, meaning that students did not organize or connectconcepts in a functional way. For example, student A’s pre-concept map uses topics that werediscussed during the first-class meeting (response to disaster, resiliency, preparation, etc.) toorganize their knowledge, while student G uses more fixed categories (actions, organizations,stakeholders, etc.) to organize their map. Examples of pre- and post- concept maps for studentsA, C, G, and J are given in Appendix A.Students varied in their growth from the pre- to post-concept map. Figure 1 shows the pre- andpost-concept map scores by student. Some students, like G and H, show no growth based on thescoring system. Other students, like B and C, whose pre-concept maps were already towards thetop of the
Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004., Oct.2004.[6]M. A. Beasley and M. J. Fischer, “Why they leave: the impact of stereotype threat on theattrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors,” SocialPsychology of Education, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 427–448, 2012.[7] S. Wee, R. M. Cordova-Wentling, R. F. Korte, S. M. Larson, and M. C. Loui, “Work inprogress- Many Smart Women Leave Engineering: A preliminary study of how engineeringstudents form career goals,” 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010.[8] C. A. Shapiro and L. J. Sax, “Major Selection and Persistence For Women in STEM,” NewDirections for Institutional Research, vol. 2011, no. 152, pp. 5–18, 2011.[9] E. Cech, B. Rubineau, S. Silbey, and C
AC 2011-2091: EXPLODING PIPELINES: MYTHOLOGICAL METAPHORSSTRUCTURING DIVERSITY-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRESEARCH AGENDASAlice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Alice L. Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a Ph.D. minor in Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist
engagement with a human-centred design project[20]. This instrument is adopted in the present study and is further discussed in themethodology.The ‘setback’ – Resistance and DevaluationNiles et al [23] investigated how engineering students respond to public welfare engagementand working with public welfare related issues. They found that although students seem toget excited for working on public-welfare-related work, they also seemed to resist it. Niles etal. found that the challenges that often lead to students’ resistance to public welfare issues arethe following: “(a) defining and defending students' identities as engineers; (b) justifying thevalue of nontechnical work and relevance to engineering; (c) redefining engineering expertiseand
m for Engineeringg Ambassaddors. The UC ConnPresentattion Team foor Engineerinng Ambassaadors perform ms the outreaach to local middle and highschools as a well as serrves as leadeers in the gen neral body oof Engineerinng Ambassaadors. Thisgeneral body b acts as a recruiting and training g platform foor the Presenntation Team m. Serving as ageneral body b membeer allows a sttudent to “tryy out” Enginneering Ambbassadors wiithout the tim
AC 2011-1415: AVOIDING INFERIORITY: GLOBAL ENGINEERING ED-UCATION ACROSS JAPANGary Lee Downey, Virginia Tech Gary Downey is Alumni Distinguished Professor in Science and Technology Studies and affiliated Profes- sor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. A mechanical engineer (Lehigh) and cultural anthropolo- gist (University of Chicago), he is co-editor of What Is Global Engineering Education For?: The Making of International Educators (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010). Author of The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits Among Computer Engineers, he is Editor of The Engineering Studies Series at MIT Press and Global Engineering series at Morgan & Claypool, as well as the Engineering Studies journal
, cultural, social, environmental, and economicfactors.”17Disciplines have a variety of ways to approach problems. In this section, three different methodsare described: the scientific method, the engineering design process, and the creative processcommon to visual arts. A summary of each method, its attributes, and a comparison between thethree is provided in Table 1.The Scientific MethodIn scientific disciplines, one of the first methods taught to students is the scientific method. Asdescribed in one source “The scientific method has five basic steps, plus one feedback step: (a)Make an observation, (b) Ask a question, (c) Form a hypothesis, or testable explanation, (d)Make a prediction based on the hypothesis, (e) Test the prediction, [and] (f
the double-bind: WIE and MEP Programs and servingthe needs of women of color in engineering. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/18963[3] T. Holloman, W.C. Lee, J. London, A. Halkiyo, G. Jew, and B. Watford (2018). A historicaland policy perspective on broadening participation in STEM: Insights from National Reports(1974–2016). Paper presented at The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference, Crystal City, VA. Retrieved from http://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10080892[4] C. D. Matt (2007, June), Wepan History And Current Update Paper presented at 2007Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/2125[5] K. Moore
Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Successes and challenges in supporting undergraduate peer educators to notice and respond to equity considerations within design teamsAbstractWe describe and analyze our efforts to support Learning Assistants (LAs)—undergraduate peereducators who simultaneously take a 3-credit pedagogy course—in fostering equitable teamdynamics and collaboration within a project-based engineering design course. Tonso andothers have shown that (a) inequities can “live” in mundane interactions such as those amongstudents within design teams and (b) those inequities both reflect and (re)produce broadercultural patterns and narratives (e.g. Wolfe & Powell, 2009; Tonso, 1996, 2006a, 2006b;McLoughlin, 2005). LAs could
Paper ID #6063Boundary Work between Engineering and Engineering Technology: Knowl-edge, Expertise, and Power at Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Ron D Dempsey, Southern Polytechnic State University Dr. Dempsey currently serves as Vice President for University Advancement at Southern Polytechnic State University. Dr. Dempsey has taught sociology and been a college administrator for the past 20 years at both private and public institutions of higher education. Dr. Dempsey is completing a second Ph.D. at Georgia Tech in the area of History and Sociology of Science and Technology
