Conceptions of Modeling and Modeling Uses in Engineering Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 77–91, 2014.[3] J. B. Ärlebäck and H. M. Doerr, “Students’ interpretations and reasoning about phenomena with negative rates of change throughout a model development sequence,” ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 187–200, Apr. 2018.[4] M. D. Lammi and C. D. Denson, “Modeling as an Engineering Habit of Mind and Practice,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 6, no. 1, 2017.[5] “573 Small Panel Air Circulator”. Vornado. https://www.vornado.com/shop/circulators- fans/small/573-compact-circulator (accessed Feb. 19, 2023).[6] Rosenthal. J. “Comparative Tests on Pressure Drop of HVAC
. Hegde, C. Son, B. Keller, A. Smith and F. Sasangohar, "Investigating mental health of US college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional survey study.," Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 22, no. 9, 2020.[4] P. Sahu, "Closure of universities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff," Cureus, vol. 12, no. 4, 2020.[5] G. D. Kuh, High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter, Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2008.[6] J. Van Dyken and L. Benson, "Precalculus as a death sentence for engineering majors: A case study of how one student survived," International Journal of
-concept and self-efficacy:Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 331–353, 2019,doi: 10.1037/edu0000281.[5] H. W. Marsh, “The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model,” J.Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 623–636, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.623.[6] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals,” Annu. Rev.Psychol., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 109–132, 2002, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.[7] A. R. Betz, B. King, B. Grauer, B. Montelone, Z. Wiley, and L. Thurston, “ImprovingAcademic Self-Concept and STEM Identity Through a Research Immersion: Pathways to STEMSummer Program,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, 2021, Accessed: Jul. 25, 2023. [Online
comments suggest a need for varied andengaging activities to maintain motivation and interest throughout the unit. (a) (b)Figure 5. EML Results for ENG1101 Students during S09Quadrant III (Negative affect and un-learning):The comments in this quadrant highlight a decline in both mood and learning effectiveness overtime. A student expresses frustration and confusion, stating, "My mood and learning started todrop off as we kept going on with the same thing for a long time." Another student points out theonset of burnout, noting, "Burnout started to set in, and frustration built up to the point where Ifelt that my brain could not process information anymore." These experiences
Grading of Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets," in ASEE Annual Meeting, Tampa, FL, 2019, pp. 1-10, doi: https://peer.asee.org/32135.[3] E. M. Rosen and R. N. Adams, "A Review of Spreadsheet Usage in Chemical-Engineering Calculations," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 723-736, 1987, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(87)87015-1.[4] G. Heyen and B. Kalitventzeff, "Spreadsheet based teaching aids in chemical engineering education," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 23, pp. S629-S632, Jun 1 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(99)80154-9.[5] B. Liengme and K. Hekman, Liengme's Guide to Excel 2016 for Scientists and Engineers: (Windows and Mac). Elsevier Science, 2019
: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2018019616. Available in: http://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027.1c5a21585279c945.435f72 dd3e2d259a.html[8] M. E. Andrews. M. Borrego. and A. Boklage. “Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace”. IJ STEM Ed. vol. 8. n.o 1. p. 24. dic. 2021. doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0. Available in: https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0.[9] H. Taimoory. D. B. Knight. & W. C. Lee. "Exploring the Relationship Between Undergraduate Students’ Level of Engagement and Perception of Support." presented at the ASEE Annual Conference. June 26. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/exploring-the
-June, 2020.[8] K. M. Kecskemety, M. E. Ita, L. Rumreich, E. Cartwright, and C. M. Staniak, “Using Concept Maps for Assessment in an Aerospace Structures Course: A Comparison of Scoring Techniques,” in AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, AIAA SciTech Forum 2022, 2022.[9] E. Barrella et al., “EM Concept Map Toolkit,” Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://sites.google.com/dforxconsulting.com/emcmaptoolkit/home. [Accessed: 14-Feb-2023].[10] J. D. Novak and D. B. Gowin, Learning How to Learn. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.[11] B. J. Daley and D. M. Torre, “Concept maps
