. This is a very important point to emphasize, especially for engineeringstudents who are drawn to quantitative data and who tend to be less comfortable with qualitativedata and analyses. Hence, this “set up” for a discussion on analyzing the stories they receivedfrom their respondents is critical to a successful implementation of this exercise. Otherwise,students will take the “path of least resistance” and base most of their paper on the quantitativeassessments described below.When I introduce this phase, I spend a few minutes describing how strengths are holisticallydefined in this exercise (summarized on a PowerPoint) 16. Strengths are an integration of our (a)self-identities, which is how we express ourselves in a given situation, (b
Society (APICS) and a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE). She is a licensed Professional Engineer in Kansas.Dr. Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology Cheryl B. Schrader became Chancellor of Missouri University of Science and Technology, formerly the University of Missouri - Rolla, in 2012. Prior to her current leadership position she served as Associate Vice President for Strategic Research Initiatives and as Dean of the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Schrader has an extensive record of publications and sponsored research in the systems, control and STEM education fields. She received the 2005 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and
), 61-69.2. Hartmann, B. L., & Jahren, C. T. (2015). Leadership: Industry Needs for Entry-Level Engineering Positions.Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 13-19.3. Cox, M. F., Cekic, O., & Adams, S. G. (2010). Developing Leadership Skills of Undergraduate EngineeringStudents: Perspectives from Engineering Faculty. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(3-4),22-33.4. Gonzalez, V. Roger. et. al. (2015). Engineering Leadership: A new Engineering Discipline, Paper #26.635.1.ASEE PEER. Seattle, Washington.5. Crumpton-Young, L., McCauley-Bush, P., Rabelo, L., Meza, K., Ferreras, A., Rodriguez, B., & ... Kelarestani, M.(2010). Engineering Leadership Development Programs a Look at What Is Needed and
. (2012). Engineering Professionals’ Expectations of Undergraduate Engineering Students. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 12, 60–70.[5] Farr, J., & Brazil, D. (2009). Leadership Skills Development for Engineers. Engineering Management Journal, 21(1), 3. http://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2009.11431792[6] Hartmann, B., Stephens, C., Jahren, C. (2015). Surveying industry needs for leadership in entry-level engineering positions. American Society for Engineering Education.[7] Male, S. a. (2005). Generic Engineering Competencies : A Review and Modelling Approach. Education Research and Perspectives, 37(1), 25–51.[8] Nair, C. S., Patil, A., & Mertova, P. (2009). Re-engineering graduate skills – a case
leadership and teamwork,either (a) that maybe the students thought they were better at these skills than they turned out tobe when forced to take on specific leadership and team member roles, or (b) that the studentsactually got worse in these roles as a result of one semester of college and this particular class.The authors would like to believe that the former is most likely.Looking at specific questions in Table 2, the individual values question with the most significantchange was “Change is a smooth and easy process for me.” At the end of the semester, studentsrated themselves lower on this question than at the beginning. Student self-ratings alsosignificantly decreased for the interpersonal values questions “I can acknowledge when I amwrong and
Paper ID #14038Contributions of Competition Based Complex Engineering Design Experi-ence to Leadership Development in Engineering StudentsDr. Farah I. Jibril , Qatar UniversityDr. Bassnt mohamed yasser, Qatar University A research assistant in VPCAO office in Qatar University and have my masters degree in quality man- agement with thesis project about ”utilization of Lean six sigma in enhancement of sterile suspensions manufacturing”. Being working on pharmaceutical manufacturing field in Glaxosmithkline Egypt as sec- tion head for quality assurance and validation I have a great experience in quality management system
Paper ID #17388Developing the Global Engineering Leader at a Leading Engineering Institu-tion in the SoutheastDr. Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy’s research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infras- tructure decision making to promote sustainable development. She studies complex real-world systems and develops infrastructure decision support systems to promote sustainable development. Kennedy earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (Structures) from Stanford University in 1994, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering (Transportation
Paper ID #15521Achieving Excellence in Master of Engineering Education: A Case Study ofNational University of Defense Technology’s PracticeProf. Fu zhongli, National University of Defense Technology FU,zhongli is deputy director of the Center for National Security and Strategic Studies, National Univer- sity of Defense Technology (NUDT).In this role, he manages NUDT’s continuing education reform and leads excellent engineer training research projects. He has conducted research on engineering education as a visiting scholar in Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in 2013. His research interests are in engineering
Paper ID #14123Engineering Leadership: A New Engineering DisciplineDr. Roger V. Gonzalez P.E., University of Texas, El Paso Roger V. Gonzalez, Ph.D., P.E., is the Director of the Leadership Engineering program for the College of Engineering and Professor and Chair of Engineering Education and Leadership. Dr. Gonzalez earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 1986 from UTEP. He earned his M.S. in Biomedical Engineering and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and was a Post-Doctoral Fellow and the premier Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and Northwestern Medical School. Professor Gonza
