Design competitions into the undergraduate experience, studentsare better prepared to enter the field of engineering and make more meaningful contributions totheir firms at an earlier rate.According to a report published for The Royal Academy of Engineering, UK (2006)1, the pace ofchange in industry is expected to intensify in both the technological and non-technologicaldomains. Particular themes that have emerged include: (a) an increased need for firms to focuson solving customer problems; (b) a growing requirement to provide system solutions tothose problems; (c) and the increasing complexity of the management task. Anotherimportant factor is globalization which will continue to affect both the demand and the supplyside of industry.Certain
emphasis oncommunication competency might be assigned a target of “1”. Courses that require littleor no writing beyond mathematical problem solving are not assigned a target at all.Each time an Electrical Engineering or support course (e.g., Mathematics, Physics,Chemistry) is offered, the instructor completes a Course Worksheet which must discussevidence that indicates the extent to which the course outcomes are being achieved. Asample worksheet is provided in Appendix B. The worksheet must also document howthe course has been changed to address action items that were identified in the previousoffering of the course. This worksheet, along with the syllabus, samples of student work,and other evidence that support the conclusions, are placed in a
responses to those questionswould remain the same regardless of which version of the introductory class they had takenwhile B) students who had taken the new form of the class would have higher levels ofconfidence in the first eight questions. Thus showing that the transformation had a positiveimpact on student confidence in the introductory class’s core topics. The survey can be found inAppendix B.3. Program Structure/ Course DescriptionThe introductory computer engineering course is a 3-credit hour class that meets 3 times a weekfor 50 minutes over 16 weeks. The course is meant to introduce the student to using a computerto interact with real world inputs and outputs, or simply, embedded systems. The nameembedded systems comes from the idea that
Russian Language)15. Dewey, J.: How We Think: a Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Boston: Heath. (1933)16. Gokhale, A. A.: Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking," Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). (1995)17. Chan, Y.-Y., Lam, H. F., Yang, H. H. et al. : Hybrid Inquiry-based Learning, Handbook on Research on Hybrid Learning Model, Information Science Reference. (2010)18. Hofer, B. K: Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378 – 405. (2000)19. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students’ Intellectual Development, Jossey Bass, San
interest and impact enrollment retention. Clearly,no template can accommodate the variety of plans; and both ET and E programs must reachcompromises. We decided to focus on the technical requirements of typical first 2 years such asmathematics, physics, and electrical & computer engineering courses. In essence, the commontwo years would necessarily increase the math/science requirements for ET majors, and increasethe lab exposure and applications requirements for E majors. The following modifications aredeemed to be new for ET and E programs:1. New for ET programs: a. Include one math course per semester, starting with Calculus I; College Algebra and pre-Calculus become necessary pre-requisites. b. Physics and circuit analysis
“enduringunderstandings” that learners should adopt from any learning experience 1 . This step is thenfollowed by identifying ways of student learning attainment and appropriate mechanisms thatwill allow conveying concepts of these kinds.The purpose of this research study is to explore the development of a quality curriculum in high-performance CG (HPCG) education coupled with data describing how students in such coursesperceived the content, assessment, and pedagogy they experienced. We utilized Wiggins andMcTighe’s backward design (1997) 1 as a framework for designing this study. Their backwarddesign process (p.9) is composed of three main stages: (a) identifying the desired learningoutcomes - the content of the lesson, (b) determining the acceptable evidence
offsets and operational current levels.The decision process relates primarily to basic physical models of the MOS transistor, which arebased on devices of much larger dimensions and much lower fields. In order to make any kindof predictive analysis, these basic models benchmark the process and therefore some predictivesimulations are necessary. These are best manifested in such constructs 1 as a CMOS pair forevaluation of the transconductance, gm and of the drain conductance gDS slopes. The device testtopology is represented by figure 1-1(a). The simulation results are as shown by figure 1-1(b). Page 14.1302.3 Figure 1.1(a) Schematic of a
