authors attempt to answer twoquestions: (1) how does an inventor think about forming a whole (complex device, tool orfunction) from parts (simple components)? (2) How can generalizations of thinking processes ofinventors be derived to “guide the act of invention” (p. 321)?Weber et al examined an actual patent (Patent # 4,683,826), granted to John B. Solie, H.D.Wittmuss and O.C. Burnside in 1987, and interviewed one of the inventors of the patent (John B.Solie) using a retrospective protocol method to understand the invention process and derive a setof heuristics to guide invention. Patent # 4,683,826 is an “agricultural invention for theapplication of herbicides” (p. 321) used to apply “herbicide uniformly in one pass over an area,using existing
executionAccording to Bringle and Hatcher [1], service-learning is defined as a “course-based, creditbearing educational experience in which students (a) participate in an organized service activitythat meets identified community needs, and (b) reflect on the service activity in such a way as togain further understanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and anenhanced sense of personal values and civic responsibility” (p. 112).” Service-learning has beenproven to benefit students in many ways. More specifically, service learning has been found toenhance students’ collaboration skills [2], civic engagement, interpersonal skills [3], [4], andtheir ability to apply knowledge to problem-solving [5].Our service-learning course was
(N=10)participating in an NSF-funded Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program at alarge research university. Positive learning outcomes gains pertained to communication skills,validation of career path, experimentation skills, valuing cross-disciplinary expertise and lifelonglearning, and gaining confidence in working independently. Low ranked learning outcomespertained to (a) leadership skills, (b) project management skills, (c) understanding ethical issues,and (d) identifying problems. Further, qualitative data analysis revealed that undergraduateresearchers faced a number of challenges and frustrations pertinent to (a) scheduling, (b) timemanagement, (c) running experiments with limited familiarity to instruments and
Paper ID #34308Work in Progress: Measuring Stigma of Mental Health Conditions and ItsImpact in Help-seeking Behaviors Among Engineering StudentsMatilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo Matilde Sanchez-Pena is an Assistant Professor in engineering education at University at Buffalo - SUNY. Her current research areas include (a) advancing institutional diversity, (b) cultures of health in engineer- ing education, and (c) data analysis skills of engineers. She aims to promote a more equitable engineering field in which students of all backgrounds can acquire the knowledge and skills to achieve their goals. She
knowledge that will transfer and be useful in problem solving. She can be contacted at pnv1@psu.edu.Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University Christine B. Masters is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Penn State. She received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 1987 and a Ph.D. in Engineering Science and Mechanics in 1992, both from Penn State. In addition to raising four children with her husband of 20 years, she teaches introductory mechanics courses, trains the department graduate teaching assistants, coordinates the Engineering Science Honors Program undergraduate advising efforts and participates in a variety of engineering educational
between teams and individuals in engineering design from a social constructionist and social network perspective.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West
education. On the other side,academia moves more in a direction of research and has a career path based on primarilyresearch criteria and with less recognition of experience from working life 1, 2.The purpose of this paper is to identify faculty approaches to industry connections andworking life issues in engineering education. The research questions are: a) What are facultyattitudes towards working life issues and their integration into the curriculum? and b) Whatactivities related to working life do faculty members introduce to the curriculum?These research questions are based on the assumption that faculty attitudes and curricularactivities related to working life are important factors in engineering education if we want toensure that students
AC 2011-1478: EXPLORING THE MOTIVATIONS FOR MIGRATION AMONGENGINEERING STUDENTSIda B Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ida Ngambeki is pursuing a doctorate in Engineering Education with a concentration in Ecological Sci- ences and Engineering at Purdue University. She has a B.S. in Engineering from Smith College. Her research interests include motivation, interest, career choice, engineering thinking, engineering and pub- lic policy and sustainability.Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Demetra Evangelou is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She has a PhD in Early Childhood Education from the University of
Paper ID #7131Automated Text Analysis Facilitates Using Written Formative Assessmentsfor Just-in-Time Teaching in Large Enrollment CoursesDr. Luanna B Prevost, Michigan State University Dr. Prevost is a postdoctoral research associate with the Center of Engineering Education at Michigan State University. Her research interests are in student writing, problem solving, and technologies that can be used to assess and teach these skills.Dr. Kevin C Haudek, Michigan State UniversityEmily Norton Henry, Michigan State UniversityMr. Matthew C Berry, Michigan State UniversityDr. Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University Associate
EducationMotivation and BackgroundThere are two purposes for this paper. The first purpose is to describe our unique application oftwo different qualitative research methods to evaluate the implementation and outcomes for thefirst year of an NSF funded grant on STEM faculty development. We used two different researchmethods in order to be able to describe and examine adequately the underlying change processesand outcomes that faculty experienced during participation in Year One of the grant. The secondpurpose is to report out the implementation results and outcomes from this evaluation.The two different research methods were: (a) conjecture mapping1 and (b) self-study2,3,4. Thegrant evaluator used conjecture mapping, which is a method from design-based
