Conference Session

Developing Better Engineering Managers - Curricular Ideas from Year 1 Through Graduate School

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ellen Belitzky, University of Bridgeport; Neal A Lewis, University of Bridgeport; Erika Belitzky, Student

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

. Kosnik, R. D., Tingle, J. K., & Blanton, E. L. (2013). Transformational learning in business education: The pivotal role of experiential learning projects. American Journal of Business Education (Online), 6(6), 613. 2. Günsel, A., & Açikgöz, A. (2011). The Effects of Team Flexibility and Emotional Intelligence on Software Development Performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(2), 359-377. doi: 10.1007/s10726-011-9270-63. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399. doi: 10.1037/h00221004. Hoda, R., Babb, J., & Norbjerg, J. (2013). Toward Learning Teams. IEEE Softw, 30(4), 95-98. doi: 10.1109/ms.2013.905. De la Iglesia, D. G

Conference Session

EMD Program Design

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Gary Teng, University of North Carolina-Charlotte; Ertunga Ozelkan, University of North Carolina-Charlotte; Yesim Sireli, University of North Carolina-Charlotte; Karen Elmore, University of North Carolina-Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

. A. T. Bahill and B. Gissing, Re-evaluating systems engineering concepts using systems thinking, IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 28 (4), 516-527, 1998.3. Wymore, A. W., Model-Based Systems Engineering, CRC Press, 1993.4. Singh, V. P., Hydrologic Systems, Rainfall-Runoff Modeling, Prentice Hall, 1988.5. Blanchard, B. S. and W. J. Fabrycky, Systems Engineering and Analysis, 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, 738 pp.6. The Institute for Systems Research, What is systems engineering? University of Maryland, http://www.isr.umd.edu/ISR/about/definese.html.7. Charlotte Chamber of Commerce, http://www.charlottechamber.org

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 3: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Scott Abney, East Carolina University; Mark Angolia, East Carolina University; Natalie Aman, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

quantity. The week 6 column has the last large/red sticky note on the game board;this is the blanket purchase order representing a total quantity ordered to supply Weeks 6 – 10.Students then issued “purchase order releases against the blanket” beginning with Week 6,represented by the smaller pink sticky notes. In addition, the game moderator added yellow [B]sticky notes to represent a “bill of lading” for the supplier shipment, and yellow [I] sticky notesrepresenting the “invoice” from supplier to customer. Student teams posted payment the sameway it was done in the first half of the game. The additional forms were explained during theWeek 5 break, along with communicating that the blockchain sticky notes, while placed on thegame board, are

Conference Session

Improving IE Course Content

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hung-da Wan, University of Texas, San Antonio; Yi-Ching Liao, University of Texas, San Antonio; Glenn Kuriger, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

(b) 8 Players Registrar Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Scheduler Red Receptionist Blue Registrar Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Scheduler (c) 11 Players Figure 5. Variable number of participants from 6 to 11 players enabled by modular tasksAnother key to the improved flexibility of number of participants is that the roles of Receptionistand Registrar can be either combined or separated as shown in (a) and (c) of Figure 5. When thetwo roles are combined, the game setting can accommodate even numbers of participants.Separating the two roles

Conference Session

Curriculum and the Classroom

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandra L. Furterer, University of Dayton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–27.Heltzel, B., Workplace bias felt in ‘a thousand cuts’. Westchester County Business Journal, MAY 9,2016 | VOL. 52, No. 19Kastner, Westman & Wilkins, Respondent’s Position Statement, Page 2, June 15, 2017.McCauley-Bush, P., Transforming Your STEM Career Through Leadership and Innovation, 1st Edition.Academic Press, 2012.No author, Teaching Tolerance, What are Gender Stereotypes?, https://www.tolerance.org/classroom-resources/tolerance-lessons/what-are-gender-stereotypes, accessed 1/23/2018.Phelan, J. E., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Competent yet out in the cold: Shiftingcriteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 406–13. doi:10.1111/j

