2004 and Spring of 2023, respectively.Dr. Krystal Corbett Cruse, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Krystal Corbett is the First-Year Engineering Programs Coordinator and Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Louisiana Tech University. She is also the Co-Director of the Office for Women in Science and Engineering at Louisiana Tech.Dr. Kelly B Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Dr Kelly Crittenden is a member of Louisiana Tech University’s Integrated STEM Education Center (ISERC), and is the Harrelson Family Professor of engineering. He is also the Program Chair of Mechanical engineering and the coordinator for Tech’s PhD in Eng ©American Society for Engineering
social and personality psychology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2007. Prior to his career in psychology, he spent six years as a teacher, coach, and social worker. Chris is a second generation educator whose grandparents were tenant farmers in Iowa and Nebraska. He tries to emulate their hard work and persistence in the pursuit of social justice. One of his favorite childhood memories is eating his paternal grandmother’s homemade fruit pies with plenty of ice cream.Dr. Dustin B. Thoman, San Diego State University Dr. Dustin Thoman is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education at San Diego State University. He also serves as California
. Siddiqui, C. Allendoerfer, R. Adams, and B. Williams, “Integration of Scholarship: Interconnections among Three Studies on Becoming an Engineering Education Researcher*,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, pp. 2352–2377, Dec. 2020.[6] S. Cutler and A. Coso Strong, “The Overlooked Impact of Faculty on Engineering Education,” in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Routledge, 2023.[7] L. Earle Reybold and J. J. Alamia, “Academic Transitions in Education: A Developmental Perspective of Women Faculty Experiences,” J. Career Dev., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 107–128, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0894845308325644.[8] D. Oyserman, “Identity-Based Motivation,” in Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, John Wiley &
. 2, pp. 75–86, 2014.[7] M. Scarbecz, C. K. Russell, R. G. Shreve, M. M. Robinson, and C. R. Scheid, ‘Faculty development to improve teaching at a health sciences center: a needs assessment’, Journal of Dental Education, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 145–159, 2011.[8] N. S. Ali, K. Hodson-Carlton, M. Ryan, J. Flowers, M. A. Rose, and V. Wayda, ‘Online education: Needs assessment for faculty development’, The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, vol. 36, no. 1. Slack Incorporated Thorofare, NJ, pp. 32–38, 2005.[9] E. S. Oztay, S. Aydin Gunbatar, and B. Ekiz Kiran, ‘Assessing Chemistry Teachers’ Needs and Expectations from Integrated STEM Education Professional Developments’, Journal of Pedagogical
. Hjelsvold, and B. R. Krogstie, “ICT-Based Challenges of Repurposing a Single-Campus Course to Multi-campus Settings: A Pragmatic Case Study,” in Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Society in the 21st Century, I. O. Pappas, P. Mikalef, Y. K. Dwivedi, L. Jaccheri, J. Krogstie, and M. Mäntymäki, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 641–653. doi: 10.1007/978-3- 030-29374-1_52.[7] C. Sielmann, C. Keulen, and S.-F. Hu, “Multi-Campus Teaching in a Canadian Engineering Context: Assessing Presence Using The COI Survey,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc. CEEA, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.14878.[8] C. Sielmann, V. Chiu, and C. Keulen, “An Online Survey Tool for Multi-Cohort
responses 3 4 1 0 0Q5: Please add any comments you have about the framework. (n=4)a. "This is a good idea - a deliberate approach."b. "I liked how we could disagree about AI and still have a productive discussion."c. "The framework can have different outcomes for different people - I think that's ok since we are at least talking about it and we can see people are acting with intention. I learned a lot about LLMs such as their environmental impact."d. "The framework sparked great discussion."While not statistically relevant, these initial survey responses indicate a generally favorableresponse to the framework and related discussions about
education became a scientific inquiry in theU.S. between 1890 to 1910 with the goal to innovate curricular design as well as pedagogicalpractices. Engineering education as a discipline and research field aims to assist students by a)providing evidence-based practices to instructors on engineering practices [2], b) ways toenhance students’ learning experiences [3]; [4], c) incorporating effective teachingmethodologies for students [5]; [6], d) integrating technology in the classroom [7]; [8]; [9], e)refining assessment methods [10], and f) enhancing curricula to meet the needs of students andimplementing strategies to better equip the next generation of engineers [7]; [11]; [12].Understanding engineering education from a historical perspective, it
