, 166-175. 3. Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult Page 14.16.7 education and human resource development. Burlington, MA: Gulf Professional Publishing.4. Johari, A.& Bradshaw, A.C. (2008). Project-based learning in an internship program: A qualitative study of related roles and their motivational attributes. Education Technology Research and Development. 56(3), 329-359.5. Vansteenkiste, M., Timmermans, T., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Van den Broeck, A. (2008). Does extrinsic goal framing enhance extrinsic goal-oriented individuals
future of design education’." Design and Technology: An international Journal 15(3): 10 - 17. 15. Pryor, J. Torrence, H. (1998). Formative Assessment in the Classroom: Where Psychological Theory Meets Social Practice. Social Psychology of Education 2: 151–176, 16. Sadler, D. Royce (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. 17. Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Price, M., (2005): A social constructivist assessment process model: how the research literature shows us this could be best practice, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30:3, 231-240 18. Lane, D., Seery, N., Gordon, S. (2010). A Paradigm for Promoting Visual
, KS: The IDEA Center9. Benton, S. L., Webster, R., Gross, A. B., & Pallett, W. (2010). IDEA Technical Report No. 15: An analysis of IDEA student ratings of instruction in traditional versus online courses, 2002-2008 data. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.10. Wiebe, E. N, Branoff, T. J., & Shreve, M. A. (June, 2010). Paths to Learning: Understanding how students utilize online instructional resources in an introductory engineering graphics course. Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, Kentucky, June 20-23, 2010.
accomplish. It can be introduced tostudents earlier and used as a tool throughout the design curriculum.As technology continues to move forward, the tools given to engineering students must alsochange to adapt to the engineering environment outside of academics. The expectation forstudents to be proficient in sophisticated design and graphics technologies requires that machinevision and computerized animation software be embraced as key elements in undergraduateengineering design curriculum.Bibliography1. DARPA OR of the Future Workshop in executive Summary 2003. P 1-22. Rosen, J. & Hannaford, B. (2006, October). Doc at a Distance. IEEE Spectrum, 43(10), [34-39
. ReferenceLoyalka, P., Carnoy, M., Froumin, I., Dossani, R., Tilak, J. B., & Yang, P. (2014). Factors affecting the quality of engineering education in the four largest emerging economies. Higher Education, 68(6), 977-1004Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 344-351.Maeda, Y. & Yoon, S. (2011). Scaling the Revised PSVT-R: Characteristics of the First-Year Engineering Students' Spatial Ability. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011.Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the
station and automatically placed on amoving platform. The team must design this platform and its driving mechanism. Due to thecost constraints, the mechanism should be a linkage design. An example of a completed linkagedesign including the stationary electrode pair is shown in Fig. 2. Page 12.104.4Requirements and Specifications: 1. The unwelded component will be placed onto the moving platform by a robotic positioner to ensure consistent and proper placement. 2. The platform will continue its motion to bring the weld locations A and B directly under the electrode pair. The platform must dwell for at least 1.5 seconds in this position
Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, Session 1871.8. Wahby, W. S. (2002). Enhancing engineering graphics courses through animated, sophisticated, multi- media, graphical presentations. Published proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, Session 3238.9. Jones, B. W. (2004). Teaching computer graphics in the online environment. Published proceeding of the 59th Annual Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, Williamsburg, VA, 38-44.10. Draves, W. A., & Coates, J. (2003). Nine shift. River Falls, WI: Learning Resources Network.11. Clark, A. C., & Scales, A. Y. (2002). Are
)different parts of ordinary difficulty per team member. FIGURE 7 shows an example of thestudent term project, an impeller assembly. The assembly includes the top and bottom housings,and the impeller shaft subassembly, the impeller blades, and a number of fasteners like bolts,nuts and washers. Page 22.567.8 FIGURE 7 – IMPELLER ASSEMBLY (WITH EXPLODED VIEW)Projects will be graded on a nine-part system which includes the following areas and pointvalues: a) MASTER GROUP PROPOSAL 5 PTS b) SKETCHING 10 PTS c) WRITTEN PRESENTATION
