Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yewande S. Abraham, Rochester Institute of Technology; Bilge Gökhan Çelik, Roger Williams University; Max Frasier Spaan, Rochester Institute of Technology; Natalie Mansson

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

students’ performance in virtual education and active learning techniquesin such settings. References[1] M. Prince, "Does active learning work? A review of the research," Journal of engineering education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[2] J. Michael, "Where's the evidence that active learning works?," Advances in physiology education, 2006.[3] C. B. Farrow and E. Wetzel, "An Active Learning Classroom in Construction Management Education: Student Perceptions of Engagement and Learning," International Journal of Construction Education and Research, pp. 1-19, 2020.[4] A. Shirazi and A. H. Behzadan, "Design and assessment of a mobile augmented reality- based

Conference Session

Construction Division Technical Session 2: K-12 through Adult Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Torres, Texas State University; Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University; Kristin Marie Kibling, Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

. 2. I prefer to learn from a professor/instructor. 3. I prefer to learn from my peers. B. Teamwork 4. I prefer to be a leader and give direction. 5. I expect to be able to work effectively in a team environment. 6. I prefer to be a valuable team member as opposed to a leader. C. Microsoft Project 7. I am very knowledgeable with Microsoft Project and can produce a schedule using the software. 8. I know how to use scheduling software other than Microsoft Project. 9. This topic is very valuable to my career.Additionally, the remaining students that received the lecture were given a post lecturequestionnaire also using a 5-point Likert scale, which can be seen in Table 2:Table 2: Remaining student post lecture

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University; Heather N. Yates, Oklahoma State University; Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

., May, L., and Haimar, A. (2013). “Risk-Based Input-Output Analysis of Influenza EpidemicConsequences on Interdependent Workforce Sectors.” Risk Analysis. V.33. N. 9. DOI:10.1111/risa.12002Senior, B. A. (1998). "Infusing Practical Components into Construction Education." Journal ofConstruction Education V. 3 N.2 pp. 92-101.Siddiqi, K. and Ozcan, S. (2004). ”Construction Management Internship and Co-op Programs:Stakeholder Needs Assessment.” Conference Proceedings, Associated Schools of Construction April2004.Tener, R., Winstead, M., and Smaglik, E. (2001). “Experiential Learning from Internships in ConstructionEngineering.” Paper presented at 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM.Wanless, D. (2013). “Perspectives from

Conference Session

ConstDiv Technical Session 1 - Capstone & Case Study

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fei Yang, Ohio State University; Michael Parke, Ohio State University; Fabian Hadipriono Tan P.E., Ohio State University; Adrian Hadipriono Tan; Shilun Hao, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

construction sequence and processes of building the Dayanta in 3D models. All of the requisite materials – materials, equipment, tools, substructure and superstructure – must be reviewed thoroughly before the student can proceed. Once this evaluation is completed, the student may repeat the process after a two-week time period has passed. This two-week time interval can be tailored to any period. The purpose of this hiatus is to avoid the retention of the results the students have just received [9].B. Score range: from 60 to 80 If a student earns +60 to +80 at first trial, indicating that he/she missed only a few steps, the system will still encourage him/her (though not mandatorily so) to review only related information

Conference Session

Construction Division Technical Session 4: Capstone, Safety and Beyond

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dorail F. Porter, Associated General Contractors; Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

their career rolepreferences and recommend construction education program improvements. Informal discussionswith some selected students provided additional insights.Key findings indicated that future construction career role preferences were: (a) Project Manager(MPCRS = 8); (b) Superintendent (MPCRS = 7); (c) Real Estate Developer and Graduate Student(MPCRS = 6); and (d) Estimator / Inspector (MPCRS = 5). The reasons construction students gavefor preferring the project manager and superintendent roles included high salaries, opportunity tolead, love for authority, prior experiences, internships, role models, management skills, hands onwork, and working outdoors. The study showed that key reasons for students’ pursuit of a CMdegree included