Conference Session

Emerging EM Areas

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carmen Zafft, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Maria A. Perez, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Stephanie Adams, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Tests. National Council on Measurement in Education. 1982. Downie, Norville M. Types of Test Scores Houghton Mifflin Company. 1968 pp. 25- 45.3 . Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS(R) system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.4. Lyman, Howard B. Test Scores & What They Mean. Fifth edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. Page 11.460.75. Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.6. Monroe Miller, David. Interpreting Test Scores John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1972 pp 20- 42.7. Simon, Laura Carmen. Study of the Performance of

Conference Session

EM Program Design

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary A. Viola, School of Engineering, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

‘data’ from various assessmentinstruments, including Myers-Briggs, Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior(FIRO-B), and 360-degree feedback. These assessments enable students to better understandtheir own tendencies and their impact on others. This is quite different from a more traditionalapproach involving the identification and discussion of core values2. This approach is deliberateand provides students with practical tools and concepts that they can quickly use to increase theireffectiveness in both their class projects as well as their professional work. These early positiveoutcomes reinforce the value of the leadership training and also motivate students who areinitially doubtful of the value.In our view, teaching and

Conference Session

Technology and Equipment to Improve IE Instruction

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard A. Pitts Jr., Morgan State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

, other students reported “It was a good course, and the robotswere pretty fun. The simulation of a part being cut and watching it in real time was awesome.”Another student said, “The concept of this course was very interesting and can be applied toplenty of real-life applications.”Final course grade data indicate that all students enrolled in the IRAM courses earned passinggrades. Final average grades were in the B range, approximately 79.5%. Three students earnedA’s in IEGR 488; two students earned A’s in IEGR 470; and one student earned an A in IEGR468. Figure 3 displays the distribution of final grades for each course.Goal 3 - Assessing educational impact with mini-module laboratory projects for problemsolving.The review of course syllabi

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Education and K-12

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fernando Garcia Gonzalez, Texas A&M International University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

9design we w used the Bernd B Bruegg ge and Allenn H. Dutoit Design Lifee Cycle Moddel. Later in 22005we used an incremen ntal design an nd developm ment processs, which allow ws for moree flexibility wwhenneeded as well as forr parallel dev velopment frrom various sub-groups which was eessential to ttheteam. Ou ur incrementaal design floow followed many sequeential ‘Validaation V’ dessigns which tthengave it a ‘W’ formatiion which reepresents thee synchronizaation of mulltiple teams w workingtogether. The team fo ound that thee ‘W’ paradiigm works e xceedingly w well for the level ofmodulariity they weree using. Desiign paradigm ms are generrally taught iin systems enngineeringcourses however

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel A. Malachowsky, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

outlined in this paper inspiring, possiblyresulting in the choice to make similar improvements to courses or academic programs in whichthey participate.9. References[1] Cmmifaq, http://www.cmmifaq.info/, Jan 2014.[2] Project management antipatterns, http://sourcemaking.com/antipatterns/software-project-management-antipatterns, Jan 2014.[3] K. Abernethy, G. Piegari, and H. Reichgelt. Teaching project management: An experiential approach. J.Comput.Sci. Coll., 22(3):198–205, Jan. 2007.[4] B. Boehm. Software engineering economics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981.[5] A. A. Cockburn. Methodology space, http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/biblio/bibtex/contrib/doc/, Jan 1997.[6] O. de Weck, J. Lyneis, and D. Braha. System project management

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 4: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Steven Hoak, United States Military Academy; John P. Richards, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

A Build torso -- B Build legs -- C Connect legs B D Attach legs C, A E Build arms -- F Attach arms D, E G Attach head & mask F H Attach launcher & disk GTasks A, B, and E had no precedence requirements. Task C, G, and H only needed the precedingtask’s work to complete their own. Task D needed both Tasks A and C’s completed work andTask F needed both Task D and E’s completed work. This fact

