professor and company founder alike - to figureout the passion and iteration on the product, the new creation, and who the audience is.References: 1. ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2015-2016 Accreditation Cycle, Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2014 2. Atman C. J. et al. “Enabling Engineering Student Success: The Final Report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010. 3. Ambrose, Susan; Lazarus, B; Nair, I. “No universal constructs: Journeys of Women in Engineering.” FIE conference proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997. 4. Anderson, C. “Reflections on Coaching Best Ted Talks.” HBR, 2013. 5. Berglund, A “Two facets of Innovation in
, “Evaluating the Quality of Learning the SOLO Taxonomy(Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome).” Academic Press, 1982.[7] N. Levina, E. Vaast, “Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences OverlappingBoundaries in Offshore Collaboration,” MIS Quarterly, Vol 32 No. 2, pp 307-332, 2008.[8] R. M. Ryan and E.L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions andnew directions,” Contemporary Educ Psychology, vol. 25, pp 54- 67, 2000.[9] Karanian, B., Parlier, A., Taajama, V., Eskandari, M., Provoked Emotion in StudentStories of Motivation Reveal Gendered Perceptions of What it Means to be Innovative inEngineering, ASEE, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[10]Worchel, F. Aaron L. & Yates, D.Gender bias on the thematic apperception test
without incorporating it into their solution proposal: “At the same time the climate is warming due to CO2 emissions, plastic garbage patch, Pacific trash vortex, spans waters from the West Coast of North America to Japan. Are we drowning in plastic waste and CO2 emissions due to 3D printing?” (group C, final report)Five groups out of 19 maintained their semantic distance towards environmental concernsthroughout the course, and the remaining 5 student groups (A, B, C, P, Q) portrayed a slightdecrease in their incorporation of environmental concerns when we compare the twodeliverables. The change in environmental concerns was not statistically significant (p = 0.42,U-value is 153, the critical value of U at p < .05
paper examines the lack of physical and in-person interaction on collaboration.We explore the extent of the shock on collaborative work due to current pandemic relatedcircumstances in and beyond the classroom and how university students and professors haveresponded to the shock.In a descriptive analysis we consider evidence from diverse literature relating in-personconnections to routine response or inhibition of innovative action (trying something new) andlack of in-person interaction to elevated attempts at innovative action. Preliminaryexamination of qualitative responses from faculty and student collaboration is associatedspecifically with (a) positive affect during first-time experiences vs. practice effects inexisting relationships, (b
to focus on twolevels of interventions: (a) high-level admonitions to include topics such as sustainability or riskmanagement in the curriculum and (b) examples of specific projects or other educationalactivities that students could engage in. Although these kinds of interventions definitely have aplace in curriculum planning, in our view, they provide either too little or too much direction forengineering educators. In line with this thinking, we have identified two analytical models (theCollingridge Dilemma and the VDI model of competing and dependent values in technologyassessment) and exemplars from a body of literature (social science research) that could beincluded in or otherwise inform engineering curriculum design.4.1 The
Alternative: Recognizing Opportunity in the Ebb and Flow of Everyday LifeThe terminology and concepts associated with innovation and creativity are notably indistinct,overlapping, and numerous. Since Gardner proposed the concept of multiple intelligences in1983, researchers working in several different fields have identified distinct forms of intelligenceand established connections between those and (a) various forms of imagination and (b) a rangeof emotions. “Creative intelligence” is not a clearly defined concept, but it does suggest acapacity that can be cultivated and explored.In “Creative Intelligence and Its Application to Entrepreneurial Opportunity and Ethics” (2012),Murray Hunter, who is affiliated with the Centre for Communication &
innovationcompetencies and illustrate the proposed interactions in the educational system.This paper is based on three main themes:1. Effective innovation is facilitated by the Innovation Competencies, and these are in turn supported by the model-centric Systems Competencies, along with the Discovery Page 24.1230.3 Competencies and the Discipline Competencies;2. Effective learning of the Innovation Competencies is facilitated by experiences during the learner’s interactions either (a) with the explicit system models used by the System Competencies, or (b) with other actors, catalyzed by those system models;3. In addition to their effectiveness in
