Conference Session

The Challenges of Tech Transfer

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael McCorquodale, Mobius Microsystems, Inc.; Richard Brown, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Science Foundation’s Engineering Research Center in Wireless Integrated Microsystems. While at Michigan, he was the sole national recipient of the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) Doctoral Fellowship in 2002. Dr. McCorquodale also received the University of Michigan College of Engineering Harry B. Benford Entrepreneurial Leadership Award and the Distinguished University of Michigan Electrical Engineer Award. He is the founder and Chief Technical Officer of Mobius Microsystems, Inc., a venture-backed start-up with headquarters in Sunnyvale, CA, and a design center in Detroit, MI, and which was founded based on his dissertation work in monolithic RF LC

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Bielenberg, Khalifa University of Science and Technology; Ali Bouabid, Khalifa University of Science and Technology; Sami Ainane, Khalifa University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

University of Maryland, Baltimore County c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22296Mechanical Engineer 1989-1995 EEC Consulting Rockville, MDPresident, Dome Enterprises 1989 - 1993 Bethesda MDHONORS AND AWARDSBest Presentation Award, ICESEEI 2016 : 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences andEffective Educational Instructions. Paris France 2016 Outstanding Service and Commitment to the En-richment of the Science and Technology Program, Eleanor Roosevelt H.S., Greenbelt MD, 05/2003SELECTED PUBLICATIONS1. A. Bouabid, B. Bielenberg, S. Ainane, N. Pasha, ”Learning Outcomes Alignment across

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leon Szeli, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

research question is: How can we describe therelationship between the BFPT and SCCT constructs? We conducted a (mainly quantitative) online-survey (n=465) among Alumni of the Stanford School of Engineering who graduated between 1 and17 years ago and who had successfully the course ME203: Design and Manufacturing. Over 20percent of the respondents had founded a venture. Results show that three out of the five personalitytraits have a significant positive relationship to certain SCCT constructs: a. Openness to newexperiences and Extraversion are correlated to Entrepreneurial Self Efficacy, EntrepreneurialIntention, Entrepreneurial Outcome Expectations, Innovation Self Efficacy and EntrepreneurialLearning Experiences. and b. Emotional Stability

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Evaluating Student Behaviors and Attitudes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jessica Dolores Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

growth and application of innovative thinking andbehavior in both student and practicing engineers has become a mantra across all typesof organizations (National Academy of Engineering, 2005; National Academy ofSciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine, 2007; NationalGovernor's Association, 2007). However, societal confusion exists about the definitionof an innovation (Ferguson D. & Ohland M., 2012), the process of producing aninnovation, and the behavior required to be a successful innovator as an engineer(Ferguson D., Cawthorne J. , Ahn B., & Ohland M., 2013). The research question thatguided our investigations started with the engineering innovator interview study and thatcontinued through the Delphi study

Conference Session

Capstone Design and Entrepreneurship

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas Miller, North Carolina State University; Stephen Walsh, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

traversals of the website with a targeted maximum depth of four web pages 3. Multiple views depending on user classification. The classifications are as follows: a) Portal Administrator – Faculty and website developers. This classification allows full read/write access to the EEP Portal. This includes the creation of E-Team workspace, setting of project deadlines including single and multiple deadline capabilities, along with file lockout and record capabilities if deadlines are not met b) Virtual Executives – E-Team Senior Members. This classification

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Meg West, Ohio State University; Meagan Eleanor Ita, Ohio State University; Laine Rumreich, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

a hierarchy is defined bypropositions that include the concept map topic (concepts stemming from the central topic) [18].HH is the number of concepts in the longest path down a hierarchy. In the example in Figure 1,the HH is three because Hierarchy A has three concepts which is more that the number ofconcepts within Hierarchy B or Hierarchy C. The NCL represents the knowledge connectednesssub-score where cross-links are links between concepts in different hierarchies [18]. In Figure 1,the NCL is one (the cross-link between Hierarchy A and Hierarchy B). The total concept mapscore is the sum of the NC, five times the HH, and ten times the NCL. The total concept mapscore for the example is 31.We began the scoring process of the collected

