, University of Vermont Holly Buckland Parker is an educational developer at the Center for Teaching and Learning at the Univer- sity of Vermont (UVM). Holly coordinates the Graduate Teaching Program and conducts workshops on pedagogy and educational technologies. Dr. Buckland Parker continues to work on her research interests regarding the implementation of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and inclusive teaching practices in Higher Education. Holly is also a part-time faculty member in the Higher Education and Student Af- fairs Program in the College of Education and Social Services at the University of Vermont. She teaches graduate courses on the implementation of anti-racist teaching practices, inclusive teaching
2019 Award for Excellence in Education Abroad Curriculum Design. He has also worked as a construction project engineer, consultant, and safety inspector. He be- lieves that educating the next generation of professionals will play a pivotal role in sustainability standard practices. In terms of engagement, Dr. Valdes-Vasquez has served as the USGBC student club’s adviser and the ASC Sustainability Team’s faculty coach since 2013. He is currently serving as a CSU President’s Sustainabil- ity Commission member, among multiple other committees. In addition, he is involved with various professional organizations at the national level, including the American Society for Engineering Educa- tion (ASEE), the
learning pedagogies are perhaps the best approach within103 the classroom, not just for sustainability development education, but for engineering in general104 [10, 11].105106 Incorporating sustainability into engineering introduces a novel perspective by teaching beyond107 conventional engineering practices and design. This endeavor seeks to cultivate practices and108 principles aimed at nurturing a society that is both more sustainable and equitable. This educational109 approach is not solely focused on the immediate benefits for our generation but is driven by the110 overarching goal of creating a lasting positive impact for generations to come. Integrating111 sustainability into engineering courses heralds a paradigm shift
practitioner subject matter expertshould feel virtually identical to the process of graduate research, dissertation writing, post-doctoral scholarship, and the years leading up to tenure.Within engineering instruction, the course design and pedagogical approaches can be successfulfor long-term deep learning and formation of engineers when the educator helps the studentswith both fluency (i.e., practice) and in doing engineering (i.e., working with an expert to receivefeedback, revise, iterate, critically reviewing their work) to achieve deep learning under theguidance of an instructor who is the master of the content. Many pedagogical tools have beenproposed to help the educator with this mission. Ranging from Active Learning [6-8], ProductiveFailure
for Engineering Education, 2023 Refining Instructional Modules for Engineering Lab Writing Using a Community of Practice ApproachAbstractLaboratory report writing instructional modules have been developed and refined using acommunity of practice (CoP) approach. Supported by the National Science FoundationImproving Undergraduate STEM Education initiative, researchers at three institutions haverefined and reorganized a series of scaffolded laboratory writing modules based on the work offaculty and graduate students at a CoP meeting. This paper documents the process used at theCoP meeting where draft modules were made available and a model laboratory session wasconsidered. Other published laboratory report writing
for Higher Education, 42(4), 1-13.Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J. C., Hernández Alcántara, D., & Morales- Menendez, R. (2019). Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13, 909-922.Howard, I. L. (2015, June), Engagement of Practitioners to Produce Balanced and Fundamentally Well-Grounded Civil Engineers Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23941Khalid, A. (2022, August), Inter-Disciplinary Senior Design Projects with Industry Partnership - A Pilot Study Paper presented at
Paper ID #41628Board 30: The Ecological Choice for Engineering Education: Decisions onSustainability in Civil Engineering and the Impact of Cognitive BiasCharlotte Robison, Oregon State University Charlotte is a second year at Oregon State University studying civil engineering. Her main interests lie in sustainability within civil engineering, and has been conducting research on cognitive biases around this topic over the past year.Cristina G Wilson, Oregon State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The “Eco”logical Choice for Engineering Education: Decisions on
degree in civil engineering from the University of Vermont in 1981.Dr. Kleio Avrithi, P.E., Mercer University Dr. Avrithi earned a Diploma in Civil Engineering, an MS in Structural Engineering both from the Na- tional Technical University of Athens, an MS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Maryland, College Park. Her research interests include uncertainty and risk quantification for design, optimization, resilience, and systems design. She is member of ASCE, ASEE, ASME, and ASTM.Ms. Jennifer Hofmann, American Society of Civil Engineers Jennifer Hofmann, M.A.Ed, Aff.M.ASCE is the Manager of Professional Advancement at
such knowledge to identify potential schools for graduate study. (5) Students should be encouraged to attend conferences in their field. This is another way to make the student feel part of a community and show the student best practices in research and presentation.ConclusionsWhile this study includes all disciplines in the cohort, mentoring in the context of research iscritical for all disciplines, especially for engineering students. These mentoring practicesenhance oral and written skills and knowledge of career opportunities while connecting facultywith students on a personal level; all skills that prepare students in ways that a traditionalclassroom setting cannot do. Additionally, the interactions between students of
Conference. Moreinformation and details related to themes and analyses may be found in that paper. This paper’smain focus was to collect and present case studies for engineering ethics instruction.ReferencesBairaktarova, D. and Woodcock, A. (2015). Engineering ethics education: Aligning practice and outcomes. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(11), 18–22. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2015.7321965.Bielefeldt, A. (2022). Work in Progress: Personalizing Engineering Ethics through the Individual Stories of Engineers and People Impacted. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference. Excellence Through Diversity. Paper ID#37519.Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.Brunhaver, S. R., Jesiek