, findmin-cut max flow, network topologies, etc. bottlenecks when traffic increases, best paths(ABET: a, b, c, e) for broadcasting to sensors, etc. Along with other topics covered this item covered network layer issues as wellIntermediate details on many wireless access Teaches students about various wirelesstechniques appropriate for IoT applications, technologies available and their capabilitiesincluding: WiFi, IrDA, Bluetooth, Bluetooth based on range, bit rate, performance, etc.Low Energy (BLE), IEEE 802.15.4, ZigBee, This lets students find a few technologies bestZ-Wave, UWB, LoRa, DSRC, DASH-7
to the most striking data.For example: ü 69% of 170 respondents agree or strongly agree with the statement “The course material has been interesting to me.” ü 70% (of 170) non-EE students are satisfied or very satisfied with this EE course ü 55% (of 153) students report increased interest in EE due to taking this course ü 62% (of 153) non-EE students report increased motivation to apply EE to their fields ü 79% (of 153) non-EE students report increased confidence in applying EE to their fields.The authors anticipate several types of applications for their findings: A. Fine-tuning of the teaching strategies and the logistics in this course. B. Verification of these findings in the future semesters (with different
A Software Package for Enhanced Student-Learning in Real- Time Embedded-Systems NetworkingAbstractToday, embedded systems networking is common in manufacturing, automobiles, medicalequipment, and home appliances, but few undergraduate engineering and technology curriculateach courses devoted to it. Not having appropriate educational experiences risks a decline in UStechnical expertise. Various companies have developed commercial software packages foranalysis, diagnosis and simulation of real-time embedded-systems networking protocols.However, these commercial software packages are very expensive and complex to be used forundergraduate courses. We have developed a user-friendly and easy-to-use software
discipline may be required to meet. In this paper, we will focus attention on thecommon (3.a) through (3.k) outcomes since these apply to all engineering programs. These elevenoutcomes may be classified into two groups. The first group, consisting of (3.a), (3.b), (3.c), (3.e),and (3.k) are technical outcomes; for example, outcome (3.a) is an ability to apply knowledgeof mathematics, science, and engineering. The second group consists of the remaining outcomes,(3.d), (3.f), (3.g), (3.h), (3.i), and (3.j), are related to what might be called professional skills 20 (alsooccasionally referred to as soft skills), as well as those related to societal issues. Thus outcome(3.d), related to a professional skill, is an ability to function on multi
evenly as three grades, namely A, Band C. The next class with traditional homework had 11 students. The grades distribution forthese classes are not statistically different (p-value 0.52). The class in which the author includeda video explanation of homework problems had 17 students enrolled but one student wasauditing the course. The grade distribution for this class shows a significant increase in numberof Grade A results and consequently decrease in number of Grades B and C. The gradedistribution for the class with video responses is statistically significantly different from thetraditional homework classes (p-value < 0.05).Course Evaluation ResultsThe course was perceived as very difficult by students when they were assigned traditional
covered. Note that some of theselectures were longer than others. Certain lectures spanned two course days, while others had toshare a day with an exercise or student challenge. 1. Concept of the frequency domain, introduction to Fourier Series, Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), and power spectral density, spectral analysis of signals found in the environment around them. Students receive actual FM radio, LTE, GSM, ADS-B signals; any signals they can find using their provided SDRs and antennas. 2. Nyquist sampling, concept of “not losing information” when sampling a band-limited signal, and the concept of band-limited. They will observe the type of artifacts that occur with inadequate sampling, such as aliasing. 3. IQ
engineering subject,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 222–233, Mar. 4, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1410523. [6] K. Wage, J. Buck, and M. Hjalmarson, “Analyzing misconceptions using the signals and systems concept in- ventory and student interviews,” in 2006 IEEE 12th Digital Signal Processing Workshop & 4th IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop, Teton National Park, WY, USA: IEEE, Sep. 2006, pp. 123–128, ISBN: 978-1-4244-0535-0. DOI: 10.1109/DSPWS.2006.265451. [7] J. A. Hurtado, J. Quiroga, and B. Masiero, “Motivating and envolving projects in signal processing class,” pre- sented at the 2016 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, Jun. 2016, p. 10. [Online