an angled laparoscope in a virtual environment. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2001,J. D. Westwood et al, Editors, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 146-152.5. Tartre, L.A. (1990). Spatial skills, gender, and mathematics. In E. H. Fennema & G. C. Leder (Eds.), Mathematics and Gender, (pp. 27-59). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.6. Casey, M. B., Pezaris, E., Nuttall, R. L. (1992). Spatial ability as a predictor of math achievement: The importance of sex and handedness patterns. Neuropsychologia, 30, 35-45.7. Kastens, K.A., Manduca, C. A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L. S., Mogk, D. W. Spangler, T. C., Stillings, N. A., & Titus, S. (2009). How geoscientists think and learn, EOS, Transactions, American
Peters, M. (2010). Sex Differences in Mental Rotation and Line Angle Judgments are Positively Associated with Gender Equity and Economic Development across 53 Nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(4), 990-997.Medina, A. C., Gerson, H. B. P., & Sorby, S. A. (1998). Identifying gender differences in the 3-D visualization skills of engineering students in Brazil and in the United States. Proceedings of the International Conference for Engineering Education 1998, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Study, N. E. (2003). A comparison of test scores of minority vs. non-minority students on the Purdue spatial visualization test: Visualization of rotations. Proceedings of the ASEE Engineering Design Graphics Division Mid-year Meeting (182-188
screencast Management Making Sharing and Disscussion OK? and Retaining NO Fig.1 The process of database management and retaining The students in the experimental groups were divided into small teams with four to sixstudents in each team. Screencast homework was given to students and all project activities wereconducted in teams. Each student in a team was assigned with a tag A or B: “tag A” forgenerating a screencast and “tag B” for providing comments. Students with different tags tookone of the two following roles: either making the screencasts or providing comments. Screencastexercises were designed to promote self-learning
courses in 3D modeling, virtual collaboration, 3D data interoperability, and graphics standards and data exchange. Professor Hartman also leads a team in the development and delivery of the online Purdue PLM Certificate Program and in the development of the next-generation manufacturing curriculum at Purdue focusing on manufacturing systems and the holistic product lifecycle.Amy B Mueller, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amy B Mueller is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the College of Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette campus. She received her BS in ME from Purdue University and her MBA in Information Systems from the University of Toledo. Before joining the faculty in 2012, Ms. Mueller spent over 30
on the document camera) B. In-class exercise completed as a team 10 minutes at each table C. Computer module completion 15 minutes D. Open lab time to work on all 35-40 minutes homework problemsAfter the students completed the in-class exercise, students (voluntarily) came up to the front ofthe room to share with the class how his/her team created the drawing. Also, while each tablewas working on the in-class exercise, the instructor and two Teaching Assistants (TAs) walkedfrom table to table to offer guidance and/or check that the students’ drawings were donecorrectly.Each module typically had four worksheets that represented
described in 9, a self-efficacy question began with two images of an object, (Object A)being shown on the screen before (left image) and after (right image) rotation (see Fig. 3). Theseimages were presented for three seconds and then were removed from the screen. Next, a Page 13.1200.3second object (Object B) was displayed in only the before rotation orientation (i.e. the afterrotation image is not shown) (see Fig. 4). Object B had nearly the same shape as Object A inFig. 3, and could be displayed in the same (A&B starts same) or a different orientation as ObjectA (A&B starts differently), and was shown without time restriction. Following
identifying sheet that is going to be used as the datum plane (the bottom). Theinstructor then identifies the starting tolerance zone by marking the identifying sheet anddrawing a line parallel to the datum. The instructor then measures the desired distance fortolerance from the first line, labels that point, and draws a line parallel to the tolerance from thefirst line drawn. Using the two shorter pieces of plastic, the instructor then tapes one on each lineto create the walls in 3-D. Finally, the instructor labels the plane and tolerance zone. Figure 1. GD&T Spatial Learning Tool for Parallelism Tolerance Figure 2. GD&T Spatial Learning Tool for Cylindricity Tolerance A. Disassembled Components, B. Top of