Conference Session

ConstDiv Technical Session 4 - Pedagogy & Accreditation I

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bashar Haddad, Western Kentucky University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

and the contractor’s company size? Third, wasthere a relationship between the contractors’ risk premium for each identified risk and thecontractors’ percent of self-completed work?To answer the above mentioned research questions, data for this study was collected from twogroups of contractors. Group A included contractors who were presented a bid package withexculpatory clauses. Group B included contractors who were presented a bid package with aseparate list of identified risks. During the analysis of the developed data the following nullhypotheses were tested:Ho1: There was no relationship between the contractors’ risk premium for each identified risk andthe contractors years of experience.Ho2: There was no relationship between the

Conference Session

Construction Division Technical Session 4: Capstone, Safety and Beyond

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bradley Louis Benhart, Purdue University; Clark A. Cory Ph.D., Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Rabita Rajkarnikar, Purdue University ; Cirilo I. Rangel, Purdue University; Mark Shaurette, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

. Fleck, “Learning by trying: The implementation of configurational technology,” ResearchPolicy, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 637–652, 1994.[15] S. Bell, “Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future,” The ClearingHouse, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 39–43, 2010[16] D. Workman, S. A. Gallagher, and W. J. Stepien, “Problem-based learning for traditionaland interdisciplinary classrooms,” Journal for the Education of the Gifted, vol. 16, no. 4, pp.338–357, 1993.[17] A. K. Ellis and J. T. Fouts, “Interdisciplinary curriculum: The research base,” MusicEducators Journal, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 22–22, 2001.[18] E. D. Duraising and V. B. Mansilla, “Targeted assessment of students' interdisciplinarywork: An empirically grounded framework proposed,” The

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 6 - Technology & Simulation

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom Michael Leathem, Auburn University; Lauren W Redden, Auburn University; Jeffrey Kim, Auburn University; Wesley Collins, Auburn University; Ishmael Boynton Preer

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

Paper ID #27217Student Perspectives on the Use of iPads for Navigating Construction Draw-ings: A Case StudyDr. Tom Michael Leathem, Auburn University Tom Leathem is an Assistant Professor in the McWhorter School of Building Science at Auburn Univer- sity where he teaches courses in Estimating, Construction Documents, Scheduling, and Project Delivery. He has 11 years industry experience in commercial construction management, holds a Ph.D. in Educa- tion, an M.S. in Integrated Design & Construction, and a B.S. in Construction Management. His areas of research include construction education, assessment, accreditation

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Scott Walbridge P.E., University of Waterloo; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

Paper ID #28672Challenges and Opportunities Observed in the Implementation of a NewArchitectural Engineering Undergraduate Academic ProgramProf. Scott Walbridge P.E., University of Waterloo Scott Walbridge has been a professor in the University of Waterloo’s Department of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering since 2006. Prior to that, he completed his doctoral studies at the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), and his bachelor’s and master’s degrees at the University of Alberta. Be- tween his master’s and doctoral studies, he worked as a structural engineering consultant for 2.5 years in Edmonton, Canada

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John J. Phillips, Oklahoma State University; Jenna A. Harbert

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

Paper ID #29219Bringing Building Information Modeling (BIM) into the Process forBuilding Structure Design CoursesProf. John J Phillips P.E., Oklahoma State University JOHN PHILLIPS, a registered engineer and associate professor of architectural engineering, practiced as a structural engineer for nine years before returning to his alma mater to teach at Oklahoma State University. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses to architecture, architectural engineering, and civil engineering students that include Statics, Analysis I, Foundations, Timbers, Steel, Concrete, Masonry, Steel II, Concrete II, Steel III, Concrete III

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael James Deigert P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Anahid Behrouzi, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Pamalee A. Brady, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

Paper ID #29779Implementing Bluebeam Software in Architectural Engineering Design CoursesMichael James Deigert P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoDr. Anahid Behrouzi, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Anahid Behrouzi is an assistant professor of architectural engineering at California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo. She has been involved with STEM education beginning in 2003 as a volunteer and summer instructor with the North Carolina Museum of Life and Science. She has been engaged with undergraduate/graduate course delivery in the topic areas of engineering

