they complete the pair of courses [8]. The instrument shown as Attachment Aprovides each student the opportunity for self-assessment as well as assessment of each of theirproject team members. A panel of outside design professionals’ use a rubric similar to the oneshown in Attachment B) to assess the outcomes that the students are expected to demonstratethroughout the semester. The panel of outside design professionals provides a perspective fromthe practical design side in addition to the academic perspective provided by the courseinstructors. This assessment information is reviewed by the ET faculty and shared with thestudents and members of the outside panel of design professional and the Industrial AdvisoryBoards of each program for
Comparison of Underrepresented Students in the Same Institution[3] American Society of Engineering Educators, "Engineering Degrees, 2017-2016," 16Profile-Front-Section(3).pdf, Ed., ed, 2017.[4] ABET. (2016). Setting the Standard World Wide. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/[5] C. R. Farrell and B. A. Lee, "No-majority communities: Racial diversity and change at the local level," Urban Affairs Review, p. 1078087416682320, 2017.[6] ABET. (2013). Engineering vs. Engineering Technology. Available: http://www.abet.org/engineering-vs-engineering-technology/[7] A. M. Lucietto, "The Role of Academic Ability in Choice of Major and Persistence in STEM Fields," Ph.D., College of Engineering School of
a CoefficientsModel Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig. Coefficients B Std. Error Beta (Constant) 5.950 1.094 5.438 .000 Total Site Activity/Usage .005 .002 .362 2.602 .0131 Chat Room Activity .013 .006 .309 2.261 .029 Message Activity -.004
Page 12.299.6delivering content, and the brokering resources from many higher education (and other)providers all serve to provide innovative approaches to the demands of future learners.Institutions must clearly identify and focus on what they do best, while automating, outsourcing,and, in some cases, discontinuing activities that retard change and innovation.Bibliography1. Schacter, M. (1999). Filling the void: Attracting new engineers. Consulting-Specifying Engineer, 26 (3): 26-30.2. Vick, R.C. (2001). Cultivating a new generation of women engineers. Pollution Engineering, 33 (3): 23.3. Buchanan, B. (1975, Spring). To walk an extra mile: The whats, whens, and whys of organizational commitment. Organizational
calculations in analyzing quality and security of ship electric power systems. 2. Students reported strong understanding of the application or importance of the outcomes requirements, except in the case of 3-phase circuits, wherein students reported adequate understanding. a. Improvement: See 1(a). B. Learning Opportunities: Regarding the five main learning opportunities, the student reported the following opinions.Improvements are listed for each opportunity. 1. Lectures: The students reported the lectures to be more than helpful, but not very helpful a. Improvement: In response to student comments, lectures will include more in-class problem solving and more
Course Learning Outcomes ABET Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Outcomes 1) Buoyancy 2) Mass Flow Determination a, b, c, d, e, 3) Pressure Drop f, g 4) Time to Empty Tank 5) Friction Loss vs. Reynold's #Activity #1 (Assignment presented in [2]): The activity investigates the buoyancy effects by tap and salty water on an object immersed in water. A balance, weight scale, beakers and other needed equipment were provided to students. The students had
Design, Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.12 Bahner, B., Report: curricula need product realization, ASME News, March 1996, vol.15, no.10, pp.1,613 Prusak, Z., Challenges to Future Engineering Professionals – How to Prepare Students to Face Them, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, June 28- July 1, 1998, Seattle, WA.14 Prusak, Z., Development of Inventive Skills and Engineering Education – a Global Outlook, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Education, July 25-29, 2005, Gliwice, Poland.15 Incropera, F.P., Fox, R.W., Revising Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: The Implementation Phase, Journal of Engineering Education, vol.85
mixed messages that may arise from the facultyor students interviews. Some examples here are: a) the SSR included the program admissionpolicy for 2010-2011 and the one for 2012-2014; b) both the college course transfer policy andthe departmental were included.The subsections related to Student Performance Evaluation, Transfer Students and TransferCourses were thoroughly explained including even redundant details. The reason is that lack ofdetail may cause unnecessary questions when the evaluation team is reviewing the transcripts.This section allows explaining the potential reasons for courses that were taken without theappropriate pre-requisites (which many times are easily explained because of a change in catalogand course descriptions).One
