Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #32452Work in Progress: Impact of the Entrepreneurial Mindset for InnovativeTeaching (EMIT) AcademyDr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Professor and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Innovation: The Student Experience

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sophia Lerner Pink, Stanford University; Beth Rieken, Stanford University; Tua A. Björklund; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #19275What Makes an Inquisitive Engineer? An Exploration of Question-Asking,Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations among Engineering StudentsSophia Lerner Pink, Stanford University Sophia Pink is a rising junior studying engineering at Stanford University. She began conducting research in Dr. Sheri Sheppard’s Designing Education Lab in June 2016. Sophia’s academic interests include mechanical engineering, human-centered design, and social science research.Beth Rieken, Stanford University Beth Rieken is a PhD Candidate at Stanford University in the Mechanical Engineering Department. She is in the Designing

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University; William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Cory Hixson, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

education. His work has been featured on the Discovery Channel, CNN Heath and TEDx. He wis a twice nominated US Case Professor and a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education faculty member.Dr. William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Associate Dean of Innovation and Professor of Engineering Management at Rose-Hulman. He joined Rose-Hulman in 2001 and his teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, design, quality, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Bill is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Illinois College and a Bronze Tablet graduate of University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign where he received a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering.Cory Hixson

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Competitions, Challenges, and Teams

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

others.Dr. William A Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Professor of Engineering Management and Associate Dean of Innovation at Rose-Hulman. His teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, quality, manufacturing systems, in- novation, and entrepreneurship. As Associate Dean, he directs the Branam and Kremer Innovation Centers which house campus competition teams, capstone projects, and a maker space. He is currently an associate with IOI Partners, a consulting venture focused on innovation tools and systems. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, he was a company co-founder and Chief Operating Officer of Montronix, a company in the global machine monitoring industry. Bill is a Phi

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kurt A. Thoroughman, Washington University; Alessandra Hruschka, Washington University in St.Louis; Patricia Widder, Washington University in St. Louis

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #10961Engineering Virtual Studio: KEEN Modules to Foster Entrepreneurial Mind-set in an Integrative, First/Second Year Online CourseDr. Kurt A. Thoroughman, Washington University Dr. Thoroughman is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at Washington University in St. Louis. He is also an Associate Professor and the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. Dr. Thoroughman received a PhD in Biomedical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University and postdoctoral training in Biology from Brandeis University.Ms. Alessandra

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University; Amy Frances Golightly, Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #22908Curious About Student Curiosity: Implications of Pedagogical Approach forStudents’ MindsetDr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based

Conference Session

Critical Success Factors for Technopolis Creation

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

W. Andrew Clark, East Tennessee State University; Peter Hriso, East Tennessee State University; Craig A. Turner, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

AC 2007-2081: ENCOURAGING STUDENT PARTICIPATION IN SOCIALENTREPRENEURSHIP OPPORTUNITIESW. Andrew Clark, East Tennessee State University W. ANDREW CLARK is a nutritional biochemist with diverse experience in academics and industrial research. He received his Ph.D. in Nutrition from North Carolina State University in 1980 and served as Assistant Professor of Nutrition at South Dakota State University (1980 to 1983). From 1983 to 2001 he held various positions in research, management and business at Eastman Chemical Company. Dr. Clark is an Associate Professor of Entrepreneurial Business at East Tennessee State University.Peter Hriso, East Tennessee State University PETER HRISO received his

Conference Session

From Entrepreneurship Education to Market

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William A Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Thomas W. Mason, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Brian Charles Dougherty, Rose-Hulman Ventures

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

AC 2012-4189: BEING INNOVATIVE: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THEPRACTICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATIONDr. William A Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is professor of engineering management and is currently serving as interim Dean of the Fac- ulty at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Kline has a Ph.D. degree from the University of Illinois in mechanical engineering and worked in industry for many years before joining Rose-Hulman. Kline was Co-founder and Chief Technical Officer at Montronix, a company providing monitoring systems for industrial machinery. At Rose-Hulman, his professional interests include design, innovation, systems engineering, quality, and manufacturing systems.Dr. Thomas W. Mason

