Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mona Eskandari, University of California, Riverside; Ville Mikael Taajamaa, City of Espoo; Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

results is on events andforces emerging from the primary character and the setting. Images and themes in the partici-pants’ responses become a tool in uncovering hidden interpersonal perceptions not typicallyfound in other, more quantitative research tools. Debate exists concerning whether the meas-ure reflects how individuals perceive themselves, how they perceive others, how they actuallybehave, norms, stereotypes, bias or some combination of these possibilities, yet experts agreethat the TAT is capable of capturing images not likely to be expressed with other techniques[10].Emotion Scale (PANAS): Mood ReportThe second measure, supplementing the story results, is a short version of the PANAS multi-ple-item, two factor scale that ensures content

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University; Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

presentation and research paper).The discussion boards allow students to have time to reflect more on the topics while serving tobuild students’ interest on developing their entrepreneurial mindset. The discussion boardsprepare students for group discussion in class while understanding the motivations andperspectives of their classmates before meeting in class.In Figure 2, the word ‘aware’ found in the introductory description will be deleted and thesentence will focus on the development on entrepreneurial skills. Students will have morefamiliarity with the entrepreneurial mindset in other courses. The word ‘aware’ was first usedsince this entrepreneurial approach was presented to the senior students for the first time.Students then performed learning

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Douglas E. Melton, Kern Family Foundation

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Incorporating an item or two from Table 1 is agood place to start. Also focus on some of these key elements of EML as defined by Wheadonand Duval-Couetil:  In order to better create value in society, students need to learn how to discover, identify, and dig deeper into real problems rather than just solve given problems.  Learning through experience and reflection is critical to entrepreneurship education due to the situated nature of entrepreneurial thought and action.  EML is student-centered and focused on developing a combination of affective factors, thinking patterns, knowledge, and skills.  EML involves creating learning experiences through which students develop self-efficacy, value-orientation

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Epicenter Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria Matthew, VentureWell; Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group; Ari Turrentine, VentureWell; Angela Shartrand, VentureWell; Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

project around a topic that appeals to them. When students follow theirpassions, the passions of their teammates, or work on a topic that, for them, will make a Page 26.990.4difference in the world, their intrinsic motivation increases.8,12 Experimentation and iteration inthe context of the project, and reflecting (in a safe environment) on the failures that ensue,completes what Neck et al. refer to as a “virtuous cycle,” that equips students with confidenceand knowledge that they can apply next time.8,12By integrating entrepreneurship into engineering, students are likely to be more connected totheir learning and thus are more likely to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Research Technical Session 7

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

cognitive style and potential level, both ofwhich are stable over time. Cognitive style (sometimes called preferred style or problem solvingstyle) is typically defined in terms of consistent individual differences in a person’s preferredways of organizing and processing information and experience4. Examples of cognitive styleinclude the Sensing-Intuition dimension of Jung’s psychological types and Kirton’s Adaption-Innovation continuum, which reflects an individual’s preference for structure4, 7. Research showsthat cognitive style is unchanged across a person’s lifetime, but coping behavior can be usedwhen needed (at an increased cognitive cost) to behave in ways that do not align with a person’scognitive style4, 7 – i.e., while style is fixed

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Programs and Courses Session 5

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael (Mick) J. Bates, Waynesburg University; Donald Ken Takehara, Taylor University; Hank D. Voss, Taylor University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Education Session 3

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Joseph, Pace University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

the fourlearning outcomes items and the three course impact items at least 67% of the students agreed orstrongly agreed with these items. In fact 67% agreed or strongly agreed with course impact item,I discovered that team work helps get assignments completed quicker than working alone.Additionally, 100% and 83% of the students agreed or strongly agreed with the item: As a resultof taking this class I have a better understanding of entrepreneurs, and this item: The use of ajournal in this course helped me to better assess my learning, respectively.The journal was provided to students in a 14-item Microsoft Word template to help students withtheir learning of the course content through reflection upon it. It requested reporting on suchitems as

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tess Hartog, University of Oklahoma; Megan Marshall, University of Oklahoma; Amin G. Alhashim, University of Oklahoma; Md Tanvir Ahad, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Findingsindicated design neurocognition differed when problem-solving versus designing, particularly inthe sketching task, as indicated by transformed power and task-related power within the EEGreadings.4.3 Current use of other techniques in the study of ED&CGWhile not a primary talking point of this paper, a notable investigation with the use of functionalnear infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is worthy of mention. This technique works via theabsorption or reflection of hemoglobin in certain areas of the brain. Researchers in [64] utilizedfNIRS to investigate the neurological differences in freshman and senior-level engineeringstudents during an engineering design brainstorm. Even though this study did not look at thenovelty of ideas generated, this study

