University (WTAMU) requires aone-credit engineering ethics course for civil and mechanical engineering and engineering technology majors.Practicing engineers realize the importance of soft skills such as technical communication (written and oral) as wellas a need for ethics knowledge in their everyday dealings in the workplace and as mandated by continuing educationrequirements for Professional Engineering licensure. The Body of Knowledge document prepared by the AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers (ASCE) further emphasizes the need for ethics instruction along with businessmanagement competence and lifelong professional development. Identification of ethics solving skills can benebulous concepts for engineering professors and students alike, as they
, internationalization, and ethics, areoften referred to as the soft skills. Generally students’ exposure to these items is through theirelective (or required) courses in the humanities and social sciences. However, ABETaccreditation also requires that the achievement of the outcomes be assessed and evaluated.Obtaining direct evidence of achievement of the outcomes by the students can be problematicalas the other departments may not be doing assessment. Even if they are, the technology studentsin a humanities course are probably just a small fraction of the course enrollment, so it may bedifficult to obtain information about their performance. While we rely on other departments toprovide the bulk of the students’ exposure to the soft skills, we have tried to
both summativeand formative feedback to students are included.IntroductionAs evidenced by ABET-TAC Criterion 3e, an important soft skill for graduates to posses is theability to function effectively and to lead in teams. Graduates are finding that they are requiredto work within a team environment and to make contributions to the “bottom” line through theirteams as soon as they join the work force. In a 1997 survey of engineering graduates from amajor state university, teaming skills were considered extremely valuable with at least tworespondents indicating in their comments that it is not technical skills but soft skills such as theability to work effectively in teams and to communicate that differentiate those individuals whoare eventually
between engineering and human kind as a soft skill because to me that’s the most technical skill, to be able to know what’s right to do when.Another interviewee echoed a similar sentiment with “people talking about the professionalskills, the hard skills and soft skills… we call them professional skills… I think in reality,those skills are much harder to learn.” Both of these educators found that calling ethical andsocietal skills “soft” is a disservice to their complexity since these skills can be the mostchallenging to teach and learn. Another interviewee expressed that even calling these skillsprofessional does not do them justice since they are inextricably part of the engineering. People used to call them soft skills… then people started
PRACTICES COURSE FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING1. AbstractThe coverage of ethics and professionalism in engineering and computer science programs hasbecome standard since ABET incorporated these and other “soft skills” as student outcomes inEngineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) and Computing Accreditation Commission(CAC) accreditation criteria. Many programs have chosen to incorporate these topics in variouscourses across the curriculum while others have developed standalone courses. The Universityof Texas at Arlington (UTA) Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) Department offersABET accredited programs in computer engineering, computer science, and softwareengineering. Initially, the department chose to cover
found anywhere. Additionally, research papers andpresentations explore cultural views on these topics and more detailed personal analyses andapplications of the material.IntroductionIn many engineering and engineering technology programs, there is much emphasis on thedevelopment of technical skills and considerably less on the development of “soft skills”. Softskills usually deal with the interpersonal relationships which are so essential to the long-termcareer success of any graduate. One of these skills is the acceptance of professionalresponsibilities for one’s action. The National Society of Professional Engineers has published aCode of Ethics for Engineers1 which explains in detail what these responsibilities are. The firstand cardinal
but then expand into the so-called “soft” skills outlined by Werhane et al.10: (a) moral imagination (reframing needs anddisadvantages into opportunities and capabilities), (b) systemic thinking (to see how technologiesintegrate into broader social-technical contexts), and (c) “deep dialogue” where engineers andcommunity members treat one another as equals and partners in a conversation designed to buildcommunity capacities into business ventures and appropriate technologies10. Engineers trainedin soft as well as hard skills could play a major role in expanding both the range and impact ofsocial entrepreneurship efforts.VI. ConclusionThis paper began by describing a movement in engineering geared to addressing problems indeveloping countries
the process (versus at the beginning and end) 3) Assessment of prior knowledge and the development of effective in-process feedback mechanisms 4) Transfer of learning with follow-on opportunities to practice what has been learned in order to reinforce motivation and self confidence to identify and manage risks in support of innovative solutionsProject PlanAs proposed in our NSF CCLI grant10, we will “…develop a continuous multilevel assessmentprocess that will measure (student’s) achievement of ‘soft skills’ knowledge and application ofthis knowledge in a multidisciplinary team environment…” while working on real-world projectsin the context of our individual academic programs under an