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A. Mallory, Western New England University; Matthew Romoser, Western New England University; Michael J. Rust, Western New England University; Thomas Keyser, Western New England University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #14951Inclusion of Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML) Modules in 2nd-Year Core Engineering CoursesDr. Jennifer A. Mallory, Western New England University Dr. Mallory joined Western New England University after earning her Ph.D. from Purdue University in August 2012. Dr. Mallory’s current teaching interests include integrating problem- and project-based learning into core mechanical engineering courses to enhance student learning and motivation. She is currently the primary instructor for the Thermodynamics I and II courses in Mechanical Engineering. Her research interests are in engineering education and spray

Conference Session

Approaches to Teaching Entrepreneurship

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

W. Andrew Clark, East Tennessee State University; J. Paul Sims, East Tennessee State University; Craig A. Turner, East Tennessee State University; Jon L. Smith, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

2006-1610: EMBEDDING INNOVATION PROCESS AND METHODOLOGY INENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT ANDMARKETING COURSESW. Andrew Clark, East Tennessee State University W. ANDREW CLARK is a nutritional biochemist with diverse experience in academics and industrial research. He received his Ph.D. in Nutrition from North Carolina State University in 1980 and served as Assistant Professor on Nutrition at South Dakota State University (1980 - 1983). From 1983 to 2001 he held various positions in research, management and business at Eastman Chemical Company. Dr. Clark is an Associate Professor of Entrepreneurial Business at East Tennessee State University.J. Paul Sims, East Tennessee State

Conference Session

The Nature of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Session 4

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech; Christina Seimetz Wade, Virginia Tech; Bevlee A. Watford, Virginia Tech; Joseph Ariel Cuadrado-Medina, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Juan Carlos Folgar-Lopez; Stephanie Nicole Lewis, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #10437Measuring Innovative Thinking Skills in Innovation Challenge ActivitiesDr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech Dr. Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech.Ms. Christina Nocon Seimetz, Virginia Tech Christina Seimetz is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She also serves as program support staff for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity where she is involved with recruitment, outreach, and retention programs specifically targeted towards females interested in engineering. Ms. Seimetz earned

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melany M. Ciampi, Safety, Health, and Environment Research Organization; Claudio da Rocha Brito, Science and Education Research Council; Rosa Maria Castro Fernandes Vasconcelos, Universidade de Minho; Luis Alfredo Martins Amaral P.E., University of Minho - ALGORITMI; Victor F. A. Barros Ing.-Paed IGIP, Science and Education Research Council

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Monitoring Committee in IGIP since 2004, Member of Strategic Planning Committee of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engi- neers, Inc (IEEE-EdSoc) since 2009, Board Member of ”Global Council on Manufacturing and Manage- ment” (GCMM) since 2004 and Director of Brazilian Network of Engineering (RBE) since 1998. He is also Member of Board of Governors of International Council for Engineering and Technology Education (INTERTECH) since 2000 and Member of Board of Governors of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc (IEEE-EdSoc) since 2001.Prof. Rosa Maria Castro Fernandes Vasconcelos, Universidade de Minho Rosa Maria de Castro Fernandes Vasconcelos is a

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nassif E. Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy; Brian A. Garner, Baylor University; Darrell K. Kleinke, University of Detroit Mercy; Rebecca P. Blust, University of Dayton; William M. Jordan, Baylor University; Edmond John Dougherty Jr., Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #10255Intercollegiate Student Design Projects: Lessons Learned by Four Universi-tiesProf. Nassif E Rayess, University of Detroit MercyDr. Brian A Garner, Baylor University Dr. Brian A.Garner is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University. He re- ceived his PhD in ME from the University of Texas at Austin in 1998, and joined the Baylor faculty in 2002. His research interests include computer modeling of the human musculoskeletal system, algorithms for human motion analysis, biomechanics of equine assisted therapies, and design of therapy assistance devices. His teaching includes capstone