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Education and K-12

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reid Bailey, University of Virginia; Joanne Bechta Dugan, University of Virginia; Alexandra Coso Strong, Georgia Institute of Technology; Matthew E. McFarland, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

referenced assessments 17, 23. Authors Wiggins and McTighe24, asone example, recommend a “backward design” framework for designing assessment methodsand learning experiences based on the desired learning outcomes. For interdisciplinaryteamwork, in this case, sub-outcomes could be utilized. One IGERT proposal, for instance,subdivided the teamwork and professionalism learning outcome into “(a) an understanding ofgroup dynamics associated with leadership, membership, and peer to peer interactions, (b) theability to listen, give, and receive feedback, (c) ability to set appropriate goals, milestones, anddivision of labor”3. By considering these learning objectives during the course design phase,faculty can avoid utilizing methods that do not provide a

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Curriculum and Programs

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alice F. Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology; Timothy L.J. Ferris, University of South Australia; Joseph J. Ekstrom, Brigham Young University; Mary D. VanLeer, Perceptive-Systems; Garry Roedler, Lockheed Martin

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

engineering, the workdoes provide insight into what is important in the discipline and can serve as a guide toundergraduate curriculum developersBackgroundGRCSE is built on an holistic interpretation of curriculum as concerning the total context inwhich education is provided, and as such the recommendations address five primary areas of asystems engineering program:5 1) student entrance expectations; 2) a curriculum architecture comprised of: a. preparatory material, b. a core body of systems engineering knowledge (the CorBoK), c. domain or program-specific knowledge, and d. a capstone experience; 3) outcomes every graduate should achieve; 4) objectives every graduate should achieve three to five years

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul C. Lynch, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Joseph Wilck, College of William & Mary; Amanda Elizabeth VanBuskirk

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

the IE EE class A. The instructor knowing student names in the Class B. Starting Every Class with Announcements/Questions C. Knowing all upcoming events from ANGEL Calendar D. Knowing the Topics to Study for all Exams and Quizzes E. Knowing Your Grades at all times on ANGEL F. Having a 1 class Quiz or Case Study Grade Return Policy and 1 Week Exam Grade Return PolicyThe average results for the three semesters of the IE EE class are shown in Figure 1 below: Importance for your Course Satisfaction (IE EE) The instructor knowing your Name Starting Every Class with Announcements/Questions Knowing all upcoming events from Angel Calendar Knowing the Topics to Study for all Exams and

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kate D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES)

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

, not learning, as such severalboxes of TG 403/404 outcomes data in Table 1 are empty. Scores range from 0 to 4 on aLikert type scale and have been aggregated from multiple instructors in order to list themper semester. Please see Appendix B for the full course outcome for each of the ABET a-k listed below and what deliverable was used to measure each outcome. Page 26.1392.6TABLE 1 – Course Outcomes Assessment Fall Spring Fall 2013 Spring Fall 2014 2012* 2013 2014TG 403- Tools (k)+ 2.70

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 3: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael Sollitto, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi; Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

, vol. 84, pp. 240-245, 2009.[13] E. B. Ray, and G. B. Ray, “Teaching conflict management skills in corporate training: A perspective-taking approach,” Communication Education, vol. 35, pp. 288-290, 1986.[14] J. T. Garner and M. S. Poole, “Perspectives on workgroup conflict and communication,” in The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice, J. G. Oetzel and S. Ting-Toomey, Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013, pp. 321- 347.[15] J. P. Folger, M. S. Poole, and R. K. Stutman, R. K, Working Through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organizations, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2009.[16] J. K. Jameson, “Conflict,” in Origins and Traditions of Organizational Communication: A

Conference Session

Improving course effectiveness

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Terri M. Lynch-Caris, Kettering University; Mark A. Palmer P.E., Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

categorized into three categories with four to seven specifictypes of technology included for each category:(1) Seating and Room Layout a. Lecture style seating arrangement b. Group tables arrangement c. Pods or node chairs d. Web-based learning – partial face-to-face e. Web-based learning – completely online(2) Boards & Projection Page 23.541.2 a. Chalkboards b. White boards c. Computer projection w/ instructor notes d. Document Camera(3) Video and Lecture Capture. a. Mobile computing: handhelds, Smartphones, tablet PCs, laptops, + b. Fixed Lab Computing c. Video capture

