studying mechanical engineering and doing research in engineering educa- tion—the perfect combination of her interests.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Dr. Sheri Sheppard is in the Design Group of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford. Besides teaching undergraduate and graduate courses on structural analysis and design, she serves an administrative role as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. Her research focuses on the study of educational and career pathways of people interested in technical work (and how to make K-20 education more supportive of these pathways).Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University
given field, and their level of attainment defines how well-prepared they are to meet jobdemands and excel in the future [16-17]. The general (meta) competencies are skill sets that enable themto function globally, such as to work with others, function in systems and meet organizational demands,and transfer task-specific skills to new challenges or tasks they have not encountered before [18-19].Thus, our goal is to revolutionize our learning community to develop an intentional culture of reflection,wherein members (both students and faculty) develop dispositions of metacognition and self-regulation.The competencies required by future engineers vary from industry sectors and even companies in thesame sector. In addition, recent graduates will
the market. The CUICAR faculty provides support through mentoringrather than defining a design problem statement.•Concept Ideation. The development of a vehicle prototype, which should be marketcompetitive, is an open-ended design problem that challenges students to explore and arriveat different design alternatives at both the vehicle system and component level. DOstudents learn in an order opposite to that of traditional education approaches, wherestudents search for answers, derive conclusions, make decisions, and justify designselections within managerial, social, economic, and engineering constraints. At this phaseof the DO program, students are divided into teams, including but not limited to majorvehicle subsystems such as powertrain
, SCCT emphasizes the roleof other personal, contextual, and learning variables (e.g., gender, race or ethnicity, ability, socialsupport, external barriers) that can help shape career trajectories, including the means to remediateany disadvantages from being under-represented in particular occupations.24 More recently, Lentand his colleagues have added the construct of educational and vocational satisfaction as acontributor to structural models examining the pathways between self-efficacy and interests andpersistence intentions.25 Page 24.1202.5SCCT theory has made an impact on models attempting to explain the withdrawal of students
AC 2011-683: INTEGRATING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE INTO THEENGINEERING CURRICULUM: A PROPOSED MODEL AND PROTO-TYPE CASE WITH AN INDUSTRY PARTNERRichard T. Schoephoerster, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Schoephoerster is the Dean of the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso, where he leads a College of over 3000 students (including approximately 500 graduate students) in 17 different BS, MS, and PhD degree programs, and 80 faculty members in six different departments with approximately $25 million in research funding from local, state, and national agencies and companies. Dr. Schoephoerster received his B.S. in Biomedical Engineering in 1985, and his M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (1989) in Mechanical
, graduate, and faculty member socialization in the academic environment[20-24]. Fewer researchers have utilized the framework in an industry environment or academic-industry partnership context. Although, few researchers have examined the engineering contextdirectly, we highlight one example to illustrate the utility of the framework.Cech et al. [25] used professional socialization to argue that experiences that occur duringprofessional training, e.g. co-op or internship experiences, cause men and women to developdifferent confidence levels about participating in the engineering community. Authors analyzedsurvey responses from 288 students at four institutions to examine behavioral and intentionalpersistence among students who enter an engineering
ofreal-world experience as a factor in the ENGINE student experience is not surprising. Similarly,given the generally important role that faculty and teaching assistants (TAs) play in studentlearning as well as the importance of grades to undergraduates, the emergence of instructionalsupport and assessment as factors in the capstone design experience is also justified. Andfinally, the fourth factor, task value serves as an indication of students' motivation to participatein the ENGINE capstone experience. Task value draws from expectancy-value theory and hasbeen demonstrated to be a distinct contributor to academic engagement and effort [26, 27] aswell as educational and career aspirations [28].RQ2: Was there a difference in student perceptions