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: First-year Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University; Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University; Eunjeong Park, Ohio State University; Alexia Leonard, Ohio State University; Jack DeLano, The Ohio State University; Kai Zhao, Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation, First-Year Programs

). We received and documented consent for participation in the assessment study from857 students.Of these 857 students, a total of 767 students participated in the pre-data collection and 634participated in the post-data collection. For the AEV group, the average score for stress tolerancedecreased from 4.51 in the pre-survey to 4.35 in the post-survey (p75%; for Level I, success in last column is > 60%)Variable Level N Mean SD Min Max ≥ .8 (%)A02Investigate the market: use information B 125 0.764 0.383 0 1 64.00^ B 61.60

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Program Development & Desired Outcomes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ikhlaq Sidhu, University of California, Berkeley; Paris Deletraz, IE Business School

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Press.Ibarra, H. (2003). Working Identity. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Little, B. R. (2011). Personal Projects and Free Traits: Personality and Motivation Reconsidered. ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.Mauer, René et. al. (2009). Self-Efficacy: Conditioning the Entrepreneurial Mindset. International Studies inEntrepreneurship, 24, 233-257.Shepherd, Dean A. et. al. (2010). Entrepreneurial Spirals: Deviation-Amplifying Loops of an EntrepreneurialMindset and Organizational Culture. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34, 59-82.Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Page 26.575.10Weick, K

Conference Session

Student Entrepreneurial and Innovative Mindset

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

according to their objectives:A) Pattern breakingB) Inquiry-basedC) Self-paced ideation – allowing imagination to run wildD) Ideation under limited time constraintsE) Imaginative observationF) VisualizationG) Collective group ideationH) Exploring problems with infinite number of solutionsI) Evaluation problemsJ) Twists to well-known out-of-the-box problemsK) Exploring simple problems with unexpected solutions A) Pattern breaking Trace a Path from Point A to Point B This activity emphasizes avoiding adding unnecessary assumptions Page 25.525.4

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

interactive, innovative workshops aretaught by practicing professionals whose real world involvement, language and style give themimmediate credibility with students. These business and industry leaders help to expand thetheoretical world of the college experience. Some of the proposed workshops would cover: (a)Teambuilding and Teamwork, (b) Creating and Maintaining Professional Portfolios, (c)Developing a Resume, (d) Making Effective Presentations, (e) Knowing Yourself – True Colors,(f) Developing a Career Plan; (g) Corporate Culture and You, and (f) Graduate SchoolOpportunities. Class structure The class met once a week for three hours each time, and usually had most of the followingelements: o Group discussion of brain teasers (led by a

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew J. Traum, Engineer Inc.; Emre Selvi, Jacksonville University; Adele Hanlon, Jacksonville University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Signed Rank Testing was applied to both data sets. To provide datavisualization, descriptive statistics were also evaluated by comparing pre/post averages ofstudents’ self-reported results.Indirect assessment showed that exposure to DEEP POOL moved students’ averaged self-reported Learning Outcome achievement up across all outcomes assessed. The largestimprovements (with averages increasing 1.71 points on a 4-point scale) were in skills related toABET (k) and ABET (h). The next largest gain (the average increased 1.29 points on a 4-pointscale) was in ABET (b). One-tailed Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test of indirect assessment datacorroborate these results. Questions related to ABET (k) (Z = −2.366, p < 0.05), (h) (Z = −2.023,p < 0.05), and (b) (Z

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Assessment Tools and Practices

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

assessment plan that could serve twomasters. The second occurred when, during consideration of revisions to the computer sciencecurriculum, the program consulted the materials provided with the Computer Science Curricula2013 (CS2013) Final Report [16]. The ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force in charge of developingthis Report conveniently developed a curricular exemplar template spreadsheet [17] that includedon one sheet a large set of “learning outcomes,” a portion of which is shown in Figure 2. Theseoutcomes – 1,110 in all – are organized into one of 18 knowledge areas (KA – column A) byboth knowledge unit (KU – column B) and one of three possible mastery levels (Level – columnD). These levels, with the number of learning outcomes for each within