of interdisciplinary work that crosses thosetraditional boundaries of hard and soft skills, evidencing just such a constructive view of therelationship between philosophers and engineers. An important variant on a view like this is theclaim that engineers can and must learn to be philosophers, rather than rely on philosophers.Such a view was proposed by philosopher Carl Mitcham in 1998, when he argued that while“philosophy has not paid sufficient attention to engineering, engineers should not use this as anexcuse to ignore philosophy” [26], and “[p]hilosophy is of critical and increasing significance toengineering” [27]. What is importance is not that philosophers can contribute to engineering, butthat “ [e]ngineers are… the unacknowledged
the importance ofinstilling this behavior in society, it is critical that engineering educators and researcherscontinue to seek out effective approaches. This article reviews the quest to find such anapproach in a redesigned industrial engineering course at Montana State University (MSU).Literature ReviewThe literature investigating how college students in general and engineering students in particularcan learn and apply the concepts of ethics is considerable. While some writing laments the lackof ethics focus in current engineering programs,6,7 most continue to seek more effective ways toincorporate ethical training into engineering education.7,8,9 Why are engineering educators sofocused on this soft skill? Of course, there are the external
predict effectiveness. Bailey and Stefaniak3used surveys, interviews, and focus groups to determine what employers in the IT industry valued asimportant non-technical skills for employees. They identified both soft skills and business skillsmentioned by the 325 IT professionals surveyed. A panel at the ACM Conference in 1978 presented skillsets of what industry looks for in new hires – among these skills are math ability, software developmentknowledge, problem-solving, team skills, initiative, diversity, and versatility14.Several resources exist for teaching issues of professionalism and ethics. Among these are exercisescompiled by the working group on integrating professionalism into the curriculum11. An exercise aboutresearching types of
Governmental Organization to pursue and proliferate ethical behavioural practices at the sprouting age of undergrad engineering students .Dr. Aravind Joshi, Business Ethics Foundation The author has worked with State Bank of India, one of the largest Public Sector Banks in India for 30 years in various capacities at different geogrphies. Post voluntary retirement in year 2000, the author has completed Master´s degree in Personnel Manage- ment and completed Doctorate in Human Resources Management. Author has been working as a facilitator and professor in reputed business schools and corportate concerns in India. The author has published various articles in Management and Soft skills in News papers, magazines and
. Assessing alternatives in terms of consequences, public defensibility, institutional barriers, etc. Engaging in reasoned dialogue or negotiations. Revising options, plans, or actions.This list highlights the complexity of the issues that engineers confront. An engineer‘s actionscan have effects on stakeholders whose existence, perspectives, and values she does notnecessarily see. An engineer does not always directly interact with the people whose livesare being altered as result of her decisions. Obviously, engineering students need to refinetheir technical competence. But it is crucially important that they develop ―soft skills‖ aswell [3]. Among these skills is the ability to identify hidden ethical challenges.Ill-Structured
prepare students with a strong foundation and new knowledge of innovativetechnologies that advance society1. In response, engineering education has seen a significantincrease in emphasis on experiential education and on the development of “soft skills” thatengineering students will need when they enter the workplace. This evolving vision ofengineering education emphasizes the development of students as competent professionals andengaged citizens, equally at home with societal concerns as they are with technical issues. Ethicseducation is a significant aspect of making engineering education socially and globally relevantand preparing engineering students to excel in a globally interconnected world with tremendousdiversity and inequities. Several
use, and the patience to listencarefully and overcome the communication gaps. One interesting finding is that for those who reportedthoughtful prompt results and active engagement, their communications were often not limited toprompt interviews but covered topics not directly related to the course content. For example, studentsdiscovered that the KFC menu in China and American are very different, from there they became moreinterested in learning what shape the differences/similarity between two cultures. These experiences, though not always positive, have made students realize that communicationis not just a “soft skill”, but the core of global engineering practice: Through communication studentsdiscovered nuances of how engineering
assess in a mass-production fashion (Hugo, Brennan, 2016). What about teachingnon-technical engineering courses online to hundreds or thousands of students?Of the 11 ABET student outcomes and the 12 Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board’s(CEAB) graduate attributes, about half are “technical / hard skills” and half are “professional /soft skills” (ABET, 2018 & CEAB, 2017). The student outcomes for professional skills arequalitative in nature. Therefore, they require qualitative assessment because of the wide range ofpossible solutions inside the gray zone (Shuman, 2005). How can hundreds of students achievethese outcomes in an online course without sacrificing the quality of teaching and learning andrigour of assessment?In Spring &
manytools you need to aid your decision-making. Listening and reflection are extremelyvital as well. Unfortunately, they are institutionally (and personally) undervaluedengineering instruments.Siddhartha Roy, Graduate Student, Virginia TechDuring the four years of my Chemical Engineering undergraduate program, therewas a barrage of technical “know-how” and a smorgasbord of activities thatexposed us to the industrial sector (e.g., lectures, seminars, site visits, internships).The idea was to get us “up to speed” on the big production facilities ChemicalEngineers build – oil and gas, for instance – and how these facilities fulfill theneeds of mankind and advance the global economy. There was an emphasis on“soft skills” too – including interpersonal