review.IntroductionThis project began in 2019. While it is still a work in progress, the authors wanted to focus onthe methodology chosen to undertake this study, as well as the current status of the researchbeing conducted. The topic itself arose from several conversations at the 2019 ASEE conferencein Tampa where the authors were curious about the landscape of engineering librarianshippublications, focusing on what research methods were typically being used by engineeringlibrarians in their research and how appropriate and well were these approaches being explained.Explorations of the types of studies typically conducted by librarians has been discussed, studiedand editorialized from many years [1]–[4] but the focus in most of the papers examined seemedto be
. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1133766.pdf[19] J. D. Basham, M. T. Marino, C. L. Hunt, and K. Han, “Considering STEM for Learners With Disabilities and Other Diverse Needs,” in Handbook of Research on STEM Education, Routledge, 2020, pp. 128–137. doi: 10.4324/9780429021381-13.[20] J. Halpern and M. Arral, “Work-in-Progress: Inclusive Mentoring Strategies for Neurodivergent Undergraduate Researchers in STEM,” ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 2022.[21] S. Matysiak, “STEM students with disabilities face extra barriers in earning degree,” The Badger Herald, Sep. 15, 2022. https://badgerherald.com/news/2022/09/15/stem- students-with-disabilities-face-extra-barriers-in-earning-degree (accessed Jan
support throughout their publication process from theircollege or university library, scholarly society, university press, or other service provider” [5].While a good deal of recent research points to research support as an area of importance foracademic research libraries, significant attention is paid to the role of data management and datascientists. In 2019, Koltay called for supporting Research 2.0 via research data management,further stating RDM services are “becoming increasingly important” and that academic librariesmust “recognize that they are part of a suite of services that meets (faculty) needs” [6].However, no mention of research intelligence or impact is included. Yet, others believe impactservices present an additional area of
Education, Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringvillage.com/share/document.url?mid=cpx_9cb441b17030ed7bdbM7 a4610178163146&database=cpx[15] N. J. Washuta and P. Bass, “A complementary approach to implementing entrepreneurship into a mechanical engineering senior capstone course sequence,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringvillage.com/share/document.url?mid=cpx_9cb441b17030ed7bdbM7 5ba10178163146&database=cpx[16] P. Golding, S. A. Starks, R. V. Gonzalez, M. R. Kendall, D. G. Novick, and C. H. Joslyn, “Leadership in Engineering Innovation and Entrepreneurship,” in ASEE Annual Conference and
. Perez, and P.R. Hottinger, Complete evidence-based practice paper: The impact of information literacy instruction on the synthesis level of first-year engineering students. Presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/34316[2] J. M. Williamson, N. Rice, C. Tenopir, J. Kaufman, C. J. Faber, and R. M. Ellestad. (2019). Best practices for engineering information literacy instruction: Perspectives of academic librarians. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/best-practices-for-engineering-information-literacy- instruction-perspectives-of-academic-librarians[3] R.A.M. Hensel, O. Brown
better? The prevalence andinterdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions," Journal ofInformetrics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 736- 756, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.006.[10] Q. Zhang, and K. Kozak, “Quick Understanding Our Engineering Faculty Research NeedsUsing Topic Modeling,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. Jun.2019, doi:10.18260/1-2—33223.[11] T. E. Behrens, P. Fox, A. Laird, and S. M. Smith. "What is the most interesting part of thebrain?" Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 2-4, Jan. 2013, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.010.[12] Scopus. “Sources.” Scopus.com. https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri (accessed Mar. 11,2023)[13] E. W. Weisstein. “Statistical Test.” Concise
- October 23, 2019, Hannover, Germany, 2020, pp. 13–19. [Online]. Available: http://greyguide.isti.cnr.it/index.php/greyguideportal/document-share/gl-proceedings-1993.[5] N. Waters, E. Kasuto, and F. McNaughton, “Partnership between engineering libraries: Identifying information literacy skills for a successful transition from student to professional,” Sci. Technol. Libr., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 124–132, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2012.648104.[6] C. Leachman and J. W. Leachman, “If the engineering literature fits, use it! Student application of grey literature and engineering standards,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, pp. 26.881.1-26.881.10. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org
. Q., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 172–190, 2011.[19] S. Wellings and B. Casselden, “An exploration into the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists,” J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 789–800, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0961000617742466.[20] D. Ellis and M. Haugan, “Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment,” J. Doc., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 384–403, 1997.[21] K. Mercer, K. Weaver, and A. Stables-Kennedy, “Understanding undergraduate engineering student information access and needs: Results from a scoping review,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 33485. doi