Paper ID #32586Student Perceptions of an Entrepreneurial Mindset and Its Relevance toEngineering CareersMs. Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University Alexandra Jackson is a senior Electrical and Computer Engineering student with a minor in Mathematics at Rowan University. She began research in Rowan’s Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) depart- ment in the Fall of 2019, and has developed interests in entrepreneurial mindset and student development. Besides research, Alexandra is involved as a Resident Assistant and is the Treasurer of Rowan’s chapter of the College Diabetes Network. Upon graduation, she plans to
effective use and purchasing of consumable materials; 5. Established guidelines for new equipment acquisition to ensure broad impact and high use by students; 6. Established two signature programmatic areas of focus a. Aggie Innovation Design Challenges: corporate sponsored 1-day design challenges that foster multi-disciplinary student involvement and are supported by a faculty mentor; b. Aggie Innovation Pop-up workshops: Offered by faculty and corporate partners, these workshops to jump-start student learning into new areas and/or areas outside of their direct major. Participation in these informal workshops is through an on- line registration and are
incorporates the Arduino microcontroller board for processing sensormeasurements. Sensors are used to monitor pH, conductivity, and temperature of theenvironment. Peripherals attached to the control system are used to drive the sensormeasurements. The mobile notification system utilizes JAVA, PACHE, and PYTHONlanguages. The designed control of the system uses the data reading to constantly maintain andbalance the environment without any human interaction. The system incorporates a unique alertsystem via SMS if any sensors failed. The team completed the design by December 2012, anddelivered a full prototype by the end of the spring semester of 2013 as seen in figure 3 (a) and (b)below.Figure 3: (a) Nursery of the plants (b) The actual
., Getz-Kikuchi, R. Price, T. and Karanian, B.Social Participation in the VirtualUniverse.National ASEE annual proceedings, Vancouver, BC, June, 2011.[7] Smith, K. et al. Connecting and expanding the engineering education research and innovationspecial session. FIE, Oct. 14, 2011.[8] Wankat, P; Felder, R. & Smith, K.The scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Engineering.2002.[9] Saxenian, A. L. The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. HarvardUniversity Press. 2006[10] Stefik, M. & Stefik, B. Breakthrough: Stories and Strategiesof RadicalInnovation: MIT press, 2004.[11] Schein, E. Organizational Culture. Jossey-Bass, 1985.[12] Heifetz, R. and Linsky, M. Leadership on the Line.Harvard Business School Press, 2002
. B. C. Figure 3. Assistive Technology Mobility Lift, Student Design Example: The Jack Lift Seat. A) Design started with a simple engineering sketch, B.) Converted into a SolidWorks model and then C.) a low- fidelity rapid prototype was created with cardboard, duct tape, straws, popsicle sticks and dowels. Pulley system or Hook that can be electric winch attached to a harness or a Hoyer Lift seat Wheels that can
Paper ID #26534Provoked Emotion in Student Stories of Motivation Reveal Gendered Percep-tions of What It Means to be Innovative in EngineeringProf. Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, formerly visiting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group at Stanford University. Barbara’s research focuses on four ar- eas: 1)grounding a blend of theories from social-cognitive psychology, engineering design, and art to show how cognition affects design; 2) changing the way people understand the emotion behind their work with the intent to do
Paper ID #34466Student Motivation and Self-efficacy in Entrepreneurial-minded Learning(EML): What These Mean for Diversity and Inclusion in EngineeringClassroomsProf. Erin A. Henslee, Wake Forest University Dr. Erin Henslee is a Founding Faculty and Assistant Professor of Engineering at Wake Forest University. Her research spans biomedical engineering, e-sports, and STEM education. Prior to joining Wake Forest she was a Researcher Development Officer at the University of Surrey where she supported Early Career Researchers. She received her BS degrees in Engineering Science and Mechanics and Mathematics from Virginia
people have their most innovative output (not creativeanymore) when they are older – in fact when they are more than 40 years old. These specificfindings suggest there are (generationally- and rank-based) workplace realities aroundinnovation that new engineering hires must confront. The current study deepens theinvestigation into innovation by examining it in the context of meaningful work forindividuals just beginning their careers.Our three specific research questions for this study are: A. What does meaningful work look like in the eyes of early career engineers? B. What does meaningful innovative work look like in the eyes of early career engineers? C. How do the personal experiences of innovative work and engineering work compare?To