institutionalize. Challenges werepresented in outcomes communication, awareness communication and recruitment, and financialstability. This project also faced additional challenges related to significant institutional changes.The lessons learned are presented along with advice to others who are beginning funded projectsor are also engaged in the institutionalization process.References[1] S. B. Wise, C. Ngai, J. C. Corbo, M. A. Gammon, J. K. Rivard, and C. E. Smith. “TowardInstitutionalizing successful innovations in the Academy,” To Improve the Academy: A Journalof Educational Development, vol. 41, no. 1, April 2022, doi.org/10.3998/tia.481.[2] J. Nworie, “Institutionalization of teaching and learning gains in higher education,”Educational Technology, vol
[15] S. Graham, D. McKeown, S. Kiuhara, and K. R. Harris, “A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 104, no. 4, p. 879, 2012, Accessed: Jan. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-18075-001[16] R. Steinmayr, A. F. Weidinger, M. Schwinger, and B. Spinath, “The importance of students’ motivation for their academic achievement–replicating and extending previous findings,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 1730, 2019, Accessed: Jan. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730/full?ref=blog.toptutors.dk[17] A. Wigfield, S. Tonks, and S. L. Klauda, “Expectancy-value theory
design science,” DesignIssues, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 49–55, 2001.[17] R. S. Adams, J. Turns, and C.J. Atman, “Educating effective engineering designers: Therole of reflective practice,” Design Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 275–294, 2003.[18] J. S. Gero and U. Kannengiesser, “The situated function-behavior-structure framework,”Design Studies, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 373–391, 2004.[19] A. Wong, The Product Design Process: A graphic novel. ASIN: B00BXB6NWE, 2004.[20] B. Burnett and D. Evans, Designing your life: How to build a well-lived, joyful life. Knopf,2016.[21] D. McGunagle and L. Zizka, “Employability skills for 21st-century STEM students: theemployers' perspective,” Higher education, skills and work-based learning, vol. 10, no. 3, pp.591-606, 2020
Conference, 2012.[2] H. Carlone and A. Johnson, “Understanding the science experiences of successful women ofcolor: Science identity as an analytic lens,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no.8, pp. 1187– 1218, 2007.[3] M. M. Chemers, E. L. Zurbriggen, M. Syed, B. K. Goza, S. Bearman, “The role of efficacyand identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students,” Journalof Social Issues, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 469-491, 2011.[4] K. Rainey, M. Dancy, R. Mickelson, E. Stearns, and S. Moller, “Race and gender differencesin how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM,” International Journal ofSTEM Education, vol. 5, no. 10, 2018.[5] D. L. DeNeui, “An investigation of first-year college students
potential of industrial ‘E-mentoring’ as a retention strategy for women in science and engineering,” in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, Nov. 1997.[5] C. Slater, W. Edmister , B. Watford, and J. Kampe, “Lessons learned: Implementing a largescale peer mentoring program,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, June 2006. https://peer.asee.org/1118[6] E. Hart, A. Mott, and S. Furterer, “Piloting an undergraduate engineering mentoring program to enhance gender diversity,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual, June 2020. https://peer.asee.org/35058[7] V. Washington and J. Mondisa, “A need for engagement opportunities and
--8653.[3] M. Wagner, B. Christe, and E. Fernandez, “Comparing First-year Engineering Technology Persisters and Non-persisters,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2012, p. 25.331.1-25.331.9. doi: 10.18260/1-2--21089.[4] M. J. Khan and C. A. Aji, “Development of Engineering Identity,” 2020.[5] D. Dougherty, “The Maker Movement,” Innov. Technol. Gov. Glob., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 11– 14, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1162/INOV_a_00135.[6] S. Weiner, M. Lande, and S. Jordan, “Making Identities: Understanding the Factors that Lead Young Adults to Identify with the Maker Movement,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8[13] Allen, O. T., Thompson, M. L., & Collins, S. (2022). How Do Latinx Dual Credit Earners Describe Their Sense of Belonging in Engineering Programs? Journal of College Student Retention : Research, Theory & Practice, 24(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119898153[14] Chang, M., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21146[15] Boone, H., & Kirn, A. (2016). First Generation Students Identification with and Feelings of Belongingness in
first semester, and teameffectiveness, which was assessed using a scale comprising four factors: interdependency,learning, goal setting, and potency. The teamwork predisposition items (Table 1) containresponses on a 6-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 6 = Strongly Agree), and the teameffectiveness scale (Table 2) responses contain a 7-point Likert scale (0 = Strongly Disagree, 6 =Strongly Agree). The team effectiveness scale contains 26 items, including two reverse-codeditems to validate students' responses. B. Table of survey questionsTable 1 TEAMWORK PREDISPOSITION ITEMS. RESPONSES ON 6-POINT LIKERT SCALE (1 = STRONGLYDISAGREE, 6 = STRONGLY AGREE) Item. Statement 1 In a
Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/infusing-innovation- and-entrepreneurship-into-engineering-education-looking-for-change-as-seen-by-asee- members-2012-to-2015[10] B. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global Engineering Competency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” Online J. Glob. Eng. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2014, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol8/iss1/1[11] “KEEN 2020 Annual Report,” Annual, 2020. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringunleashed.com/annual20/[12] R. Desing
, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1011–1245, 2007. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237[3] R. W. Lent, H-B. Sheu, D. Singley, J.A. Schmidt, L.C. Schmidt, and C.S. Gloster, “Longitudinal relations of self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 73, pp. 328– 335, 2008. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.005[4] L.R.M. Hausmann, J.W. Schofield, and R.L. Woods, “Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first year college students,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 803–839, 2007. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9052-9[5] E.D. Tate and
Paper ID #42461Designing Good Practices for Recruitment, Admissions, and Program Structureof Engineering Outreach Programs to Increase Access for Marginalized andNon-Traditional Higher Education StudentsDr. Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University Dr. Sonia Travaglini specializes in the intersection of engineering and learning, and is an educator passionate about new technologies and collaboration. Sonia also enjoys supporting engineering outreach with local community colleges and schools.Aya Mouallem, Stanford University Aya Mouallem (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. She received
Involvement in Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 6–13.Hauhart, R. C., & Grahe, J. E. (2015). Designing and teaching undergraduate capstone courses. Jossey-Bass.Jacoby, B., & Others, A. (1996). Service-Learning in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St.Kittur, J. (2023). Conducting Quantitative Research Study: A Step-by-Step Process. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(4), 100-112.Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Second edition). Pearson Education, Inc.Lee, E
education,” Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019.[11] B. Hughes, et al. “Do I think I’m an engineer? Understanding the impact of engineeringidentity on retention,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2016.10.18260/1-2--32674.[12] A. Godwin, “Development of a measure of engineering identity,” 2016 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016. 10.18260/p.26122.[13] J.C. Major, A. Kirn, “Engineering identity and project-based learning: How does activelearning develop student identity?” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus,Ohio, 2017. 10.18260/1-2--28255.[14] O. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri and R. Anderson, "On the development of aprofessional identity: engineering
First-Year EngineeringExperience at a regional campus of a large midwestern university. Challenges faced by studentsand faculty will also be presented in this paper along with some guidance and best practices. Manyuniversities invest their resources to explore teaching pedagogies that best fit the needs of theirstudents. Universities that offer programs at regional campuses ensure consistency of thecurriculum, however, there are challenges associated with offering programs with differentdemographics represented at the regional campuses. The purpose of this paper is to: a) presentsome of the challenges faced by instructors in teaching the first two years of engineering courses,b) share student attitudes and performance in core courses, and c
skills and study habits. Considering the weighted grade pointaverage (GPA) of the first semester of studies, which can vary between 1.0 and 7.0.ResultsThe results are presented in the following manner: A. Descriptive analysis conducted viaMicrosoft Power BI software about i) family and social factors; ii) economic factors; iii) priorstudy experience; iv) personal skills and study habits, and B. Correlation analysis wasundertaken using the IBM SPSS Statistics software.Descriptive analysisFamily and social factors. The following variables were analyzed for this factor (Fig. 1): thelevel of education of parents; the perceived importance of the level of contact with the familyand close-knit groups; whether the students have children; and who is the
2008.[7] G. E. Okudan, M. Murphy, and B. Bowe, “An international comparison of engineeringprograms in their emphases and professional skills development,” in Proc. of the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education North Midwest Section Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC,June 2011.[8] A. M. Gansemer-Topf, Q. Li, S. Jianh, G. E. Okudan-Kremer, and N. F. Reuel,“Implementing professional skills training in STEM: a review of the literature,” in Proc. of theAmerican Society for Engineering Education North Midwest Section Annual Conference,Brookings, SD, October 2020.[9] S. M. Lord, B. Przestrzekski, and E. Reddy, “Teaching social responsibility in a circuitscourse,” in Proc. of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,Tampa, FL