8 0 0 0 16 learn makes me want to find out more. 7 I think what we are learning in 8 6 0 2 0 16 this course is important. 8 Understanding Engineering 4 7 3 1 1 16 Ethics is important to me. 9 In a class like this, I prefer 7 8 1 0 0 16 course material that arouses my curiosity, even if it is difficult to learn.Appendix B: Full post-surveysInstructor 1 # Question Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Total Agree Disagree 1
Paper ID #14631On Becoming an Engineer: The Essential Role of Lifelong Learning Compe-tenciesJillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba Jillian Seniuk Cicek is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education in the Department of Biosystems Engi- neering at the University of Manitoba, in Winnipeg, Canada. She is a research assistant for the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education in the Faculty of Engineering. Her research areas include outcomes-based teaching and assessment methods and tools, student-cantered instruction (SCI), the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) graduate
contributions by participants about socioeconomicdisadvantage and social class.I employed a two-step validation technique typical in qualitative educational research to ensurethat the data analysis was trustworthy: (a) peer debriefing and (b) assessing my own biases andvalue orientations. For the peer debriefing process, two graduate students reanalyzed significantportions of the data, one with a qualitative research background, and the other a higher educationstudent affairs professional, both with academic advising backgrounds. These contributions wereimportant as they helped minimize my bias, and ensure that the data findings and narrative weredeveloped appropriately. To assess my own biases and values, I also wrote research memos anddiscussed the
Paper ID #12488What is gained by articulating non-canonical engineering ethics canons?Dr. Donna M Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Prof. Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Amy E. Slaton is a Professor of History at Drexel University. She write on issues of identity in STEM education and labor, and is the author of Race, Rigor and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line .Dr. Joseph R. Herkert, Arizona State University Joseph R. Herkert, D.Sc., is Lincoln Associate Professor of Ethics and Technology (Emeritus) in
course(taught by an engineering subject matter expert). We will also discuss how practicing engineers canuse this book and accompanying online workflow materials as they develop their own workplaceprojects.Bibliography[1] D. Kmiec, B. Longo and J. M. Williams, "Extended abstract: Using project workflow to teach engineeringcommunication," Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2015 IEEE International, Limerick, 2015, pp. 1-2.[2] D. Winsor. Writing Like An Engineer: A Rhetorical Education. New York: Routledge, 1996.[3] R. Spilka. “Orality and Literacy in the Workplace: Process- and Text-Based Strategies for Multiple-AudienceAdaptation,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 4 (1990), pp. 44-67.[4] C. Spinuzzi. Tracing Genres
. Our analysis of ratings for each of the 11 skills(not counting “sensitivity to time” and “taking questions”) shows, in general, that the reliabilityof the overall rubric is acceptable. However, there is some variation in the reliability of eachskill. In particular, for the overall results we see a. High reliability for 10 of the skills, b. Moderate reliability for an additional 1 skill.Specific results for each skill and in each setting are displayed below. Page 24.605.8Industrial Engineering Session inter-rater reliabilityAs shown in Table 2, in this session, for pairwise comparisons, every skill demonstrates
Paper ID #22246Examining the Relationships Between How Students Construct Stakeholdersand the Ways Students Conceptualize Harm from Engineering DesignAlexis Papak, University of Maryland, College Park Alexis Papak is a Research Assistant at the University of Maryland, College Park with the Physics Edu- cation Research Group. They completed their Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. Their research interests lie at the intersection of ethnic studies, critical pedagogies, and STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta
/interpersonal skills”). • Each document includes capabilities related to what we classify as “social analytic skills,” such as ethical reasoning, understanding of global and local contexts, or political awareness.As our main interests are how a) “the social” and b) the relation between “the social” and “thetechnical” are represented, our attention now shifts to an assessment of how these features aremanifest in the accreditation documents. For the most part, professional/interpersonal skills areconceptually straightforward in the accreditation documents, and there is agreement that goodcommunication and teamwork skills are core competencies for engineers (even if the attributesof these skills are less-clearly specified). While we acknowledge
Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L. Schwartz, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2012. “Parallel Prototyping Leads to Better Design Results, More Divergence, and Increased Self-efficacy.” In Plattner, Hasso, Christoph Meinel, and Larry Leifer (eds), Design Thinking Research: Studying Co-Creation in Practice. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg.[6] Zoltowski, Carla. B., William. C. Oakes, and Monica. E. Cardella. 2012. “Students’ Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design.” Journal of Engineering Education, 101:28–59. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00040.x[7] Nieusma, Dean. 2008. “Integrating Technical, Social, and Aesthetic Analysis in the Product Design Studio: A Case Study and Model for a New Liberal Education for