-based learning and the associated advice, based onboth their Capstone and subsequence post-graduation experience, that alumni provided toincoming students for overcoming those challenges.IntroductionThe purpose of this paper is to share feedback Brigham Young University (BYU) Capstonealumni provided concerning the challenges faced when beginning project-based learningexperiences and suggestions they recommended to new students for being successful. The BYUCapstone program started in 1990 as a two-semester senior design experience. The program wasdeveloped by BYU faculty members and industry leaders to answer the needs for improvedengineering education.1 From its small beginnings in 1990 of just four projects, the Capstoneprogram has steadily
”program at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). This program providesfinancial support, mentoring, and leadership and career development to undergraduate studentswith demonstrated potential to succeed in engineering, but who face significant financialchallenges, possibly in combination with other barriers to meeting their full academic potential,such as being a first-generation college student or a member of an underrepresented group. Inaddition to scholarship support, CLEAR Scholars are provided with an intentional set ofactivities that promotes student retention, achievement, and persistence to graduation through:(a) Community-building through a cohort model; (b) Leadership and career development; (c)Engagement with
named the Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor for Teaching Excellence in 2007, and was awarded the College Faculty Excellence Award in 2009. Furthermore, he is the recipient of the ASCE Committee on Student Services Certificate for Exemplary Services in 2000, has served as the Faculty Advisor of Syracuse University’s Chapter of ASCE for more than a decade, and was named recipient of the ASCE Faculty Advisor Reward Program from 2001 to 2003. Lui has been a long-time member of the American Society of Civil Engi- neers (ASCE), and has served on a number of ASCE publications, technical, and educational committees. He was the Associate Editor (from 1994 to 1997) and later the Book Editor (from 1997 to 2000) for
university cooperativeeducation with an industry-centered approach. Our program will allow a student to complete upto four semester-long paid work experiences related to his/her major and career interests, whilestill earning a bachelor degree in four years. ARAP students would graduate on-schedule andahead of the curve.ARAP is designed to offer students the opportunity to “learn while they earn” and to: Explore different professional positions related to their major and career interests before graduation. Practically apply classroom knowledge and laboratory experiences in real-world problem-solving scenarios, preparing them for more advanced coursework and exciting careers of the future. Better accomplish goals
associated with applied engineering prior to receivingtheir degree, which somewhat helps in their professional preparation. More importantly theseactivities have nurtured working relationships with a number of academics and their studentsfrom different educational institutions. In some cases this has also enriched the faculty members‟experience where the information gained subsequently found its way into the classroom as partof their teaching. It should be mentioned that the faculty members most receptive to taking partin these activities almost always have been those with industry experience and who already valueand share personal experiences with their students. Unfortunately this group represent a smallpercent of all those teaching in most
Economics from Western Michigan University.Dr. Darrell K. Kleinke P.E., University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Kleinke has over 25 years of industry experience in the design and development of electro-mechanical systems. As a tenure-track faculty member and Chair of the University of Detroit Mercy Mechanical Engineering department, he has developed a program of instruction that promotes student-lead design of assistive technology products for people with disabilities. The guiding principle is that student project work is more meaningful and fulfilling when students have the opportunity to experience interaction with real live ”customers.” Dr. Kleinke is currently the Director of the Graduate Engineering Professional Programs
Leaves with Industry: Three ExperiencesIntroductionOne approach to developing and strengthening relationships between universities and industry isto have tenured faculty members engage in one-to-two semester sabbatical leaves at an industrysite. Personal relationships between the faculty member and managers/engineers at the host siteare developed; graduate students can become involved in a way that leads to a masters ordoctoral degree research topic; follow-on contracts and publishable results often benefit thefaculty visitor; new methods/technology introduced by the faculty visitor, and introductions toother faculty members with specific expertise, can benefit the industrial host.In contrast, most sabbatical leaves involve leaves of absence for
systems. As a tenure-track faculty member and Chair of the University of Detroit Mercy Mechanical Engineering department, he has developed a program of instruction that promotes student-lead design of assistive technology products for people with disabilities. The guiding principle is that student project work is more meaningful and fulfilling when students have the opportunity to experience interaction with real live ”customers.” Dr. Kleinke is currently the Director of the Graduate Engineering Professional Programs, emphasizing Systems Engineering and Graduate Product Development programs. In addition to academic work, Dr Kleinke continues his involvement in industry as he conducts seminars on innovation which are