Conference Session

Engineering Entrepreneurship and K-12 Education

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David M Feinauer, University of Kentucky; Bruce Walcott, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

company. (A, B, C, D)Hands-on engineering labs – The students are presented with an overview of engineering ingeneral and the disciplines commonly offered by universities across the country. The programparticipants are then required to choose a subset of the fields that they would like to furtherinvestigate. Students are asked to select experiences from the following areas of study:Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Chemical and Materials Engineering, CivilEngineering, Computer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and MechanicalEngineering. The students have the opportunity to learn about these fields with faculty andstudents from each discipline. The hands-on activities usually begin with a discussion of the areaof interest, a

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Brock Alexander Hays, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

the entrepreneurial mindset across the curriculum,” unpublished. 4. S. Purzer, N. Fila, and K. Nataraja, “Evaluation of Current Assessment Methods in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education,” Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2016 issue, Feb. 2016. 5. Shartrand, P. Weilerstein, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and B. M. Olds, “Assessing student learning in technology entrepreneurship,” 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. 6. J. E. Mcgee, M. Peterson, S. L. Mueller, and J. M. Sequeira, “Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy: Refining the Measure,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 965–988, 2009. 7. M. Schar, S. Gilmartin, A. Harris, B. Rieken, and S. Sheppard, “Innovation Self

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tess Hartog, University of Oklahoma; Megan Marshall, University of Oklahoma; Amin G. Alhashim, University of Oklahoma; Md Tanvir Ahad, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

International Handbook of Innovation Education, vol. 5, pp. 153–167, 2013.[3] G. A. Davis, “Testing for creative potential,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 257–274, 1989.[4] K. H. Kim, “Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT),” Creativity Research Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–14, Jan. 2006.[5] H. B. Parkhurst, “Confusion, Lack of Consensus, and the Definition of Creativity as a Construct,” The Journal of Creative Behavior, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 1999.[6] R. Florida, The rise of the creative class--revisited: Revised and expanded. Basic Books (AZ), 2014.[7] “IBM 2010 Global CEO Study: Creativity Selected as Most Crucial Factor for Future

Conference Session

Successful Outcomes of Student Entrepreneurship

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stuart Kellogg, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

this might be so, consider the Herrmann Whole BrainModel3 shown below. Page 13.1189.3 a. First Year Students b. Senior Engineering Students Figure 1. HBDI Thinking Preference Profiles for Engineering StudentsFirst Year students, even engineering students, are typically all over the map in terms of learningstyles or thinking preference profiles (Fig. 1.a.). However the average thinking preference curvefor engineering students tends to be significantly more concentrated in the engineering or rationalself of the whole brain model (Fig. 1.b.). While much of the engineering work requirescoordination (green), systems design and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; Alyssa J. Harris, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, R= rate, N= number of years.This rule is precise, but is most precise when you stay in the interest rate range of 7-9% as can beseen in Figure 4. Figure 4: Rule of 72 Error Percentage PlotSome Rules of Thumb that engineering students may be familiar with are: a.   For every hour you spend in class, you need to spend two hours studying. b.   Moore’s Law on Technology: “The number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles approximately every 2 years.” …. And the list goes on.80/20 RuleHave you ever noticed that the majority of the work gets accomplished by a small group ofpeople? Another well-known Rule of Thumb is the 80/20 Rule which states that 80% ofoutcomes can