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sidaard Gunasekaran, University of Dayton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

content of several existing classes were adjusted to better reflect nationaltrends in Aerospace engineering education. The intention of the Introduction to Flight course within theMechanical Engineering curriculum is to motivate sophomore level undergraduate students to differentaspects of aerospace engineering so that they can make an informed decision about pursuing aerospaceengineering as their career. The topics covered in the course are shown below - 1. Aviation Pioneers 10. Thrust to Weight Ratio and Lift to Drag 2. Parts of Airplane (Activity) Ratio (Gimli Glider activity) 3. Nomenclature of Airplane and Airfoils 11. Finite Wing Aerodynamics

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education: Experiential Learning and Economic Development II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; Moshe Barak, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Timothy VanEpps, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Table 1: Module-activity-skill Relationship 73. “Short Course Modules” These types of modules are meant to deliver material that normallyneeds at least 15 hours of teaching and additional 15 hours for self learning, reflecting and practice. Theplan is to have two courses which will run during the second year of each cohort. The first course titled:Inventive and Innovative Problem Solving, focuses on teaching and fostering methods for inventiveand innovative thinking. Specifically systematic methodologies will be presented for thinking out-of-the-box based on well established literature and the cumulative experience of the authors. The followingtopics could be included in such a short course

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education: Cases and Models

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anuradha Basu, San Jose State University; Minnie Patel, San Jose State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, implying that students couldconsult the text to answer the questions. However, the instructor’s experience suggested thatstudents were more likely to connect theory with practice, if the theory had been explicitlydiscussed in class. Secondly, in the instructor’s opinion, the 2008 student cohort seemed, onaverage, to possess superior reasoning and analytical skills than the 2007 cohort. Thecomparatively higher score on the fourth question was unexpected since the question requiredanalytical skills rather than comprehension. In part, it reflects the open-ended nature of thequestion because of which the answers were quite diverse and therefore more difficult tocompare or evaluate using a rubric. While a few students suggested a large number of

Conference Session

Successful Outcomes of Student Entrepreneurship

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen Thornton, University of Maryland-College Park; Anik Singal, Affiliate Classroom, Inc.; David Barbe, University of Maryland-College Park; James Green, University of Maryland-College Park

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

attributes, business practices, and human resource management practices.The second stage was to identify unique characteristics relevant to undergraduate studententrepreneurs in universities based on Anik’s comments, reflections, and perspectives. Theobjective of this methodology was to develop a set of suggestions for programs and activities foruniversities to foster desired characteristics and behaviors of undergraduate entrepreneurs.The findings for the singular case of Anik Singal’s experiences were then compared to findingsof critical success factors from the 90 undergraduate students of the Hinman CEOs Program.Using a qualitative approach through an online survey and one-to-one 30 minute interviews: • 91.7% stated their “knowledge base

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education - A 10,000' View

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Secor, Institute to Promote Learning; Douglas Arion, Carthage College

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Course in the MajorSenior Year • Bring Integration and Closure • Career Services to College Experience • Alumni Development • Provide Opportunities to Programs Reflect on the Meaning of the • Capstone Courses Undergraduate Experience • Internships • Prepare for the Personal and Professional Issues Related to Post-College Life Figure 5. Developmental Needs and Suitable Programs for Students. Page 11.365.18 Cognitive Domain

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Galaleldin, University of Ottawa; Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

theories. In her transformation model of experiential learning experiences, students gothrough four stages: 1) Reflective observation: students identify barriers that represented an entity theory they held; 2) Abstract conceptualization: participants in an experiential learning environment identify alternative incremental implicit theories; 3) Active experimentation: students’ engagement in embodied experiences helps them discuss future work and provides them with concrete enacted experiences; 4) Concrete experiences: students engage in exercises that represent “aha experiences” that help them recognize new incremental implicit theories. [35, p.67].In the context of our study, first and second-year

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Timothy Chow, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Tony Ribera, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, Table 6 shows that for the three years studied, Wednesdaysconsistently have the most number of visits from students followed by Tuesdays and Thursdays.These results reflect that some capstone design classes meet and work at the center onWednesdays. Tuesdays and Thursdays are often workdays for competition teams. These resultsalso show the importance of weekend hours with 20% of visits occurring on Saturdays andSundays. Day of Week AY 2014-15 AY 2015-16 AY 2016-17 Mon 1166 14% 2021 13% 2984 14% Tue 1445 17% 2944 18% 3583 16% Wed 1752 21% 3434 22% 5286 24