, 2010 Toward a Better Understanding of Academic and Social Integration: A Qualitative Study of Factors Related to Persistence in EngineeringAbstract In general, the challenge to produce more engineers in the United States can beunderstood as two-pronged: (a) recruiting students to the field of engineering; and (b) retainingstudents in the discipline. There have been considerable efforts to recruit additional students toengineering which have yielded modest results. However, the increase in enrollment has notcoincided with an increase in engineering graduates. Therefore the departure of students from thediscipline remains an issue. Using a recently proposed model of engineer retention by
Paper ID #29752WIP: Exploring an Engineering Faculty’s Intention Toward InclusiveTeachingMemoria Matters, Purdue University at West Lafayette Memoria Matters is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is also pursuing a Master’s degree at the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering for computer engineering, in which she obtained her BSE from the University of Pennsylvania. Her research interest is in increasing the diversity of engineering by improving the inclusivity of engineering higher education through teaching methods, policies, and culture change.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski
Paper ID #9939Understanding Team Ethical Climate Through Interview DataMegan Kenny Feister, Purdue University, West Lafayette Megan K. Feister is a doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research focuses on organizational identity and socialization, team communication, ethical reasoning development and assessment, and innovation and design. Megan holds a B.A. in communica- tion from Saint Louis University and a M.A. in Organizational Communication from the University of Cincinnati.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is
as research into different distance education delivery methods and theirassociated impacts on the spatial ability of students.Bibliography 1. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States. Needham MA: Sloan Consortium. 2. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009. Needham MA: Sloan Consortium. 3. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. 4. Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM
Wendy J. Harrison, Ruth A. Streveler, Ronald L. Miller, and Arthur B. Sacks Colorado School of MinesAbstractThis paper describes the process by which the curriculum of the award-winning Guy T. McBrideHonors Program in Public Affairs of the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) is being redesigned.Best practices in curriculum development have been followed (e.g., developing a clear missionstatement with measurable outcomes; aligning course-level learning objectives with Programoutcomes and expected attributes of CSM graduates; establishing an implementation matrix toorganize topics and content into a logical course sequence; embedding assessment processesthroughout; and engaging the broad participation of Program faculty
Roy, West Virginia University Abhik Roy is a professor educational psychology in the Department of Learning Sciences & Human Development (https://lshd.wvu.edu/) within the College of Education & Human Services at West Virginia University. Dr. Roy holds a Ph.D. in Program Evaluation with expertise in data science, visualization, and social network analysis and is an evaluator on multiple federal grants spanning both the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. He currently conducts research in (a) the use of machine learning to evaluate programs, (b) using predictive networks to assess change, and (c) deep learning architectures for text classification
impact might be captured longitudinally over the twelve-month period following theworkshop.References[1] J. A. Koenig, “Assessing 21st Century Skills: Summary of a Workshop,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/159080/. [Accessed January 21, 2020].[2] V. Byrd, “Introducing Data Visualization: A Hands-on Approach for Undergraduates,” in Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Las Vegas, NV, USA, November 4-7, 2018, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 730-73, 2018.[3] B. T. Ladd, “The Information Frontiers Program: Expanding Student Capacity for Crossing Domain and Institutional Borders,” in
Engineer in the Real World”Key words: “project-based learning,” “international,” “assessment”IntroductionThe quotation in the title of this paper is a student’s statement about the future impact of hisproject-abroad experience in South Africa. Indeed, study-abroad and project-abroad experiencesare increasingly viewed as important for engineering students’ careers. Assessing the studentlearning outcomes of such programs can benefit (a) the students, as they engage in self-reflectionand communication about their experience, (b) the study-abroad program itself, for continualimprovement, and (c) the engineering education community at large, as it seeks effectivemethods and models for preparing engineers for their work. To
://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Student-Centered.html (2015/01/25). 3. Borrego, M.J., Prince, M.J., Shekhar, P., Waters, C. and Finelli, C. J. 2014. Student perceptions of instructional change in engineering courses: A pilot study. In 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education. Indianapolis, IN. June 15-18. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings (2015/01/15). 4. Felder, R. M., Brent, R. and Prince, M. J. 2014. Engineering instructional development: Programs, best practices and recommendations. In Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, eds. A. Johri and B. M. Olds, 409-436. New York, NY
, played into the meritocratic game to prove that she could solve difficult equationseasily and thus was a “good engineer.” Yet, her approach was common, as Seron et al. [19] hasdocumented that the culture of engineering reproduces a particular way of being, in that itsocializes women into believing that raising concerns about marginalization is “tangential … towhat counts as the “real” practical and objective work of engineers” [p. 4]. At the end of the fourthinterview, Kitatoi’s reflection of what constituted a “good engineer” was filled with resentment,while she received a B in her statics class, the image of who belonged in engineering left anunpleasant feeling, stating, I think it’s really messed up. I think a lot of the times tambien
