develop team and leadership skills for students and instructors. Table 2. Learning activities and assessments generating data for continual improvementAssessment Description and Purpose Frequency Assessor /Type (Case) Data TypePre – Post Students self assess individual skills required Twice per IndividualTest Student for project teamwork as an input to team course StudentSkill Self formation and developmental goal setting. The /Assessment skills assessed are mapped to graduate attribute Quantitative(Case A, B - outcomes and the purpose is to identify areasDeveloped
meaningful relationships. 10 Community I felt encouraged and supported by others in a way that 8 helped me grow.Appendix B includes specific quotes from portfolios that we categorized in each impact theme.DiscussionMost Meaningful Activities/ExperiencesSeveral things stand out to us in the data. First, we were surprised by the number of differentactivities or experiences that the students listed as being most meaningful to them, and that noactivity or experience was listed by more than 11 students. This suggests it is unlikely that wecan plan any one activity that will be meaningful to an entire cohort of students, and thatincluding a diverse group of activities will make it
Education: A Review of Best Practices” 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Seattle, Washington, USA.[6] Bayless, David J. and T. Richard Robe, “Leadership Education for Engineering Students”, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington DC, Oct 27-30, 2010.[7] Farr, J. V., & Brazil, D. M. (2009). Leadership skills development for engineers. Engineering Management Journal, 21(1), 3–8.[8] Farr, J. V., Walesh, S. G., & Forsythe, G. B. (1997). Leadership development for engineering managers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(4), 38–41.[9] Goodale, M. J. (2005). The right stuff: Traits and skills of effective leaders. Leadership and Management in
Industrial or Manufacturing 128 5.2 Mechanical 323 13 Software 70 2.8 Other (Environmental, Geological, Material/Metallurgical, Mining / Mineral) 106 4.3 Other (miscellaneous) 164 6.6 Did not identify discipline 4 0.2 Academic standing High-performing, A-, A or A+ (3.5 or above) 890 35.8 Average-performing, B or B+ (2.9 to 3.4
State.Monika B Kwapisz, Montana State University Monika Kwapisz (they/them) is an undergraduate at Montana State University studying Industrial and Management Systems Engineering with a minor in Mathematics. Monika is the president of MSU’s chapter of Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (oSTEM), a cross-country ski coach, and an avid outdoors-person. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Exploring the Relationship Between Students’ Engineering Identity and Leadership Self-EfficacyAbstractIn order to lead the social process required to solve society’s grandest challenges and ensure thatthe capabilities of an expanded engineering workforce are
, pp. 525-545, 2009.[8] J. Kiyama and S. Luca, “Structured opportunities: exploring the social and academic benefits for peer mentors in retention programs,” Journal of College Student Retention, vol. 15 no. 4, pp. 489-514, 2014.[9] J. Good, G. Halpin, and G. Halpin, “A promising prospect for minority retention: students becoming mentors,” Journal of Negro Education, vol. 69 no. 4, pp. 375-383, 2000.[10] M. Washburn and S. Miller, “Retaining undergraduate women in science, engineering, and technology: a survey of a student organization,” Journal of College Student Retention, vol 6 no. 2, pp. 155-168, 2004.[11] B. Brand and M. Kasarda, “The influence of social interactions on female students in two engineering
Paper ID #32495Exploring the Role of Ambiguity Tolerance in an EngineeringProfessional’s Identity as a LeaderDr. Michele Norton, Texas A&M University Michele Norton is a Postdoctoral Research Associate that is working with the METM program at Texas A&M on research related to narrative inquiry, engineering leadership education, leading technical teams, personal and team emotional intelligence, creativity, innovation and learnings on teams, coaching, uti- lizing design-based learning experiences to develop both individuals and teams, and a holistic view of designing and flourishing as the best-loved self and the best
, no. 3, pp. 305–331, 2006.[7] D. . Peterson and M. D. Hicks, The leader as coach: Strategies for coaching and developing others. Minneapolis, MN, 1995.[8] C. M. B. O’Flaherty and J. Everson, “Equipping Leaders To Coach – an Androgogic Learning Model,” Elev. Int. East. Acad. Manag. Conf. Manag. a Glob. Econ., pp. 372– 397, 2005.[9] J. . Hunt and J. . Weingraub, The coaching manager: Developing top talent in business. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.[10] V. . Bianco-Mathis, L. . Nabos, and C. H. Roman, Leading from the inside out: A coaching model. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.[11] A. D. Ellinger, A. E. Ellinger, and S. B. Keller, “Supervisory coaching behavior, employee satisfaction, and