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum II

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrea T. Kwaczala, Western New England University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Biomechanics II course is also supported with a 1-creditBiomedical Engineering Laboratory course with a 4-hour time block that meets 1x per week.A. B. Figure 1. Impactful biomechanics projects teach kinematics of joints, kinetics and balance using motion analysis and force plates. A) Students utilized Kinovea to analyze the football throw for a typical 2-D dynamics using motion analysis software. B) Students learned kinetics and balance using force plates.The EML module was designed to allow students the chance to design and execute a study in which theystudied kinetics and kinematics of the human body in motion. They were introduced to motion

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Entrepreneurship Education in New Contexts

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University; Paula Gangopadhyay, The Henry Ford (museums)

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

” creative problem solving approachthat consisted of five steps as follows. A) Planning your approach B) Defining the correct problem/understanding the challenge C) Generate Ideas/Alternatives – Brainstorm D) Decide course of action/Preparing for action/Carry through/Implement E) Acceptance and EvaluationTable 2 shows the six methods from which the general steps originated. The letters beside eachstep correspond to steps A-E listed above. These “steps” are lettered instead of numbered toemphasize that there are instances when the problem-solver will return to a previous step andrepeat it (more than once perhaps), or even skip it altogether. In fact, each team at the campstypically followed a slightly different method from the others

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Teaming and Collaboration

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

classroom time, the methodologies were organized into one “grand”creative problem solving approach that consisted of five steps as follows. A) Planning your approach B) Defining the correct problem/understanding the challenge C) Generate Ideas/Alternatives – Brainstorm D) Decide course of action/Preparing for action/Carry through/Implement E) Acceptance and EvaluationTable 2 shows the general steps of the six methodologies studied and references for each method Page 25.364.9are given. The letters beside each step correspond to steps A-E listed above. Within each stepare sub-steps that may or may not be needed for a particular problem

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandra Furnbach Clavijo P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology; Leslie R. Brunell, Stevens Institute of Technology; Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology; Kishore V. Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

specializing in Urban Land Redevelopment and Municipal Engineering. Sandra holds a B.S. Degree in Civil & Environmental Engineering, an A. B. degree in Art History, and a Master of Engineering degree in Engineering Management from Stevens Institute of Technology. She also holds a Professional Engineering license in NJ.Dr. Leslie R. Brunell, Stevens Institute of Technology Leslie Brunell, PhD, PE is a Teaching Professor at Stevens Institute of Technology. She coordinates both the civil and multidisciplinary engineering senior design projects. These projects are the culmination of the undergraduate engineering experience. Students design an innovative solution to a complex problem. She has recruited professional sponsors

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan; Julie Libarkin, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

research design, community-engaged research and mentoring to a) investigate how people perceive, understand, and make decisions about the planet in order to b) address access, inclusion, equity, and justice in STEM and academia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Developing a conceptual framework to understand student participation in entrepreneurship education programsAbstract: The importance of fostering innovativeness and creativity in graduates has beenwidely noted in national calls and accreditation reforms to enhance graduates’ competitiveness inthe global economy. As a result, universities and other higher education institutions haveinitiated curricular

Conference Session

Assessing Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd M. Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

identify their weaknesses. B) engage with people I trust and build partnerships even if they might later become rivals.The major changes in wording between the heuristic definition and items came from reframingthe descriptions provided of the heuristics into actions that might be taken by an individual testtaker. Throughout, for the initial item development and testing, we sought to be as authentic aspossible to the original wording of the trait definitions provided stated by Sarasvathy (2008). Thefinal versions of all the initial items, which we used in this study, appear in the appendix.MethodologyPopulation and data collectionWe collected data for this study from a required first semester course at the [blinded] UniversityCollege of Business

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum II

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology; Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kali Lynn Morgan; Paul Benkeser, Georgia Institute of Technology; Joseph M. LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, Building and Sharing Stories and Social Understandings: The Intrinsic Value of Narrative,” ETS Res. Rep. Ser., vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 1–78, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1002/ets2.12266.[9] R. Delgado, “Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others: A Plea for Narrative,” Mich. Law Rev., vol. 87, no. 8, p. 2411, Aug. 1989, doi: 10.2307/1289308.[10] S. T. Murphy, L. B. Frank, J. S. Chatterjee, and L. Baezconde-Garbanati, “Narrative versus Nonnarrative: The Role of Identification, Transportation, and Emotion in Reducing Health Disparities: Narrative vs. Nonnarrative,” J. Commun., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 116–137, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1111/jcom.12007.[11] R. F. Baumeister and L. S. Newman, “How Stories Make Sense of Personal Experiences: Motives

