Paper ID #48647Empathy: Developing This Core Leadership Skill in Engineering StudentsMr. Seth C. Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he worked in consulting in the private sector and as an analyst in the U.S. Government. Heˆa C™s earnedMs. Maria PolyzoiSheila RiveraRachel Elizabeth Rice, Texas A&M UniversityNicholas Aleczander Barrio, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Empathy: Developing this Core
expected from an effectivedept/program chair/head in terms of leading, developing, and supporting faculty. Surveycomponents are shown in Appendix B, were administered through Qualtrics, and distributed withthe York University of Pennsylvania IRB approval (IRB# 24FA016).Table 2. Characteristics or attributes of a department chair Advocate Decisive Forward thinker Loyal Professional attitude Clear communicator Empathic Good listener Organized Relationship builder Conscientious Enthusiastic Growth mindset Patient Steady Creative thinker Ethical Humble Problem solver TrustworthyIn this study, the authors are specifically interested in
Paper ID #49338BOARD #142: Learning ’Street Smarts’ from Engineering Leadership Alumni:A Work in ProgressCalvin Hawks, University of Colorado Boulder Calvin Hawks is a second year undergraduate researcher studying Computer Science, Engineering Leadership, and Creative Technology and Design at the University of Colorado Boulder. His interests are in engineering leader curricula, artificial intelligence, and Human Computer Interaction. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025
minutes sharing observations and advice, helping tocontextualize the learning by connecting it to their world of practice. Finally, as the ELL periodends, each team’s second-year student team coach conversationally delivers feedback to the first-year team leader (scaffolded by a feedback form shown in Appendix A); that first-year team leaderthen has five days to submit a personal reflection on their ELL experience and feedback (via areflection prompt shown in Appendix B).Each ELL activity is self-contained (i.e., not part of an ongoing, semester-long challenge or project),with each primarily focused on one or two Capabilities [2]. The decision to situate the ELLlearning activities into this short-duration format represents a trade-off in
closed-ended than normal. We will likely expand on this question in later weeks. In Friday's Team Creativity session, we talked about the importance of a team developing a superordinate identity, or a shared team identity that's above individual identities. Your team was asked to generate a company name and slogan or logo. For this week's entry, simply respond with your company name, and complete the statement below using the provided choices. Creativity is _____________ aspect of leadership. A - an essential B - an important C - just like any other D - barely an E - not at all an8. In last week's entry, you were asked to complete the sentence "Creativity is ___________ part of leadership,' using one of the choices
- engineering leadership not your theory X, Y or Z leaders,” in 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Mar. 2005, pp. 4389–4397. doi: 10.1109/AERO.2005.1559744.[31] T. Riley and E. A. Cudney, “Defensive Routines in Engineering Managers and Non- Engineering Managers — A Case Analysis,” International Journal of Engineering Business Management, vol. 7, p. 8, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.5772/60114.[32] D. A. Wyrick, “Understanding Learning Styles to be a More Effective Team Leader and Engineering Manager,” Engineering Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 27–33, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1080/10429247.2003.11415193.[33] J. V. Farr, S. G. Walesh, and G. B. Forsythe, “Leadership Development for Engineering Managers,” J. Manage. Eng., vol. 13, no. 4
engineering,even if not explicitly so.References[1] J. J. Park, M. Handley, D. Lang, and M. A. Erdman, “Engineering Leadership Development:Contribution of Professional Skills to Engineering Undergraduate Students’ LeadershipSelf-efficacy,” International Journal of Educational Methodology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–80, Feb.2022, doi: 10.12973/ijem.8.1.69.[2] D. B. Knight and B. J. Novoselich, “Curricular and Co-curricular Influences onUndergraduate Engineering Student Leadership,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106,no. 1, pp. 44–70, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20153.[3] M. R. Kendall and C. Rottmann, “Student leadership development in engineering,” NewDirections for Student Leadership, vol. 2022, no. 173, pp. 7–12, Mar. 2022, doi:10.1002/yd.20474.[4] Y
, funding institutions, and associations.Prof. Camila Zapata-Casabon, Universidad Andres Bello Master in Marketing and Market Research from the University of Barcelona, Spain. Industrial Civil Engineer from the Universidad del B´ıo-B´ıo. She has three diplomas in the areas of coaching, digital marketing and equality and empowerment of women. Her professional experience is linked to higher education as a project engineer and university management in the public and private area. Teacher at different universities in matters of entrepreneurship, business plans and marketing. She currently works as a teacher and academic secretary at the Faculty of Engineering of the Andr´es Bello University. The areas of research interest
technical expert roles grows considerably over time, with only 8% ofrespondents indicating that early career roles fall into this category, while 42% of respondents whohave been working six or more years have indicated serving in technical expert roles. Figure 2. Participation in technical expert roles among GEL alumni at different experience levelsMultidimensional roles: Those who are engineers and supervisorsGEL alumni survey respondents were asked "What is your current primary job title?" and wereprovided an open-ended text field in which to type a response. Appendix B presents job titlesreported by respondents who indicated that they are an engineer (or software engineer/developer)and who also indicated being a supervisor (at any level of