Evolution of Online Learning and the Revolution in Higher Education.5. Jones, S., & Johnson, C. (2005). The Internet's impact on college faculty. Retrieved December 17, 2008, from Professors online: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_9/jones/index.html6. Olsen, F. (2000). Massachusetts May Require Public-College Students to Own Laptops. The Chronicle of Higher Education .7. Read, B. The upside and downside of laptops in education.8. Shirley, D. L., Pierson, C. L., Trytten, D. A., Rhoads, T. R., & Court, M. A. (2002). A laptop college of Page 14.621.7 engineering at the university of Oklahoma.Page 14.621.8
whichgovern the direction of the given programs. At the center of the NIU Department of Technologyprogram are the following core educational Outcomes and Objectives.ATMAE and ABET (TAC) Learning Outcomes: An engineering technology program mustdemonstrate that graduates have: Designator Outcome A An appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of their disciplines. B An ability to apply current knowledge and adapt to emerging applications of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology. C An ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve processes
Annual Mean Minimum Design Dry Bulb Temperature = – 16 ºC Tmin = – 16 ºC – 25 ºC = – 41 ºC V1 = Voc x { 1 + [ (– 41 ºC) x (– 0.32% / ºC)]} = 21.9 x 1.1312 = 24.77 V There are two PV modules in series per string. Therefore, the maximum output voltage from PV modules after temperature correction will be 49.55 V that is within the input voltage specification of Xantrex C35 charge controller. 2 modules in series Vmax = 24.77 x 2 = 49.55 V(b) The maximum output current from PV modules Short-circuit current Isc of GS-Star-100W = 6.13A Temperature coefficient of Isc = 0.04 % / ºC ASHRAE 2% High Temperature = 34 ºC Tmax = 34 ºC – 25 ºC = 9 ºC I1 = Isc x { 1 + [ 9 ºC) x (0.04% / ºC)]} = 6.13 A x
AC 2007-251: DEVELOPMENT OF NDE LABORATORY FOR AET STUDENTSAND CERTIFICATION PROGRAMVladimir Genis, Drexel University Dr. Vladimir Genis, Associate Professor and Program Director of Applied Engineering Technology in the Goodwin College, Drexel University, taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses in physics, electronics, biomedical engineering, and acoustics. His research interests include ultrasound wave propagation and scattering, ultrasound imaging, electronic instrumentation, piezoelectric transducers, and engineering education. He serves as a member of the Drexel’s Faculty Senate.David Spang, Burlington County College Dr. David I. Spang, the Dean of Science
. Time Activity August 2019 Form the advisory committee September Look for speakers by contacting industry leaders, federal or state workforce 2019 administrations and organizations, college and university educators, researchers, and K-12 teachers January 2020 Determine the time of the workshops February 2020 Announce the time and locations of the workshops and start recruiting participants March 2020 Continue recruiting workshop participants May 2020 Workshop in City A, MI June 2020 Workshop in City B, CA July 2020 Wrap up and report 4. Speaker ArrangementsOne or two speakers were expected to present in the eight sessions with
and technologystudents, (b) increasing overall student diversity in engineering and technology education, (c)enhancing student learning in advanced manufacturing technologies, (d) modernizing laboratoryfacilities for a wide regional area, and (e) encouraging undergraduate student research projects.The evaluation plan is focusing on student learning and is also comparing the relative advantagesof remote and traditional laboratories. Through this project, many more users are benefiting fromstate-of-the-art rapid prototyping technology, thereby better justifying the cost of purchasing andmaintaining the overall facility. Currently, this lab has been used by three technology programsin TX, KY, and TN. The current practices made by schools and
map it to various modes of DE Dissemination. Table 4: Methods of DE Dissemination for Lab Intensive STEM Courses Labs Proposed Methods of DE dissemination ITEC 2081 Tape, Virtual Instrumentation and Virtual Reality, etc. ITEC 2091 Tapes, Virtual Instrumentation and Virtual Reality, etc. ITEC 2055 Web & Virtual Instrumentation, etc. IENG 2021 Tapes , CD-ROM, etc. IENG 2077 Tapes, CD-ROMs, etc. IENG 3021 Tapes, Virtual Reality, etc.Phase II: a) Identify components of various courses, b)map it to various modes of DE Delivery, c)create new teaching materials. Example: ITEC 2081