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Innovative Course Offerings

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leo E. Hanifin, University of Detroit Mercy; Ross A. Lee, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

on the collaborative effort of the intrapreneurship study, Villanova and Campbell’s (one of the intrapreneurship study Industry Team members) are modelling a new T-shape guided intrapreneurial internship. The job description was jointly written by Villanova and Campbell’s to provide the following T-shaped (and intrapreneurial) outcomes: a. Applies engineering expertise to situation analysis and solution development. b. Develops and applies insights from data collection to business opportunities c. Organizes and presents information in a clear, effective and professional manner d. Understands the science and engineering basis for the problem e. Demonstrates data

Conference Session

From Entrepreneurship Education to Market

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James V. Green, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

). Organizational learning and organizational knowledge. Management Learning, 36(1): 49-68. 7. Cooper, A.C. (1973). Technical entrepreneurship. R&D Management, 3: 59-64. 8. Cooke, L., & Williams, S. (2004). Two approaches to using client projects in the college classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 67(2): 139-152. 9. Duch, B., Groh, S. & Allen, D. (2001). The power of problem-based learning. Stylus, Sterling, VA. 10. EGFSN (2007). Expert Group on Future Skills Needs. Available at: www.skillsireland.ie. 11. Elam, E., & Spotts, H. (2004). Achieving marketing curriculum integration: A live case study approach. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(1): 50–65. 12. Forfas (2009). Statement on

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hamid R. Piroozi J.D., Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Charles Feldhaus, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

completed, eachstudent group will create a proof-of-concept prototype, and thereafter prepare a patentapplication in association with the company’s legal department, providing a rich engineering andlegal learning environment as well as potential internship and permanent employmentopportunities. The experience that students will gain through this approach will solidify conceptsthey learn in the classroom.AcknowledgmentsThis project was supported by seed funding from SEIRI at IUPUI. We would also like to thankthe students who participated in the course and survey design described herein.References[1] B. Obama

Conference Session

Assessing Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abigail Jane Kulhanek, University of Pittsburgh; Matthew Raymond Markovetz, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Golnaz Arastoopour Irgens, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Zachari Lucius Swiecki, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison; David Williamson Shaffer, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

.” Academic Press Limited. 2 Aug. 1988. 33-52.[9] Nagy, R. L., D. G. Ullman, & T. G. Dietterich. “A Data Representation for Collaborative Mechanical Design.”Research in Engineering Design 3.4 (1992): 233-242.[10] Chusilp, P., and Y. Jin. “Impact of Mental Iteration on Concept Generation.” Journal of Mechanical Design128.1 (2006): 14-25.[11] Perttula, M., and P. Sipila. “The Idea Exposure Paradigm in Design Idea Generation.” Journal of EngineeringDesign 18.1 (2007): 93-102.[12] Linsey, J. S., E. F. Clauss, Tolga Kurtoglu, & Arthur B. Markman. “An Experimental Study of Group IdeationGeneration Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods.” Journal ofMechanical Design 133.3 (2011): N.p.[13] Austin, S. A., J

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew J. Czuchry, East Tennessee State University; Shawn A. Carson, University of Tennessee; James H. Lampley, East Tennessee State University; William H. Knight, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

conceptual framework.Relationship RisksMaxwell and Lévesque identified a relatinship between behaviors related to relationship risk andinvestment decisions in the early stateges of decision making (see Table 2) [17]. Whenquantified these relationship factors are a) different and b) have greater weight than previouslyanticipated. See the left hand column in step four of the conceptual framework.Much has been discussed about the availability of objective, risk mitigating frameworks and theemergence of the “soft skills”; those categories of relationship-based risks. Entrepreneurshipeducation has done a good job of incorporating the former into curriculum and pedagogy andperhaps the latter will find its way as well. But little if no research has