ormeasuring the impact in makerspace curriculum [16]. To address this gap, the University ofTexas, Arlington assembled an ad-hoc taskforce from various universities to develop a nationalstandard of maker-based competencies to enhance student learning outcomes to impactundergraduate students [17]. Among the taskforce was the University of Nevada, Reno. In 2017and 2019, the group received two National Leadership grants from the Institute of Museum andLibrary Services (IMLS).To form their framework, the grant team used the competencies-based education model, whichincludes the assessment of learning outcomes and learning that is personalized, measurable, andtransferable [16]. Ten maker competencies were developed, addressing various transferable
Obama administration, which held its own nationalWhite House Maker Faire in 2014. Public libraries were out front in embracing the makermovement, since their mission to serve as a hub for lifelong learning fit so well with one of themaker movement’s foundational purposes: to provide anyone, of any skill level, an opportunityfor self-directed learning. In response to the White House Maker Faire, over 100 Urban LibraryCouncil members signed a letter to President Obama in which they pledged their ongoingcommitment to being centers for creative making.Makerspaces have been called a variety of things – Fablabs, Idea Labs, Hackerspaces, InnovationLabs, to name a few – but in the ASEE PEER Document Repository, makerspace is by far themost frequently
number ofcitations per report with aggregate data. Mean Citations per Report Year Number of Reports Number of Citations Report 2019 21 208 9.9 2020 25 228 9.1 2021 24 249 10.4 2022 14 133 9.5 2023 17 172 10
Engineering Education (ASEE) [1]. World War II curtailed the activities of bothgroups. After the war, however, the engineering librarian communities in ACRL and ASEE grewquickly, offering new opportunities for professional development, networking, informationsharing, research, and advocacy.This paper seeks a deeper understanding of the academic engineering librarian community in the1940s and early 1950s through the analysis of data compiled from the Directory of CollegeEngineering Library Personnel [2], published in 1949 by the Engineering School LibrariesSection of ACRL and supplemented by data from other sources such as Who’s Who in LibraryService [3]. The Directory is a rich source of data that includes details such as position titles,degrees
practices and promotion of open data in science,” Sci Ed, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–9, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.6087/kcse.149.[2] D. R. Berg and K. E. Niemeyer, “The case for openness in engineering research,” F1000 research, vol. 7, pp. 501–501, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3SH2PpQ[3] A. Johri, S. Yang, M. Vorvoreanu, and K. Madhavan, “Perceptions and Practices of Data Sharing in Engineering Education,” Advances in engineering education, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3Ur54hJ[4] B. Suhr, J. Dungl, and A. Stocker, “Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering—A qualitative interview study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 9 September, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone
this role, Mr. Landmesser has honed his technical acumen and improved his management and communication skills while building strong organizational and leadership qualities. Mr. Landmesser is currently pursuing a PhD in electrical engineering from the University of Tennessee, focusing on modeling soil- moisture impacts to wildland-urban interface. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Technical Standards in Engineering Education: A Survey Across Professional Sectors Final Submission: May 1, 2023: American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2023 Annual Conference and Exposition, Baltimore, MD on June 25-28, 2023AbstractThe global emphasis
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[9] T. Anderson and C. Leachman, “Strategies for Supporting OER Adoption through Faculty and Instructor Use of a Federated Search Tool,” J. Librariansh. Sch. Commun., vol. 7, no. 1, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.2279.[10] C. Leachman and T. Anderson, “Open Educational Engineering Resources: Adoption and Development by Faculty and Instructors,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017, p. 28725. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28725.[11] C. D. Czajka and D. McConnell, “The adoption of student-centered teaching materials as a professional development experience for college faculty,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 41, no. 5
Paper ID #43714Board 103: Developing a User Experience Study (Work in Progress)James M. Cox, The University of Iowa James M. Cox has been a member of the University of Iowa Lichtenberger Engineering Library Staff since August 2014. In his current role as the Public Services and Emerging Technologies Librarian, since 2019, he oversees a team of 12 student employees at the Service Desk. Additionally, James manages the library’s technology resources, including the prototyping equipment available in the Creative Space/Makerspace and the extensive Tool Library containing over 275 pieces of equipment. James is interested in
