Conference Session

Curriculum in Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Lynne Gradon Cowe Falls P.Eng., University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

observed across the goals was about helpingstudents learn how to be an independent learner. This is shown through statements such as“further engages students in their education”20, “offers students the opportunity to discover”14and develop “the student into an action-driver leader”21. These emphasize the fact that regardlessof how well designed an engineering program is, the responsibility to learn rests with thestudents7. It can also help students understand that they are capable and can succeed, but there isalways room for improvement and they must continue learning and improving3. Recent researchdiscusses the importance of reflection in the continued and independent learning process25,26.Experiential learning. The majority of the program

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary L. Winn, West Virginia University; Jeremy M. Slagley, Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

manifested because it’s the right thingto do, it reflects authentic leadership and not just literature and business cards. This authenticleadership leads to authentic values-driven culture.The values-driven culture is essential for safety because the safety professional or projectengineer is not omnipresent to the workers to direct every behavior. Every individual mustbecome a leader. Authentic leaders can exist at all levels of an organization; a forklift driverdoes not need the title CEO or foreman to manifest his actual values in voluntarily instructing anew employee in the virtues of inspecting the truck’s brakes every day whether the rules requireit or not.Organizational leaders, including those directly responsible for safety, must act

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Logan Oplinger, Arizona State University; Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Figure 3 was used by the researcher togive an example for each expression of leadership. The researcher then determined from theinterviews when a Maker expressed one of the leadership roles.In their Making, this person:___ 1. Listens to the problems of team members/subordinates. (Mentor)___ 2. Reviews and/or reflects upon project achievements. (Monitor)___ 3. Influences decisions made at higher levels. (Broker)___ 4. Does problem solving in creative, clever ways. (Innovator)___ 5. Clearly defines areas of responsibility for team members/subordinates. (Director)___ 6. Displays a wholehearted commitment to the job/project. (Producer)___ 7. Facilitates consensus building in work-group sessions. (Facilitator)___ 8. Protects continuity in day-to-day

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luisa Ruiz Mendoza, University of Texas - El Paso; Leonardo Orea-Amador, University of Texas - El Paso; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas - El Paso

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

experience, where students are expected to observe, apply, and reflect upon topicscovered academically5. The intent of this study, therefore, is to determine the level of leadershipdevelopment students’ benefit from during such an opportunity to practice their leadership skillsintegrated into their engineering curriculum.Method In the spring of 2015, four E-LEAD students were recruited for the internship with theH.O.T Summer Conference. The E-LEAD students were divided into pairs to prepare andimplement workshops for local minority middle and high school students - one pair focused onthe middle school program and the other on high school. The four male students were ofHispanic ethnicity and they had finished their first year in the E-LEAD

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diana Bairaktarova, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Glen DePalma, Purdue University; Pouneh Eftekhari

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

. 5However, in their midterm reflections, the mentors hardly ever talk about mentorship andleadership. One out of 49 participants stated that having the opportunity to be a peermentor has allowed her to grow as a leader. They didn’t use any verbs such as “lead”,“mentor”, “instruct”, or “guide”. Only one peer mentor saw the reflections as anopportunity to continue practicing her strengths as a mentor and to grow in areas. Onlyone mentor stated that being able to work alongside the first-year engineering studentsand to pass on knowledge from the first-year has been a great way to give back to thecommunity and the university. Table 3 displays how the mentors ranked themselves in qualities of being a leader.It presents similar results as those in

Conference Session

Curriculum in Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven W. Klosterman, Northeastern University; Steven T. McGonagle, Northeastern University; Simon Pitts, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

engineering and technology.This paper describes how the program builds awareness of the broad characteristics of leadershipleading up to this exercise, enriching the understanding of how leadership emerges and evolves,as a blueprint of a best practice in a nationally recognized curriculum. Included is an overviewand structure of the leadership program and brief descriptions of the leadership topics taught inthe class, including supporting literature, and outcomes.2 The Assignment – Personal Case StudyThe purpose of the assignment is to give students the opportunity to analyze the leadershipapproach and philosophies of historic figures and reflect upon how their styles match andcontrast with what they’ve been taught in the classroom, and then share

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto, ILead; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

experienced than engineers in the country with a slightover-representation of chemical and mechanical engineers. The gender split reflects that ofCanadian engineering graduates over the past two decades. Please see Table 2 below for asummary of our demographic data.  T ABLE  2 :  S AMPLE  C HARACTERISTICS    Category Sub-Categories % of SampleSex Male 74 Female 26Age 20-29 43 30-39 33 40-49

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development: Theories, Models, Frameworks, and Tools