Conference Session

ConstDiv Technical Session 4 - Pedagogy & Accreditation I

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University; George D. Ford, Mississippi State University; Tori Thompson, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

university grade pointaverage (GPA) and transfer credit as well. Their ACT scores and sectional scores were recorded alongwith the construction studios grades. A data model was created by compiling all data and grouping theminto two groups of students who 1) took or 2) did not take studios A and B in the summer. Studio A is atwelve hours laboratory which presents an introduction to construction materials and methods,construction drawing and modeling, building systems, project life cycles and management, andprofessional thinking and action. Studio B is also a twelve hours laboratory in which the development ofbuilding assemblies and construction sequencing, drawings and computer applications, projectmanagement skills, and professional thinking and

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ramyani Sengupta, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Anthony E. Sparkling, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

/.[12] Looi, C.-K., Wong, L.-H., So, H.-J., Seow, P., Toh, Y., Chen, W., Zhang, B., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1120–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.021[13] Gao, Y., Gonzalez, V. A., & Yiu, T. W. (2019). The effectiveness of traditional tools and computer-aided technologies for health and safety training in the construction sector: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 138, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.003[14] Sacks, R., Perlman, A., & Barak, R. (2013). Construction safety training using immersive virtualreality, Constr. Manag. Econ. 31 (9) 1005–1017, http

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs; Bryan John Hubbard P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

Students A B 2 meetings per week | Basic mechanical, electrical CM 3 1-hhour lecture + 1- and plumbing course for 31 50% 50% 23301 Credits hour lab per meeting constructors and architects 4 meetings per week | Design studio for CM 6 2 1-hour lectures + 2 construction-oriented students 6 80% 20% 33000 Credits 4-hour studios (Residential Focus) CM 2 2-hour lectures and 2 Introductory design and 8 Hour 20000 2-hour labs over 2 construction integration

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Krishna Prasad Kisi, Texas State University; Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Snigdha Rangineni, Texas State University; Guntulu S. Hatipkarasulu, Texas State University; Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

ladder. Question 1 asks the user to find the coordinates of twopoints A and B, which are the end points of a ladder against a building. When that question isanswered correctly, then solving for the distance between those two points (Question 2), asshown in Figure 4 (b), would be asked as to calculate the length of the ladder. Question 3, asshown in Figure 4(c), asks the inclination/slope of the ladder the worker must climb. If all thethree questions are answered then the student would be able to see an animation of the workerclimbing the ladder. However, if any of the three questions are incorrect or unanswered, then theworker will not climb the ladder, that means the player did not score all three points. a. Part 1 – Question 1

Conference Session

Construction Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gad M. Ghada, California State Polytechnic University; Jinsung Cho; Yasser Salem

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

to alumni and industryadvisory council (IAC). The assessment of SOs was conducted on a six-year cycle, in which bothdirect and indirect measures were used by the CET program. Direct measures included PIs thatare drawn from both the senior project and the coursework. Indirect measures include senior exitsurveys, alumni surveys, and IAC surveys. These tools will be discussed in further details inSections A and B, covering the assessment tools used for the PEOs, and then moving into detailingthe assessment measures for the SOs. Figure 2: Assessment Process and Assessment CycleA. Assessment of Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)PEOs are broad statements that describe what graduates are expected to attain within a few

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Rachel D. Mosier, Oklahoma State University; Sandeep Langar, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

among construction industrystudents to a) evaluate their experience of natural disasters, b) examine the source of knowledgeof resilience on natural disasters, c) measure knowledge of post-disaster evacuation, and d)evaluate disaster preparation from university education. The study found that the population of thestudent body existed that had not experienced a natural disaster and were unaware of its impactseither on a personal or familial basis. Further, the majority of the responding students felt that theirmajor(s) and universities did not prepare them in terms of handling natural disasters and extremeweather events. Finally, a correlation was found between the location students live and a desire forknowledge about extreme weather events at

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University; Carisa H. Ramming, Oklahoma State University; Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