received his B. Tech. from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (2010) and his Ph. D. from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (2016), both in Mechanical Engineering. He worked as Post-Doctoral Research Associate for 1.5 years and as a Lecturer for 6 months at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute prior to joining the College of Engineering at West Texas A&M in Fall 2019 as an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering. The famous American scientist Richard Feynman prophesied the huge potential for engineering at small scales (There’s plenty of room at the bottom!). In this spirit, Dr. Pal is interested in the unique nano-mechanical behavior of materials at small scales, and how they can be harnessed to produce
toshare this approach in a Lightning Talk.References[1] A. Dudo, J. C. Besley, and S. Yuan, “Science Communication Training in North America: Preparing Whom to Do What With What Effect?,” Sci. Commun., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 33–63, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1075547020960138.[2] T. S. Ritchie, D. L. Rossiter, H. B. Opris, I. E. Akpan, S. Oliphant, and M. McCartney, “How do STEM graduate students perceive science communication? Understanding science communication perceptions of future scientists,” PLoS ONE, vol. 17, no. 10, p. e0274840, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274840.[3] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies
and mentees on a national mentoring programme for pharmacists: An examination intorelationships, personal and professional development,” Research in Social and AdministrativePharmacy, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 2495–2504, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.019.[11]. Pawson, Ray “Mentoring relationships: an explanatory review.” 2004.[12]. M. J. Karcher, G. P. Kuperminc, S. G. Portwood, C. L. Sipe, and A. S. Taylor, “Mentoringprograms: A framework to inform program development, research, and evaluation,” Journal ofCommunity Psychology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 709–725, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1002/jcop.20125.[13]. Eby, L. T. D. T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., ... &Evans, S. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary
engineering student outcomes," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2016.[3] B. M. Schwartz and A. Haynie, "Faculty development centers and the role of SoTL," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 136, pp. 101-111, 2013.[4] P. C. Wankat, R. M. Felder, K. A. Smith, and F. S. Oreovicz, "The scholarship of teaching and learning in engineering. Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning," pp. 217-237, 2023.[5] D. Boden and M. Borrego, "Academic Departments and Related Organizational Barriers to Interdisciplinary Research," Higher Education in Review, vol. 8, 2011.[6] R. Felder and R. Brent, "An analysis of fifteen years of the national effective teaching
for Education," SSRN, 2023.[4] I. Tuomi, Y. Punie, R. Vuorikari and M. Cabrera, "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Learning, Teaching, and Education: Policies for the Future," European Commission, 2018.[5] A. Bozkurt, J. Xiao, S. Lambert, A. Pazurek, H. Crompton, S. Koseoglu, R. Farrow, M. Bond, C. Nerantzi, S. Honeychurch, M. Bali, J. Dron, K. Mir, B. Stewart, E. Costello, J. Mason, C. M. Stracke, E. Romero-Hall, A. Koutropoulos, C. M. Toquero, L. Singh, A. Tlili, K. Lee, M. Nichols, E. Ossiannilsson, M. Brown, V. Irvine, J. E. Raffaghelli, G. Santos-Hermosa, O. Farrell, T. Adam, Y. L. Thong, S. Sani-Bozkurt, R. C. Sharma, S. Hrastinski and P. Jandrić, "Speculative Futures on ChatGPT and Generative Artificial
conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] Excelencia in Education (2023a). “Hispanic–serving institutions (HSIs): 2021–22,” 2023.[Online]. Available: https://www.edexcelencia.org/media/2105[2] A. M. Núñez, J. Rivera, J. Valdez, and V. B. Olivo. “Centering Hispanic-serving institutions’strategies to develop talent in computing fields,” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technologyand Society, vol., 4, no. 1, 1842582, 2021.[3] B.L. Scott, S. M. Muñoz, and S. B. Scott. “How whiteness operates at a Hispanic ServingInstitution: A qualitative case study of faculty, staff, and
. "Limited learning on college campuses." Society 48 (2011): 203-207.12. B. C. Sanyal and M. Martin, "Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: An overview," Report: Higher Education in the World 2007: Accreditation for Quality Assurance: What is at Stake?, 2007.13. J. S. Eaton, "An Overview of US Accreditation. Revised November 2015," Council for Higher Education Accreditation, 2015.14. D. G. Rodionov, I. A. Rudskaia, and O. A. Kushneva, "The importance of the university world rankings in the context of globalization," Life Science Journal, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 442-446, 2014.15. S. N. S. Sahuri et al., "Engineering Education: Program Ranking and Student Interest," ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2015.16