-Interpret. Herestudents are required to take a sentence description of a datum feature and sketch the datumfeature symbol in the appropriate location on the correct view. In this case the student onlyreceived credit for item 15 (although the student did not leave the required visible gap betweenthe extension line and the visible line). The datum feature symbols for datums B, C, & D werenot placed correctly. Figure 2. Sketching Datum Feature Symbols Bloom’s Category: Understand-Interpreting.The example in Figure 3 illustrates items at two different cognitive levels of the revised Bloom’staxonomy. First students must Remember-Recognize by identifying the established datum. In theexample, the primary
reflections, and observations by the instructor while they work in class as well as students’ responses to a survey related to the assignment. Formative assessments are in the form of discussions with the members of the individual groups .14II. Emerging technologies for virtual active learning Pilot results were impacted by variability in students’ competency and self-‐efficacy with the new tools presented to them under tight time constraints. In order to establish baseline student competency with, and thereby measure the effectiveness of, A) the digital tablet and stylus and B) the Moodle Discussion Forum as collaborative ideation tools, units of
AC 2009-906: DESIGN VISUALIZATION AND SERVICE LEARNING: USINGPHOTOREALISTIC COMPUTER RENDERING TO SUPPORT A THIRD-WORLDCOMMUNITY-DEVELOPMENT PROJECTStan Guidera, Bowling Green State University Dr. Stan Guidera is a registered architect and an Associate Professor in Architecture at Bowling Green State University. His areas of specialization are in Building Information Modeling and design visualization.Christopher Hill, Linedota Architects Christopher Hill is an architect and partner with Linedota Architects in London, England. He has taught architectural design at the University of Nottingham and his firm is involved with a wide variety of projects throughout the UK as well as internationally
. Page 25.26.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Comparative Analysis of 3D Parametric Surface Modeling and Freeform Mesh Modeling as Tools for Investigating Student LearningAbstractThis paper investigates the effectiveness with which similar outputs can be produced fromtwo 3D CAD packages that employ different modeling approaches. The modeling approachesin question are parametric NURBS1 (Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline) surface modeling andpolygonal freeform modeling. The former refers to the creation of organic geometry using 2Dsketches and building standalone faces between sketches fig1, the latter refers to taking anexisting geometric shape and
Paper ID #13075Engineering Graphics Concepts: A Delphi StudyDr. Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mary A. Sadowski has been at Purdue since 2003 and until September 1, 2011 served as the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Learning in the Purdue College of Technology where she provided leadership for strategic initiatives in undergraduate education. As a professor of Computer Graphics, her research interests include enhancing visualization skills, cre- ative thinking, and learning styles. She is currently funded to begin gathering data to create a concept inventory for engineering graphics. As
Paper ID #15202Is Condensed Better? Comparison of a Condensed Spatial Training Courseto a Semester-long VersionMs. Norma L. Veurink, Michigan Technological University Norma Veurink is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Michigan Techno- logical University where she teaches introductory engineering courses and a spatial visualization course designed for engineering students with poorly developed spatial visualization skills. Ms. Veurink man- ages several summer programs that introduce middle and high school students to engineering. She is active in the Engineering Design Graphics Division of
AC 2007-1386: INTEGRATION OF ACONCEIVE-DESIGN-IMPLEMENT-OPERATE (CDIO) EXPERIENCE IN ASOPHOMORE-LEVEL AERODYNAMICS COURSEPriti Bhatnagar, Daniel Webster College Priti Bhatnagar is a senior at Daniel Webster College enrolled in Aeronautical Engineering and Aviation Flight Operations pursing Bachelor’s Degrees. She is currently interning as a flight instructor at Daniel Webster. Her goal is to someday pursue a career as a test pilot. Email: bhatnagar_priti@dwc.eduSonja Crowder, Daniel Webster College Sonja M. Crowder is a junior at Daniel Webster College enrolled in Aeronautical Engineering, pursuing a Bachelors Degree. Currently she is a machine operator at UltraSource Inc. After