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Galaleldin, University of Ottawa; Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

anindividual’s entity versus incremental personality theory in the domains of intelligence andmorality. The three items in the implicit personality theories of intelligence domain measure arethe following: a) You have a certain amount of intelligence and you really can’t do much to change it; b) Your intelligence is something about you that you can’t change very much; and c) You can learn new things, but you can’t really change your basic intelligence.Respondents indicated their agreement with these statements on a 6-point scale from 1 (stronglyagree) to 6 (strongly disagree) [25, p. 269]. Respondents with a score of 3.0 or below areclassified as entity theorists, and those with a 4.0 score or higher are classified as incrementaltheorists

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Design and Entrepreneurship

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

José Antonio Riofrío, Western New England University; Robert Gettens, Western New England University; Anthony D. Santamaria, Western New England University; Thomas K Keyser, Western New England University; Ronald E. Musiak, Western New England University; Harlan E Spotts Jr., Western New England University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

techniques such asbrainsketching, flipping and Debono’s Six Thinking Hats method are used in the design process Page 26.969.4[6]. The ‘bot challenges are altered each year. Partnering with the University Army R.O.T.C.Battalion, the most recent challenges were given an Army Engineering flavor and included an A)Race ‘Bot, B) Tractor ‘Bot, C) IED ‘Bot and D) Minesweeper ‘Bot. The ‘bots were also judgedby the customer (Army R.O.T.C. Instructor/Officer) on aesthetics. Figure 2: Schematic of the engineering design process taught in the Introduction to Engineering course. This process is derived from Holtzapple and Reese [5].The first challenge (the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education: Experiential Learning and Economic Development II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara Karanian, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gregory Kress, Stanford University; Joel Sadler, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

intergy in Figure B. Figure BSubjectsStudents and industry leader guest guides ranged in age from twenty-something to fifty-something inthe classes. Some took the class for credit while others participated and visited on a regular basis.Each class group had 8-12 participants. Each group had at least one female participant.i. Design as Organizing Questions for Each classOrganizing questions for the seminar were formulated based on factors of motivation, imagination,perception and cognition across the seminar project phases of explore, express, evolve and excite (seeTable 3). While many of the questions were part of the pre-planning for the course curriculum, somequestions emerged based on the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education: Assessment and Integrating Entrepreneurship into the Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Johnson, Valparaiso University; Mark Budnik, Valparaiso University; Doug Tougaw, Valparaiso University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education National Conference (2006).7. D. Barbe, J. R. Baum, and K. S. Thornton, “Components of a Comprehensive Engineering Entrepreneurship Program,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education National Conference (2002).8. J. Green, K. Thornton, B. Robertson, B. Ghavam, D. Barbe, M. Weinstein, and T. Casalena, “Student Perspectives on the Hinman CEOs Program,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Illinois/Indiana Conference (2005).9. E. Johnson, B. Engerer, K. Leitch, and D. Tougaw, “Teaching Probability and Statistics in a First-Year Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference (2008).10

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Freddy Solis, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Joseph Victor Sinfield, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle: Transaction Books, 1934.[4] M. Casson, The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory: Edward Elgar Publishing, Incorporated, 1982.[5] W. B. Gartner, "Who is an Entrepreneur? Is the Wrong Question," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp. 47-67, 1989.[6] S. Shane and S. Venkataraman, "The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research," The academy of Management Review, vol. 25, pp. 217-226, 2000.[7] S. Sarasvathy, "Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency," Academy of Management Review, vol. 26, pp. 243 - 263, 2001.[8] S. Venkataraman, "The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Courses and Outcomes II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica R. McCormick, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Beverly Radloff, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Nancy Lamm, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

they are not in a traditional engineering program nor in the EDDP.Appendix A contains a comprehensive listing of the month and year each survey participantgraduated and Appendix B shows the distribution of responses by engineering discipline.Research QuestionsResearch questions were developed to gather a large amount of data that can be evaluated toanswer the research problems. The questions were compiled using an if/then system in thesurvey tool. The employment questions (3-10) were given based upon the previous question’sresponse. Each participant was asked questions 10-14. The questions are: 1. Month and year of graduation 2. Major(s) 3. When did you receive your first job offer (related to your major)? Month and year 4. Did