorporating Technical Peer Review of Civil Engineering Student ProjectsAbstractPracticing engineers use peer review of most work products on a regular basis. While peerreview of team members and peer review of classmate’s writing and presentation has beenextensively researched, the use of student peer review of

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I: Communication in Engineering Disciplines

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington; Stephanie Pulford, Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT)

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

bedemoralizing4,6. Students also often defer to their reviewers’ suggestions without engaging withthem or making meaning out of them, in order to attain better grades5,6. And though studentsprefer to receive honest and straightforward critiques, they are not all yet in a position to give it;there is great variation in both participation and quality of feedback among peer discussants6.These drawbacks are reminiscent of similar ones within peer-to-peer review activities in writingcourses. Among writing educators, these shortcomings are often mitigated by providing morescaffolding within the peer review activity itself. Recommended practices include providingstudents with guiding questions to help them focus on important feedback7; instructing studentsto

Conference Session

Hey You: Effectively Engaging Students in the Classroom

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego; Samuel Holton Lee, University of California, San Diego; Jacqueline Linh Le, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

AC 2012-4477: INCORPORATING CLICKERS AND PEER INSTRUCTIONINTO LARGE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CLASSROOMSDr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Lelli Van Den Einde is a tenure-track lecturer at UC, San Diego, and focuses mostly on undergraduate education in mechanics and design courses. Her past research was in the seismic design of bridge sys- tems, but she is currently focused on assessing and improving engineering education pedagogy through technology. She has been the Faculty Advisor for UC, San Diego’s Society of Civil and Structural En- gineers (SCSE), a student chapter of the American Society of Civil Engineers, for the past two years. Additionally, Van Den Einde is also the Faculty Advisor

Conference Session

Supporting Successful Progression From First-year Studies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Charles Riley P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology; Dave Kim, Washington State University Vancouver; Ken Lulay, University of Portland; John D. Lynch, Washington State University Vancouver; Sean St. Clair, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

collaborators attracted close to $1M research grants to study writing transfer of engineering undergraduates. For the technical research, he has a long-standing involvement in research concerned with manufacturing of advanced composite materials (CFRP/titanium stack, GFRP, nanocomposites, etc.) for automotive, marine, and aerospace applications. His recent research efforts have also included the fatigue behavior of manufactured products, with the focus of fatigue strength im- provement of aerospace, automotive, and rail structures. He has been the author or co-author of over 200 peer-reviewed papers in these areas.Dr. Ken Lulay, University of Portland BSME, University of Portland, 1984 MSME, University of Portland, 1987 PhD

Conference Session

First-Year Activities and Peer Review Strategies in Civil Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan L. Hart, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

themselves and with industrialfacilitators. During the final, the videos were anonymously assessed by their peers as to whether or not thevideos answered the initial questions posed and how useful proposed improvements were. Additionally, thegroups peer assessed themselves by dividing a limited number of points for the project among team membersand indicating why they felt each team member should be given a certain number of points for theircontributions. At the end of viewing the videos, individual students were again asked to write a reflectivepaper defining what a civil engineer was and why they wanted to pursue civil engineering as a profession.At the end of the reflective paper they were to self assess their association with that definition on

Conference Session

First-Year Activities and Peer Review Strategies in Civil Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

to the Three Gorges Dam in China. In that way, all students were required to thinkabout an international project to some degree. This was another suitable model to teach studentsabout globalization. The older Three Gorges Dam assignments were no longer available forcontent analysis as part of this research. Final Reflective EssaysIn the first part of the final essay assignment, students were required to write about oneprofessional society meeting (such as ASCE, AGC, SWE, etc.) or professional developmentactivity (such as the career fair, design expo, civil engineering graduate seminar) that they hadattended during the semester. Of these options, EWB represents the opportunity that is the mostobviously global in nature. The percentages

Conference Session

Your Best in 5 Minutes: Demonstrations of Hands-On and Virtual In-Class Teaching Aids

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Willi Brand, University of California, Irvine; Joel Lanning P.E., University of California, Irvine

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

gradually increased incomplexity, with students receiving feedback on report structure, grammar/spelling, conciseness,figures/tables, and overall argument through drafting, classroom presentations, peer review, andone-on-one group meetings.In 2016 and 2017, students were given examples of “real world” technical reports and articles asexamples of technical writing, and in 2018 students were only given other students reports (withexamples of A, C, and F work) and encouraged to search articles and reports for additionalexamples.2.3 Study Outline2.3.1 DataThree major data sources were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. 1) Anonymous course evaluation survey data. Course evaluations were conducted every year of the