Conference Session

Classes in Entrepreneurship

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhang Fenzhi, Aalborg University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

formal interivews Semi-structured Group 1 Individual interivew Students (5 in total): A, B, C, D, E; Academic staff (2 in total): K, L Interviews Group 2 Individual interivew Students (5 in total): F, G, H, I, J; Academic staff (2 in total): M, N Additional Data Check list for observation Selective Observation occasions checklist Chekclist for seeing and hearing Researcher’s relfection Observation ☐Group formualtion ☐Conflicts (what) ☐ What’s new today? ☐Group meeting ☐Facilitation (who) ☐ Students’ change on behaviors ☐Supervison meeting ☐Facilitation (How

Conference Session

Classes in Entrepreneurship

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge Rodriguez, Western Michigan University; Alamgir A. Choudhury, Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, together with innovative design practices, need to be an essential part of thelearning experience in undergraduate engineering technology programs. The proposed integratedapproach teaches the basic theoretical knowledge and hands-on practices of the aforementionedsubjects embedding modules in a sequence of courses across the curriculum. The mainobjectives are: (a) introduce the entrepreneurial process and practice in a multidisciplinaryenvironment, (b) emphasize energy efficiency, environmental friendliness, and long-termsustainability in fundamental engineering courses, and (c) apply the proposed approach in thecontext of human-powered transportation systems, a topic that has great interest and potential inunderdeveloped countries. The work

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education: Cases and Models

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas Arion, Carthage College; Matt Wagner, Center for Advanced Technology and Innovation; Clifton Kussmaul, Muhlenberg College

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Innovators Alliance Annual Meeting [Invited]. 3. Arion, D. and Wagner, M. 2008. Leveraging late stage industrial intellectual property for economic development and entrepreneurship. National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance Annual Meeting. 4. Bozeman, B. 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627-655. 5. Lockett, A., Wright, M., and Franklin, S. 2003. Technology transfer and universities’ spin-out strategies. Small Business Economics 20, 185-200. 6. Markman, G., Phan, P., Balkin, D. and Gianiodis, P. 2005. Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 2, 241-263. 7. Pauli, J. 2008. Incentive-based

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

] C. L. Colbeck, A. F. Cabrera, and R. J. Marine, “Faculty motivation to use alternative teaching methods,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, USA, April 1, 2002.[9] M. Miles and M. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis: A source book for new methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 
Publications, 1994.[10] P. L. Hardré, R. B. Miller, A. D. Beesley, T. M. Pace, M. S. Maxwell, and K. Xie, “What motivates university faculty members to do research?: Tenure-track faculty in research- extensive universities,” Journal of the Professoriate, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 75-99, 2007.[11] P. L. Hardré, A. D. Beesley, R. L. Miller, and T. M. Pace, “Faculty motivation to do research

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Shapiro, N. S. and Levine, J. H., 1999, Creating Learning Communities: A Practical Guide to Winning Support, Organizing for Change, and Implementing Programs, 1st Edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.3. Lenning, O. T., Hill, D. M., Saunders, K. P., et al., 2013, Powerful Learning Communities: A Guide to Developing Student, Faculty, and Professional Learning Communities to Improve Student Success and Organizational Effectiveness, 1st Edition, Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA.4. Smith, B. L., MacGregor, R. S., Gabelnick, F., et al., 2004, Learning Communities: Reforming Undergraduate Education, 1st Edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.5. Benjamin, M., 2015, Learning Communities from Start to Finish, No. 149, Jossey-Bass

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Entrepreneurship Education in New Contexts

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Federico Garcia Lorca, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng.; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

; Universities. (2010). Written Communication Value Rubric. Retrieved from: http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/written-communication[4] Kolbe Corp. (2015). Kolbe A Index Assessment Tool. Retrieved from: http://www.kolbe.com[5] Leydens, J., Moskal, B., & Pavelich, M. (2004). Qualitative Methods Used in the Assessment of Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 65-72. Page 26.1327.7[6] Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[7] Shane, S., Venkataraman, S., & MacMillan, I. (1995). Cultural Differences in Innovation

