(see above). a. The State Point Table is expanded to break out SP2s and SP4s because information is given about P and T, and they are both < 1. b. Determine where to draw SP1, SP3, & SP4, and then draw the process diagram to represent what the states actually are (CL, SL, WV, SV, or SHV). Drawing the T-s concept graph is a bit of an iterative process, but should be drawn to represent the proper regions for the state points. It is a good practice to label the pressure lines with their values. Similarly, labeling the temperatures on the graph is a good practice. Note that the T-s graph is not to scale. You can see this by noting that SP2 temps are actually
able to meet the demands of a economy increasingly globalized.To this end, the IE Department emphasize practical or experiencial learning throughout thecurriculum. For instance, the IE Department have implemented a number of changes in theundergraduate manufacturing courses that are linked and transfered to consecutive classes inorder to provide gainful hands on activities (IE 217, IE 152, IE 375, IE 467 and IE 478). Thisintegrative approach has helped to introdue a greater focus on injection molding, CAD/CAM andsimulation. As a consequence, these courses have reach a better integration and the enhancementof industry experience among IE graduates.II. Educational Model: B-Ready in EngineeringThe particular nature of industrial engineering
. Table 1: Engineering Economy Case Study Topics Engineering Economy Case Study Topics PART A (100 Points) PART B (100 Points) Roth IRA Investment Portfolio (Stocks/ Metals) Traditional IRA Financial Statement Analysis (Apple Inc.) 401k BondsIn part A of the case study, the students worked on both qualitative and quantitative (calculationbased) questions regarding retirement planning (i.e., traditional IRA, Roth IRA, and 401 (k)) andbond investing. In part B of the case study, the advisers helped the students to complete an indepth financial statement analysis on Apple, Inc. and also monitored stock and precious
Paper ID #10845From Classroom to Online to Hybrid: The Evolution of an Operations Man-agement CourseDr. Letitia M. Pohl, University of Arkansas Letitia Pohl is an instructor in the Department of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Arkansas, an M.S. in Systems Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology, and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Tulane University. Dr. Pohl served as an officer in the U.S. Air Force for eight years. At the University of Arkansas, Dr. Pohl has served as the Assistant Director of the Mack-Blackwell
. Page 24.379.4Table 3: Student Survey Questions for Modes of Instruction. Relevant Modes of Instruction Survey Questions 1. Of the junior level Industrial Engineering Classes listed on the previous page please select one that you found extremely satisfying: ________________________ 2. What were the primary modes of instruction in this class? Please circle all that apply. A. Blackboard Lecture B. PowerPoint Lecture C. Problem solving sessions D
a test problem on that topic. It is important tonote that the homework problem is usually a larger problem requiring at least 2-3 hours of work.However, all the tools, solved sample problems, software to check the solution, and more areavailable to the students.The topic test is usually one problem to be solved in a 20-30 minute class time and it is given toall students who have passed that topic. Although fast-paced, this method affords students anopportunity to pass a test on a consolidated segmented amount of material in a synchronizedtimeframe. To pass the course, each student needs to pass at least 7 topics for a grade of “C” with8 and 9 topics for grades of “B” and “A” respectively.Additional Bonus Topics have also been offered to
in engineering education, participatory design in manufacturing systems, and she has also published research in rapid prototyping. Victoria loves to learn and help others to learn.Dr. (Ruth) Jill Urbanic P.Eng., University of Windsor (Ruth) Jill Urbanic received her B. A. Sc. in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Waterloo in Canada. After graduating, she pursued opportunities to work in various advanced manufacturing environ- ments. She has been involved with design, implementation, and support for several types of manufactur- ing, material handling, testing, gauging and assembly equipment for a variety of engine components and vehicle styles. Dr. Urbanic wished to enhance her practical background with more
-0.2assignmentsDifficulty of subject matter 3.1 3.2 +0.1Student Description:I worked harder on this course than on 3.6 4.1 +0.5most courses I have takenI really wanted to take this course 3.9 3.5 -0.4regardless of who taught itAs a rule, I put forth more effort than 3.6 4.1 +0.5other students on academic work Table 1. IDEA Evaluation Results – Summarized Page 24.1201.11ReferencesBloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R., Taxonomy ofeducational objectives: the classification of educational goals; Handbook I: Cognitive
Paper ID #8784Introducing Flexibility in an Engineering Curriculum Through Student De-signed Elective ProgramsDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University Dr. William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engineering from Montana State University. He is an Assistant Professor of Industrial and Management Engineering at Montana State where his primary research interests are engineering education and the role of leadership and culture in process improvement with
lectureswere delivered in short online videos. Each class began with a brief review lecture and studentsspent most of the remaining class time solving problems in groups. Compared to the Spring2012 offering, the same material was covered in less time and test scores on a common finalexam increased.This paper summarizes the lessons-learned by teaching ISYE 330 as a flipped class. Classorganization is contrasted with earlier versions of the course. The preparation of online andsupplementary materials is described including a discussion of the evolution of the materials asthe semester progressed. Student performance is analyzed and compared to previous offerings.Course evaluations are examined to gain insight into student attitudes to flipped classes
Paper ID #10084Toward Broadening Participation: Understanding Students’ Perceptions ofIndustrial EngineeringMs. Valerie Yvette RitoJessica Lynn AschenbrennerDr. Jessica L. Heier Stamm, Kansas State University Jessica L. Heier Stamm holds a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in industrial engineering from Kansas State University. Her research in en- gineering education centers on broadening the participation of underrepresented students in engineering and introducing students to humanitarian applications of operations research. Dr. Heier Stamm also con- ducts