learn to complete the challenges. For instance, when a student needs to design a pedometer, we first go through a tutorial covering how to interface with the analog sensor to read the raw data. The tutorials guide them through the process that they then need to utilize to accomplish the task. 4. Challenges a. The challenges are the most critically assessed portions of the labs. Once students complete the previous three sections, we make sure that they have all the prerequisite knowledge and tools to accomplish the challenge. b. It is in the challenges where we assess critical thinking, creativity, and the effective application of knowledge
P2N2222AGOS-ND Leads from left to right: C-B-E LM741 Op Amp LM741CNNS/NOPB-ND 1N5819 Schottky Diode 1N5819GOS-ND Tantalum 2.2 𝜇𝐹/ 35 𝑉 478-1871-ND Equivalent Equiv. Series Resistance = 5.0 Ω4. Details of Laboratory ExperimentLab procedure:The following step by step procedures were provided to the students to improve theirunderstanding on the lab and to help them conduct effective experiments. 1) Design an astable multivibrator (oscillator) with a frequency of 100 𝑘𝐻𝑧 using the popular timer IC, NE555. (To simplify design and troubleshooting in the lab, the capacitor value of 1 𝑛𝐹 was given.) 2) Simulate the oscillator circuits and verify through implementation on a breadboard. 3) Add a
separation]. Ref: HW#4 Page 15.1219.10 problem 4.7” b. “[I] did not realize that gop [optical generation rate] and tau [recombination lifetime] were in different units. Reference: HW#4 problem: 4.7” c. “I used the value of 10-7 [u]s for tau instead of 10-1 us . Reference: Textbook: pg 143: Example 4-5 and pg. 131: Formula defined.” d. “I forgot how conductivity changed [when excess electrons and holes are created in a semiconductor]. Ref: Text: Pg. 124 and 102.” e. “I ran out of time and didn’t know how to do it [determine the quasi Fermi level]. Ref: Textbook pg 142-143” f. “For some reason I didn’t use no*po=ni2 [the
outcomes were assessed for the actual course (F and J),but all could be considered. These assessment tools are representative examples, and moreexamples could be created. The new ABET outcomes would also be able to map similarly to thecourse activities. Student Outcome Potential Assessment Tool(s) Mathematics: cryptology proof; science: electromagnetic (A) An ability to apply knowledge of mathemat- side-channel attack recreation or simulation; engineering: ics, science, and engineering any of the laboratory assignments listed in Table 1 (B
traditional laboratory consists in sharing and grouping the students,discussing the theoretical problems together, working directly on a set of equipment andapparatus following a set of written guidelines, evaluating the results and elaborating personalconclusions4-12, 17-31. The major shortcomings of the traditional laboratories: (a) the sets ofequipment can be significantly high and the institution can't modernize them in a timely manner;(b) the students access to laboratories is restricted only to the laboratory periods; (c) since thestudents can see only the inputs and outputs of the system, those laboratories cannot fully backupthe understanding / intuitiveness of the physical phenomena illustrating the functionality of
the projectsRobotic platformThe robotic platform used for the projects is shown in fig 1. It consisted of a round platform of 30cm ofdiameter with eight sonar sensors placed every 45o degrees around the platform. A Field ProgrammableGate Array (FPGA) card [2] is installed in the robot platform, as well as, radio frequency identification(RFID) tag reader [8] that is used to identify the goal the robot should find, and a Basic Stampmicrocontroller is used for I/O processing. Figure 1. a) Mobile Robot Platform and b) Sonar Sensor Layout and WeightsThe Challenge.Design and implement a controller to be able to drive the robot autonomously in an unknown indoorenvironment (maze) avoiding static obstacles, and reaching a goal (an RFID
required to read through each of the answersof the question in detail and choose which they felt was the most accurate response. An exampleof a multiple choice question implementing the grading rubric is given below [7]: Multiple Choice Question Example (Objective #1) Which of the following most completely describes the function of the stack in a microcontroller? A The stack is in ROM and is used to access constant data used in your programs. (0 points) B The stack is in RAM and is used to store temporary variable data and subroutine return addresses using indexed addressing modes. (1 points) C The stack allows you to have nested subroutines in your programs
