, and a practical leadershipexperience. We discuss the pedagogical approaches that: 1) foster reflective self-leadership; 2)support the emergence of personal vision; and 3) create learning communities. We conclude bysharing recommendations for engineering educators to implement engineering-graduate-student-specific, leadership development initiatives at their institutions.ContextThe Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at U of T is home to approximately 3000graduate students and postdoctoral fellows and 5000 undergraduate students. The graduatestudent population is divided equally into three degree-programs, PhD, research-based Masters,and course-based, professional Masters. Of all graduate students, 29% identify as women and42% are
Paper ID #27481Fostering a Relationship with a Corporate Sponsor to Grow an EngineeringLeadership Development ProgramDr. Elizabeth Michelle Melvin, Louisiana State University Elizabeth M. Melvin is currently the Director of Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. She earned her BS in chemical engineering from The Ohio State University in Columbus, OH in 2002 and her MS and PhD in chemical engineering from North Carolina State University in Raleigh, NC in 2008 and 2011 respectively. While NC State, the focus of her research was to design microfluidic devices for the
applied in both academic and non-academic settings.For example, the rubric development presentation covers how rubrics can be used to as-sess exams, homework, and quizzes as well as to conduct an employee’s annual review. Adean from the college of engineering gives instruction on enforcing academic integrity, andour research park and alumni network has provided panelists for panel discussions wherequestions about professional ethics are deliberated.Perhaps the single best practice that we employed was holding a weekly meeting to conductlecture reflection and planning. In these meetings we perform regular checks on our lecturecontent to ensure that we do not lose sight of the integrative approach. The culture of theteam is one that allows
parts of engineering practice. In describing the foundation of the practice, Koen [19,p. 10] defines the engineering method as, “the strategy for causing the best change in a poorlyunderstood or uncertain situation within the available resources.” One could succinctly use thewords optimization or innovation in place of the Koen definition. Furthermore, change thecontext or application and this portrayal of the engineering method is equally meaningful to thepractice of leadership! In a nutshell, we have identified solid and robust common groundbetween engineering and leadership. To follow this theme in more detail, let us consider the Lucas and Hanson [20] list of sixelements that they call engineering habits of mind. In other words, the
Ohio State University in Multicultural and Equity Studies in Education where she also earned an MA in Quantitative Research, Evaluation and Measurement. Dr. Patterson’s work in the educational field began as an elementary level inclusive special educator. She is committed to preparing educators who take up a critical lens to working with children and best serving their needs while seeking ways to deconstruct inequities woven into the US’s existing public school system and structure. To this end, Dr. Patterson serves as a co-coordinator for the newly (2020) established Social Justice in Education minor available to students across the University. Broadly, Dr. Patterson’s research interests consider intersections
throughout the five semesters, we were interestedin understanding the graduating seniors’ perceptions of the overall impact of the program. Wewere also interested in learning which activities or experiences they found most meaningful. Ourgoals in this analysis were to inform our own curriculum for future cohorts in our program and toshare lessons learned with faculty and staff involved in leadership development programs forengineering students at other universities.Program BackgroundThe Zachry Leadership Program is a joint effort between the Texas A&M University College ofEngineering and Zachry Group. The purpose of this program is to empower engineering studentsto become future leaders who are well versed in our free enterprise system
such as producing algal-based fuels coupled with mitigation of greenhouse gases, bioreactor design, novel fluidized bed gasification, thermal process- ing of solid fuels, and adapting planar solid oxide fuel cells to coal-derived syngas. He has been principal investigator for over $18 million in externally funded research, holds several patents with three revenue generating licenses and one spin-off company, and over 60 peer-reviewed publications. Dr. Bayless for- merly worked for American Electric Power (Gavin and Amos Plants) and was an officer in the United States Navy. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (Profs. Richard Buckius and James Peters
