Commons [EngineeringLibrary], Garage Physics, and Discovery Building), and University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign (Undergraduate Library and Granger Engineering Library) for meeting to share yourexperiences and ideas.ReferencesAdobe Systems Incorporated. (2017). “Adobe KickBox.” Retrieved from: https://kickbox.adobe.com/.Bieraugel, M. & Stern, N. (2017). “Ascending Bloom’s Pyramid: Fostering Student Creativity and Innovation in Academic Library Spaces.” College & Research Libraries, 78(1), 35- 53.Forest, C. R., Moore, R. A., Jariwala, A. S., Fasse, B. B., Linsey, J., Newstetter, W., …. Quintero, C. (2014). “The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture.” Advances in Engineering Education, 4(2
. (2016). Meet the Dean. Retrieved from https://engineering.tamu.edu/about/ovcd/dean 4. Paretti, Marie C., Pembridge, J. J., Brozina, S. C., Lutz, B. D., et al. (2013). "Mentoring team conflicts in capstone design: Problems and solutions." American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 5. Sullivan, Brian T. and Karen L. Porter. (2016). “From One-shot Sessions to Embedded Librarian.” C&RL News, 77.1, 34-37. 6. Texas A&M University. (2013). Announces initiative to increase engineering enrollment. Retrieved from http://engineering.tamu.edu/news/2013/01/23/texas-am-announces- initiative-to-increase-engineering-enrollment-to-25-000-students 7. Tucci, Valerie K. (2011) “Faculty/Librarian
. Classification is intended to encompass “the whole body ofknowledge” and is divided into eight sections: A—Human Necessities; B—PerformingOperations and Transporting; C—Chemistry and Metallurgy; D—Textiles and Paper; E—FixedConstructions; F—Mechanical Engineering and Lighting and Heating and Weapons andBlasting; G—Physics; and H—Electricity. (The CPC added an additional category “Y” forcross-referencing purposes.) These sections are divided into a hierarchical classification systemwhich has further lower levels. When classifying an invention four specific areas of inventionare considered: 1) the invention’s intrinsic nature or function; 2) the invention’s particular use orpurpose; 3) the invention’s application; 4) the incorporation of an invention into
. It was also important that the engineering teamtook this information seriously and used it to formulate the final results.At the conclusion of the semester, the engineering student team gave a presentation for anyinterested staff in the library. The PowerPoint they used included drawings of the currentconfiguration of Technical Services as well as two potential new layouts (see Appendix B). Italso included pictures of new desk and chair options as well as suggestions as to how thefurniture could be configured. The presentation was well-attended and well-received. It gave thestaff an additional opportunity to ask questions and make comments. Following the presentation,the engineering student team sent out a short feedback survey asking for
, B., C. Fuchs, and A. Todman, Static vs. Dynamic Tutorials: Applying Usability Principles to Evaluate Online Point-of-Need Instruction. Information Technology & Libraries, 2015. 34(4): p. 30-54.7. Sachs, D.E., et al., Assessing the Effectiveness of Online Information Literacy Tutorials for Millennial Undergraduates. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 2013. 20(3/4): p. 327-351.8. Mery, Y., et al., Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tools for Online Database Instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 2014. 8(1): p. 70-81.9. Zhang, Q., M. Goodman, and S. Xie, Integrating Library Instruction into the Course Management System for a First-Year Engineering Class: An Evidence-Based Study Measuring
-269.9. White, H. D.; Griffith, B. C., Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectualstructure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1981, 32 (3), 163-171.10. Small, H., Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society forInformation Science 1999, 50 (9), 799-813.11. Morillo, F.; Bordons, M.; Gómez, I., An approach to interdisciplinarity throughbibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 2001, 51 (1), 203-222.12. He, Q., Knowledge Discovery Through Co-Word Analysis. Library Trends 1999, 48 (1),133-159.13. Peters, H. P. F.; Van Raan, A. F. J., Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis.Scientometrics 1991, 20 (1), 235-255.14. Borgman, C. L.; Furner, J
printing services by acquiring two entry level fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printersfor its Teaching Resource Center (TRC).37 The 3D printers were placed in the TRC because thedepartment directly supports the College of Education, and 3D printers were rapidly becomingcommonplace in K-12 school libraries across the state and the rest of the United States. (a) Signage above study room (b) ZPrinter® 310 Plus Figure 1. Collaborative 3D printer lab and equipment.7, 30, 31One of the new 3D printers, a FlashForge Creator Pro38 (see Figure 2), is an FDM style 3Dprinter with a dual extrusion print head. The FlashForge’s dual extrusion head allows interlacedcolor objects to be printed, and the printer can extrude
Paper ID #18067Libraries Embrace the Engineering Grand ChallengesMr. James A. Van Fleet, Bucknell University Jim Van Fleet has been the Engineering Librarian at Bucknell University, and a member of the ASEE Engineering Libraries Division, for over 25 years. His professional interests include reference services and library collection management. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Libraries Embrace the Engineering Grand Challenges The National Academy of Engineering has put forward 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering in the 21stCentury. Students at participating universities address