. By the conclusion of the course, all students have experience with working in teams,utilizing the engineering design process, 3D modeling, and both written and oral communication.Their repeated assessments allow students to experience greater growth throughout the 18-dayblock period than previous iterations of the course.AppendixTeam Evaluation Questions for Weekly Assessment 1. My team met outside of class for at least _____ this week a. <1 Hour b. Less than 2 hours but more than 1 c. 2 hours or more 2. Rate your team on a scale of 1 to 5 in terms of its ability to cooperatively work (maximizing individual strengths and minimizing weaknesses) 3. Rate your team on a scale of 1 to 5 on its ability to
to the Professor: Impact of the Student-Faculty Relationship in a Highly Challenging Course," College Teaching, vol. 60, pp.41-47, 2012.[22] M.M. Uddin and K. Johnson, "Faculty learning from the advisors for students' retention and persistence to graduation", in Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[23] R. B. Landis, Studying engineering: A road map to a rewarding career, 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Discovery Press, 2013.[24] Louisiana State University Center for Academic Success. “Study Resources Quick Links.”https://www.lsu.edu/cas/earnbettergrades/tipsandtools/takecharge.php (retrieved March2022).
. 2008.[7] E. Seymour, and N. M. Hewitt, “Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave thesciences,” Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 1997.[8] P. J. van der Zanden, E. Denessen, A. H. Cillessen, and P. C. Meijer, “Domains andpredictors of first-year student success: A systematic review,” Educational Research Review, 23,57-77. 2018.[9] M. Birks, and J. Mills, “Grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd ed.),” London: Sage. 2015.[10] A. Bryant, and K. Charmaz, “The Sage handbook of grounded theory.” Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage, pp. 1–28. 2007.[11] B. Glaser, and A. Strauss, “The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitativeresearch,” Chicago, IL: Aldine. 1967.[12] QSR International Pty Ltd., NVivo (Version 12, 2018),https
object had to be created with themanufacturing/fabrication capabilities of the makerspace, additive manufacturing, laser cutting,and/or waterjet cutting. Pictures of the Engineering Innovation Hub are shown below in Figure 1. a) b) c) Figure 1. Engineering Innovation Hub Photos; a) Manufacturing and Fabrication Space, b) Additive Manufacturing Space, c) Advanced Manufacturing SpaceThe study’s analysis is based on three surveys. The first survey occurred at the start of theacademic year, the second at the middle of the fall semester (after the first iteration of the groupproject and before the individual project began), and the third survey was administered
perception of writing. In asense, whether writing is inadequate or not, faculty perceive it to be.We surveyed the faculty of the Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering, with the following fourquestions:1. In which areas of writing for engineering do you think students need the most improvement?2. In which areas of writing instruction would you (as a faculty member) appreciate training and guidance?3. Please rank the following topics for a first-year writing for engineering module: a. basic writing (sentence structure, grammar, etc.) b. concrete, clear, and concise sentences c. formatting using MS Word d. outlining and organizing writing e. proper use of tables and figures f. technical letters g
. Uenlue, “CDM: Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.” Apr. 11, 2022. Accessed: Apr. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CDM[10] A. C. George, A. Robitzsch, T. Kiefer, J. Groß, and A. Ünlü, “The R Package CDM for Cognitive Diagnosis Models,” J. Stat. Softw., vol. 74, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.18637/jss.v074.i02.[11] G. Xu and Z. Shang, “Identifying Latent Structures in Restricted Latent Class Models,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 113, no. 523, pp. 1284–1295, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1340889.[12] Y. Zheng and C.-Y. Chiu, “NPCD: Nonparametric Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis.” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NPCD[13] A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunson
Paper ID #39880GIFTS: Introducing Agile Process and Product Development in an FYE CourseDr. Karen C. Davis, Miami University Karen C. Davis is a Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering at Mi- ami University. Her research interests include database design, query processing and optimization, data warehousing, and computing education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 GIFTS: Introducing Agile Process and Product Development in a FYE CourseAbstract: Great Ideas for Teaching Students (GIFTS): This paper describes two