AC 2007-1217: THE HILLMAN ENTREPRENEURS PROGRAM: A NEWEDUCATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP MODEL THAT PARTNERS THE DAVIDH. AND SUZANNE D. HILLMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION, INC., PRINCEGEORGE’S COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AND THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND,COLLEGE PARKKaren Thornton, University of Maryland Karen Thornton has more than twenty years experience working as an educator and mentor in two industries, first music performance where she was an artist entrepreneur, and now by supporting young entrepreneurs. She provided guidance to entrepreneurs in her role as the program director of the award-winning Hinman Campus Entrepreneurship Opportunities (CEOs) Program from its launch in fall of 2000 until December 2006. She and the
AC 2009-1349: A STRUCTURED APPROACH TO INNOVATION: A CLASSROOMEXPERIENCE IN INVENTIVE PROBLEM SOLVING FOR ANENTREPRENEURIAL PROGRAMDana Clarke, Applied Innovation Alliance Dana W. Clarke, Sr. is President/CEO of Applied Innovation Alliance, LLC. Mr. Clarke has over 30 years of industry experience in solving the most difficult problems business, science and engineering. Prior to this, he spend 18 years with Emerson Electric Corp. where he was involved in product and process development, 5 years working with many of the leading TRIZ experts in the US as their customer and 5 years as an employee of Ideation International. Having become involved in TRIZ in late 1991, He became the first American to
Paper ID #21515Student-created Canvases as a Way to Inform Decision-making in a CapstoneDesign SequenceProf. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Dr. Joseph (Joe) Tranquillo is an Associate Professor at Bucknell University in the Department of Biomed- ical Engineering, He is also co-director of the Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management, co-director of the KEEN Winter Interdisciplinary Design Program, and chair of the Biomedical Engineer- ing Division of ASEE. Tranquillo has published three undergraduate textbooks and numerous engineering education publications, and has presented internationally on
AC 2008-600: A DECADE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION: ARETROSPECTIVE VIEW OF THE FIRST DECADE OF THE NCIIAPhil Weilerstein, National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance Phil Weilerstein began his career as an entrepreneur while still a graduate student at the University of Massachusetts. He and his colleagues launched a start-up biotech company which eventually went public. This experience, followed by several other entrepreneurial ventures, brought him a lifelong passion for entrepreneurship, which he has pursued through his work as Executive Director of the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance or NCIIA. Phil’s tenure at the NCIIA is marked by his skill for network
VoC techniques (Phase 1); Initial Sketches ● B – Task Analysis (Phase 2) Appendices ● C - Onshape Drawings (Phase 3) ● D – Economic Analysis of Manufacturing Processes (Phase 3) ● E – ReflectionsStudents were also required to present information about their toy in the form of a video. Thevideos were 5-6 minutes long and needed to include information regarding the potential market,voice of customer techniques used, final prototype, tradeoffs made
building strong relationshipswith the industry mentors. This contrast with a faculty mentoring students in their own lab wherethe success is mostly linked to scholarly works, future funding, and job security. Figure 1. (A) General organizational chart for the Lab and (B) and example of a real industry partner. Students are in green, internal mentors in pink, leadership in red, external partners in dark blue, and external mentors in light blue. Solid lines indicate internal connections, dashed are external.At the heart of the endeavors of the Lab are the students, who either approach the Lab for way-finding opportunities or are invited by faculty mentors. A key step in ensuring student success ismatching them to a
the project goalsand rubric categories. Finally, we plan to introduce the concept of sustainability as anoverarching theme in the project to meet what we see as a societal need to train engineers whoare able to competently discuss and integrate sustainability in their engineering practice.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by funding from the Kern Family Foundation through a KEENInstitutional Program Grant.References[1] Lewis, K., Moore-Russo, D. A., Kremer, G. E. O., Tucker, C., Simpson, T. W., Zappe, S. E., ... Williams, C. B. (2013). The development of product archaeology as a platform for contextualizing engineering design. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[2] Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017