Needs of Engineering Faculty: How the Library and Librarian Fit In," presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, July, 2021.[3] K. Tanaka et al., Teaching Business: Looking at the Support Needs of Instructors. Ithaka S+R, 2019.[4] Ithaka S+R. "About." https://sr.ithaka.org/about/ (accessed February 14, 2022).[5] D. Cooper et al., "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Agriculture Scholars," New York, NY, 2017.[6] D. Cooper et al., "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Asian Studies Scholars," New York, NY, 2018.[7] D. Cooper et al., "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Public Health Scholars," New York, NY, 2017.[8] D
making connections and helping students and faculty” [8, p. 150]. In 2019,Corrall and Jolly describe this shift as “the social turn in library innovation”, where librariansfocus more on “community-oriented service models” rather than strictly collections [9, p. 122].In this community-oriented approach, librarians take a holistic view of the student experienceand aim to support students beyond the classroom [9]. In 2020, the Association of College andResearch Libraries (ACRL) identified “supporting well-being on campuses” as one of the toptrends in academic libraries [9, p.4], [10]. And while the end goal may be the same - to helpstudents find and access information [6] - librarians are increasingly doing so by supporting non-academic campus
needs and experiences of undergraduate students and practicing engineers,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 39–49, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.12.004.[3] M. Phillips, D. Zwicky, and J. Lu, “Initial study of information literacy content in engineering and technology job postings,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2020, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274195.[4] J. Jeffryes and M. Lafferty, “Gauging workplace readiness: Assessing the information needs of engineering co-op students,” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, vol. 69, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.5062/F4X34VDR.[5] N. Waters, E. Kasuto, and F. McNaughton, “Partnership between engineering libraries
Authors:The first task in surveying OER authors in engineering was to compile a list of contacts to reachout to. Locating OER has thankfully become easier as lists and databases of these resources havebecome more common, but this also presented our first choice as there are multiple lists of OERin engineering, some with more than a hundred resources. Because we were submitting the paperto the ASEE Libraries Division, we decided it would be appropriate to use the ASEE EngineeringLibraries Division Open Textbooks for Engineering list [12] as our central resource foridentifying authors. This list contains over a hundred resources and is consistently updated toinclude the most recently published OER. In addition to this database, the authors added a
Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 45-76, 2014.[5] A. Henry and L. Stieglitz, "An Examination of Systematic Reviews in the Engineering Literature," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[6] M. Phillips, J. B. Reed, D. Zwicky, and A. S. Van Epps, "A scoping review of engineering education systematic reviews," Journal of Engineering Education, 2023.[7] K. Kolaski, L. R. Logan, and J. P. A. Ioannidis, "Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews," Systematic Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 96, 2023/06/08 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02255-9.[8] N. R. Haddaway, M. J. Grainger, and C. T. Gray, "Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation
. 454-471, 07// 2017, doi: 10.1108/RSR-10-2016-0077.[6] P. McMonigle, "Engaging Engineering Students with Mobile Learning Technologies," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[7] Association of College and Research Libraries. "Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education." https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed February 1, 2024).[8] L. Romero Rodríguez, "Using Nearpod for Reviewing Lessons to Increase Motivation and Academic Performance: A Case Study with Engineering Students," in International Conference in Methodologies and intelligent Systems for Techhnology Enhanced Learning, 2023: Springer, pp. 199-206.[9] K. S. Grigg and J. Dale
,” Ithaka S+R, Jan. 2019. doi: 10.18665/sr.310885.[11] S. Parker, “Research Data Sharing in Engineering: A Report on Faculty Practices and Preferences Prior to the Tri-Agency Policy,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore, Maryland: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023, p. 44112. doi: 10.18260/1-2--44112.[12] C. Tenopir et al., “Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide,” PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 8, p. e0134826, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826.[13] B. Suhr, J. Dungl, and A. Stocker, “Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering—A qualitative interview study,” PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 9, p
notstandardized, taught, or easily described. This challenge makes researching technical standardseducation tough. Technical standards challenges and their viewed importance change across thelifetime of an engineer, by putting numbers and names to these challenges and importancecategories through coding the engineering community and academic community has access toanother tool to make a change.AcknowledgmentsFinancial assistance for travel to the 2024 ASEE conference was provided by the TennesseeValley Society of Fire Protection Engineers and the University of Tennessee – Knoxville. 15References[1] M. Phillips, "Standards Collections: Considerations for the