Studies: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No.9,” UNICEF-IRC, 2014, Accessed: Apr. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/754-comparative-case-studies-methodological-briefs-impact-evaluation-no-9.html[19] B. J. Beatty, Z. Merchant, and M. Albert, “Analysis of Student Use of Video in a FlippedClassroom,” TechTrends, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 376–385, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11528-017-0169-1.[20] B. K. Morris and S. Savadatti, “Analysis of Basic Video Metrics in a Flipped StaticsCourse,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[21] “ChatGPT.” OpenAI.
STEM.Dr. Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati Dr. Sheryl Sorby is currently a Professor of STEM Education at the University of Cincinnati and was recently a Fulbright Scholar at the Dublin Institute of Technology in Dublin, Ireland. She is a professor emerita of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering MecDr. Clodagh Reid, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest PhD in spatial ability and problem solving in engineering education from Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest. Graduated in 2017 from the University of Limerick with a B. Tech (Ed.). Member of Technology Education Research Group (TERG). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Exploring the
Paper ID #37931Project-Focused Redesign of a First-Year Engineering Design Course forCAD and CAM in a Modern EraMs. Barbara Groh, University of Texas at Austin Barbara Groh is a 3rd year mechanical engineering PhD student at the University of Texas at Austin. Previous degrees include B.S.E from Duke University and M.S.E from the University of Texas at Austin. In addition to her primary research focus on metrology for roll-to-roll nanofabrication, she is a TA for a first year design class and aids in the assessment of the course’s continued development.Christopher Grady RylanderDr. Michael Cullinan, University of Texas at
Paper ID #36899Using EFA to Determine Factor Structure of a Computer-Based Version ofthe Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations (PSVT:R)Ms. Savanna Dautle, Rowan University Savanna Dautle is a graduate student in the Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) department at Rowan University, in Glassboro, NJ. She is pursuing her Ph.D. in Engineering Education under the advise- ment of Dr. Stephanie Farrell. Her research interests include spatial skills in undergraduate engineering students, diversity in engineering, and instrument validation.Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Professor and
/uploadingdeliverables on time, 4) CAM tool path definitions in part file, and 5) individual contribution.Each category was graded as passed or failed, and the overall project grade was determined bythe number of categories passed (Tab. 5). Table 5: Grading for Project 2 # Passed Score ≤1 F (50% or 0%) 2 D (63%) 3 C (75%) 4 B (87%) 5 A (100%)Project 3: Advanced Feature ExplorationStudents are often interested in advanced modeling features that time constraints prevent
. H. Rosales, J. Haines, and A. D. Benally, “Development of Undergraduate Students’ Professional Skills,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 102–108, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1061/(asce)1052- 3928(2009)135:3(102.[6] J. Donnell, B. M. Aller, M. Alley, and A. A. Kedrowicz, “Why Industry Says That Engineering Graduates Have Poor Communication Skills: What the Literature Says”. 2020. doi: 10.18260/1-2--18809.[7] S. Kauppi, H. Muukkonen, T. Suorsa, and M. Takala, “I still miss human contact, but this is more flexible—Paradoxes in virtual learning interaction and multidisciplinary collaboration,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1101–1116, Jul. 2020
, “Creating a better mousetrap: On-line student assessment of their learning gains,” Paper presentation at the National Meeting of theAmerican Chemical Society, San Francisco, CA., 2000.[7] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FTpress, 2014.AppendixStudent Assessment of Learning Gains Survey Adapted for Engineering Design Graphics 1. As a result of your work in this class, what GAINS DID YOU MAKE in your UNDERSTANDING and PERFORMING each of the following? Scale (no gains, a little gain, moderate gain, good gain, great gain, not applicable) a. The main concepts explored in this class b. Using manual sketching techniques to effectively convey design ideas. c
pedagogies. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(1), 05014002.Finelli, C. J., Holsapple, M. A., Ra, E., Bielby, R. M., Burt, B. A., Carpenter, D. D., ... & Sutkus, J. A. (2012). An assessment of engineering students' curricular and co‐curricular experiences and their ethical development. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 469-494.Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education.Garzón, J. (2021). An overview of twenty-five years of augmented reality in education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(7), 37.Guntur, M. I. S., Setyaningrum, W., & Retnawati, H. (2020, July). Can augmented reality improve problem-solving and spatial
., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240.[11] Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R., & Kennedy, M. S. (2016). Measuring undergraduate students' engineering self-efficacy: A validation study. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 366-395.[12] Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312-340.[13] Sorby, S. A., & Baartmans, B. J. (2000).The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3‐D spatial visualization skills of first year
Paper ID #39630Culture-inspired creative design projects increase students’ sense ofbelonging in freshman engineering design courseDr. Raghu Pucha, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Raghu Pucha is a Principal Lecturer at the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, in the area of CAD/CAE and Manufacturing. He teaches computer graphics, design, mechanics and manufacturing courses at Georgia Tech., and conducts research in the area of developing upfront computational tools for the design, analysis and manufacturing of advanced materials and systems. His current research includes
Education - The Ohio State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023WIP - Comparing Exam Scores in Engineering Graphics Courses Using FullyOnline Theory Exams vs Exams That Incorporate Hand SketchingIntroductionAt Penn State Behrend, an introductory engineering graphics course traditionally had theoryexams that incorporated true/false, multiple choice, short answer, and sketching questions. Theseexams were administered using a paper hard copy during a 50-minute lecture period and weretypically closed book and closed note. When the pandemic struck in Spring 2020, by necessityall exams were converted to an online format and administered in Canvas, the LMS used at PennState. With this change of format