ASEE Paper_2019_Final - Google Docs concerns. As such, the co-instructors framed the seminar as helping the LAs (a) learn how to support their students, (b) learn how to partner with course instructors to improve students’ experiences, and (c) develop their engineering skills (e.g reflect on design process, facilitate teamwork, and consider social justice implications). This second iteration of the seminar maintained some of the same learning objectives as the pilot version of the seminar such as (1) identify and critically evaluate claims from readings, (2) carefully observe and document classroom events, (3) analyze classroom events and consider multiple plausible
to consciously and deliberately monitor and regulate one’s knowledge, processes,and cognitive and affective states” (Hacker, 1998, p. 3). This definition identifies bothdeclarative and procedural components of metacognition (see Figure 1). Metacognitivedeclarative knowledge consists of a person’s knowledge or beliefs about: (a) one’s cognitive andaffective states and the states of others; (b) a task, its demands, and how those demands can bemet under varying conditions; and (c) strategies for accomplishing the task and how and when touse them (Flavell, 1979). Metacognitive procedural knowledge consists of both monitoring andcontrol components. Metacognitive monitoring refers to processes that are “directed at theacquisition of information
. Pintrich, P. R. A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. J. Educ. Psychol. 95, 667–686 (2003).18. Hagemeier, N. E. & Murawski, M. M. An instrument to assess subjective task value beliefs regarding the decision to pursue postgraduate training. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 78, (2014).19. Artino, A. R. & McCoach, D. B. Development and Initial Validation of the Online Learning Value and Self- Efficacy Scale. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 38, 279–303 (2008).20. Garcia, T. & Pintrich, P. R. Assessing students’ motivation and learning strategies in the classroom context: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Altern. Assess. Achiev. Learn. Process. prior
rubric for assessing engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2004. 93(2): p. 105-115.29. Borrego, M., et al., Using concept maps to assess interdisciplinary integration of green engineering knowledge. Advances in Engineering Education, 2009. 1(3): p. 1-26.30. Segalàs, J., D. Ferrer-Balas, and K.F. Mulder, What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses? The effect of the pedagogical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010. 18(3): p. 275-284.31. Carew, A.L. and C.A. Mitchell, Characterizing undergraduate engineering students' understanding of sustainability. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2002. 27(4): p. 349 - 361.32. Hayles, C. and B. de la Harpe. A study of student
-year institutions, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.12. Myers, B. A. (2016). Evaluating admission practices as potential barriers to creating equitable access toundergraduate engineering education, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado Boulder.13. The University of Colorado Boulder 2008-2009 Course Catalog. Retrieved January 19, 2017.http://www.colorado.edu/registrar/sites/default/files/attached-files/ucb_2008-09_catalog.pdf14. The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology. (2014). 2015-16 Criteria for Accrediting EngineeringPrograms. Retrieved September 4, 2015. http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2015-2016/15. Van Treuren, Ken and Eisenbarth
Paper ID #32477Collaboration Through Participation: Rethinking Scale Conceptualizationand Development in STEM Education ResearchDr. Cijy Elizabeth Sunny, Baylor University Dr. Cijy Elizabeth Sunny is a PD Research Associate in the Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics, Hankamer School of Business at Baylor University. She is a research methodologist and psychometrician who has applied her skills in quantitative and mixed methods research methodology in the substantive areas of STEM education research, medical education, and more recently in engineering education. Additionally, she has been an educator
preliminary thoughts about the history of disability,governmentality and experience. Educational Philosophy and Theory: 56-63.15. Hughes, B. (2009.) Wounded/monstrous/abject: A critique of the disabled body in the sociological imaginary. Page 23.247.14Disability & Society 24, 4: 399-410.16. Humphrey, J.C. (2000). Researching disability politics, or, some problems with the social model in practice.Disability & Society 15: 1- 36.17. National Science Board. (2010.) Preparing the next generation of STEM innovation. Washington, DC: NationalScience Board/National Science Foundation.18. Schwartz, R. B., Ferguson, R., and Symonds, B
Paper ID #25301An Exploratory Study of Engineering Students’ Misconceptions about Tech-nical CommunicationDr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006