Conference Session

Going Viral: Effective Instructional Techniques in an Online Environment

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monique H. Head, Morgan State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

dynamics. When writing their abstracts, students are expected to demonstrateknowledge of their topic and explain their research objective, methodology, results andconclusions in a clear and concise manner. The abstract is written as a wiki to share thisinformation for peer learning and to gain feedback on the clarity and quality of their technicalwriting. Assessment and evaluation of the impact of this effort includes peer review andfeedback from the instructor directly using the wikis. Comments to the wiki are made alongsidethe abstract as to not completely change the original composition but rather to enhance it forinclusion in their final paper. Results include student perceptions about their writing experiencewith the wikis compared to a more

Conference Session

Fostering Business and Professional Skills in the Engineering Classroom

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Veera Gnaneswar Gude P.E., Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. Although the conventionalapproach is still important, lifelong and project-oriented learning for engineers is considered afundamental education in recent times5-7. Providing engineer training to meet this goal is quitechallenging. The degree to which the students develop skills depends on how they solveproblems, write reports, function in teams, self-assess and do peer-review, learn new knowledgeand adapt to changing professional expectations8-11. Recent research shows that engineer trainingand development of critical design skills can be facilitated by providing practice through severalmechanisms that would allow for critical thinking. Instructors should not only simplydemonstrate the problem solving, but also coach students to develop similar

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James L. Hanson PE, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

writing skills. Studentassessment of the teaching methodology is provided. Faculty observations of experiences aredescribed in the paper and suggestions are provided for effective use of this teachingmethodology.Introduction and BackgroundPeer review is common for all scientific publications as well as for engineering design work inprofessional practice. Integration of peer review to the curriculum has been reported for a varietyof implementation modes. Limited experiences in this regard have been reported for civilengineering coursework in relation to technical writing. Rationale for including peer review incoursework includes emphasizing the development of technical writing skills and promoting anactive and collaborative classroom environment

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christianna Irene White, Iowa State University, Institute for Transportation; David J. White, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

learning included the ability to ―demonstrate reading,writing, listening, and speaking skills‖ (49). Employers in both industry and academic settingsconsistently rank technical ability and communication and teamwork skills as the most desireableproficiencies.16 Page 22.167.4Our Response to the ProblemPrior to organizing the Writing Support Program, some graduate students found technical writingassistance (outside of input from their faculty advisor) through the English department‘s Writingand Media Help Center35 or, in some isolated cases, by hiring an expert writing consultant orconsulting with peers. Although mostly helpful, experience with

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I: Communication in Engineering Disciplines

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David A. Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth; Mary U. Christiansen; Adrian T. Hanson, University of Minnesota Duluth; Jill D. Jenson, University of Minnesota Duluth; Sara Ojard; Rebecca L. Teasley, University of Minnesota Duluth; Emily Woster, University of Minnesota Duluth

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

presentationskills are repeatedly identified as important to employers looking to hire new engineers.7, 8Presenting the writing guide and relevant evidence of the importance of communication skillsearly on in the students’ career will help them develop strong habits to be reinforced throughouttheir time at school. Additionally, the guide will help make it easier for instructors to provideuseful feedback by aligning their comments with the elements found on the rubric, byreferencing the writing guide, and by having students use the guide to peer review each other’swork, all strategies proven successful in improving writing skills.9, 10Developing the writing guideMotivation for creating a department writing guide came from consistent weaknesses in

Conference Session

Program Support Initiatives

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Paper ID #33684Leader Development Model (LDM) Through Self- and Peer-assessment Acrossthe CurriculumDr. Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel Alyson G. Eggleston is an Assistant Professor in the Department of English, Fine Arts, and Communica- tions at The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina, where she teaches STEM-focused technical writing and communication, writing-intensive courses for international students, and linguistics. She re- ceived her PhD from Purdue University in Linguistics, and she has a BA and MA in English with concen- trations in TESOL and writing pedagogy from Youngstown State University. Her

Conference Session

Innovation in the Civil Engineering Classroom

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Roberts, University of Wisconsin, Platteville