Conference Session

Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Farris, Grand Valley State University; Hugh Jack, Grand Valley State University; Shabbir Choudhuri, Grand Valley State University; Christopher Pung, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Page 13.852.8References 1. Faculty Handbook, 2007-2008, [University] , [Location], 2007.Appendix Page 13.852.9 GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYINVENTION DISCLOSURECover Sheet for Inventors An invention disclosure should be made when some new and useful idea has been conceived ordeveloped at GVSU, or when a GVSU employee or student has obtained unusual, unexpected, or unobviousresearch results that can be utilized by someone to enhance economic development in west Michigan. This Invention Disclosure Form (“IDF”) will enable evaluation of your idea to determine (a) itspatentability and (b) its potential for commercial value. An

Conference Session

IP and Supporting Student Startups

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Swamidass, Auburn University; Brian Wright, Auburn University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

invention: 2. 6. Number of technologies still under active analysis: 14 7. Number of technologies on hold: 9—waiting for feedback from inventors. 8. Number of technologies in which the TTTs helped the authors reach final decision: 14 a. Two have been optioned (one company has signed an option to license, and a startup company based on these technologies is expected) b. OTT decided not to pursue 12 inventions i. Our analyses revealed that 3 did not have patent position—due to prior art, or previous public disclosure ii. Nine were determined to lack commercial interest or value. Of these, seven were allowed to lapse while

Conference Session

Approaches to Teaching Entrepreneurship

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Weissbach, Pennsylvania State University-Erie; Jana Goodrich, Pennsylvania State University-Erie

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

and Learning Project Management,” Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM, June 2001, Session 2630.3. Mark R. Plichta, Mary Raber, “The Enterprise Program at Michigan Technological University,” Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM, June 2001, Session 3454.4. Forsyth, D. R., Group dynamics, 2nd Ed., Brooks/Cole, 19905. John B. Ochs, Todd A. Watkins and Berrisford W Boothe, “Creating a Truly Multidisciplinary Entrepreneurial Educational Environment,” Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM, June 2001, Session 2554.6. James A. Buckenmyer, “Using Teams for Class

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jocelyn L. Jackson, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University; Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #33035The Urgency of Intersectionality: A Review of Racialized Experiences inSTEM EntrepreneurshipJocelyn L. Jackson, University of Michigan Jocelyn Jackson is a second year doctoral student in Engineering Education at the University of Michigan and National Chair of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). Her major work includes improv- ing diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM and entrepreneurship as well as strategic planning for NSBE. She earned a MS and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Iowa State University.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University In February 2021 Dr. Huang-Saad joined

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University; Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

11 Research PaperTable 2. Planned and Actual Deployment Schedule of EML activities (DB: Discussion Boardand Student-led, In-class Discussion) Discussion Topic: Internet of Things 1. Please watch or read the following content: a. How It Works: Internet of Things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSIPNhOiMoE (IBM Think Academy) b. Top 5 Facts about the Internet of Things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-Ekz2kK7J4 (watchmojo.com) c. Unlocking the potential of the Internet of Things: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our- insights/the-internet-of-things-the-value-of-digitizing-the-physical-world 2. Write at least two technical paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting paragraphs. Make at least one

Conference Session

Systems Engineering and Entrepreneurship

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carmo D'Cruz, Florida Tech; Shoaib Shaikh, Northrop Grumman Corporation

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration, Innovation Associates, Inc., Reston, Virginia 2000.16. Pacific Partners Consulting Group. “An Economic Impact Study of Stanford University”. Stanford. CA. 1997.17. Jansen, C. and D. Jamison. “Technology Transfer and Economic Growth. Salt Lake City, Utah.” The University of Utah. 1999.18. Gartner, William B. “What Are We Talking About When We Talk About Entrepreneurship ?” Journal of Business Venturing, (5), 1990 pp. 1519. D’Cruz, Carmo and P. Vaidyanathan “A Holistic Approach to Teaching Engineering Entrepreneurship and Technology Commercialization” - Proc. of ASEE National Conference, Nashville, Jun 200320. Kirzner, Israel. “The Entrepreneurial Process” in The Environment for