openness to newways of thinking and knowing.Kendall et al. [3] articulate an expansive definition of Engineering Leadership that incorporatesmany of the dimensions of complexity inherent in wicked problems: “Engineering Leaders (a) employ the full range of engineering skills and knowledge in the design of socio-technical innovations, while (b) seeking to understand, embrace, and address the current and future impact of their work in context by (c) actively fostering engaged and productive relationships with diverse stakeholders, including themselves and their team, the users of their technologies, and those impacted by their engineering work”.We argue that systems thinking is an important engineering leadership
Paper ID #41656ASEE 2024 Paper—Examining Cultural Elements to Enable ChangeDr. Marnie Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is a Teaching Professor in Chemical Process Design in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education and a PhD in Chemical Engineering. She is currently the William and Elizabeth Magee Chair in Chemical Engineering Design. She leads the process design teaching team. Her current research focuses on engineering design and leadership, engineering culture, the engineering graduate
first Executive Board of JLLA: Randi Mendes, President;Stephany Santos, Vice President; Arshia Yusuf Mirza, Secretary; Justin Fang, Treasurer; DonyeilHoy, Parliamentarian and Armin Tahmasebi Rad, Event Coordinator. Thank you for paving theway for future John Lof Scholars.References[1] A. M. Agogino, Educating the Engineer of 2020, vol. 3, no. 2005. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[2] Tang, X., Burris, L., Hu, N., & Brenkus, N. (n.d.). Preparing ethical leaders in engineering research and practice: Designing an ethical leadership module. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33190[3] Sullivan, S., & Koufteros, B. (n.d.). Meaning and impact: A review of Personal
Paper ID #46571Identifying the potential gap between graduates’ preparation and the ProfessionalCivil Engineering Consultant’s needsDr. Juan M Cruz, Rowan University Juan M. Cruz is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. He has a B.S. in Electronic Engineering and a Masters in Education from Universidad Javeriana in Colombia and a PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research uses a systems perspective to understand the dynamics of the academic system and how it influences faculty motivation to change, undergraduate students’ motivation to learn
Paper ID #41595AI’s Visual Representation Gap: Redefining Civil Engineering Workspacesfor Early-Career WomenMiss Elizabeth Volpe, University of Florida Elizabeth Volpe, EIT, LEED-GA, is a Ph.D. candidate in the Simmons Research Lab located in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include inclusive engineering, leadership, the experiences of early-career women in engineering, and improving sustainability, diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice within engineering education and the engineering workforce. Elizabeth
associated with collective change inengineering education. We also intend to build out the descriptions, and examine ingreater depth, the potential impact of culture shifts in key engineering education co-contraries, such as the ones we have put forward in this work.Finally, we are hopeful we can begin a dialog on how we can leverage engineeringleadership education to facilitate our capacity for meaningful change in engineeringeducation.5. References[1] D. E. Goldberg and M. Somerville, “A Field Manual for A Whole New Education: Rebooting Higher Education for Human Connection & Insight in a Digital World.” Threejoy Associates, Incorporated, 2023.[2] B. Johnson, Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems. HRD Press
://www.kornferry.com/insights/featured-topics/diversity-equity- inclusion/the-benefits-of-inclusive-leadership[9] M. Adams and X. Zúñiga, “Getting Started: Core Concepts for Social Justice Education,” in Teaching for diversity and social justice, 3rd ed., M. Adams and L. A. Bell, Eds., New York, NY: Routledge, 2016.[10] J. A. Leydens and J. C. Lucena, Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice. in IEEE PCS Professional Engineering Communication Series. IEEE Press, 2018.[11] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x.[12] J. Saldaña, The
Paper ID #43844Assessing Student Engagement, Success, Leadership and Teamwork Skillswith Respect to Team Role Selection and ExecutionDr. Edward Latorre, University of Florida https://www.eng.ufl.edu/eed/faculty-staff/edward-latorre-navarro/ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Assessing Student Engagement, Success, Leadership and Teamwork Skills with respect to Team Role Selection and ExecutionAbstractThe importance of working in teams throughout the engineering education curriculum has beenwell documented in research. Therefore, most engineering curricula conclude with a team-basedcapstone design
Paper ID #47450Enhancing Leadership Capabilities of Engineering Instructional Faculty Throughan ICVF-Based Reflection ActivityDr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso An Associate Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is a founding member of the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership. With a background in both engineering education and design thinking, her research focuses on how Latinx students develop identities as engineers and navigate moments of identity interference, student and faculty engineering leadership development through the Contextual Engineering
Paper ID #43772Work-In-Progress: Understanding ”Engineering Leadership” within EngineeringConsulting FirmsJessica J. Li, University of Toronto Jessica is a Professional Engineer currently pursuing her PhD in Industrial Engineering with the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. Jessica’s research explores how professional services organizations can support or hinder leadership development in their staff. Jessica holds a Bachelor’s of Applied Science in Chemical Engineering from the University of Toronto and previously worked as an engineering consultant in the