and Educational Materials and he has been formally engaged in K-12 engineering education for nearly ten years.Dr. Scott A. Sell, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng.Dr. Michelle B. Sabick, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng. Dr. Michelle Sabick assumed the role of Dean of Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology at Saint Louis University in July of 2016. Prior to that she was Chair of the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Saint Louis University. Dr. Sabick began her academic career at Boise State University in Boise, Idaho where she co-founded the Center for Orthopaedic and Biomechanics Research and served as Chair of the Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering for
Paper ID #27318A Complementary Approach to Implementing Entrepreneurship into a Me-chanical Engineering Senior Capstone Course SequenceDr. Nathan John Washuta, The Citadel Dr. Nathan Washuta is an Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. He received both his B.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Maryland – College Park. His primary research interests include Hydrodynamics, Free Surface Flows, and Experimental Methods.Dr. Patrick Bass, The Citadel Patrick Bass is an assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Citadel, in
large Southwestern publicuniversity. The program implementation component included program data associated withcurriculum content and format, recruiting approach, and participant data from five cohorts. Dueto the delayed employment of the assessment, the evaluation component included findings fromtwo cohorts using pre- and post-quizzes on knowledge of entrepreneurship terms and pre- andpost-surveys that captured changes in perceptions of entrepreneurship and customer interview.The results of this study indicated that while student interest on entrepreneurship remainedconstant, there were significant improvements of participants in three areas of self-efficacy: (a)entrepreneurship, (b) marketing and business planning, and (c) customer interview
(“transdisciplinary-thinking”). Second, it is transdisciplinary in that learning experiencesintegrate the humanities into engineering, design, and technology skill sets. Finally, it isscaffold in that instruction of each of the four modules builds on the other, further enhancingand grounding the learning experience. This paper will explain our unique yet standardizedapproach through a semester-long course introducing engineering and technology students toinnovation-related frameworks as an immersive approach to increase deeper transdisciplinarythinking through innovation. This funnel method is intentionally applied to guide studentsfrom (a) System’s Thinking - big picture, holistic perspective to (b) Design Thinking -human-centered approach to problem
research design, community-engaged research and mentoring to a) investigate how people perceive, understand, and make decisions about the planet in order to b) address access, inclusion, equity, and justice in STEM and academia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Developing a conceptual framework to understand student participation in entrepreneurship education programsAbstract: The importance of fostering innovativeness and creativity in graduates has beenwidely noted in national calls and accreditation reforms to enhance graduates’ competitiveness inthe global economy. As a result, universities and other higher education institutions haveinitiated curricular
conceptual framework.Relationship RisksMaxwell and Lévesque identified a relatinship between behaviors related to relationship risk andinvestment decisions in the early stateges of decision making (see Table 2) [17]. Whenquantified these relationship factors are a) different and b) have greater weight than previouslyanticipated. See the left hand column in step four of the conceptual framework.Much has been discussed about the availability of objective, risk mitigating frameworks and theemergence of the “soft skills”; those categories of relationship-based risks. Entrepreneurshipeducation has done a good job of incorporating the former into curriculum and pedagogy andperhaps the latter will find its way as well. But little if no research has
Value of Value of Scores of Scores of University A University B value University A University B University A University BCurrent proportion of students 100 x 100 xreceiving entrepreneurship x a% b% (a+b)% a%/(a+b)% b%/(a+b)% [a%/(a+b)%] [b
Paper ID #26534Provoked Emotion in Student Stories of Motivation Reveal Gendered Percep-tions of What It Means to be Innovative in EngineeringProf. Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, formerly visiting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group at Stanford University. Barbara’s research focuses on four ar- eas: 1)grounding a blend of theories from social-cognitive psychology, engineering design, and art to show how cognition affects design; 2) changing the way people understand the emotion behind their work with the intent to do