, analyzing, and processing a wide-range of signals. Hence,these ultra-low cost RTL-SDR devices provide a mobile studio for students studying digitalsignal processing. We expect that the ability to capture and process actual real-world signalsusing their own hardware will be particularly impactful for many of our students. Due to therelatively large tunable bandwidth, students can explore a large range of the RF spectrum and“see” signals such as FM radio, digital television, amateur radio, GPS, and commercial aircraftADS-B transmission.For the purposes of our course, the mobile studio consists of the following: An RTL-SDR and stock antenna. A modern laptop computer running Windows. Supporting software packages, including o
regarding what a student feels are the correct answers, specific rulesbased on a student’s drop-down selections can be applied once certain responses are removed fromconsideration. In this case, the rules would be applied after the three responses indicating a changein the power of R1 were removed. So too, responses that correspond to drop-down selections inwhich ONLY the power of R2 was believed to change could be removed to avoid lumping localizedwith sequential misconceptions. Even without using drop-down selection to eliminate the potentialfor false positives, the results are promising considering only a very simplistic word-matchingapproach was used. B. Constant Voltage ErrorsThe second most common error that showed up in in student
connection between open and closed loop systems. A simple dailyexample makes a difference!A quantitative example of this can be seen in Figure 33 along with the corresponding derivation. (a) (b) Figure 33 (a) Open Loop and (b) Closed Loop SystemsAlthough the following mathematical explanation is currently not part of the video, we plan toadd it later on in the longer and more comprehensive version. By deriving the transfer functionof each system we have the following: Open Loop Transfer Function: C 5
Defuzzification Crisp Input 2 Rule BaseFig. 10. A block diagram of the fuzzy controller utilized in this paper. S SB M MB B BB VS S SM SB B VB 1 1 0.8 0.8 Membership Membership 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4
. B. V. Benitti, "Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review.," Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 978-988, 2012.[2] A. Melchior, F. Cohen, T. Cutter, T. Leavitt and N. Manchester, "More than robots: An evaluation of the first robotics competition participant and institutional impacts," Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 2005.[3] G. Nugent, B. Barker, N. Grandgenett and V. Adamchuk, "The use of digital manipulatives in k-12: Robotics, gps/gis and programming," in Frontiers in Education Conference, 2009.[4] S. Grover, "Robotics and Engineering for Middle and High School Students to Develop Computational Thinking," in Annual Meeting of the American
exposure tothe students; (b) Lack of system level exposure; (c) Unnecessary emphasis on language syntax;(d) No support for adaptability; and (d) No support for life long learning.The “Breadth First” approach was considered as an option to provide a more holistic view of thediscipline. Many computer science educators have argued for this approach in which the firstcourse introduces to a broader range of topics in the CSE discipline. Creating a universalintroductory “breadth-first” course that introduces a dynamic field like CSE is a very dauntingtask. Developing a successful stand-alone breadth-first implementation, however, has proven tobe even more difficult. One option though has been to use the breadth-first model as a lead-in toa more
Instruction, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137-175, 2001.[8] C. Chin and D. E. Brown, “Learning in Science: A Comparison of Deep and SurfaceApproaches,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 109, 2000.[9] J. L. Cowan, On becoming an innovative university teacher: reflection in action.Maidenhead: Society for research into higher education & Open University press, 2006.[10] T. A. Feldhausen, B. R. Babin, and E. Dringenberg, “Connected Mechanical EngineeringCurriculum through a Fundamental Learning Integration Platform,” 2017 Annual Conference &Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017, June. ASEE Conferences, 2017.[11] H. Alnajjar, “Getting Freshmen To Make The Connection Between Courses ThroughIntegrative Learning Blocks (ILBs),” 2000
OS RTOS Wire/Wireless PCI (b) (c) USB (d) PCI (a) Interface + FPGA + P2P VP-1 VP-2 VP- VP-N+1 (f) Wireless P2P (c)3~N Sensor Signal Processing & Wireless Communication (g) Virtual-/Real-Road Test Speed Controller Battery Module
student to apply communications theory to a practical circuit implementation.• Outcome b: "an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data" The proposed project provides the opportunity for the student to experiment with the circuit parameters and evaluate the circuit response.• Outcome e: "an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems" The proposed project gives the student a chance to solve for a number of circuit components and signal parameters associated with the assignment.• Outcome k: "an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice" The proposed project uses modern simulation software and