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

expected, a large portion (40%) of the total project grade is based on the draft. Aguideline entitled “Effective Engineering Writing,” which was adapted from Parker,(8) isgiven to the students (and included as Appendix E).The students turn in one copy of the draft report for the instructor, with all group mem-bers identified. Each group also turns in additional anonymous copies with no identifica-tion of group members. These anonymous copies are randomly distributed to othermembers of the class who have one week to perform a peer evaluation of the draft. Moredetails on the peer evaluation are given in the “Peer Assessment” section below. Thegrade on the final draft is determined using the student peer assessments and a gradingrubric used by the

Conference Session

Supporting the Capstone Experience

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nathan Miner, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Aliye Karabulut Ilgu, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Jennifer S. Shane, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Katherine Madson, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

the semester. After each team-based project was completed, thestudents were also asked to evaluate themselves and their team member’s teamwork skills.Preliminary analysis of the data showed that students had relatively high pre-semester teamworkconfidence. Students rated themselves lower than their peers on the first evaluation, however,peer evaluation ratings decreased throughout the semester while self-evaluation ratings remainedrelatively constant.IntroductionTraditional classrooms are often structured in a way in which students take notes and listen tolectures during class time and are assigned individual homework assignments to be completedoutside of class. This style allows students to passively take in information, though

Conference Session

Trends and Applications in Curricula and the Capstone Experience

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University; Kevin D. Hall, University of Arkansas; Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

culminating designexperience. Associated questions include:  Do most schools use rubrics for assessment? Are peer and industry assessments likely to have a greater weight in the overall student grade if rubrics are used?  Does the design team size affect content taught and/or assessed in the course?  What does it mean to “involve” an industry mentor? Does the use of industry mentors influence the project types, assessment, grading practices, or use of rubrics?  Does the school type: Ph.D. granting, Undergraduate and Masters (UM), or Undergraduate Only (UO), affect the design experience?Rubrics and Project AssessmentRubrics have become a common tool in assessment3 and much has been covered

Conference Session

How to Effectively Teach Using Teams

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Burian, University of Utah; Pedro Romero, University of Utah; Steven Bartlett, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

rapid departmental growth. ‚ Enhance students’ data analysis abilities and reinforce technical concepts by reducing time spent learning course-specific laboratory formatting and procedural requirements. ‚ Improve the quality of technical writing and report organization by using team leader oversight, team participation and accountability, peer review, and direct instructor-to- student feedback. ‚ Develop interpersonal and leadership skills through team laboratory experience, resolving conflicts and barriers and exercising leadership.The approach developed for implementation in the 2005-06 academic year included (1) the useof a department-consistent laboratory report format, (2) the introduction of additional

Conference Session

The Senior Experience: Capstone and Beyond

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Large Seagrave

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

: Responding to Needs of Industry in a Capstone CourseAbstractResearch has shown that consulting engineering firms need newly graduated junior engineers tobe skilled in communication, especially writing. In response to this plea from the civilengineering industry in Salt Lake Valley, University of Utah has designed a capstone course inits Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering that focuses on written, oral and teamcommunication besides technical and design elements. The course incorporates communicationinstructors from the CLEAR program who collaborate with faculty, lecture in the class, consultwith students and assess assignments in an effort to ensure a higher level of communicationcompetency in graduates.IntroductionUndergraduate

Conference Session

Active and Out There: Labs and Active Learning

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Veera Gnaneswar Gude P.E., Mississippi State University; Benjamin S. Magbanua Jr., Mississippi State University; James L. Martin P.E., Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Experiences (FYE - some colleges and universities have a course called first-year experiences or seminars to better prepare students that are currently struggling with motivation to succeed in academic environments) 2. Common Intellectual Experiences (CIE - two or more courses that build upon same background and advance in concepts and difficulty in a given field) 3. Learning Communities (LC - students form groups to study and work on problems or projects together) 4. Writing-Intensive Courses (WIC) 5. Collaborative Assignments and Projects (CA) 6. Science as Science Is Done; Undergraduate Research (UR) 7. Diversity/Global Learning (DGL) 8. Service Learning, Community-Based Learning (SL) 9. Internships (intern

Conference Session

Reassessing Your Teaching Through Turmoil

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer Retherford P.E., University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Kristen N. Wyckoff, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Sarah J. Mobley, University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