design to research that applied engineering and molecular biology approaches to the study of the skeletal response to mechanical loading. As a Mechanical Engineer, she worked on facility design projects involving mechanical systems that included heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and energy conservation systems, as well as R&D of air conditioning equipment for Navy ships. Additional research interests have included the investigation of relationships among components of the indoor environment, occupants, and energy usage. Specifically, the effects of the indoor environment on occupant health and well-being and in parallel, how socially-mediated energy-saving strategies can increase awareness of energy use and/or
for Success (ECLIPS) Lab. His research focuses on contemporary and inclu- sive pedagogical practices, emotions in engineering, competency development, and understanding the experiences of Latinx and Native Americans in engineering from an asset-based perspective. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State Uni- versity. Prior to this appointment, she was an Associate Professor in the School of
, June 2020.AbstractReflection is an active learning technique that can be used to encourage greater understandingand act as a metacognitive strategy to develop lifelong learning skills. This “Work-in-Progress-Assess” paper presents a research study related to a weekly leadership reflection journalassignment that is carried out in graduate level Engineering Leadership courses at two CanadianUniversities. The specific objectives of this study are to explore the impact of structuredreflection on engineering leadership development by: 1) examining the effectiveness ofstructured reflection for developing engineering leadership skills, and 2) identifying how theinsights gained through reflective practice will be applied in students’ careers.As a
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A study of alumni of the Leveraging Leadership for a Lifetime leadership development courseABSTRACTOver the past two decades there has been abundant discussion, research and subsequentpublication about the need for leadership skill development for both newly minted and seasonedengineers. The calls have come from both engineering practice and academic communities, andthe expectations have been codified by ABET for engineering academic preparatory programs.But there is a dearth of information about whether, and how, this education has been of value tothe graduates and their organizations. This study documents the results of a survey of alumni ofseveral post-graduate
focused on the design and implementation of a course using a student-led laboratory method which supports the development of authentic and courageous leaders. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 How Do Human Interaction Labs Contribute to Engineering Leadership Development?AbstractThis paper outlines the impact of a small group experiential learning course (Human InteractionLab) that cultivates authentic engagement between participants. Unlike many experientiallearning environments, this course is fundamentally learner-centered, where students designateboth the content of discussion and the norms that dictate
learning, inquiry-based laboratory instruction, and any ini- tiative that empowers students to do hands-on learning. Additional service interests include teaching and leadership training for graduate students, enhancing communication education for undergraduate en- gineering students, developing evidence-based design project team formation strategies, and improving engineering design curricula.Dr. Molly H Goldstein, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Molly H. Goldstein is an engineering design educator and researcher at University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign. She previously worked as an environmental engineer specializing in air quality influencing her focus in engineering design with environmental
Paper ID #21520The Engineering Leader of the Future: Research and PerspectivesDr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Meg Handley is currently the Associate Director for Engineering Leadership Outreach at Penn State University. Previously, Meg served as the Director of the Career & Corporate Connection’s office at the Smeal College of Business at Penn State University. Meg completed her PhD in Workforce Education at Penn State, where she focused on interpersonal behaviors and their impact on engineering leadership potential. Meg is a board certified coach with experience in developing
– in the absence of more in-depth research on the impacts of studentsorting effects upon EL learning environments – that cohort and team composition of these fourstudent group and demographic affiliations may be of concern to EL educators.AcknowledgementsThis paper came to fruition thanks to the support of several individuals and organizations. Theauthors would first like to thank Warren Seering for his help in coordinating sample acquisitionand in managing cross-university communications during the project. We are also indebted to theMechanical Engineering departments of Boston University, Carnegie Mellon University, MIT,Penn State University, Santa Clara University, Tufts University, Texas A&M University, theUniversity of Connecticut