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

the engineering community of practice. What isunclear from the engineering identity research and related literature is if students are providedopportunities for reflective learning regarding their leadership experiences, the fourthenvironmental condition. As shown through the discussion of engineering identity this reflectionis typically left to chance at best or, at worst, actively discouraged through the viewpoint thatleadership is a “soft” skill not worthy of consideration in an engineering curriculum. Thequestion of incorporating effective reflective learning is central to the work underway.Moving engineering students from a positional to relational understanding of leadership has twobenefits: first, they should have a more stable sense

Conference Session

Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary; Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Stephanie Hladik, University of Calgary; Marcela P Rodriguez, University of Calgary; Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary; Lynne Gradon Cowe Falls P.Eng., University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

report. Students must report back to the fund indicatinghow the awarded funds were spent and how they brought their experience and knowledge backto campus. All successful applicants must submit a final report afterwards describing the impacton their learning experience, a reflection on their personal and leadership development goals, anda description of their contribution.Impact on the Engineering LeadershipSince its inception ten years ago, the SSAF has provided support for an immense variety andnumber of student activities. These opportunities range from local to international, and provideleadership development possibilities to hundreds of students each year. In 2015, 471 studentsreceived funding to pursue activities and opportunities of their

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development: Theories, Models, Frameworks, and Tools

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Klassen, University of Toronto; Serhiy Kovalchuk, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

thatexamines leadership transitions throughout the career trajectory of engineers. The first phaseinvestigated the engineering leadership transitions that take place during undergraduateeducation [17]. The current phase of research investigates the school-to-work transition ofengineering graduates, while subsequent phases will focus on the transition from technical tomanagerial roles, including the lifetime reflections on career trajectories of engineers who end upin positions of senior leadership.The current phase of the project analyzed the experiences of individuals as nested cases withinfour engineering companies. We used two main sampling criteria to select early career engineersfor the participation in the study: (1) they should have completed

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto; Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

< 1 hour commute: 20% variable > 1 hour commute: 21%Our sample reflects the population of undergraduate students enrolled in the faculty ofengineering in terms of year, program and sex. No population level data was available in thefaculty’s annual report on our other two demographic variables: ethno-cultural identity andcommuting distance.FindingsOverall, we found that undergraduate engineering students who engaged in a range of non-classroom activities reported significant gains in their engineering skills, leadership skills,engineering identity and leadership identity. We present our findings in greater detail

Conference Session

Insights and Practices for Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan R. Parkinson, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Randall Davies, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

approximately 650 B.S., 100M.S. and 20 Ph.D. degrees annually. These degree totals reflect the direction of the Board ofTrustees that BYU remain predominantly an undergraduate institution. About half of the B.S.graduates go on to graduate school at BYU or other schools around the country.Profile of 2015 Freshman ClassIn order to understand why the college elected to require leadership training for all students, it ishelpful to go into some detail regarding the profile of the freshman class. The average ACT scorefor incoming freshmen in Fall 2015 was 29.0 This represents approximately the 92nd percentilefor the exam. Thus, in terms of this criterion at least, the students have good academicpreparation. But perhaps just as significant, relative to

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bruce DeRuntz, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Rhonda K. Kowalchuk, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; John W. Nicklow, Southern Illinois University Carbondale

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Page 24.672.6step to ensure everyone’s complete understanding of our vision and mission and to affirm buy-infor each of the student participants. The LDP’s vision and mission statements have beendeveloped over the past seven years.Vision Statement: To become the premier university program that develops the United States of America’s future technical leaders.Mission Statement: Through teamwork, we push harder, faster and further than anyone thought possible, achieving world-class resultsKey Strategic ObjectivesThe team is then asked what kind of Key Strategic Objectives would reflect our proficiency inachieving our vision and mission. The students have the opportunity to amend the current KeyObjectives

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew C. Hurt, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robert C. Deadman, Ivy Tech Community College; Jenny Daugherty, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel O. Lybrook, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

technology students and then will be used todevelop/modify curriculum at the community college and university partner. Page 24.973.6Technology Leadership Certificate and CurriculumUtilizing the Technology Leadership competency model, we will develop the content for aTechnology Leadership certificate. Course content of the certificate will reflect those essentialcompetencies, allowing all students who complete to develop a technology leadership skill set.Further, we will use the working competency model to develop and refine courses in the AS /AAS programs at the statewide community college and the university program, with a focus onstudents

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven W Klosterman, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

as the Myers-Briggs TypeIndicator (MBTI), suggest the typical engineer tending towards a preference for introversion asgeneralized below16. “I like getting my energy from dealing with the ideas, pictures, memories, and reactions that are inside my head, in my inner world. I often prefer doing things alone or with one or two people I feel comfortable with The following statements generally apply to me: o I am seen as "reflective" or "reserved." o I feel comfortable being alone and like things I can do on my own. o I prefer to know just a few people well. o I sometimes spend too much time reflecting and don't move into action quickly