. 1 2 3 4 5DC7 Critical thinking courses are important to my career. 1 2 3 4 5DC8 Calculus courses are not applicable after graduation. 1 2 3 4 5DC9 English Literature courses are meaningful to me. 1 2 3 4 5DC10. My degree is required for my career path. 1 2 3 4 5Questions in reference to self-reporting grades are as follows.Self-report your average grades for the following course types:1. Major courses A B C D 5. Calculus A B C D2. Critical Thinking A B C D 6. Humanities A B C D3. Structures A B C D

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Didier M. Valdes, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Carla Lopez Del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Alberto M. Figueroa-Medina, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez; Benjamin Colucci, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Rocío Juliana Sotomayor-Irizarry, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

have regarding work zones and TTCprimary components, an illustration of a TTC zone with a stationary right lane closure on adivided highway was presented (see Figure 2). The text of the warning signs was shown inSpanish as required by local statutes. Lines A, B, C, and D refer to strategic points in the TTCzone. Line A identifies the start of the advance warning area (i.e., the position of the firstwarning sign shown to drivers). Line B was positioned at the last sign of the advance warningarea. Line C represents the beginning of the transition area (i.e., the start of the right-lanemerging taper). Line D marks the start of the activity area. Using these four lines as references,subjects were asked to identify: where the construction work zone

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs; Bhavya Rathna Kota, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

Belonging. Milton: Taylor and Francis, 2018.[12] Shane, J., Lopez del Puerto, C., Strong, K., Mauro, K. M., Wiley-Jones, R., & Wiley, R. “Retaining Women Students in a Construction Engineering Undergraduate Program by Balancing Integration and Identity in Student Communities.” International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 8(3), 171–185, 2012.[13] Fielden, S. L., Davidson, M. J., Gale, A., & Davey, C. L. (2001). “Women, equality and construction.” Journal of Management Development, 20(4), 293–305, 2001.[14] Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. “Women in stem: A gender gap to innovation.” Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief, 4(11), 2011

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 6 - Technology & Simulation

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Don Mah P.Eng., Northern Alberta Institute of Technology; Neetu Sharma, MacEwan University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

that were non-compliant did not meet one or more of following requirements: a. timelysubmission, b. completeness of information, c. acknowledgement of addendums, and d. othermistakes and errors typically found on bids which results in disqualification.Although the teams had a strong compliance results, more teams submitted an incomplete bids(33 teams) than a complete bids (39 team). Based on a debriefing session with students followingthe competition, students commented the time commitment for the project was not adequateenough to finish off the submission completely.The teams’ estimate to the target price was very impressive with the 58 compliant bids in ouranalysis for this criteria (Figure 1). Note that 83% of the compliant bids were within

Conference Session

ConstDiv Technical Session 7 - Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Shenoda, Farmingdale State College

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

to the other. There are, indeed, lower cost textbook and software available, as a searchat Amazon.com will uncover. These materials were selected (a) in consultation with our IndustryAdvisory Board as to the typical software and topics of concern in the practice and (b) without aconsideration of cost (as a primary factor). This course material cost is comparable to the costsconsidered for engineering courses, as discussed in the “Background” section.Table 1. Typical course material costs for CON 357 – Quantity Surveying and Costing. Resource Cost Textbook Construction Estimating Using Excel, 3rd $164.48 (via Amazon.com [31]) Edition by Steven Peterson Software (for

Conference Session

Construction Division Technical Session 3: Case Studies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Perrenoud, University of Oklahoma; Juvenal Huizar, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely # Bachelor’s Degree Q18.A Architecture 0% 29% 14% 43% 14% Q18.B Architecture Engineering 0% 29% 38% 19% 14% Q18.C Business Management 9% 41% 18% 23% 9% Q18.D Construction Management 17

Conference Session

Construction Division Technical Session 2: K-12 through Adult Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University; Justin Earl Weidman, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