Paper ID #11738Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocatesfor Gender EquityDr. Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University Dr. Genalo is a University Professor and Associate Chair of the Materials Science and Engineering Department at Iowa State University. He is a Fellow of ASEE and has run the NSF Grantees Poster Session for nearly 20 years. He is a former chair of DELOS and the Freshman Programs Constituent Committee (the year before it became a Division).Dr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green received the B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering and the
Paper ID #19462Leading from the Bottom Up: Leadership Conceptions and Practices AmongEarly Career EngineersMr. Mike Klassen, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is the Assistant Director, Community of Practice on Engineering Leadership at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. He designs and facilitates leadership programs for engineering students - with a range of focus from tangible skill development to organizational leadership to complex social problems. Mike is a candidate for the Master of Arts in Higher Education at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
, “Engineers Learn ‘Soft Skills the Hard Way’: Planting a Seed of Leadership in Engineering Classes,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2007.[2] P. Galloway, “Engineering Education Reform,” in The 21st-Century Engineer: A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007, pp. 46–51.[3] B. Ahn, M. F. Cox, J. London, O. Cekic, and J. Zhu, “Creating an Instrument to Measure Leadership, Change, and Synthesis in Engineering Undergraduates,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 115–136, Jan. 2014.[4] S. S. K. W. Fakeh, M. S. Shahibi, A. Jamaludin, M. R. Rahim, J. Paiman, and Z. Ibrahim, “Understanding Leadership Values Among Under Graduate Students in UITM
. 5 We adopted categories used by the National Survey of Student Engagement to define our ethno-‐cultural identity variable. 6The blue box in one of the activity types is for the review process only. We have temporarily removed the name ofour leadership program. 8 F IGURE 1 : P ARTICIPATION R ATES B Y A CTIVITY T YPE 7 40.0 35.0 % of sample 30.0
IGURE 3 : L EADERSHIP O RIENTATION B Y Y EARS EXPERIENCE Page 26.1519.6No clear patterns emerge from this graph with the exception of a strong orientation amongnovice engineers (zero to two years) toward collaborative optimization. This “experience” effectmay be confounded by a “sex” effect, as women make up a greater percentage of individuals intheir first two years (35%) than in the sample as a whole (26%).Finally, we found no clear pattern of leadership orientation preferences by organizationalposition. Please see Figure 4 for an illustration of these findings. While we expected engineerswith formalized management
on life support, whether patient is able to walk, and the patient ID number) (see Appendix B for example of patient records), • emergency supply box which was hidden somewhere in the room and contained some water, a flashlight and batteries.Participants used a Windows messaging app Lync to communicate with the CentralCommunications Center C3 (managed by ROTC cadets). Participants were able to direct theirmovement and activities of staff and patients by contacting the C3. If they wanted to dosomething with the patient (evacuate, move to different area of hospital, provide treatment, etc.),participants had to study their patient records, and then read off the patient ID number andprovide C3 with specific instructions on what
graduation.Attainment of proficiency for each outcome is measured using embedded indicators based onmapping to the six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy 11,12. Table 1 summarizes the 22 CEE Page 26.1465.3Table 1 Summary of Citadel Civil Engineering CEE Department Program Outcomes Dept. Program Outcome Dept. Program Outcome with Professional Skills Linkage 1. Mathematics 2. Science 3. Solid & Fluid Mechanics 4. Experiments 5. Problems Solving a.) Techniques b.) Tools Design 6. a.) Environmental 7. b.) Structural 8. c.) Land Development 9. d.) Transportation 10. Contemporary Issues 11. Project Management
Paper ID #13734Implementation of an Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum to Prepare21st Century LeadersMs. Katherine Agnew Trevey, Marquette University Ms. Trevey currently serves as the Director of Engineering Leadership Programs in the Opus College of Engineering at Marquette University. She has more than 10 years of experience creating leadership development programs for undergraduate students. In early 2014, she was hired to run the newly created E-Lead Program (a three-year people-focused, technical leadership program offered to undergraduate students in the College of Engineering). Her responsibilities include
Paper ID #15201Charting the Landscape of Engineering Leadership Education in North Amer-ican UniversitiesMr. Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is a Leadership Programming Consultant with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto where he develops leadership programs and industry partnerships for engineers. His research interests include engineering leadership, organizational culture, and higher education. Mike has a Graduate Diploma in Social Innovation from the University of Waterloo and a BASc in
Paper ID #18352Exploring the Use of the Competing Values Framework in Engineering Edu-cationRebecca Komarek, University of Colorado Boulder Rebecca Komarek is the Assistant Director of the Idea Forge and Managing Director of Catalyze CU at the University of Colorado Boulder. She has taught in the areas of educational research and leadership development and served as a design team adviser. She is earning her PhD in engineering education with a focus on leadership development.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado
Paper ID #14911Engineering Leadership: Faculty Perceptions and ProfilesDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University Dr. William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engineering from Montana State University (MSU). He is an Assistant Professor in Industrial and Man- agement Systems Engineering at MSU with research interests in engineering education and the role of leadership and culture in process improvement and serves as an Associate Editor for both the Engineer