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Bruce D. Oestreich, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

presentations in global engineering ed- ucation at several national conferences. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally and nationally, as well as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Dr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sergio Celis, Universidad de Chile; Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

in the description of both cases—regardless of cultural and institutional differences—there are several common places between the two approaches to change presented in this paper(see Table 2 for a summary). There is a common motivation and goal, which is achievingexcellence in engineering education within the region and worldwide. Although each institutiondescribes its guideline principles in a different way, they all respond to the logic model suggestedby CORFO. Of note is that both leading engineering schools were aware of previous experiencesrelated to cultural change in engineering education and to the creation of university-basedentrepreneurship ecosystems. This awareness can be reflected in three major change strategiesconsidered from

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Program Development & Desired Outcomes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Nilsen, VentureWell; Victoria Matthew, VentureWell/Epicenter; Angela Shartrand, VentureWell; Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

example.The overarching purpose of the landscape analysis process is to have teams consider thestrengths and gaps on their campuses. This process provides team members with a sharedunderstanding of the unique opportunities and challenges on their campus, and forms afoundation on which to develop plans for growing their entrepreneurial ecosystem.The tool was originally designed as a spreadsheet for teams to document “assets” on theircampus (e.g., courses, extra-curricular offerings, spaces, champions). The tool alsodefined the terms “innovation”* and “entrepreneurship”† to support shared understanding.Finally, the tool guided teams in reflecting on various dimensions of their schools’ecosystem as a whole – the balance between electives and required

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Reissman, University of Dayton; Allison L. Kinney, University of Dayton; Kevin Patrick Hallinan, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

of student innovations from the first two projectsdescribed in Table 1. The creative space for the first project was a vertical farming system. Within thisspace, students had the freedom to consider any system they wished that utilized vertical space (or tiers)and was consistent with the goal of increased growing productivity with less fresh water. The scale of theprojects emerging ranged from a system mounted to a door in an apartment, to an indoor/outdoor systemthat would meet 100% of the vegetable needs of a Midwest American family, to a mass scale vertical ricefarm, and an orange tree farm in California. The diversity displayed in the systems was also reflected inthe target markets, which ranged from apartment dwellers, to suburban

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jidong Huang, California State University, Fullerton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

60 seconds, it significantly helped developing student interest inbusiness entrepreneurship (80% compared to 62% for the engineering field trip); and helpedstudents understand the connection between STEM and entrepreneurship (79% compared to 72%for the engineering field trip).Figure 4. Student responses to “Please indicate the degree the event/activity helped you in the following:” for a field trip to a fast-pitch competition in year 3Summative Results Across the years, student interest towards subjects and fields in Engineering, ComputerScience or Entrepreneurship was tracked by student self-surveys. Each field interest constructwas measured using items on a 0 to 10 scale, with 10 reflecting the highest positive

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Wells, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

in comprehensive documents reflecting product,production system and business enterprise design, as well as the prototyping experience(fabrication and performance evaluation).[6] student learning: The central issue throughout the project was student learning. From theperspective of the capstone experience, the purpose of the project was always focused onexpansion and development of student skill sets and attitudes. By far, the most importantoutcome has been that the three surviving engineering students are ‘scarred for life’ withintellectual habits of innovation and entrepreneurialism.Assessment: There are several measures through which to assess the accomplishments of thisproject. First, the suitability of innovation team projects as

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Courses and Outcomes II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Marchese, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

exposure to commercialization opportunities for their graduate research along with therecognition of the potential opportunities at the base of the global economic period. The slate ofguest speakers was overwhelmingly evaluated as the most valuable aspect of the course. Theproject component of the course was generally viewed less favorably.The second offering of the STESE course is scheduled for the Spring 2011 semester. Based onfeedback from the students and reflection among the instructors, we have identified the followingareas for improvement:  Improving the interface with the GSSE program,  Using the course as a means of harvesting technology from university research labs,  Modifying the choice of text book and doing a

Conference Session

New Methods and Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald Reimer, Lawrence Technological University; Margaret Pierce, Lawrence Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

employers and determine thebest strategies for approaching employers who may be eligible to participate in the EIP program. Once the student begins an EIP, they establish brief learning objectives and complete a preassessment survey. Whenever possible, a site visit by an OCS staff member and appropriatefaculty are conducted. At the end of the EIP, participating students complete a post assessmentdocument as well as a brief report about their experiences. These requirements reinforce thelessons learned through reflective writing assignments that challenge them to review andintegrate what they have learned.University – Marketing, Operating, Monitoring, Compensation, AssessmentThe EIP has been designed to be flexible and easy to administer, while

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University College of Engineering; Michael Beyerlein, Texas A&M University; Kiersten Potter, Student Engineers' Council; Jiacheng Lu; Lori L. Moore, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