he earned his master’s degree in civil engineer- ing. He also worked as a project Analyst with AgileP3 after graduating with a Bachelor of Engineering (B.Eng) in civil engineering from Covenant University, Nigeria. Adebayo has taught courses in Trans- portation and Chemistry at Morgan State University as part of his commitment to the STEM profession. He has attended conferences across the Transportation engineering field.Dr. Steve Efe, Morgan State University Dr. Steve Efe is an Assistant Professor and the Assistant Director of the Center for Advanced Transporta- tion and Infrastructure Engineering Research. He obtained his Doctor of Engineering in Civil Engineering with a major in Structural Engineering and minDr
lesson development by providing ideasfor creating assignments (for both before and after class), discussion points, activities, and otherlesson materials to teach undergraduate and graduate students about the effects of infrastructureinequities and how to mitigate negative effects. The framework will provide a solid foundationfor faculty to take a case study or historical example and create lesson objectives, design studentexercises to be used before, during, or after a class session, and create materials to supportstudent learning. The CIT-E community of practice is also applying this framework to createseveral lessons using case studies that are currently under development and will be available foruse by any faculty member in the
education; infrastructure; sustainable design; and clean, renewable energy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work-In-Progress: Application of Employee Appraisal Forms to Facilitate Assessment of Student Outcomes in the Engineering Capstone CourseAbstractA critical component of educating civil engineering students and preparing graduates to enterprofessional practice is the engineering capstone course. This paper describes a work-in-progress to evaluate the use of employee appraisal forms to facilitate self-reflection andcounseling as a metacognitive strategy in engineering education. The authors have developed a“capstone support form” that mimics an employee evaluation report support form
concrete, Egg ProtectionDevice, Prototyping, Civil engineering education.IntroductionSenior design and integrative design courses often represent the culmination of coursework for astudent in an engineering program. While these courses may range in methodology or scope, thecommon goal is for students to apply a range of skills to develop a design project that spans theirengineering discipline. In civil engineering programs, these projects may come directly fromprofessional practice or include experiential components to develop a preliminary design [1].With other engineering disciplines, such as mechanical or electrical, there may be requirementsto develop prototypes to iterate on their designs. The prototyping and iterations provide tangiblepoints
construction. Research hasshown that providing students with physical demonstrations may increase learning and retentionof the course material by increasing the students’ intellectual excitement [22]–[24].Cardinale et al. implemented a multi-dimensional problem for which students had to develop acode-based solution [20]. The project was designed to replicate what would be expected of thestudents in industry. Instead of being presented with a traditional design problem, the studentswere tasked with designing a timber shear wall in a seismic area. The project required students touse structural analysis software, practice construction management skills, develop designdrawings, and construct their final design. Students who participated in the project
Management from Stanford University in 1987 and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 1997.Prof. Brent Nuttall, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Prof. Brent Nuttall P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Professor Nuttall has 25 years experience as both a practicing engineer and engineering professor. He is currently a tenured professor at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo where his teaching focus is on structural and seismic design for engineers, architects and construction managers.Mr. Craig Baltimore, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Baltimore is a Professor in Architectural Engineering at California Polytechnic
, like civil engineering, are undergoing atremendous transformation with the emergence of newer technological solutions. The majority ofthese solutions require operational convergence, placing a heavy demand on the academiclearning process to ensure that graduates possess the skill transferability required at theworkplace. This study examines the transferability of design skills in undergraduate civilengineering students through a longitudinal study conducted at the Kerala TechnologicalUniversity. In particular, the study analyzes the impact of freshmen Design and Engineeringcourse on the transferability skills demonstrated by the same group of students in a senior-yearGroup Project course in the civil engineering program. The findings show that
learners by integratingneuroinclusive teaching best practices. Research indicates that those with ADHD, dyslexia,autism, etc., often possess strengths like visualization, spatial thinking, and hands-on activities[15] - [17]. Guided by Universal Design Learning (UDL) [11], additional teaching strategieswere added to enhance the distinct talents of neurodivergent students. The revised course focuseson three key areas: accessibility, flexibility, and a strength-based approach.In Spring 2023, the Mechanics of Materials course enrolled 130 students and took place in anactive learning classroom. The course was co-taught by two instructors. This section discussesthe course components, policy and class features which supported neuroinclusive
, conducting research experiments, etc. • Reflective observation: In this stage, the learner reflects on the experience and synthesizes the experience for an extension to new domains. For example, while attending a conference, a student may be encouraged to reflect on a recent classroom learning experience. • Abstract conceptualization: In this stage, the learner forms new ideas or modifies existing ideas based on reflection. For example, after reflecting on the research problem, the learner may adjust their initial perception (learned during lectures) of how best to solve it. • Active experimentation: In this stage, learning is transferred to other settings around the learner. For