(i.e., searching for the heroic leader [6]). Recent work by Goleman [7]described knowledge of self, and its companion, self-control, as two of the four domains thatmake up Emotional Intelligence.While emotional intelligence also deals with social awareness and relationship management,other researchers have developed approaches specifically focused on how the leader connects tofollowers and motivates them to do their best. These approaches include leader-memberexchange [8], situational leadership [9], resonant leadership [10], servant leadership [11],transformational leadership [12], and path-goal [13].In leadership literature, leading a cause is a process defined by the technical requirements of aproject as well as the political (regulatory
. Ford et al., “Transitioning from capstone design courses to workplaces: A study of new engineers’ first three months,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1993–2013, 2019.[28] D. W. Knight, C. Gewirtz, and T. M. Chowdhury, “The Impact of Capstone Design Courses on New Engineering Graduates Preparation for Teamwork : A Mixed Methods Investigation,” in Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 2019.[29] R. Komarek, D. Knight, and A. R. Bielefeldt, “Evolution of leadership behaviors during two-semester capstone design course in mechanical engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018-June, 2018.[30] M. Feiner, The Feiner points of leadership : the fifty basic laws that will make people
problems. These non-technical skills allowstudents to understand the social, political, economic, cultural, environmental, and ethical aspectsof their future jobs[1]. The development of leadership is especially important for students whowish to pursue management careers including project management (PM) which is a highlyneeded and promising career path. Few undergraduate students are exposed to PM during theirundergraduate curriculum, and most PM courses are based on literature and reading. TheNational Research Council Board on Engineering education noted that undergraduate curriculumneeds to be reformed in order for undergraduates to get extensive exposure to interdisciplinary,hands-on skills, creative design, and systems thinking[2]. At the
research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that applied engineering and molecular biology approaches to the study of the skeletal response to mechanical loading. As a Mechanical Engineer, she worked on facility design projects involving mechanical systems that included heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and energy conservation systems, as well as R&D of air conditioning equipment for Navy ships. Additional research interests have included the investigation of relationships among components of the indoor environment, occupants, and energy usage. Specifically, the effects of the indoor environment on occupant health and well-being and in parallel, how socially-mediated
, in part, by the US-based National Academy ofEngineering publication, The Engineer of 2020 [10]—engineering educators have begun todevelop and evaluate formal leadership learning opportunities available to undergraduate andgraduate engineering students. Most of this research involves program directors describing andassessing best practices in the context of their programs [11-20], with some taking a multi- 1institutional approach [21-25]. A smaller, but growing community of researchers has surveyedindustry leaders about the skills and traits necessary to become an effective leader, oftenconcluding their studies with recommendations for
HLP, we have formulated threepillars of opportunity to encourage wide participation throughout the College. This paperdescribes the curriculum and our implementation of our engineering leadership program.The student feedback, outcomes assessment, and improvements will be published in asubsequent article.IntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) [1,2] has stressed the need for engineers topossess leadership abilities. The NAE has also emphasized that engineering graduates mustunderstand the principles of leadership, have some experience in the applications, and beable to practice their leadership in realistic settings in order to be successful in a modern, Conference Paper submitted to the 127th Annual ASEE Conference &
Education: A Review of Best Practices” 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Seattle, Washington, USA.[6] Bayless, David J. and T. Richard Robe, “Leadership Education for Engineering Students”, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington DC, Oct 27-30, 2010.[7] Farr, J. V., & Brazil, D. M. (2009). Leadership skills development for engineers. Engineering Management Journal, 21(1), 3–8.[8] Farr, J. V., Walesh, S. G., & Forsythe, G. B. (1997). Leadership development for engineering managers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(4), 38–41.[9] Goodale, M. J. (2005). The right stuff: Traits and skills of effective leaders. Leadership and Management in