Paper ID #12499Transforming a Computer Graphics Department from Traditional EducationMethods to a Polytechnic ApproachDr. Patrick E. Connolly, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Patrick Connolly is a professor and interim department head of the Department of Computer Graph- ics Technology in the College of Technology at Purdue University. He has extensive experience in the aerospace design and CAD/CAE software industries, and has been serving in higher education for almost twenty years. Dr. Connolly has a BS degree in Design and Graphics Technology and an MS in Com- puter Integrated Manufacturing from Brigham Young
AC 2007-1203: DEVELOPMENT OF A STANDALONE COMPUTER-AIDEDTUTORIAL TO INTEGRATE COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS INTO AMECHANICAL DESIGN CURRICULUMFernando Class-Morales, Cessna Aircraft Company Fernando Class-Morales earned his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez in 2002, and his M.S. in General Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2007. He worked as an intern for UTC – Pratt & Whitney, and is currently a Mechanical Systems Engineer at Cessna Aircraft Company in Wichita, KS. In his free time, Fernando enjoys playing paintball and working on obtaining his pilot license.Jim Leake, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign James Leake joined
2006-2151: PADDLING FOR A RECORD—BUILDING A KAYAK TO IMPROVECAD SURFACE MODELING AND COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION SKILLSEric Leonhardt, Western Washington University Eric Leonhardt is the Director of the Vehicle Research Institute at Western Washington University. He teaches courses in powertrain, vehicle design and vehicle construction. Prior to April, 2002, he worked for DaimlerChrysler in the CAx Research and Development Group.Veekit O'Charoen, Boeing Commerical Aircraft Group (Seattle) Veekit O'Charoen currently works on computer aided design and integration issues for Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group. He taught computer aided design techniques including surface modeling and CAD customization
2006-2043: MULTIVIEW DRAWING INSTRUCTION: A TWO-LOCATIONEXPERIMENTPatrick Connolly, Purdue UniversityKathy Holliday-Darr, Pennsylvania State University-Erie, The Behrend College Page 11.944.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Multiview Drawing Instruction: A Two-location ExperimentAbstractSeveral methods have been developed, presented, and discussed at recent ASEE andEDGD conferences on the topic of computer-based multiview drawing instruction. Whilesmall-scale and localized testing of these instruments and methods has been undertaken,no larger-scale or multi-location experiments have been attempted. This paper describesan experiment that
Paper ID #7859Computer Aided Reverse Engineering of a Toy CarDr. Jahangir Ansari, Virginia State University Jahangir Ansari is Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering at Virginia State University. He received his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering in 1979 and Ph. D. degree in Mechanical Design and Production Engineering in 1983 both from Seoul National University. He joined the faculty at VSU in 2002. His research interests include Structural Vibration, FEM, CAD/CAM/CAE, and Virtual Manu- facturing. Page
Paper ID #22200The Engineering Design Graphics Journal and Its Selected Metrics of EffectDr. Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University Robert A. ”Bob” Chin is a faculty member, Department of Technology Systems, College of Engineering and Technology, East Carolina University, where he has taught since 1986. He is the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s chair and in 2015, he completed his second term as the director of publications for the Engineering Design Graphics Division and the Engineering Design Graphics Journal editor. Chin has also served as the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s annual and mid-year
Isometric Pictorial Cabinet Oblique Cavalier Oblique Figure 11 ‐ Examples of the isometric, cavalier oblique and cabinet oblique drawings of a simple cubical shape Generate Ideas:Give the students Snap Cubes so that they are able create the shape above.Possible questions: 1. Why does the cavalier sketch look stretched? a. This is intended to point out the differences between the different types of pictorial drawings. b. The
2006-1051: DESIGN OF AN ENGINEERING GRAPHICS COURSE FOR APRE-ENGINEERING PROGRAMMark Holdhusen, University of Wisconsin-Marathon County Mark Holdhusen is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Marathon County. He began at UWMC in January of 2005 after completing his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Mark received a Bachelor's in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Minnesota in August of 1999. He currently lives in Wausau, WI with his wife, Elona, and his two dogs. Page 11.408.1© American Society for Engineering Education