SSKG:StudentSuccess (b) Individual: SSKG:iLink_REU Annotations: dc:source < https://ilink.cybershare.utep.edu/> dc:description “The iLink group provides research and training opportunities for undergraduate and graduate students through multiple research projects funded by different agencies, organizations and industry partners.” Types: SSKG:UGResearchProgram (c) ObjectProperty: SSKG:impacts SubPropertyChain: SSKG:ReportedIn o SSKG:DescribesOutcomeFigure 3. (a) Description of the SSKG High Impact Practice class, (b) an example of anUndergraduate Research Program instance individual, and (c) an Object Property
Paper ID #43034A Predictive Study on the Adoption of Active Learning at HBCUs amongEngineering FacultyMr. Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University Pelumi Abiodun is a current doctoral student and research assistant at the department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland. Pelumi got his BSc and MSc degree in Physics from Obafemi Awolowo University, where he also served as a research assistant at the Environmental Pollution Research unit, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. As part of his contribution to science and engineering, Pelumi has taught as a teaching assistant both at Morgan State University
Positions at Hispanic- Serving Institutions,” in Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Lincoln, NE: American Society for Engineering Education/IEEE, 2021.[10] J. R. S. Molano et al., “AMPLIFY Institute: A Professional Development Program Designed for and with Engineering Instructional Faculty.,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore, MD, Jun. 2023.[11] A. B. Dellinger, J. J. Bobbett, D. F. Olivier, and C. D. Ellett, “Measuring teachers’ self- efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 751–766, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010.[12] C. M. Campbell and K. O’Meara, “Faculty Agency: Departmental
Paper ID #42083Faculty Development Symposium: Building a Community for Early-CareerEngineering Hispanic Faculty’s Success and AdvancementDr. Dayna Lee Mart´ınez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dayna is a Senior Director of Research & Impact at the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), where she leads a team of professionals who specialize in data-driven design and implementation of programs and services to empower pre-college students, parents, graduate students, and faculty members in STEM fields, with a particular focus on advancing Hispanic representation and success. With over 15
Polytechnic Institute and State University Jennifer Case is Head and Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds an honorary position at the University of Cape Town. Her research on the student experience of learning, focusing mainly on science and engineerinDr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and
professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAINDr. Yilin Feng, California State University, Los Angeles Yilin Feng is an assistant professor at California State University, Los Angeles. She received her Ph.D. degree from Purdue University. Her research interest is in airport simulation, operation, and management.Dr. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal State LA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the
--30768Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016).Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. ATD Press.Landry, C. A., Richard, J. M., & Layou, K. M. (2022). Turning the page: The importance of faculty‐led book clubs.New Directions for Community Colleges,2022(199), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20531Lang, J. M. (2021).Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning(Second edition). Jossey-Bass.8Liberatore, M. W. (2021). AIChE Virtual Communities of Practice _ Supporting Faculty during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Chemical Engineering Education,56(1). https://doi.org/10.18260/2-1-370.660-125282Lyons, B., & Ray, C. (2014). The Continuous Quality Improvement
Paper ID #43908Learning from Experience: A Faculty-Led Collaborative Inquiry ExploringEvidence-Based Strategies for Embedding Communication Skills Across EngineeringCurriculaDr. Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Ashley Taylor (she/her) is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics at Virginia Tech. Her teaching and research focus on mobilizing engineering students to solve pressing real-world challenges through community-based participatory approaches. Taylor has partnered alongside communities in rural Appalachia, Nigeria, Malawi, Tanzania