the project goalsand rubric categories. Finally, we plan to introduce the concept of sustainability as anoverarching theme in the project to meet what we see as a societal need to train engineers whoare able to competently discuss and integrate sustainability in their engineering practice.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by funding from the Kern Family Foundation through a KEENInstitutional Program Grant.References[1] Lewis, K., Moore-Russo, D. A., Kremer, G. E. O., Tucker, C., Simpson, T. W., Zappe, S. E., ... Williams, C. B. (2013). The development of product archaeology as a platform for contextualizing engineering design. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[2] Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017
Paper ID #24784Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool for Evaluating Students’ Perception ofEntrepreneurial Mind-setMs. Marissa Mary Martine, Rowan University Marissa Martine is a sophomore Chemical Engineering major with a concentration in Honors Students and Material Science at Rowan University. She is also involved with the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and the Society of Women Engineers, and involved in research at the Sustainable Materials Research Laboratory at Rowan University.Lia X. Mahoney, Rowan University She is a student at Rowan University for Mechanical Engineering with an strong interest in
Paper ID #25440Entrepreneurial Engineering Education – A Research Experience for Under-graduates Focused on Entrepreneurship and Technical InnovationProf. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Professor-in-Residence in the De- partment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, and his M.S.C.E.P and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively. His primary areas of interest are game
Paper ID #26513A Multi-institution Investigation into Faculty Approaches for Incorporatingthe Entrepreneurial Mind-set in First-year Engineering ClassroomsMs. Renee Desing, Ohio State University Renee Desing is currently a graduate student at the Ohio State University in the Department of Engi- neering Education. Ms. Desing holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the Pennsylvania State University. Most recently, Ms. Desing worked as a managing consultant for IBM Public Sector Advanced Analytics.Dr. Krista M
Signed Rank Testing was applied to both data sets. To provide datavisualization, descriptive statistics were also evaluated by comparing pre/post averages ofstudents’ self-reported results.Indirect assessment showed that exposure to DEEP POOL moved students’ averaged self-reported Learning Outcome achievement up across all outcomes assessed. The largestimprovements (with averages increasing 1.71 points on a 4-point scale) were in skills related toABET (k) and ABET (h). The next largest gain (the average increased 1.29 points on a 4-pointscale) was in ABET (b). One-tailed Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test of indirect assessment datacorroborate these results. Questions related to ABET (k) (Z = −2.366, p < 0.05), (h) (Z = −2.023,p < 0.05), and (b) (Z
the entrepreneurial mindset across the curriculum,” unpublished. 4. S. Purzer, N. Fila, and K. Nataraja, “Evaluation of Current Assessment Methods in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education,” Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2016 issue, Feb. 2016. 5. Shartrand, P. Weilerstein, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and B. M. Olds, “Assessing student learning in technology entrepreneurship,” 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. 6. J. E. Mcgee, M. Peterson, S. L. Mueller, and J. M. Sequeira, “Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy: Refining the Measure,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 965–988, 2009. 7. M. Schar, S. Gilmartin, A. Harris, B. Rieken, and S. Sheppard, “Innovation Self
anindividual’s entity versus incremental personality theory in the domains of intelligence andmorality. The three items in the implicit personality theories of intelligence domain measure arethe following: a) You have a certain amount of intelligence and you really can’t do much to change it; b) Your intelligence is something about you that you can’t change very much; and c) You can learn new things, but you can’t really change your basic intelligence.Respondents indicated their agreement with these statements on a 6-point scale from 1 (stronglyagree) to 6 (strongly disagree) [25, p. 269]. Respondents with a score of 3.0 or below areclassified as entity theorists, and those with a 4.0 score or higher are classified as incrementaltheorists