or more designated areas of potential growth.Students must select one the four RIPE courses below (1 credit):RCEL 410 Engineering Launchpad - ResearchRCEL 410 is one of four RCEL courses intended to jump-start the next steps for aspiringengineering leaders. The other courses deal with industry, alternative pathways, andentrepreneurship, while RCEL 410 is focused on developing an understanding of leadershipprinciples applicable in a research environment. Students will gain insights into managing ethicaldilemmas, developing communication strategies, creating a vision and goals, and projectmanagement in either an undergraduate or graduate student level engineering discipline. Researchin academia, government labs, and industry will be compared
. Emily holds a master’s degree in higher education and student development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 What is engineering leadership? A proposed definition.AbstractIn response to the demand for engineering graduates with stronger leadership skills, manyengineering leadership development programs have been established around the world. Many ofthe best practices in such programs are similar to those in general leadership programs, and thereseems to be a lack of understanding of how to define engineering leadership, and explain how itdiffers from general leadership. To address this issue, a survey was distributed to 163participants (87% students, 13% alumni from a Canadian
Paper ID #30042A Narrative Inquiry into Pedagogical Approaches that Support theDevelopment of Transversal Skills in Engineering StudentsDr. Michele Norton, Texas A&M University Recent PhD graduate from Texas A&M University. Currently working across four NSF funded grants related to STEM education and other funded grants related to Engineering Education and developing leaders in Engineering. Research interests include design-based learning, transversal skills, creativity, engineering education, holistic education, and teams.Dr. Behbood Ben Zoghi, Texas A&M University Ben Zoghi is the Victor H. Thompson endowed
Paper ID #32495Exploring the Role of Ambiguity Tolerance in an EngineeringProfessional’s Identity as a LeaderDr. Michele Norton, Texas A&M University Michele Norton is a Postdoctoral Research Associate that is working with the METM program at Texas A&M on research related to narrative inquiry, engineering leadership education, leading technical teams, personal and team emotional intelligence, creativity, innovation and learnings on teams, coaching, uti- lizing design-based learning experiences to develop both individuals and teams, and a holistic view of designing and flourishing as the best-loved self and the best
. https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2019/06/academia-or-industry-how-i- learned-pivot-between-them (accessed Feb. 28, 2021).[24] “Integrating Development and Operations in Cross-Functional Teams - Toward a DevOps Competency Model | Proceedings of the 2019 on Computers and People Research Conference.” https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3322385.3322400?casa_token=dmOlMsfxiscAAAAA%3A9t6lNXkH7j- stOCU75MXEmwH3N5w7cUMMxp3kiLCWIWIrfpCRPhgmowFnTLpqhDIciYRroxNuvgYEg (accessed Feb. 28, 2021).[25] J. Laurent and R. M. Leicht, “Practices for Designing Cross-Functional Teams for Integrated Project Delivery,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 145, no. 3, p. 05019001, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943
diverse, interdisciplinary teams [26]–[29] and as part of theleader-mentor-learner triad [30]–[32]. As with all EF training, these leadership skills will bepresented using a variety of role-playing and discussion exercises to allow participants toimmediately practice new skills in the context of engineering research and practice.In addition to the materials being developed by Tau Beta Pi and Michigan State Universitythrough the NSF-funded project, the EF facilitators are lending their professional expertise to thedevelopment of additional curriculum modules. For example, a module on Design Thinking isbeing developed based on work done at The Pennsylvania State University. The development ofthis module responds to the recent growth in popularity
” as an assistant instructor in the University of Texas at Austin for five years.Mr. Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University Andrew M. ”Mike” Erdman received his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State and his M.S. from USC. At Rocketdyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Reactor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL (Bechtel), he con- ducted research for Naval Reactors. He currently serves as the Walter L. Robb director of Engineering Leadership and as a Professor of Practice in SEDTAPP and Engineering Science at Penn State. Erdman has chaired the local Jaycees, Department of Social Services Advisory Council, GE Share
, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Perceived Importance of Leadership in their Future Careers Relative to Other Foundational, Technical and Professional Skills among Senior Civil Engineering StudentsAbstractMany demands are placed on undergraduate students to possess a broad range of foundational,technical, and professional knowledge and skills when they graduate. Expectancy value theory(EVT) indicates that students will be more motivated to learn topics that they believe will beimportant in their future, due to utility value. Self-efficacy beliefs also contribute to learning.Given this framework, the research