: thetechnical communications course, laboratory courses, and a series of project-based courses. Thetechnical communications course was changed to a rotating face-to-face model, for which lecturevideos and assigned activities were performed on out-of-class days and in-class days were reservedfor workshops. Workshops replaced the traditional guided learning activity approach with activelearning in a think-pair-share format. Students were given strong and weak examples of writing tobe able to give feedback to their peers and improve their own writing prior to submission. Studentsworked on improving their formal written assignments, and therefore improved their capacity fortechnical writing, during class rather than submitting their first writing

Conference Session

Trends and Applications in Curricula and the Capstone Experience

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel M. Dulaski PE, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

plans SPRING BREAK Final report and plans Present final plans to community Final Presentations Figure 2 Transportation Capstone Requirements, by Week, Civil and Environmental Engineering (Transportation Concentration) – Northeastern UniversitySemester Outline – Task-BasedDuring the second week of the semester, the firms are given project descriptions. The projectdescriptions are “broad”. The “broad” descriptions are deliberate – they afford the students theopportunity to be creative in their approach. The projects are reviewed by the consulting teams.After the review, the students write two

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. Some teams lacked focus and spent too much time in debating the content and coverage for each lesson. Other teams left with their lessons nearly complete. In the months after the workshop, teams continued to complete their lessons. Lessons 1-3 were completed by October 2016 and the remainder were completed in the Spring of 2017.  Internal peer review – once a lesson was completed, the lesson leader shared it with the other two team members and requested feedback. The feedback was then incorporated to improve the lesson.  External peer review- once a lesson had completed the internal peer review process, it was sent to 5-7 external peer reviewers. A rubric was provided to reviewers. Reviewers

Conference Session

The Evolving Classroom

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Riley P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology; Sharon L. Beaudry, Oregon Institute of Technology; Aja Bettencourt-McCarthy, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

structural practices translate wellto the institutional level and lay the groundwork for a sustainable teaching certificate program,an institutional teaching model, and formalized faculty teaching assessment and peer observationprograms. This paper will describe and document the successes and challenges of theinstitutional workshop as well as the modifications made from the ExCEEd materials and format.IntroductionTwo years ago, the Commission on College Teaching (CCT) at the Oregon Institute ofTechnology was considering developing a teaching certificate program to support facultyprofessional development and high quality instruction. While many of the commission membershad participated in teaching certificate programs at other institutions, the

Conference Session

Integrating Teaching Assistants, Tenure-track, and Non-tenure-track Faculty into a Cohesive Department

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Molly A McVey, University of Kansas; Caroline R. Bennett P.E., University of Kansas; Jae Hwan Kim, University of Kansas; Alexandra Self, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Self, University of Kansas c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Impact of Undergraduate Teaching Fellows Embedded in Key Undergraduate Engineering CoursesAbstractResearch has shown the positive impact of peer mentoring on student learning in STEM. Withthe goal of improving student learning and retention, the School of Engineering (SoE) hasundertaken a program in which Undergraduate Teaching Fellows (UGTFs) are utilized in keycourses across the School. The UGTFs support in-class activities, such as team-basedproblem-solving, hands-on activities and demonstrations. This program has grown from fourUGTFs in Spring 2015 to 28 UGTFs in Spring 2017, with UGTFs embedded in 13

Conference Session

The Teacher as Manager: Best Practices for Culminating Design Experiences

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William P. Manion, University of Maine; Judith A. Hakola, University of Maine

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

practicing engineers, many of them graduates of the University of Mainethemselves, effectively complete the transition from student to young engineer.Student grades are based on writing and performance evaluations by the instructors in all fourrespective courses, although there is considerable discussion of grading within each semester.There are assignments that are specific to only one course, such as written exams in ProjectManagement, and some assignments that are shared, such as the proposals. Teamwork andindividual contributions are based on written evaluations by both peer and instructor at severalpoints during each semester. Faculty advisors are not involved in grading, except on a voluntarybasis of the final design report presentations

Conference Session

The Teacher as Manager: Best Practices for Culminating Design Experiences

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University; Kevin D. Hall, University of Arkansas; Ronald W. Welch, University of Texas, Tyler

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

26% Other“it depends on the project” and“course director, faculty and Figure 10: Primary advisor or mentor of studentsindustry mentor”. Figure 10shows the complete breakdown of responses. Page 25.967.8Course Content and AssessmentEighty-five departments are using the major design experience as an opportunity to teach a widevariety of topics, including the ‘soft skills’ required by ABET. Over 80 percent of the 85departments report teaching project management, teaming skills, oral communication, andtechnical writing or written communication. It should be noted, however, that one schoolreported