4 2.2 Total 186 100.0Individual Skill Development. Table 6 reports mean scores and their standard deviations foreach of the skills/scales assessed at the beginning (Week 1), middle (Week 6), and end (Week10) of the internship. These results reflect self-assessment by the students at the beginning,middle, and end of the summer program. Mean scores for the group increased for every skillarea. Scores for growth mindset and creative mindset remained stable. They were not explicitlytargeted by the curriculum for the program.Table 6. Individual Skills Assessments at the Beginning, Middle, and End of InternshipSurvey of Intern Team Effectiveness

Conference Session

Assessing Entrepreneurship Programs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martin Grimheden, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

participation in external activities provided byother actors of the Swedish innovation system. Examples are participation in innovationcompetitions, existing lecture series and contacts with business coaches.The logbookFundamental for most creative work is the idea log, scrap book or design log. Each studentdocuments his/her own process, reflections and learning experience. This logbook is used anddiscussed in the project meetings to illustrate the process since last meeting.Synergistic integrationIn perspective of the PIEp program, the course described is dependant on receiving knowledgeand experience from the other fields and using all possible mechanisms to succeed in bringingthe ideas to the market. Through PIEp, access to mentors and coaches is

Conference Session

Course-Based Approaches to Entrepreneurship

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Weaver, University of Detroit Mercy; Nassif Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

two microphone system similar to what Clarity experimented Page 13.1360.6with early in its history.This case study went a bit longer than the planned 30-45 minutes intended, so other institutionsusing this case may wish to eliminate either the Somanetics or the Clarity portions of the case.To convey the nature of the case study presentation as much as possible without being able toinclude the video clips or detailed slides for size considerations, a rough content outline isprovided below: • Video: Ray Gunn defines entrepreneurship • Reflection on that definition and traits of an entrepreneur per NCIIA/KEEN • Video: Ray Gunn discusses

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education: Assessment and Integrating Entrepreneurship into the Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sridhar Condoor, Saint Louis University; Mark McQuilling, Saint Louis University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

technological solution can address all the complexities of global warming. What eachsociety will need is a solution portfolio with a variety of technologies that can address themanifold challenges without requiring completely new infrastructure. Wind is a renewable,clean, pollution-free energy source with a nearly fixed cost. Apart from economic specificationsfor the market acceptance, in an urban environment, several marketing points become important: 1. Reflecting a green corporate image. 2. Noise level. 3. Being bird-friendly. 4. Adding appealing aesthetic element to city skylines.The initial idea of the windmill group is to mount a wind turbine on a high-rise building. Thisexploits the existing structures to mount the wind turbine. From

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education: Experiential Learning and Economic Development I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Olsen, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

mentioned earlier, of more value thanthe rating numbers are the written comments about different parts of the program. These datatogether with discussions between Harold Frank staff and the Advisory Board were used to eithereliminate portions of the program or to modify them extensively. Thus, the program is beingcontinuously evaluated and improved.The entire Frank Fellows program is submitted annually to the Advisory Board for feedback.These individuals all either are or have been active entrepreneurs and hence considered“experts.” Suggestions from them have included the establishment of the “People Issues”activity since more companies fail due to conflicts among principal employees than for any otherreason. Board members also reflected on the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luke Nogales, New Mexico State University; Rolfe Sassenfeld, New Mexico State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

problemformat that was less constrained also offered the student a more genuine and creative engineeringexperience.The workshop leverages the LLP methodology to provide the students with an experientialengineering design learning experience. The LLP process forces the participants to formalize aseries of hypotheses [7] that are tested and refined based on feedback provided by possiblestakeholders and customers. Students test their ideas and modify their designs to reflect theirnewly gained knowledge. In this regard failure is an option. Failure of the student’s hypothesishappens on a routine basis and requires the student to go back to the drawing board, figurativelyand literally. These ‘failures’ are used as learning opportunities where the student’s

Conference Session

New Tools for Teaching Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Christe, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Jay J. Bhatt, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Douglas G. McGee, University of Pennsylvania; Ruth Wolfish, IEEE

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

from “totally agree” to “totally disagree”. The facilitator would then invite sharing ofperspectives along the spectrum, to engage the group in social knowledge construction. Students could beasked to breakout into small groups and craft pitches on portable whiteboards, and a facilitator wouldinvite a few groups to pitch the audience on their ideas for startups.As the Harvard education strategist Tony Wagner writes “The world doesn’t care what you know, it caresabout what you can do with what you know”[15]. There is clear opportunity for university libraries toform partnerships to develop a new layer of experiences focused on entrepreneurship that go beyondcontent delivery. The work herein reflects a collaborative partnership between two