Paper ID #22461Increasing Student Construction Interest by Engaging Elementary Studentsin an Inquiry-Based 3D Modelling After School ProgramDr. Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University Dr. Geoffrey A. Wright is a professor of Technology and Engineering Studies in the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University.Dr. Justin Earl Weidman, Brigham Young University Justin Weidman is an Assistant Professor in Construction Management at Brigham Young University. He earned his PhD from Virginia Tech in Environmental Design and Planning. c American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, 2018, pp. 125–131.[2] N. Labonnote, A. Rønnquist, B. Manum, and P. Rüther, “Additive construction: State-of- the-art, challenges and opportunities,” Autom. Constr., vol. 72, pp. 347–366, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026.[3] P. Pradhananga, M. ElZomor, and G. S. Kasabdji, “Identifying the Challenges to Adopting Robotics In the U.S. Construction Industry,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 2021.[4] P. Wang, P. Wu, J. Wang, H. L. Chi, and X. Wang, “A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 15, no. 6, 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061204.[5] A. Shepherd and B

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University; Heather N. Yates, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

affect internships. An online surveyinstrument was created to circulate among construction students to a) evaluate internshipsexperience during COVID-19, b) identify adaptation of working environment in the office andfield, c) use of additional safety measures, d) identify any project changes due to COVID-19, ande) describe their role of the COVID-19 response team. The results of the student internshipsactivity are analyzed to examine the changes associated with their previous internships beforeCOVID-19 versus their internship during the COVID-19 pandemic. The two states, Georgia andOklahoma, are compared with students' respondent perspectives. Additionally, insights intoexternal views of the media or political background are identified in the

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrew Richard Kline, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Fernanda L. Leite, University of Texas, Austin; Eduardo Luis Isatto, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

. Gerber, and K. Ku (2011). “The pace of technological innovation inarchitecture, engineering, and construction education: Integrating recent trends into thecurricula.” J. Inform. Technol. Constr, 16, 411–432.[5] B. T. Johnson, and D. E. Gunderson (2009). “Educating Students concerning recent trends inAEC: A survey of ASC member programs.”Associated Schools of Construction: Proc., 45thAnnual Conf., Proc., 45thASCAnnualConf., T.Sulbaran, ed., Univ. of Southern Mississippi,Hattiesburg, MS.[6] Wu, W., Mayo, G., McCuen, T. L., Issa, R. R., & Smith, D. K. (2018). Building InformationModeling Body of Knowledge. I: Background, Framework, and Initial Development. ASCEJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(8).[7] L. Wang, F. Leite

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University; Mohamed ElZomor, Florida International University; Gabriella Santi; Arif Mohaimin Sadri, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

growing cities," Waste Management, vol. 83, pp. 1-5, Jan 2019.[3] A. Morello, Issa, R. R. A., Franz, B., "Exploratory Study of Recruitment and Retention of Women in the Construction Industry," American Society of Civil Engineer, 2018.[4] J. Jung, Caffarella, R. S., "Advancing Cultural Knowledge: Experiential Learning International Graduate Study Training Programs in the Health and STEM Disciplines," in Adult Education Research Conference, 2010.[5] C. A. Webster, D. F. Stodden, R. L. Carson, C. Egan, and D. Nesbitt, "Integrative Public Health-Aligned Physical Education and Implications for the Professional Preparation of Future Teachers and Teacher Educators/Researchers in the Field," Quest, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 457-474, 2016.[6

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University; Valentina Ferrer, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University; Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

projects, 8% to entertainmentprojects, and the remainder was not sure yet [Figure 5Error! Reference source not found. (b)]. Second, the students were asked the type ofcompanies they would prefer to work for upon graduation. 60% of the students would like towork for a construction company, while only 4% of the class stated their interest in working for agovernment organization [Figure 5Error! Reference source not found. (a)]. These pilot results showed that the majorityof the students are interested in vertical construction and it is essential to integrate aninfrastructure-based curriculum to increase the inclination of students towards learning andworking in horizontal construction. Finally, students were asked about their working experiencein

Conference Session

Construction Division Technical Session 1: Assessments

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thahomina Jahan Nipa; Sharareh Kermanshachi, University of Texas at Arlington

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

% 26% without loan students Variables with no Variables with no 74% significant difference 84% significant difference for studetns with and for engineering and without loan non-engineering students (a) (b) Fig. 5. Ratio of number of significant variables to non-significant ones (a) for engineering and non-engineering