, provided the tuition resourcesnecessary to underwrite new degree programs and initiatives in engineering education. Anengineering workforce shortage of about 8,000 was also anticipated during the coming decade atthe time of our interviews.Overall, it is our assessment that the Danish national response to Bologna can be characterized asfollows: A decision to embrace the Bologna Process through a desire to introduce market competition, greater specialization, and responsiveness within Denmark’s educational institutions, especially at the master’s level. A decision to address both the a) short term recessionary softening of the labor market and the b) long-term competitiveness of the Danish workforce by having 50% of all
Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2007.[2] B. R. Cohen, J. S. Rossmann and K. S. Bernhardt, "Introducing engineering as a socio- technical process," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[3] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, "Engineering education - Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer," Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol 3, no. 2, pp. 2- 16, 2003[4] M. Taks, P. Tynjala and H. Kukemelk, "Engineering students' conceptions of entrepreneurial learning as part of their education," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 53-69, 2016.[5] J. L. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, "The flipped classroom: A survey of the research," in ASEE Annual
Grant Nos. DUE-1626287 (Purdue),DUE-1626185 (Cal Poly), and DUE-1626148 (UTEP). Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesABET (2011). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2012- 2013 Accreditation Cycle. Baltimore, MD: ABET, Inc. Read General Criteria and skim Program Criteria.Anderson, G.M., Sun, J.C., and Alfonso, M. (2006). Effectiveness of statewide articulation agreements on the probability of transfer: A preliminary policy analysis. Review of Higher Education, 29(3), 261–291.Bakker, A. B. (2005). Flow among music
physicalviolence/dominance.When I was an undergraduate at Princeton, a form of the “engineers’ cheer” was in widecirculation: Demosthenes, Thucydides, the Peloponnesian War A squared, B squared, H2SO4 E to the x! E to the x! E to the x, dy, dx! Cosine, secant tangent, sine 3.14159 Label the axes y and x To Hell with football, we want sex.That this would be the call of the engineer speaks to an identification with both technicalprowess and sexual desire, and a disidentification with a football-jock sort of hegemonicmasculinity. That engineers might not conform to prevailing normative masculinities creates anopening for resistance to those masculinities, but
EngineeringEducation.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2015 AnnualConference and Exposition. ASEE: Seattle, WA.26 Rogers, J. David, G. Paul Kemp, H. J. Bosworth, & Raymond B. Seed, R. B. 2015.“Interaction between the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Orleans Levee Board precedingthe drainage canal wall failures and catastrophic flooding of New Orleans in 2005.” Water Policy17(4): 707-723.27 Riley, Donna M. 2008. Engineering and Social Justice. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.28 Lachney, Michael. 2014. “Building the LEGO Classroom.” In LEGO Studies: Examining theBuilding of a Transmedial Phenomenon, Mark J. P. Wolf (editor). New York: Routledge. Pp.166-186.29 Nieusma, Dean, & James W. Malazita. 2016. “Making" a
during operation of thedevice, as seen in the following page from the manual. 5 Operation of Device 1. Align device towards the sun such that there is no shadow created on trough by the plywood pieces. The shadow created by the device on the ground should be exactly behind the device as shown in Figure 37. After orienting the device, secure the wheels to prevent it from rolling. (a) Incorrect alignment (b) Correct alignment Figure 4: A page from the manual written by the students, depicting how the shadow of the device must be directly behind the deviceAnother set of additions made to the
systemworks rather than how it is put together. For unit 1 students create an 11”x17” poster or displayto visually describe how a structural or mechanical system works. For unit 2 students create abrochure to visually describe how an electrical or energy system works. For unit 3 studentscreate an animation that is based on sketches to visually describe how a biomedical or roboticdevice works. Finally, for unit 4 students may choose both the medium and the type ofengineered system for their final project display, which is shared publicly at an end of the termevent attended mainly by others in the engineering department.The rubric used to evaluate the projects is given in Appendix B. Students are evaluated based on5 separate categories: Focus
