associated with collective change inengineering education. We also intend to build out the descriptions, and examine ingreater depth, the potential impact of culture shifts in key engineering education co-contraries, such as the ones we have put forward in this work.Finally, we are hopeful we can begin a dialog on how we can leverage engineeringleadership education to facilitate our capacity for meaningful change in engineeringeducation.5. References[1] D. E. Goldberg and M. Somerville, “A Field Manual for A Whole New Education: Rebooting Higher Education for Human Connection & Insight in a Digital World.” Threejoy Associates, Incorporated, 2023.[2] B. Johnson, Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems. HRD Press
. Ioannidis, "Design and Assessment of a Hybrid Chemical Engineering Laboratory Course with the Incorporation of Student- Centred Experiential Learning.," Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 30, pp. 1-8, 2020. 12[11] C. Higgs, F. C. Higgs, K. Karwowski, D. A. Van Kleeck, T. E. Phalen, G. Moran and J. P. Hennessy, "The Challenges of Developing Engineering Management and Leadership Curriculum for Students Planning RIPE Careers,," American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE, 10 September 2020.[12] M. B. Miles, M. Huberman and J. Saldana, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.[13] D. L
analysis, engineering economy, and health systems engineering. Dr. Smith’s research interests include simulation modeling and optimization methodologies with applications to healthcare, public health, supply chain, information systems, logistics, sustainability, and other industrial and service systems.Dr. Henry Lester, University of Dayton Dr. Henry D. Lester is an Associate Professor and Director of the Systems Engineering Program in the School of Engineering at the University of Dayton. He holds a Ph.D. & M.S. in Civil Engineering (The University of Alabama), M.S. in Applied Statistics (T ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Navigating the AI Revolution in Engineering
model?” Furthermore, what are the upsides and downsides of such anintegration. There is a need to develop a comprehensive product development model with theproduct manager in the mix.Integrating the PDM into this model will likely experience growing pains and learning curves butshould result in a higher probability of successful NPD initiatives. Some of the potential areas ofconflicts to consider are: a. The role of the PDM. b. Changes in the roles of the PGM, SE, and PM. c. Change and level of complexity. d. Advantages, disadvantages, and challenges for the product development team. e. Advantages, disadvantages, and challenges for the firm. f. Advantages, disadvantages, and challenges for the customer. g. Value
requirement for the engineering management master’s degree at the University of Idaho," in SEM 41st International Annual Conference Proceedings "Leading Organizations through Uncertain Times", 2020.[8] J. Mallen, C. T. J. P.E., N. A. Koehler and A. K. Ilgu, "Workflow for Developing Online Content for Hybrid Classes," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[9] L. M. Pohl and E. A. Pohl., "From Classroom to Online to Hybrid: The Evolution of an Operations Management Course," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[10] Nicolas-Sans, J. B. D. Ruben and J. A. Valdes, "Teaching in Times of Pandemic, Converging Towards a Hybrid Scenario," Journal of Management and
Paper ID #41624Preparing Future Generations for Executive Leadership Roles in TechnicalOrganizationsMr. Richard (Rick) Warren Blank, Johns Hopkins Engineering for Professionals Richard W (Rick) Blank, B.A., B.S., M.S. Mr. Blank is a Lecturer in the Engineering for Professionals Master of Engineering Management Program at the Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering. In this program he teaches Planning & Managing Projects; Finance, Contracts, & Compliance for Technical Professionals; Strategic Communications in Technical Organizations; and Executive Technical Leadership. He also holds an appointment as the
systems, and application of analytical models for business problem solving, and operations management. He has published data analysis textbooks, research articles in Quality Management Journal, and Journal of Brand Strategy.Dr. Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Jena Asgarpoor is a Professor of Practice at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln and the Director for the Master of Engineering Management Program in the College of Engineering. She received her Ph. D. and M.S. in Industrial Engineering, specializing in Engineering Management, from Texas A&M University in College Station where she had previously earned a B.A. in Political Science (Summa Cum Laude). Prior to UNL, she was a professor
Paper ID #41454Career Advantages of Business Education Courses for Engineering ManagementStudentsDr. Saeed D. Foroudastan, Middle Tennessee State University Dr. Saeed Foroudastan is the Associate Dean for the College of Basic and Applied Sciences (CBAS). The CBAS oversees 10 departments at Middle Tennessee State University. He is also the current Director for the Masters of Science in Professional Science proSuzanne S. Hicks, Middle Tennessee State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Evaluation of Impact on Employability of Business Education Courses in a
Paper ID #46274Bridging the Gap: Accelerating Engineering Management Education ThroughInnovative Graduate PathwaysDr. David Paulus, University of Arkansas David Paulus, PhD is a Professor of Practice of Industrial Engineering and the Director of the Engineering Management and Operations Management graduate programs at the University of Arkansas. David is Professional Engineer (PE) in the state of Arkansas and a Certified Professional in Engineering Management (CPEM). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Bridging the Gap: Accelerating Engineering Management Education Through
Management Science and Engineering from Stanford University, and her Ph.D. in Management from UC Irvine. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Iterative Learning: Using AI-bots in Negotiation TrainingNegotiation skills are essential in management education and in engineering practice. Traditionalteaching methods, centered around role-playing activities. have often struggled to fully engagestudents or provide the personalized feedback necessary for mastering such a complex skill set.To addressing this pedagogical gap, I developed AdVentures with chatGPT [1] by leveragingartificial intelligence to create a dynamic, interactive learning experience that adapts to eachstudent's needs and performance
Paper ID #46564Teaching professional skills for students’ competitive advantage in the era ofAI workplace transformationDr. Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University Ekaterina Koromyslova is an Associate Professor in Operations Management. She teaches several courses, including Operations and Supply Chain Management, Engineering Economic Analysis, and Interdisciplinary Project Experience courses. She has several years of industry experience as an analyst-consultant for manufacturing companies and as a leading manager in supply chain and logistics. Her research interests are in interdisciplinary education