to Entrepreneurship Thinking. Sandra previously worked in the Office of Innovation & Entrepreneurship and managed programs encouraging and supporting entrepreneurship around Stevens Campus. Before coming to Stevens, Sandra worked as a consulting engineer with Stantec and T&M Associates specializing in Urban Land Redevelopment and Municipal Engineering. Sandra holds a B.S. Degree in Civil & Environmental Engineering, an A. B. degree in Art History, and a Master of Engineering degree in Engineering Management from Stevens Institute of Technology. She also holds a Professional Engineering license in NJ.Dr. Kishore V. Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Kishore
-month I-Corps program for undergraduates [5] or(b) completed a course in innovation in technology, in which students developed ideas forpotential startups.Junior-level sequence. The two courses in the junior-level sequence were Engineering Design:People to Products and Engineering Entrepreneurship: Products to People. This was a requiredcourse sequence for majors. The course had students develop potential startups, using LeanLaunchpad [7], the NSF I-Corps methodology [8], and the Innovation Canvas [9]. The entiresecond semester involved refining the design and developing the “Market” quadrant of theInnovation Canvas, which is equivalent to the business model canvas, for a single startup projectper team of three to five students. The second
the other half of the totalizer system. For that we use either Red LionPAXI or CUB5B totalizer units, and put optional RS485 serial data and set point cards in them.The students program them to count upward on both A (for a customer count) and B (for a dailycount) channels when they receive a wired signal from a hole or trough, and to reset the A countvia an external reset signal. They program each unit’s communications to 19200 baud, 7 bit odd.So that the intake table can also be used as a counting table for output to a vendor, each hole alsohas attached to its counter a Banner EZ-LIGHT S18L GRXP LED light. The students wire andprogram the set point relays for each hole to change the light from green to red when a certainbag-full count is
instrument in May 2018 before they graduated. After Table 1. Growth Measurement Instrument and Results 2014 2018 A B C F*# Items mean mean 14/18 d mean p val.1 When I see a complicated piece of machinery, I always 4.29 4.17 0/0 -0.13 (0.24) IC like to find out how it works2 I always actively seek as much information as I can in a 4.08 4.29 0/0 0.21 0.10 IC new situation3 I consider myself to be a person who takes action when 3.92 4.25 0/0 0.33 0.05 IC I'm curious about something4
Paper ID #27804Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions of Engineering Graduates: WhatContributes to Increased Intentions and Continued Entrepreneurial Skill De-velopment?Mr. Christian Schnell, Stanford University Christian is currently pursuing a Master in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Technical Uni- versity of Munich (TUM). Within his studies he focuses on power engineering as well as automation and robotics. He is also a participant in the Entrepreneurial Qualification Program ”Manage&More”. This is an additional education at the Center for Innovation and Business Creation at the TU Munich (”UnternehmerTUM
Paper ID #26849Employer Perceptions of Undergraduate Student Entrepreneurial Experi-enceMrs. Elizabeth Rose Morehouse, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Liz Morehouse is an assistant director in Career Services & Employer Relations at Rose-Hulman Insti- tute of Technology. She received a B.A. in Spanish and M.S. in Community Counseling from Northern Kentucky University in 2007 and 2009, respectively. She is an award-winning curriculum designer with significant experience providing leadership and career development opportunities for college students.Dr. Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Tom
that would form the basis of the typology presented in this study. Each theme was comprised of multiple codes or elements that added nuance or clarity to the overarching theme.4. Checking themes – We cross-compared themes and their underlying elements to ensure (a) similar aspects were grouped together and (b) themes conveyed different types of student learning related to innovation. Thus, themes were checked intrinsically by asking, “Is this an accurate depiction of the comprising elements and critical incidents?” Themes were also checked holistically by asking, “Does this comprehensively describe the learning apparent across the elements and critical incidents?”5. Building narratives – This step further described the themes in