inclusive leadership development.ReferencesAvolio, B. J., & Vogelgesang, G. R. (2021). Beginnings matter in genuine leadership development. In Early Development and leadership: Building the next generation of leaders (pp. 179–204). New York, NY: Routledge.Bell, M. (2006). Managing diversity in organizations. Mason, OH: Thomsen South-Western.Bendick, M. (2008). Measure inclusion, not diversity! In SHRM Diversity Conference. Atlanta, GA: Society for Human Resource Management.Bright, D. S., Cortes, A. H., Hartmann, E., Parboteeah, K. P., Pierce, J. L., Reece, M., & Gardner, D. G. (2019). Principles of management. OpenStax.Carmeli, A., Reiter-palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in
://www.myersbriggs.org/[5] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2001). Engineering Criteria2000 Third Edition: Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States.Baltimore: ABET.[6] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions ofengineering in the new century. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press.[7] National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing andemploying America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.[8] Northouse, Peter G. Leadership: Theory and practice. E-Content Generic Vendor. 1999.[9] Crumpton-Young, L., McCauley-Bush, P., Rabelo, L., Meza, K., Ferreras, A., Rodriguez, B.,and Kelarestani, M
and Exposition, June, 2016.[2] E. Crawley, J. Ostlund, and D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Heidelberg, DE: Springer, 2014.[3] B. L. Hartmann and C. T. Jahren, “Leadership: Industry needs for entry-level engineering positions,” Journal of Stem Education: Innovations and Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 13- 19, 2015.[4] B. L. Hartmann, C. M. Stephens, and C. T. Jahren, “Validating the importance of leadership themes for entry-level engineering positions,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 143, no. 1, 2016.[5] R. Graham, E. Crawley, B. R. Mendelsohn, “Engineering leadership education: A snapshot review of international good
them from sharing openly. Theyexplored causes and triggers and identified a variety of reasons to explain their emotions. Somestudent quotes displaying this include: “I am always worried that if I tell somebody something they could improve on they won’t like me anymore.” “I also learned that I’m afraid of being judged as a person.”Most of the reasons for their fear of sharing genuinely fell into one of the three followingcategories: a) Fear of being judged b) Fear of being disliked c) Fear of hurting another student’s feelingsMany students identified hindering emotions being at least partly triggered by their upbringing: “I think it’s partially because my dad and my ex often express anger very strongly
Paper ID #22439Flipped Classroom and Emotional Learning in an Engineering LeadershipDevelopment CourseDr. Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that applied engineering
Paper ID #34488Embracing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Our Classroom and TeachingDr. Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Jena Asgarpoor has been on the faculty at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln since August 2017. She is a Professor of Practice and the Director for the Master of Engineering Management Program in the College of Engineering. Dr. Asgarpoor received her Ph. D. and M.S. in Industrial Engineering, specializing in Engineering Management, from Texas A&M University in College Station, where she had previously earned a B.A. in Political Science (Summa Cum Laude). Prior to UNL, she
Paper ID #21682Examining the Engineering Leadership Literature: Community of PracticeStyleDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is a Senior Research Associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, inclusion/equity & qualitative research methodology.Dr. Doug Reeve, University of Toronto Dr. Reeve is the founding Director of the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) estab- lished in 2010. Development of personal capability has been central to
Paper ID #22197Evolution of Leadership Behaviors During Two-Semester Capstone DesignCourse in Mechanical EngineeringRebecca Komarek, University of Colorado, Boulder Rebecca Komarek is the Assistant Director of the Idea Forge and Managing Director of Catalyze CU at the University of Colorado Boulder. She has taught in the areas of education research and leadership development and served as a design team adviser. She is earning her PhD in engineering education with a focus on leadership development.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at
Paper ID #23040Understanding the Perceived Impact of Engineers’ Leadership Experiencesin CollegeDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engi- neering from Montana State University (MSU). He is Associate Professor in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering and Associate Director of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center at MSU with research interests in engineering education and the role of
Paper ID #25598Counting Past Two: Engineers’ Leadership Learning TrajectoriesDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and equity in engineering education.Dr. Doug Reeve, University of Toronto Dr. Reeve is the founding Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) (2010-2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a