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

capability analysis, measurement systemanalysis, specification and tolerances, and acceptance sampling plans. Students typically take thiscourse in the second year of their masters program. The course learning outcomes are (a) Defineconcepts in quality and quality management; (b) Apply statistical tools in analysis andapplication of Statistical Process Control; (c) Produce and employ control charts; (d) Explainsampling process; and (e) Design acceptance sampling procedures for quality control.The course work and activities typically include a term paper, a term project, homework, in classexercises and discussions, quizzes and two exams (midterm and final). During the study periodthe author added the library training and a factory visit to the class

Conference Session

Curriculum and the Classroom

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mustafa Shraim, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

. Tension setting - fixed arm B. Tension setting - moving arm C. Ball seat D. Elevation E. Ball Type F. Hight of catapult placement G. Reclining distance before releaseThe in-flight distance is measured using a tape measure to the closest inch. This is done visuallyby an inspector. As a result, the determined distance will also include variation from themeasurement system, mainly the inspector.Project DetailsThis project is an element of a required Quality Improvement course taught at a majorMidwestern public university. Below are some of the learning outcomes of this course that relateto the Six Sigma project: • Apply knowledge of engineering and statistical fundamentals to solve technical problems • Understand the

Conference Session

IE and EM Program Mangement

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Hagenberger, Valparaiso University; Peter Johnson, Valparaiso University; Doug Tougaw, Valparaiso University; Jeffrey Will, Valparaiso University; Mark Budnik, Valparaiso University; Kathleen Sevener, Valparaiso University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

exists to determinequantitatively if these changes have been a success, the lessons that have been learned will allowthe faculty to improve two experiences that __________ University is proud to offer.8. References1. C. J. Nixon, “Key Business Competencies for New Aerospace Engineers,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).2. B. R. Dickson, “The Engineer Ought To Be A Man Of Business,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).3. George Suckarieh, Jason Krupar, “Leadership and Teamwork Education for Engineering and Technology Students: An Experiential Learning and Community Service Approach

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caleb Wolters, University of Dayton; Sandra L. Furterer, University of Dayton; Kellie Schneider, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Goal A IET Faculty IET skills for future engineering B IET Alumni Interconnected learning throughout curriculum C Industry partners Growing industries in IET D Current IET Students Include CAP requirements in IET Table 2: CTS Characteristics Title Description Meet ABET Requirements must be set so the program remains accredited requirementsImprove students hands- More hands on learning and use of equipment students learn

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects and Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tim L. Brower, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

water tower apparatus must be easily drainable 7 Power input must be typical 110 V 8 Device must be fully automatedEach team was allocated a role and a set of responsibilities, viz: 1) Integrating Contractor Team a. Acts as the Project Manager for the project b. Acts as budget officer c. Assures an adequate amount of energy available and characterizes flow d. Determines timeline, tracks progress e. Assembles integration specifications from each team f. Writes final report 2) Sensor Design Team a. Responsible for sensor, pump, & shut-off system specification and design b. Computer interface and readout, coding and formatting c

Conference Session

Enhancing Engineering Management

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ana Valeria Quevedo, Universidad de Piura; Dante Arturo Guerrero, Universidad de Piura; Martin Palma, Universidad de Piura; Susana Vegas, Universidad de Piura

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Descriptive statistics by student Student distribution by cumulative performance grade-point average 28.89% 35.56% 40.00% 22.22% B+ A- A A+ 11.11% 20.00% 2.22% 2% 0.00% 14% 33% 51% Performance of students (1: max., 0: min.)Figure 2. Descriptive statistics of students’ characteristicsFurthermore, data from the

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alejandro Salado, Virginia Tech; John Ray Morelock, Virginia Tech; Arash Baghaei Lakeh, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