2006-2147: DESIGNING TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING NATIONSWillie Ofosu, Pennsylvania State University-Wilkes-Barre Dr. Willie K. Ofosu is an Associate Professor and Head of Telecommunications Engineering Technology program at Penn State Wilkes-Barre, where he teaches telecommunications, wireless systems, networking, optoelectronics and analog and digital electronics. He is a member of IEEE, IEE (England), and a Chartered Engineer (CEng) of England. He is also a member of the National Association of Radio and Telecommunications Engineers (NARTE) and contributes to their Education Committee. His research interests are in RF components and antennas. He is currently involved in
)B. Proportional-Integral ModeThe integral mode adjusts the controller output to reduce the error. If the error is large, theintegral mode changes the controller output fast. The speed of the integral action is set by thecontroller’s integral time Ti. A small integral time makes integral action fast. To compare theproportional-integral control response, we set up two different RSET_min such as 0.25 and 0.10.It is noted that RSET_min refers to the integral time (i.e., Ti). For example, the RSET_min is0.25, which means that the integral time is for 15 seconds (i.e., 0.25 × 60 sec). Similarly,RSET_min of 0.10 corresponds to integral times of 6 seconds. When the RSET_min decreases, 𝐾𝐾𝑝𝑝the
programs such as the Early Alert System, Freshman First YearExperience, Learning Communities, and the North Star Center are being used to improvethe success of Engineering Technology (ET) students. New ET programs such as thementoring of women ET students, a transfer student scholarship program, and theaddition of professional staff advisors to the ET departments have also been added. Thesuccess of these programs is measured by comparing the attrition of ET freshman andtransfer students for the past five years to the RIT attrition of freshman and transferstudents.IntroductionRIT is a private university with a modern 1,300 acre campus located in Rochester, NewYork, the third largest city in New York. There were 11, 821 undergraduate students
significantly improve our ability to providethe kind of training that industry is looking for in the mechatronic product design andapplication. City Tech students will benefit tremendously through these integrated concurrentengineering and mechatronic product design activities. In addition, by introducing the LearningProducts Designs through Hands-on Robotics Projects, the impact of NYC public high schoolsand NYC industry partners will be significant.8. AcknowledgementThe work is partially funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation AdvancedTechnology Education Division. The award number is NSF ATE No 1003712. The authorsappreciate greatly the support from the NSF.9. References1. David G. Alciatore and Michael B. Histand, “Introduction to
] T. Samad, “Intelligent Control: An Overview of Techniques,” in Perspectives in Control Engineering Technologies, Applications, and New Directions, IEEE, 2010.[3] K. B. Letaief, W. Chen, Y. Shi, J. Zhang, and Y. J. A. Zhang, “The Roadmap to 6G: AI Empowered Wireless Networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 84–90, Aug. 2019.[4] D. Bradley, D. Russell, I. Ferguson, J. Isaacs, A. Macleod, and R. White, “The Internet of Things - The future or the end of mechatronics,” Mechatronics, vol. 27, pp. 57–74, Apr. 2015.[5] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs, 2018 – 2019 | ABET.” [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting
- tional Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Huston, Texas Nov.13-19, 2015 • Butler, P. B., Tanbour, E., Rahman, S., and Smith, T. F., ”Virtual International Design Teams,” Proceedings of 2002 ASEE Midwest Section Meeting, Madison, WI, September 2002 Significant Other Publications • M. F. Alzoubi, E. Y. Tanbour and R. Al-Waked (2011), Compression and Hysteresis Curves of Nonlin- ear Polyurethane Foams under Different Densities, Strain Rates and Different Environmental Conditions, IMECE11 2011, Denver, Colorado, USA • E. Y. Tanbour (2011), Institutional Effectiveness, the Point Of View of Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), King Saud University, Feb 2011 • Emad Y. Tanbour, Rafat Al-Waked and
seekother techniques that create opportunities for academic, interpersonal, and administrativeengagement of and with our students to build the confidence for potential success.References1 McDonald, ‘Enhancing the Recruitment and Retention of First-Year Students with Improved Career SelectionOpportunities,’ 1995 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceeding.s2 Woolston, D., Shook, K., and Wilson, J., ‘Same Problem, Different Solutions: Attempts at Improving Retention inEngineering at a Research vs. a Teaching University,’ 1995 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education ConferenceProceedings.3 Khan, F., and Siddique, B., ‘An NSF Pilot Project on Minority Student Retention’4 Brower, T., and Cornachion, H., ‘Women in Engineering Technology: Where