Paper ID #34202Introducing Entrepreneurship and Innovation in a Design CourseDr. Jaby Mohammed, Illinois State University Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at Illinois State University. He received his PhD in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2006), masters in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2003) and also a master’s in business administration from Indira Gandhi National Open University (2001). His research interests include advanced manufacturing, design methodologies, six sigma, lean manufacturing, and engineering education. He previously taught at Khalifa University (UAE),Indiana
AC 2008-1603: DEVELOPING A JOINT ENGINEERING/BUSINESS SCHOOLENTREPRENEURIAL CURRICULUMTimothy Faley, University f MichiganPeter Adriaens, University of Michigan Page 13.384.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Approach to Building a Graduate-level Engineering and Business collaborative entrepreneurial curriculum American Society of Engineering Education AC2008-1603 re-submitted March 2008AbstractTechnology-based entrepreneurship, regardless of whether it takes place within a largeorganization or in a startup, requires a mixture of technological and business skills. Our aim indeveloping a joint graduate
AC 2008-1094: A HOLISTIC PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FORENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATIONJames Green, University of Maryland James V. Green is the Director of the award-winning Hinman CEOs Program. In this role, he advises students in their new ventures, instructs entrepreneurship courses, and manages a host of educational programs including the Technology Start-Up Boot Camp and the MTECH Ventures Execution Education Program. James earned a BS of Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, a MS in Technology Management from the University of Maryland University College, an MBA from the University of Michigan, and a Doctor of Management from the University of Maryland
AC 2009-1383: ATIC: A PROGRAM TO ENERGIZE UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRYCOLLABORATIONSJane Laux, Arizona State University Jane Laux is a Program Coordinator Sr. at the Advanced Technology Innovation Center, Arizona State University. Her expertise and experience include project management, development and execution, in addition to research operational responsibilities.Anshuman Razdan, Arizona State University Anshuman Razdan received the Ph.D. degree in computer science from Arizona State University (ASU), Tempe. He is currently an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering and the Director of the Advanced Technology Innovation Center and the I3DEA Lab, ASU’s Polytechnic campus, Mesa, Arizona
AC 2009-682: SERVICE LEARNING AS A PREREQUISITE TO ENGINEERINGENTREPRENEURSHIPLisa Zidek, Florida Gulf Coast University Page 14.1054.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Service Learning as a Prerequisite to Engineering EntrepreneurshipIntroductionEngineering Entrepreneurship is becoming more prevalent in engineering curricula andthroughout engineering programs. At Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) the UA WhitakerSchool of Engineering incorporated Engineering Entrepreneurship as a required course for allengineering disciplines. The original curriculum at FGCU introduced EngineeringEntrepreneurship in the second semester of the sophomore year. Engineering
AC 2009-239: A MODEL FOR TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION:MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITYGerald Nelson, Mississippi State University Gerald Nelson, an industrial engineering graduate (1974) with an MBA (1985) from Mississippi State University, began his career with a co-op experience at Rockwell International. Nelson worked five semesters with Rockwell before joining them full time after graduation as a Project Engineer and Program Manager. Nelson’s career includes former positions as Plant Manager, Trinity Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer of the Wear Resistance Group of Thermadyne Industries, Inc.; Executive Vice President of Operations, Viasystems Group, Inc.; and Chief
Paper ID #19937A Comparison of Maker and Entrepreneurial CharacteristicsMiles J, Mabey, Arizona State University Miles Mabey (Yes that’s his real last name) is a third year student at Arizona State University studying Robotic Engineering. He joined the Maker Research team two years ago and has been to the Bay Area and New York Maker Faires.Dr. Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design
mentioned four times in association with the need for a “real job.” 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% s ce re e b rt y n g ce rin rit