subordinate clause is Page 22.1169.7used per sentence, for example: Sample 2: Practitioner Use of Subordination and Embedded Structures (in italics) A. In addition, this report contains cost estimating instructions and formulas, which allow the user to estimate replacement and rehabilitation costs for additional bridges not included in this study. B. No jurisdictional ditches (or ditches of any kind) were present, although storm drains capture roadway runoff along 17th Street below the bridge.The sentence in 2A starts with a simple sentence and then contains a relative clause thatdescribes the object in the main sentence. The
validity of tests and instruments.Ms. Melissa Marshall, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Enrique D. Gomez, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Esther Gomez, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkProf. Angela D. Lueking, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Page 25.1442.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Using student ambassadors to relay themes from Changing the Conversation in Engineering First Year SeminarsAbstractThis paper describes the efforts at a large mid-Atlantic university to integrate themes
Crispino, “Cultural Intelligence: Engineering Success for a Flat World,” Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin TX, 2009.15. Waggenspack, W.N., Hull, W.R., Bridwell-Bowles, L., Bowles, D., Farrell, J. “Integrating Technical Communication into Engineering Curricula – An Implementation Model and Tools for Assessment of Success.” 2007 IEEE Professional Conference on Communication, Seattle, Washington, October, 2007.16. Sheehan, K. “Email Response Rates: A Review,” School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue2/sheehan.html, January 2001, Accessed January 16, 2011.17. Björkam, B., “English as the Lingua Franca of Engineering: The Morphosyntax of Academic
for NewSchools were equipped with the aid they needed to recruit and train new teachers and schoolleaders and to create new and innovative charter schools. b Other corporate entities like CapitalOne and Walmart also allocated money to either establish their own charter schools, donatemillions to other local and national non-profits operating in the area, or directly support the RSDin redesigning school plans.28Privatization of Engineering Education in New OrleansThe not for profit organization Building Louisiana Science & Technology (BLaST) was foundedin 2003 as a gateway for bringing science and technology programs to enrich the learningexperiences of Louisiana students.32 The organization is made up of members from industryacademia and
moduledraws attention to cultures of computing and what it could mean to intervene in computingcultures. By introducing radical interventions from the epistemic peripheries of computing, thefourth and final module primes students to think about the disciplinary and geographiclandscapes of computing. See Appendix B for a sample course schedule that outlinesassignments, readings, and course ideas at the level of individual class meetings. Module 1: Intervention From Where Module 2: Inclusion as Intervention •Interdisciplinary frameworks for justice and •Liberatory and oppressive potentials of critical participation. diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. •Limitations of
for world's poor. Journal Sentinel.8. Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy ofManagement Journal, 50(1), 25-32.9. Riley, D. (2008). Chapter 4. Toward a More Socially Just Engineering. In Engineering and social justice (p. 111).San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool.10. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.11. Bullough, R. (2001). Guidelines for Quality in Autobiographical forms of Self-Study Research. Education andEducational Research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13-21.12. Kar, K., & Chambers, R. (2008). Handbook on community-led total sanitation. London: Plan UK.13. Hariharan, B. (2011
learning.Bibliography[1] W.E. Kastenberg, G. Hauser-Kastenberg, D. Norris. “An approach to undergraduate engineering education forthe 21st century,” American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, 2006.[2] J. Duderstadt. Engineering for a Changing world. A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research,and Education. The millennium Project, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2008.[3] A. Akera. “Liberal learning revisited: a historical examination of the underlying reasons, frustrations, andcontinued prospects of engineering and liberal arts integration,” American Society for Engineering EducationConference Proceedings, 2011.[4] C. Traver, J. Douglass Klein, B. Mikic
and Contact in Signed Languages, C Lucas, Ed. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 2002, pp. 3-26. [12] A. Biglan. "The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 195–203, 1973. [13] M. Borrego. "Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 91-102, 2007. [14] J.B. Lodahl and G. Gordon. "The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments," American Sociological Review, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 57–72, 1972. [15] S. Sorby and B. Baartmans, "The Development