would do the upgrade) or a new from-the-factory model.Additional challenges in projects such as these include: 1. The students are from different disciplines and on different project calendars for milestones and assignments: a. Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Business, Social Innovation b. The final products (PoC / Prototype, paper, presentation, poster session) dates do not all coincide. 2. Being the senior year, while this is a major focus it is not their only focus. 3. Most, if not all, of the students have never managed a project with their own classmates, let alone a project that involves others outside their discipline. 4. Each student team is organized differently
, D. Kum Tien, "A Blueprint for implementing Grand Challenge Scholars’Programme: A Case Study of Taylor’s University," Journal of Engineering Science andTechnology, Special Issue April 2003, pp. 80-86.[2] T. Byers, T. Seelig, S. Sheppard, P. Weilerstein, "Entrepreneurship: It’s Role in EngineeringEducation," The Bridge, p. 35, Summer 2013.[3] A. Richert-Kaźmierska, E. Lechman, Chapt 1, 2. Creating Entrepreneurial Mindset,University College Denmark, 2014.[4] L. Bosman, B. Mayer, P. McNamara, "Promoting Entrepreneurially Minded Learningthrough Online Discussions," presented at 124th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June25-28, Columbus, OH, 2017.[5] M. Taks, P. Tynjala, M. Toding, "Engineering Students’ Experiences in
: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2019-2020/. [Accessed: 31-Jan-2019].[3] “KEEN - The Framework.” [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset- matters/framework.aspx. [Accessed: 31-Jan-2019].[4] A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers, 1st edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2010.[5] S. Blank and B. Dorf, The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company, 1 edition. Pescadero, Calif: K & S Ranch, 2012.
the x-axis is an identifier with thefollowing structure: A B, M or D is used as the first letter to denote programs that offer baccalaureates, master’s or doctorates as the highest degree. The two digits following the first letter is a numeric code assigned to each institution. The two digits and optional letter between the two dashes is a code assigned to the instructor. If the same instructor deployed a module in multiple sections or courses, then the letter code “a”, “b”, … is used to denote the different sections/courses”. The letters at the end denotes the e-learning module (e.g., TC = Thinking Creatively). In addition to the ratings assigned to student performance, the magnitude of the EML
skills.References[1] J. M. Santiago and J. Guo, "Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Courses Using the Online Flipped Classroom Approach," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OHIO, 2017.[2] K. M. S.-L. J. R. Y. Andrea L. Welker, "Weaving Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Throughout a Civil Engineering Curriculum," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[3] S. E. Zappe, R. M. Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger and H. W. Lee, "flipping" the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2009.[4] B. Kerr, "The flipped classroom in engineering eductation: A survey of research," in Internation Conerence on
, no. 4, pp. 357–366, 2014.[5] S. Sheppard et al., “Exploring what we don’t know about entrepreneurship education for engineers,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., 2015.[6] J. A. Katz, “The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876-1999,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 283– 300, 2003.[7] K. H. Vesper and W. B. Gartner, “Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 403–421, 1997.[8] P. a Gompers, “The Rise and Fall of Venture Capital,” Bus. Econ. Hist., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1–26, 1994.[9] K. Kobe, “Small business GDP: update 2002–2010,” Rep. Small Bus. Adm., 2012.[10] T. Turner and P. Gianiodis, “Entrepreneurship
of Mass and Momentum 7. Coefficient of Pressure 17. Conservation of Energy 8. How Lift is Generated and Calculation 18. Thrust Equation and Design of Lift and Coefficient of Lift (F-15 Considerations (Activity) Activity) 19. Radial, Turbojet Engine 9. Concept and Importance of Wing 20. Turbofan, Turboprop and Propeller Loading (Flight Sim Activity) Engines a. Takeoff Performance 21. Flight Dynamics and Stability (Activity) b. Landing Performance 22
Paper ID #25982Using the KEEN Framework and the System Engineering Approach for De-sign and Development of Affordable Wireless Power Transfer using InductiveCoupling for Application in Earphone ChargingProf. John M. Santiago Jr, Colorado Technical University Professor John Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management, acquisition development and operation research support while in the United States Air Force. He currently has over 18 years of teaching experience at the university level and taught over 40 different graduate and