Paper ID #33656The Critic as Designer: How Metacognition Makes TransdisciplinarityPossibleAndrea L. Schuman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Andrea is a first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma. Her research interests include culturally relevant pedagogy, teaching and learning in ECE, and international engineering education.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director
Paper ID #18551Learning to Anticipate the User in Professional Engineering WorkDr. Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University Alexandra H. Vinson is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwest- ern University. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology & Science Studies from the University of California, San Diego. Her research interests include professional education in medicine and STEM fields.Dr. Pryce Davis, University of Nottingham Pryce Davis is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Nottingham. He received his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences from Northwestern
Paper ID #12973Institutionalizing Ethics: Historical Debates surrounding IEEE’s 1974 Codeof EthicsDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Penn State University Xiaofeng Tang is a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his PhD in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Associate Professor in Science and Technology Studies and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer. Page 26.977.1
were identified using qualitative data analysis. They were broadly organized for this paperinto dominant themes that included a) interviewees’ characterizations of “the public,” b)experiences that shaped interviewees’ views of “the public,” c) interviewees’ understandingsabout their role in society, d) interviewees’ understandings about the role of “the public” inengineering decision making, and e) interviewees’ perceptions of risks and benefits associatedwith interacting with “the public.”IntroductionAt the forefront of the engineering code of ethics is the mandate to “hold paramount the safety,health and welfare of the public”1. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) refers toengineers as “a key force in the improvement of our economic
Page 24.1218.14Development of Higher Engineering Education in China]. Beijing Institute of TechnologyPress.2012:144.2“The College and Department Adjustment of Higher Education” in the 1952, “the Anti-RightistMovement" in 1957, “The Socialist Education Movement ”in the 1960s, the ten-years long "CulturalRevolution" movement (from 1966 to 1976), and “The Improvement and Rectification” period after1976 and “The Reform and Opening Up” period after 1978 in the so called "post-Cultural Revolution"era.3 Kimball, B. A. 1995. Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. CollegeBoard.4The Research Group of General Education Project in Institute of Higher Education, Beijing Universityof Aeronautics and Astronautics. Zhuan
Paper ID #32920Alumni Reflect on Their Education About Ethical and Societal IssuesDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where students
Paper ID #9075Integration of Art and Engineering: Creating Connections between Engi-neering Curricula and an Art Museum’s CollectionDr. Katherine Hennessey Wikoff, Milwaukee School of Engineering Katherine Wikoff is a Professor in the General Studies Department at Milwaukee School of Engineering, where she teaches a variety of humanities and social science courses including literature, film studies, po- litical science, and communications. In addition to her teaching at MSOE, she consults and teaches tech- nical communication courses on-site for industry professionals at companies like Harley-Davidson and Milwaukee
ABSTRACTThis paper describes the way innovation and entrepreneurship have been integrated intoan engineering curriculum through a year-long liberal arts seminar. This three-coursesequence has “The City” as its topical focus, and it incorporates principles ofentrepreneurship and innovation through course content specifically centered on theseconcepts through experiential learning in a service project, and through critical thinkingand rhetorical analysis of students’ own research strategies using the Burkean parlormodel of academic and professional conversation.In Fall Quarter, students read texts, view films, and study other cultural products relatedto the concept of “The City.” They examine how depictions of entrepreneurs andindustry illuminate our
AC 2011-1325: THE ENGINEERING ”PIPELINE” METAPHOR AND THECAREERS OF FEMALE DEANS OF ENGINEERINGPeggy Layne, Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., joined Virginia Tech in 2003 as director of the AdvanceVT program, a National Science Foundation sponsored program to increase the number and success of women faculty in science and engineering. Prior to accepting her current position, Ms. Layne worked as a diversity consultant for the American Association of Engineering Societies and as director of the program on diversity in the engineering workforce at the National Academy of Engineering. She also spent a year as an AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow in the office of Senator Bob Graham, where she was responsible
Paper ID #7065”What can you Teach me?”: (Re)thinking Responses to Difference for Multi-disciplinary TeamworkMs. Julie L Taylor, University of Utah Julie L. Taylor is a Ph.D. candidate in Communication at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, UT. She received her M.A. and B.A. from Colorado State University in Communication Studies, Secondary- Education, and certificate in Women’s Studies. Her interests are concerned broadly with organizational communication, gender, and interdisciplinary studies. Page 23.1407.1
Paper ID #18554Problem Solving in Engineering Education and Professional Engineering WorkDr. Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University Alexandra H. Vinson is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwest- ern University. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology & Science Studies from the University of California, San Diego. Her research interests include professional education and enculturation in medicine and STEM fields.Dr. Pryce Davis, University of Nottingham Pryce Davis is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Nottingham. He received his Ph.D. in