recentgraduates. They need to understand the purpose of licensure laws, the career paths that require alicense, and the depth and scope of engineering licensure exemptions. A study was designed toanswer the following research questions: How many jurisdictions within the United States have licensure exemptions for engineers who perform tasks commonly considered engineering practice? Are there patterns in the number and type of exemptions found in licensure laws? Do civil engineering graduates practice in areas that are commonly exempt? What should undergraduate engineering students know about licensure exemptions?Research MethodsThe study used licensure exemption data from fifty states, four territories, and the District
Paper ID #41843A Comparison of Civil Engineering Curriculum and EAC-ABET Civil EngineeringProgram CriteriaDr. Matthew K Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He then went to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridges. He is currently a professor of civil engineering and the Jackson-Hope Chair in Engineering at VMI. He teaches
Academic Program, a living-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Integration of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Topics into a First-Year Introduction to Civil Engineering CourseAbstractThis paper presents an example of how diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) topics have beenintegrated into an Introduction to Civil Engineering course for first-year (FY) students. DEIissues were integrated into the
thinking and practice essential for CEE systems development. Contentincludes sustainability in professional codes of ethics, and models and rating tools forsustainability, environmental impact, and social equity assessment. During this module, the 3Csof EM are discussed and then referred back to throughout the semester. In the second module, thestudents study how to apply optimization, multiple criteria and uncertainty evaluation tools. In thethird module, the students study and apply engineering economic decision analysis tools. In thefourth and final module, which occurs across the entire semester, the students research, evaluateand recommend changes to a large-scale system to enhance its sustainability and performance byapplying the tools they
Paper ID #41120Fostering Student Ownership and Active Learning through Student-Led GroupLectures in a Civil Engineering Materials CourseDr. Shenghua Wu, University of South Alabama Dr. Shenghua Wu is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Coastal, and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Alabama. His research areas include civil engineering materials characterization, pavement performance evaluation and modeling, design, and maintenance, multidisciplinary approach to address complex engineering issues, as well as STEM education. He is the Director for the Solid Waste Sustainability Hub
and a preferred course for the transportationspecialization of the Master of Science in Civil Engineering program at Cleveland StateUniversity.There is no assigned textbook for this course. The lectures have been developed based onAASHTO’s Geometric Design on Highways and Streets, TRB’s Highway Capacity Manual,ITE’s Recommended Practice for Transportation Impact Studies, and the TCRP Report 165Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. Copies of these resources are either availableonline or through the course reserve at the Michael Schwartz library and students are encouragedto read the sections referenced in the lecture materials.All students complete the weekly assignments and receive three exams, scheduled as twomidterm exams and one
recognition of the importance of diversity and inclusion in engineering education hasgrown in recent years [1], little is known about the best practices for supporting neurodiversestudents [2-3]. It has been suggested that neurodiverse students benefit from course assessmentsthat allow for a more flexible mode of expressing knowledge [3]. However, evidence forimproved learning outcomes on different types of course assessments is largely anecdotal.Characteristics associated with different forms of neurodiversity, such as attention deficithyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum, depression, and anxiety, are suggested to benormally distributed in the population [2]. Indeed, research suggests that these conditions arebest conceptualized as
insightWhen a team is evaluating design options, the objective is to select the best option tomaximize positive outcomes while minimizing negative consequences. A challenge for mostteams is recognizing the broad range of potential outcomes and consequences, and themagnitudes of those impacts. Questioning helps students discover things they missed. Evenonce the team members have identified the potential outcomes and consequences, they oftenstruggle to develop a consensus of what is “best”. In this case, asking questions helps theteam members discover the underlying values informing each student’s assessment of theimpacts.To motivate the skill, we shared the story of Citicorp Center (Morgenstern 1995): A questionfrom an architecture student prompted
community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt served on the ASCE Body of Knowledge 3 committee and the Program Criteria Task Committee. Bielefeldt is a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include community engagement, sustainable engineering, so- cial responsibility, ethics, and diversity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Future World Vision integrated into a First-Year Civil Engineering CourseAbstractCivil engineering (CE) has faced stagnant or declining enrollments in recent years, in contrast tomajors such as mechanical engineering that have been increasing
effectiveness ofengineering education, recent engineering graduates were interviewed, and the results showedthat the majority of them felt that their education failed to impart the practical skills required fortheir jobs [8]. Additionally, other researchers ([9], [10], [11], [12], [13]) have also highlighted theinadequacy of engineering education in preparing students for engineering practice. Some studieshave even documented the distressing impact of this gap on recent graduates, leading them toseek alternative career paths ([14], [15]). In response to this issue, several researchers in the fieldof engineering education have emphasized the importance of experiential learning ([16], [17],[18], [19], [20]). In fact, ([19], [20]) has suggested that
Engineering. He is a licensed Professional Engineer with over 30 years of consulting, academic and research experience. He is currently a Professor of Civil Engineering at the United States Coast Guard Academy in New London, CT ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Enriching student learning through compelled active participation in a coastal resiliency courseAbstractAs the primary commissioning source for civil engineers for the U.S. Coast Guard, it isimperative that our graduates understand the projected impacts of climate change – sea level rise,altered hurricane patterns, and other associated hazards – on coastal infrastructure. At the UnitedStates Coast Guard