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard J. Schuhmann, The Landing School; Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University; Jack V. Matson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Jeffrey G. Soper, Montreux School of Business; Donald H. Horner Jr., Jacksonville University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

as non-engineering courses in the College. Several members of the EngineeringFaculty Curriculum Committee thought the Minor was more appropriate in the Business School.The debate was heated, but the Minor was narrowly approved by one vote. The narrow successof the vote was a clear reflection of the views of the college. The domain of engineeringleadership was new at the time, and there were no other programs available to offer to faculty asbenchmarks of value or success. Reluctance, by many in the College of Engineering, to includenon-technical courses at that time was not unexpected. Industry champions, incased within theLeonard Center, were critical to the acceptance of the program.The hard work of figuring out the details of each course

Conference Session

Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocates for Gender Equity

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Archie L Holmes Jr., University of Virginia; Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Lopresti, Lehigh University; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division, Minorities in Engineering, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering

country, but it is a major barrier at my institution.I otherwise believe that advocacy needs to be a formalized institution-level mission and goal, andit must be genuine. If it is not for the right reasons (such as public relations), then thoseindividuals within the institution will see through it and potentially lose confidence and morale.It cannot simply be words or data; there has to be action, and institutions cannot fake this. I alsobelieve that it is a barrier if the leaders of the institution do not speak and act consistentlybetween their public and internal personas. These leaders cannot speak of how important equityis and then internally emphasize efforts that do not reflect this

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development: Theories, Models, Frameworks, and Tools

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. S.. Shelley, California State University, Long Beach; Kenneth Wayne Santarelli P.E., California State University, Long Beach; Christopher R. Warren, California State University, Long Beach; Amelia Bahrami, California State University, Long Beach

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

efficacy and success of the program are addressed. Each item represents a uniquedimension, or learning objective, where positive gains indicate improvements prior to and afterparticipation in the program. Results indicated positive, statistical change in four out of sixintended dimensions: students’ confidence, self-awareness, and ability to recognize theirstrengths and weaknesses were all significant, as was the students’ perception of the success ofthe program. Analysis of the remaining two dimensions, students’ preparedness to work in teamsand student’s ability to perceive the value in cooperation for group success, also indicatedimprovement in the intended direction. These results reflect an all-around improvement instudents’ perceptions of

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve, University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto; Annie Elisabeth Simpson, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto; Amy Huynh, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Totonto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

social impact-focused programs werethe most likely to emphasize organizational forms of leadership (although not to anextreme), possibly reflecting a broader systems view of engineering’s potentialcontribution to society.Cluster 3 – Influencing core curriculumThe third and final cluster that was observable included the two programs explicitlyfocused on engaging all engineering students in leadership education. This involvesfaculty buy-in and relationships with key administrators that are fundamentally differentto developing small, targeted programs using self-selection mechanisms to recruitparticipants. Given the focus on undergraduate students, both of these programs are usinga wider range of strategies: teaching mandatory courses on leadership

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame; Victoria E. Goodrich, University of Notre Dame; Gary Allen Gilot P.E., University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Group GeneralManager, System Z Pat Toole, an engineering alumnus, speak on leading engineers and IgnatiusSpirituality-appealing to some of our quiet engineering student leaders in formation. Thewisdom shared clearly touched chords with our engineering students as evidenced in theirwritten reflections and post discussions with staff in mentoring sessions.As we begin our Spring 2015 program, students are being encouraged to compete inmultidisciplinary teams on a specific pilot scope on Bowman Creek as a community projectsuggested by the South Bend Department of Public Works to apply both technical and leadershipskills. These projects have a broader range of stakeholders and more complex constraints thantypical academic projects, and participants

Conference Session

Listening and Negotiation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas; Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development, Engineering Leadership Development Division, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

few days later and included the two itemsshe had requested. The salary was not quite the level Sarai had hoped for, but given her interestin remaining in the region and her success in receiving funding for both of her requests, shedecided against negotiating for a higher salary. All in all, the negotiation workshop had, in hereyes, paid off. Without it, she reflected, she would have just accepted the verbal offer withoutarticulating what else she needed to help her succeed in this new position.Administrative Level NegotiationsCase 3: College level budget negotiationState U had just hired a new provost. He was a biologist and one of his platforms was to launch anew STEM program. The university had, however, been weathering budget crises for

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University; Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

professors was not specifically identified, typical estimates are reflected by a recent publication by the National Society of Professional Engineers which stated that … “few engineering faculty today have practical experience in design, analysis, review, or management of engineering projects.”18  22% of authors represent university leadership institutes, indicating these organizations are playing a significant role in contributing to the scholarship in this field.  Contributions from authors in nontraditional and nonacademic positions are also substantial with 38% of authors currently working in these areas. Again, this proportion is much higher than anticipated considering a recent study by the