Business Administration, in Marketing and Economics from Western Michigan University. David Pistrui, Ph.D. e - pistruda@udmercy.edu m - 312-371-8190Dr. Darrell K. Kleinke P.E., University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Kleinke has over 25 years of industry experience in the design and development of electro-mechanical systems. As a tenure-track faculty member and Chair of the University of Detroit Mercy Mechanical Engineering department, he has developed a program of instruction that promotes student-lead design of assistive technology products for people with disabilities. The guiding principle is that student project work is more meaningful and fulfilling when students have the opportunity to experience interaction with real
representative of a University affords a faculty member access toa wide variety of facilities and individuals willing to share processes and information that wouldnot normally be available to them. An early observation from one of the authors was howwilling most companies are to bring faculty and students into their facilities for tours andexplanations of their business. Through these visits, personal networks grow, along withindustry expertise, providing the individual growth and future opportunity.Transitioning from the corporate world to academia requires balancing risks and rewards for theinstructor, as well as the institution. Some risks are fairly obvious, whereas others are somewhathidden. A personal challenge overcome in both case studies was
requirements [1]. The engineering graduationrate is even lower for Texas Higher Education institutions. It has also been noted that manystudents made their decision to leave an engineering major within the first two years, the periodduring which they are taking engineering prerequisites and before taking any (or many)engineering courses [2]. One of the potential reasons for this situation is that students in theirfirst two years are given little exposure to the many possibilities that an engineering career canoffer, while they are taking math and science courses taught outside of engineering departments.It suggests that few students-even those who have had some prior exposure to engineering-knowwhat engineers do, and this affects their commitment to
educators outside of the engineering realm and younger students encourages theundergraduate engineering students to synthesize their knowledge more broadly than theytypically do during regular classroom examinations.The intent of this project is to form a rewarding partnership between academia and nonprofitindustry, while simultaneously benefiting the educational objectives of both parties. Severalpartnerships have been described between academia and industry such as software3, defense,automation, and aerospace industry4. In order to graduate well-versed engineers, academicinstitutions have partnered up with industries to form advisory boards that provide feedbacktowards an academic program’s direction3. Such partnerships have an instant advantage
-conventional ideas from the next generation ofSTEM graduates. Personally, there is an internal satisfaction in sharing knowledge and fosteringgrowth in the next generation of professionals for industry. Without an intrinsic sense ofaccomplishment, there may be little incentive for a professional to donate their time. Theseinternal rewards must be supported by faculty through recognition and presentation of “letters ofappreciation” from the College.Faculty benefit through maintenance and upgrade of personal skills in the face of changingtechnology, having a pathway to keep course material current, developing a broader personalnetwork, and intrinsic rewards of providing a better student experience.4. Adopting Industry Fellows for Online/Distance
twenty undergraduates, a not-for-profit communitypartner – for example, a community service agency, a museum or school, or a governmentagency and a faculty, staff or industry advisor. A pool of graduate teaching assistants from sevendepartments provides technical guidance and administrative assistance.Each EPICS team is vertically-integrated, consisting of a mix of first-year students, sophomores,juniors, and seniors and are multidisciplinary drawing from across engineering and the entirecampus. Last year, over 60 majors participated. Teams operate for several years, from initialproject definition through final deployment and support. Once the initial project(s) is completedand deployed, new projects are identified by the team and its project
student services (academic ad- ministration, advising, career planning, women and diversity programs, etc.) and curricular issues. He is principal investigator on several NSF grants related to retention of engineering students. As a faculty member in civil engineering, he co-teaches a large introductory course in civil engineering. His research and consulting activities have focused on the safety and reliability of hydraulic structures, and he has participated as an expert in three different capacities regarding reviews of levee performance in Hurri- cane Katrina. He is a three-time recipient of his college’s Withrow Award for Teaching Excellence, a recipient of the Chi Epsilon Regional Teaching Award, and a recipient