like to express our gratitude to the McNair Scholars Program at Harding University.This work was made possible by their support. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in the material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the McNair Scholars Program.Additionally, we would like to thank the insightful comments of the anonymous reviewers of thispaper. These points of feedback helped us sharpen the quality of the paper.References 1. Graesser, A. C., D'Mello, S. K., Craig, S. D., Witherspoon, A., Sullins, J., McDaniel, B., & Gholson, B. (2008). The relationship between affective states and dialog patterns during interactions with AutoTutor. Journal of Interactive
Paper ID #23568Examining the Replication – or Mutation – Processes of Implementing a Na-tional Model for Engineering Mathematics Education at a New SiteDr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the
expectations (expected consequences of a particular behavior), self-efficacy(confidence about being successful at a task), and goal setting (identifying a desired outcome).The cognitive apprenticeship model is characterized by expert guidance provided by a mentor to Page 24.1226.3the novice in an authentic task or setting within a community of practice.16 This model differsfrom the traditional apprenticeship model by (a) allowing the objectives of the learningassignments to dictate the types of tasks given to students rather than the demands of theworkplace; and (b) decontextualizing knowledge so that it can be applied in diverse settingsrather than a
following category list of gains wereidentified: (a) thinking and working like a scientist, (b) “becoming a scientist,” (c)personal/professional gains, (d) clarification/confirmation of career plans, (e) enhancedcareer/graduate school preparation, and (f) other gains and skills. The findings showed a highlevel of agreement between students (92%) and faculty (90%) that the undergraduate researchexperience was highly beneficial2. Although the work of Seymour and colleagues revealedfindings pertaining to attitudes toward graduate school and research, as well as confidence levelsand other gains in skills, the number of engineering student participants was limited to a smallnumber.Most recently, one of the more extensive studies on assessing the
Challenge Scholars Program," 2017. Retrieved from http://www.grandchallengescholars.org[2] "Grand Challenge Scholars Program-Arizona State University", 2017. Retrieved from https://gcsp.engineering.asu.edu/[3] C.L.A. Dancz, J.M. Plumbee, D. Bargar, P. Walters Brunner, K. High, L. Klotz and A.E.Landis, "A Rubric to Assess Civil Engineering Students' Grand Challenge SustainableEntrepreneurship Projects," in American Society for Engineering Education 123rd AnnualConference & Exposition, 2016.[4] R. Stevens, K. O'Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns and D.M. Amos, "Becoming an engineer:Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning," J Eng Educ, vol. 97, pp. 355, 2008.[5] J. Turns, B. Sattler and D. Kilgore, "Disciplinary knowledge
. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. London: Routledge.19. Gee, J.P. (2001). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Taylor & Francis. Page 26.880.1620. Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication theory, 10(3), 310-331.21. Romero, E. J., & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The use of humor in the workplace. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 58-69.22. Ng, M., Fleming, T., Robinson, M., Thomson, B., Graetz, N., Margono, C., . . . Abera, S. F. (2014). Global, regional, and national prevalence of
research design approach to bemore relevant given the nature of our research questions as well as our desire to gain in depthinsight into students’ learning. More specifically, we collected data from: (a) a series of open-ended questions that were a part of a project evaluation questionnaire that was administered atthe end of the semester, (b) a couple of Likert-scale items, which were a part of the end ofsemester course evaluation and were designed to measure the value and difficulty of the project,(c) observations made by two assessment specialists, which served as external evaluators to thiseffort. Page 15.1082.4The data analysis of the open
, these must be justified. At a minimum, the mathematical model should include assumptions about the situation and the types of data to which the procedure can be applied. This would be accomplished by more thoroughly completing the following memo outline requirements: I. Introduction A. In your own words, restate the task that was assigned to your team (~1-2 sentences). This is your team’s consensus on who the client is and what solution the client needs. B. Describe what the procedure below is designed to do or find – be specific (~1- Page 22.1339.9 2 sentences
AC 2007-1683: DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTI-LEVEL ASSESSMENT FOR ACROSS-DISCIPLINARY PROJECT EVALUATING THE SYMBIOSIS OF TABLETPC'S AND COLLABORATION-FACILITATING SOFTWARE IN THECLASSROOMrebecca devasher, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Rebecca B. DeVasher received her B.S. in Chemistry from the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, AL (the main campus) in 2000, and her Ph.D. from the same university in 2004 under the guidance of Kevin Shaughnessy. Rebecca was an instructor at the University of Alabama while she was working on her Ph.D. Upon completion of her doctoral degree, she accepted a visiting faculty position at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology for the academic year 2004-2005. In March
AC 2011-925: UTILIZATION OF A THINK-ALOUD PROTOCOL TO COG-NITIVELY VALIDATE A SURVEY INSTRUMENT IDENTIFYING SOCIALCAPITAL RESOURCES OF ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATESJulie Martin Trenor, Clemson University Julie Martin Trenor, Ph.D. is an assistant professor of Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the School of Materials Science and Engineering. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of under-represented students in engi- neering. Dr. Trenor is a recent NSF CAREER award winner for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.”Matthew K. Miller, Clemson