. 3–8, 1990.[5] K. Csavina R., C. Nethken Rochelle, and A. Carberry R., “Assessing Student Understanding of Reflection in Engineering Education,” in ASEE 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, Jun. 2016, pp. 1–11.[6] L. A. Sepp, M. Orand, J. A. Turns, L. D. Thomas, B. Sattler, and C. J. Atman, “On an Upward Trend: Reflection in Engineering Education,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.1196.1-26.1196.13. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/on-an-upward-trend-reflection-in-engineering- education[7] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Emotional Indicators as a Way to Initiate Student Reflection in Engineering
Paper ID #43695Exploring Motivational Tools for Homework in a Senior-Level EngineeringCourseDr. Richard T Buckley P.E., United States Air Force Academy Dr. Richard Buckley is an Assistant Professor at the US Air Force Academy Department of Aeronautics. He is the Discipline Director for the Structures and Materials discipline within the Aeronautics major. His research focuses on pedagogy and teaching techniques, as well as aircraft structural analysis, design and testing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Motivational Tools for Homework in a Senior-Level
Paper ID #42619TA Training at Two R1 Institutions: A Comparative AnalysisMs. Haley Briel, University of Wisconsin, Madison Haley Briel is an instructional design consultant with the Collaboratory for Engineering Education and Teaching Excellence (CEETE) within the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) at UW - Madison’s College of Engineering. Her work focuses on promoting inclusive, evidence-based best practices in teaching for instructional staff and faculty. She is particularly passionate about teaching assistant training as a foundation for graduate students as they begin careers in academia.Dr. Deesha
Paper ID #42103When You Don’t Know the Way, Walk Slowly: Our Transition from a Teaching-IntensiveUniversity to a Research-Intensive University as Professors of EngineeringPracticeProf. James Canino, Purdue University Jamie Canino is currently an associate professor of engineering practice at Purdue University where he focuses on integrating active learning in his classrooms. He teaches in the aerodynamics and propulsion fields and can be reached at canino@purdue.edu.Prof. Steve France, Purdue University Steve France is Assistant Professor of Engineering Practice at the Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer
differences amonglearners and take the form of culturally relevant pedagogy. Ladson-Billings (1995) definesculturally relevant pedagogy as: …a pedagogy of oppression not unlike critical pedagogy but specifically committed to collective, not merely individual, empowerment. Culturally relevant pedagogy rests on three criteria or propositions: (a) students must experience academic success; (b) students must develop and/or maintain cultural competence; and (c) students must develop a critical consciousness through which they challenge the current status quo of the social order (p. 160).That is, culturally relevant pedagogy acknowledges the home-community culture of the studentsand integrates these cultural nuances and
Paper ID #41985Sessions on Faculty EthicsDr. Robert A Linsenmeier, Northwestern University Robert Linsenmeier is a Professor Emeritus of Biomedical Engineering, Neurobiology, and Ophthalmology. His interests are in the microenvironment of the mammalian retina and engineering education. His teaching is primarily in physiology for both biology and BME majDr. Jennifer L. Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer L. Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and the Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research at Northwestern
Paper ID #42477Bridging the Gap: Exploring Real-Life Experiences of Engineering Facultyin Implementing EBIPsStephanie Adams, Oregon State University Stephanie Adams is currently enrolled as a doctoral student at Oregon State University, where she is working towards her PhD in Civil Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Education. Her current research focuses on the adoption of evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs) among engineering faculty members. Additionally, she is investigating the identity development of engineering students in capstone courses.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University
Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Transitions in Engineering Education Leadership – Interim to Permanent Deans and ChairsAbstractThis paper describes strategies for navigating leadership transitions within engineeringdepartments, schools, and colleges. The challenge of transitions and best-practices are reviewedfor (a) those seeking or thrust into interim leadership roles, (b) those becoming permanentleaders following an interim steward, and (c) administrators supporting these transitions. Thepaper describes key issues of these transition challenges, presents theories of organizationalbehavior and leadership germane to this situation, and summarizes existing literature in thisspace. A meta-analysis