problems) liesin the process of design under constraint involved in what we are here calling ‘problem-solving’.We can now define ‘problem-solving’ to mean the identification of resources, strategies,constraints, risks, and trade-offs for meeting an open-ended, multi-solution spec in the presenceof ambiguity and variability, through the process of design under constraint. b. Problem-Finding as a Subset of Problem-Solving in Engineering CareersGiven the highly engineering-specific definition above, the question arises as to whether the roleand prominence of problem-solving in the arts can be pertinent to engineering education or not.To address this question, consider LaBanca and Ritchie’s notion of problem finding”14, whichthey define as “setting
puzzle and inspire debate. B. Allow a few moments of silently looking before beginning the discussion using three very specific, research-tested questions to motivate and maintain the inquiry: 1. What is going on (or happening) in this picture? (Asked once to initiate the discussion.) 2. What do you see that makes you say that? (Asked whenever an interpretive comment is made.) 3. What more can we find? (Asked frequently throughout the discussion to encourage, broaden and deepen the search for meaning.) C. Listen carefully (as facilitator) to catch everything each student says, paraphrase all comments, link related comments, and remain neutral through careful use of pronouns and by treating everyone and each
-anxiously-optimistic-workforce-future , accessed on Jan 11, 2020.[12] Wiest, B., 2019, “Experts Say Gen Z Isn’t Prepared for the Workplace, But It Isn’t All TheirFault,” Forbes, Published Feb13, 2019,https://www.forbes.com/sites/briannawiest/2019/02/13/experts-say-gen-z-isnt-prepared-for-the-workplace-but-it-isnt-all-their-fault/#65f9f409ae92n , accessed on Jan 11, 2020.[13] Gray, P., 2015, “Declining Student Resilience: A Serious Problem for Colleges,”Psychology Today online, Sep 22, 2015, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/freedom-learn/201509/declining-student-resilience-serious-problem-colleges, accessed on Jan 11, 2020.[14] Gray, P., 2015, “Causes of Students’ Emotional Fragility: Five Perspectives,” PsychologyToday online, Nov 25, 2015
Construction Kits for Kids,” in The Design of Children’s Technology. A. Druin ed. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. pp. 149-16, 1999.[8] A. Watters. “Lego Mindstorms: A History of Educational Robotics,” 2015. http://hackeducation.com/2015/04/10/mindstorms Retrieved February 3, 2019.[9] FIRST, Building a Community: 2017 Annual Impact Report, 2018. https://www.firstinspires.org/sites/default/files/uploads/annual-report/fy2017-annual-impact- report.pdf Retrieved February 3, 2019.[10] J. Wakeman-Linn, and A. Perry, “A Proposal to Incorporate Lego® Mindstorms into an Introduction to Engineering Courses,” 2002. Paper presented at 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.[11] B. Adams, Traction and Ballasting Experiments
Paper ID #9561Fostering 21st Century Skills in Engineering Undergraduates through Co-Curricular InvolvementMs. Dara R Fisher, Harvard University Dara Fisher is a first-year Ed.D. student at the Harvard Graduate School of Education studying higher education with a focus on international and branch campuses of U.S. technical universities. Before enrolling at Harvard, Dara completed her masters of science in Technology and Policy with a concentration in Engineering Education at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where she served as a graduate research assistant to the MIT Collaboration with the new Singapore
, 2012.[10] Transportation Research Board (TRB), Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2018.[11] C. Putnam, M. Dahman, E. Rose, J Cheng, and G. Bradford, “Best Practices for Teaching Accessibility in University Classrooms; Cultivating Awareness, Understanding, and Appreciation for Diverse Users.” ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, Vol. 8, No. 4, Article 13, Mar. 2016. 14[12] C. Traver, J.D. Klein, B. Mikic, A. Akera, S. Shooter, A. Epstein, and D. Gillette, “Fostering Innovation through the Integration of Engineering and Liberal Education,” in American Society of Engineering Education: Proceedings from the 2011 Annual Conference, Paper ID #2011-1233, June 2011.[13] B. Chang, K. Tremblay
Conference, 2009. IPCC 2009. IEEE International. 2009.5. House, R., A. Watt, and J.M. Williams. Mapping the Future of Engineering Communication: Report on a Research Study of Engineering Faculty and Their Teaching of Writing as a Function of the ABET/EAC Criteria. in International Professional Communication Conference. 2007. Seattle.6. Paretti, M.C., et al., Reformist Possibilities? Exploring Cross-Campus Writing Partnerships. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 2009. 33(1-2): p. 74-113.7. Shwom, B., et al., Engineering Design and Communication: A Foundational Course for Freshmen. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 1999. 3(2): p. 107-112.8. Waggenspack, W.N.J., CxC and Engineering: A New