. Page 15.314.6Bibliography1. Baker, E. L., and Mayer, R. E. (1999). Computer-based assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 269–2822. Bransford, J., & Stein, B. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. New York:W. H.Freeman.3. Brown-Chidsey, R. (Ed.). (2005). Assessment for intervention: A problem-solving approach. New York: Guilford4. Cook, R. E. and Slife, B. D.(1985), Developing Problem-Solving Skills, Academic Therapy, v21, pp.5-135. Custer R. L. el al.(2001), Assessment Model for a Design Approach to Technological Problem Solving, J. of Technology Education, Vol.12, No.26. David W. Chan(2001), Dimensionality and correlates of problem solving: the use of the Problem Solving Inventory
2 b. Understanding of the theories and the ability to apply the principles and concepts of mathematics and science and the application of computer fundamentals. c. Application of concepts derived from, and current skills developed in, a variety of technical and related disciplines which may include, but are not limited to, materials and production processes, industrial management and human relations, marketing, communications, electronics, and graphics. d. Completion of a field of specialization, for example, electronic data processing, computer aided design, computer
Figure 1. Fall 2005 Number of Questions by Question TypeA sample of a question that was aimed at assessing conceptual understanding of covered materialis shown here for reference: A pump’s first natural frequency is at 17 Hz. An imbalance in the impeller causes forced vibration at a frequency of 25 Hz. The pump system has a damping factor of 1.0. Will the pump vibrate at: (A) 17 Hz (B) 25 Hz (C) 17 Hz and 25 Hz
-engineering-technology-programs-2020-2021/[6]. How to Write a Design Report. University of Minnesota, Department of MechanicalEngineering. www.me.umn.edu/education/undergraduate/writing/How-to-write-a-Dedsign-TReport.pdf[7]. V. V. Baba and M. E. Ace, “Serendipity in Leadership: Initiating Structure and Consideration in theClassroom”, Human Relations, 42, pp. 509-525, 1989.[8]. B. Lahat-Mandelbaum and D. Kipnis, “Leader Behavior Dimensions Related to Students’ Evaluation ofTeaching Effectiveness”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, pp. 250-253, 1973.[9]. “Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development”. A Report from the Institute of EducationSciences, U.S. Department of Education and the National Science Foundation, August 2013.
Paper ID #17065Update on the Development of an Electrical Power Technician Associate De-gree ProgramDr. Glenn T. Wrate P.E., Northern Michigan University Glenn T. Wrate received his B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. from Michigan Technological University (MTU) in 1984 and 1986, respectively. While attending MTU, he worked for Bechtel Power Corporation on the Belle River and Midland power generating stations. After graduating MTU, he worked for the Los Ange- les Department of Water and Power from 1986 to 1992, primarily in the Special Studies and High Voltage DC (HVDC) Stations Group. He returned to MTU in 1992 to pursue a Ph.D. in
Paper ID #25785Engineering Technology in IndiaDr. Amitabha Bandyopadhyay, State University of New York, Farmingdale Dr Bandyopadhyay is a SUNY Distinguished Service Professor of Architecture and Construction Man- agement Department at Farmingdale State College. He is also the Director of Green Building Institute at the college. He was (2012-13) the Chair of Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission of ABET. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engineering Technology in IndiaIntroductionAn engineering technologist is a specialist dedicated to the development
AC 2011-39: THE EVOLUTION OF ENGINEERING AND ENGINEER-ING TECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED STATESGeorge D Ford, Western Carolina University Construction Management at Western Carolina University. Dr. Ford worked for over fifteen years in the corporate world in plant engineering and environmental engineering positions and managed numerous construction projects as a plant engineer in the paper, plastics and rubber industries including warehouses, manufacturing buildings and utilities infrastructures.Aaron K. Ball, Western Carolina University Aaron K. Ball is a Full Professor and serves as the Graduate Program Director in Engineering and Tech- nology at Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, North
ranging from mining rock mechanics and engineering to civil/geotechnical and foundation engineering in particular. He earned his D.Eng (Ph.D. in Engineering Science of Mining Engineering) from University of Science and Technology Beijing and also holds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Alabama, respectively. With an interdisciplinary background, Dr. Li also has strong interest in transportation and water resources problems related to geotechnical engineering and other disciplines closely tied to geo- engineering’s learning, discovery and engagement study and collaboration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Using Google Earth in the Study of