for Grants and Agreements withInstitutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations.Samuels, S. M., Grochowski, P. F., Lalwani, L. N., & Carlson, J. 2015. Analyzing DataManagement Plans: Where Librarians can make a Difference. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Paper #12072.Tenopir, C., Hughes, D., Allard, S., Frame, M., Birch, B., Baird, B., Sandusky, R.,Langseth, M. & Lundeen, A. 2015. Research Data Services in Academic Libraries: DataIntensive roles for the future. Journal of eScience Librarianship 4(2) e1085. DOI:10.7191/jeslib.2015.1085Van Tuyl, S.V., & Michalek, G. 2015. Assessing research data management practices of facultyat Carnegie Mellon University. Journal of
web form for the submission of search requests to the reference librarian. The current method of electronically requesting services from the PNC library consists of a general web-based form with one area for typing in a description of what the faculty member is requesting. We concluded that the library’s outreach process could be improved by making it easier to submit a search request specifically. The web-based form we recommend includes: a) a level of priority associated with the request, b) an optional requested due date, c) identification of the department in which the faculty is a member, d) the subject area, e) keywords, f) any specific databases to be searched (optional), g) any special comments, and h) an option
and centers in 1989, and continues to this day. At present, theengineering move is about 75% complete.Library support at NC State is fairly centralized for a university of its size, with two majorresearch library buildings (one on the historic main campus and one on Centennial Campus) andthree small branch libraries. The library on Centennial Campus, the James B. Hunt Jr. Library, isa recent addition to the University, opening in 2013. Thus, for most of its existence, CentennialCampus had no central library and NC State has never had a dedicated library for engineeringstudents and faculty.Evolution of a Service ModelIn 1998, subject librarians for engineering and textiles began to work on a model for deliveringlibrary services to engineering
Undergraduate Education in theCollege of Engineering to talk about the overall use of OERs in engineering and to select courseswhere OERs might be a viable option. We then selected interview questions that inquired aboutfaculty members’ and instructors’ teaching experience, their criteria for selecting textbooks, andtheir potential interest in using OERs (Appendix B). Ultimately, we reached four faculty orinstructors whose average instruction experience ranged from four to 16 years. The intervieweesincluded three female and one male. The interviewees included two clinical assistant professors,one associate professor, and one professor. Of the four interviewees, two were from the Schoolof Mechanical and Materials Engineering, one from Civil and
Paper ID #18599University Library Services to Engineering Summer CampersJulie Arendt, Virginia Commonwealth University Julie Arendt is a Science and Engineering Research Librarian at Virginia Commonwealth University. Prior to coming to VCU, she was a science and engineering librarian at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. She received her M.S.I. from the University of Michigan and her B.S. from the University of Wisconsin- Madison. In her research, Ms. Arendt is interested in the relationship among library services, open access, and scholarly impact.Dr. Rosalyn S. Hobson Hargraves, Virginia Commonwealth University
Paper ID #17908The History of the Engineering Libraries Division, Part 2: 1960-2017Mr. Michael J. White, Queen’s University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The History of the Engineering Libraries Division, Part 2: 1960-2017IntroductionThe Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) of the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE) is one of the oldest professional communities of engineering and technical librarians inthe world. It is also one of the few engineering organizations where librarians and professors arerecognized as academic professionals. First organized as a regional committee in 1941
Institute of Technology Bette Finn is the subject librarian for the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the Georgia Tech Research Institute at the Georgia Tech Library. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 History of the Georgia Tech Library with Emphasis on the Crosland EraTo celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the Engineering Libraries Division of the AmericanSociety of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the seventy-fifth anniversary of the creation of theEngineering School Libraries Committee (ESLC), the authors of this paper want to highlight theoutstanding accomplishments of a former member of ESLC, Dorothy Murray Crosland, who wasdirector of the Library at the Georgia
Of special importance is the uichling Memorial Library, of the School of Civil Engineering, a collection of about fifteen hundred books and pamphlets on hydraulic and municipal engineering, formerly the professional library of the late Emil uichling, A B , C E , of Rochester, N Y It was given to the school in 1919 by Mrs Sarah L uichling, with an endowment of one thousand dollars, the income of which is to be used to e tend the
Paper ID #20375Information Literacy Portfolio for Curriculum MappingMr. Jeff McAdams, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Jeff McAdams graduated with a Bachelor’s of General Studies from The University of Kansas and a Mas- ters of Library and Information Science from Emporia State University. He worked at Spahr Engineering Library at The University of Kansas, as the Science and Engineering Librarian at The University of Texas at San Antonio, and currently works in the same capacity at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.Julia Glauberman, Binghamton University Libraries Julia Glauberman is the Instructional