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Bayless, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

objectives from #5 d. Reflection and feedback (coaching) in your small group of other leaders e. Any other leadership aspect you plan to employ 7. Explain the metrics that you must attain/assess in order to meet your objectives from #5 Page 26.534.4 8. Describe how you will hold your teammates (other leader) accountable for progress 12687The heart of the model is that the students address these objectives for the capstone leadershipexperience within a small group (a cadre of 3-5 students) while building the team

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Toby Egan, Purdue School of Engineering & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

degree of moralobligation in the workplace. As such, conscientious individuals value truth and honesty, and areless likely to engage in corruption. Such predispositions connect conscientiousness and thepattern of conduct commonly associated with leader coaching behavior. Judiciousness,reliability, achievement motivated, accountable, deliberate, self-disciplined, persistence, andthoroughness are key aspects of conscientious individuals. 27Because individuals exhibiting conscientiousness are oriented toward goals and maintainingdetails they are commonly well organized. 32 Conscientious leaders may more often tend tocommunicate standards and clear priciples to followers. Conscientious leaders tend to manageboth time toward reflection and feedback

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Bayless, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

provides added value for the particular practicing engineer in his field? Why? 2. What experience(s) would be valuable for a new engineer in the field of practice for this particular engineer? Why? 3. How would you (the student) go about seeking a job in this particular field of engineering practice?Each question, at first glance, seems to point to a specific answer or set of answers, and thusseems “closed.” But upon further reflection, the second part of the question made them open-ended. The freshmen would have to understand potential classes and experiences to understandhow they would be useful in a future career environment. For freshmen, this was a dauntingchallenge. They were marginally familiar with the curriculum, but

Conference Session

Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

thepotential for engineering leadership behavior. A student who demonstrates engineeringleadership behaviors during the career fair will communicate in ways that show a reflection andunderstanding of their personal leadership development. Experiences are important to have, butan ability to translate those experiences from merely an action to a learning experiencedemonstrates potential for engineering leadership during a career fair.“Engineering students that are able to articulate these experiences as positive and beneficial intheir development and how or why is a plus.”“Potential engineering leaders often present those experiences in a way that often times reflectstheir thirst for more.”“Hands-on senior design projects are important. My industry is

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anton E. Bowden, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

importance and benefit of additional leadership development, but some studentsfeel they already have enough leadership experience or that leadership is not necessary forstudents graduating in engineering and technology. This sentiment is also reflected in a smallportion of the faculty who have been passive or resistant to the college-wide effort of leadershipdevelopment. Mitigating of these perceptions is still an on-going challenge in implementation.Developing capable instructors for the Foundations course has been a key aspect of the courseimplementation. To get started the college sought our faculty with some passion for leadershipthat would be willing to invest in course development. By sharing with each other and studyingindividual aspects of

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roger V. Gonzalez P.E., University of Texas, El Paso; Richard T. Schoephoerster, University of Texas, El Paso; Jessica Townsend, Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

courses depends on minor.) • A focused area of study such as Pre-med, Pre-law, or preparation towards a Peace Corp assignment. Page 26.635.3 Figure 1: Track Options for the Bachelor of Science in Engineering LeadershipUTEP is uniquely poised to craft the first undergraduate program around this new discipline.With a motto of “Access and Excellence”, UTEP strives to attract a student demographic notwell represented in engineering today and arm them with the skills, mindset, and experience thatallows them to make a positive impact in the communities in which they live and work. UTEP’sstudent population is 80% hispanic and reflects

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel; Dimitra Michalaka P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

, engineering marketing, business development and proposal submittal. 6. Understanding of ethical and legal aspects of engineering. 7. Demonstration of management techniques, decision economics, engineering organization, and business accounting methods. 8. Understanding of value engineering and total quality management concepts.Eight CIVL 411 course goals are mapped to CEE Department outcomes and shown withaccompanying levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy as indicated in Table 7. The focus of the class isgenerally on lower levels of Bloom’s, even though this is a senior course. Higher levels ofBloom’s Taxonomy are used for course instruction and student assignments, even thoughassessment mapping has not been adjusted to reflect this more rigorous

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kirsten S. Hochstedt, Penn State University ; Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University; Richard John Schuhmann, Gordon–MIT Engineering Leadership Program

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

and facilitator vs. “the sage onthe stage”), and the class is accompanied by a laboratory where students actively apply andpractice the material they learn in class. Anecdotally, student-written assessment comments tothe instructor at the end of the semester often reflected that students felt they had worked harderper credit in the leadership principles class than in their other classes, but that this extra effortwas worth it. Electively taking and working harder in a non-required class requires intrinsicmotivation. Given the rich literature on the power of intrinsic motivation17, 18 and its effect on Page 23.851.14passion, interest, and