). Nurturing affinity spaces and game-based learning. In C. Steinkuehler, K. Squire & S. Barab (Eds.), Games, Learning, and Society: Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age (pp. 123-153). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Grohs, J. R., Maczka, D. K., Soledad, M., & Bagalkotkar, K. K. (2016). Exploring the Feasibility of an Educational Computer Game as a Novel Means of Assessing Problem Solving Competencies. Paper presented at the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Now Orleans, LA.Hazelrigg, G. A. (1998). A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4), 653-658. doi: 10.1115/1.2829328Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated Engineering

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 3: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta; Lianne M. Lefsrud P.Eng., University of Alberta; Fereshteh Sattari; John Donald, University of Guelph

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Integrative Framework for Engineering Education, Sustainability,and Risk ManagementTo design engineering program learning activities and experiences consistent withachieving the engineering graduate attributes and the emerging development of asustainability culture, we integrate three frameworks: 1) the CEAB Graduate Attribute framework (Appendix A), 2) the United Nations (UN) Sustainable development framework (UN Sustainable Development Summit, 2015) (Appendix B), and 3) the Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS) management framework (AIChE CCPS, 2007; Crowl & Louvar, 2019) (Appendix C).All suggest that education, continual improvement and lifelong learning practices underliethe long-term success of sustainable development

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects and Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michele Miller, Michigan Technological University; John K. Gershenson, Michigan Technological University; Amilcar Alejandro Rincon-Charris, Inter American University of Puerto Rico, Bayamon; Carlos A. Alvarado, Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico; Jose A. Rojas, Universidad del Turabo

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

Pre-Phase A Phase A Phase B Phase C Phase D Design Problem System Level Parameter Level Optimized Fabrication, Assembly, Analysis

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 4: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Revenue per Banchee from customer 4. Define the problem 5. Deliverables: A. Charter- Project Charter (1).doc or begin A-3 B. SIPOC – in lab spreadsheet C. Specifications of product- Product Specification Sheet.doc D. Review Process Map – In spreadsheet E. Review Customer Specs – Product Specification Sheet.doc F. Produce first Banchees – make 10 G. Get first measurement a. Weight b. Size – thickness c. Conformance to specs H. Quality people do 1st MSA – do an attribute MSALab 2 – Measure 1. Run 10 minute production – 3 times 2. Take measurements a. Weight b. Thickness c. Other specs d. Factory measurements e. Delivery time f

Conference Session

EMD Recruitment and Certification

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Loendorf, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

; Davis5, 2003, p. 17). Three ofthe major contributors were W. Edward Deming, Joseph M. Juran, and Philip B. Crosby. Anumber of basic similarities can be extracted from these philosophies. These include Page 12.1234.7management commitment, training, and continuous improvement.These methodologies offer support and provide direction for organizations interested inbeginning or improving a total quality system. All of these methodologies utilize and involve thesame common practices: “Establish an organizational policy, implement that policy throughdocumented procedures, practice the procedures and policies in the work environment, andshow proof that

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Jimmy Gandhi, California State University, Northridge; Jennifer A Farris, Texas Tech University; Mario G. Beruvides Ph. D., Texas Tech University; Ahmad R Sarfaraz, California State University, Northridge

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

, (2013), 120th Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013. 7. Farnsworth, C, Lords, M.O & Charles, B, Involving students in an international technology exchange, (2012), 119th Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012 8. George, J. (1996). Virtual Best Practice: How to Successfully Introduce Virtual team Working. Teams, 38- 45. 9. Holton, J. (2001). Building Trust and Collaboration in a Virtual Team. Team Performance Management, 7(3/4), 36-47. 10. Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Leidner, D.E. (1999). Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Organization

Conference Session

Improving course effectiveness

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard L Marcellus, Northern Illinois University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

: 0.01 b. Calculate the probability that a wax block will either crumble away OR melt too fast when it is put to use. c. You have been told that a particular wax block was not Usable, but not the reason that it was unusable. Calculate the (conditional) probability that the wax block melted too fast (given that it was unusable). d. Calculate the following three probabilities: the probability that a wax block will Page 23.93.6 crumble away given that it was made by shift one, the probability that a wax block will melt too fast given that it was made by