AC 2011-1200: A WRITING PROGRAM FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEER-INGWilliam K. Durfee, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities William Durfee is Professor and Director of Design Education in the Department of Mechanical Engi- neering at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. His professional interests include design of medical devices, rehabilitation engineering, advanced orthotics, biomechanics and physiology of human muscle including electrical stimulation of muscle, product design and design education. Additional infor- mation is at www.me.umn.edu/˜wkdurfee.Benjamin Adams, Mechanical Engineering, University of MinnesotaAudrey J. Appelsies, University of MinnesotaPamela Flash, University of Minnesota Pamela Flash
) Ideas related to function (b) Ideas related to form Figure 1: A comparison of the number of ideas generated on initial and final papers. Improvement Ideas by Type 4. Average Number of Ideas in Papers 3. 2. 1. 0. Initial Paper Final Paper
developing support materials to increase its effectivenessand impact.References[1] T. Stanton, D. Giles, and N. Cruz, Service-learning: a movement's pioneers reflect on its origins, practice, andfuture. Joessey-Bass, 1999.[2] J. Eyler and D. E. Giles, Where’s the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass, 1999.[3] P. A. Leidig and W. C. Oakes, “Model for project-based community engagement,” Manuscript submitted forpublication, 2021.[4] C. B. Zoltowski, and W. C. Oakes, “Learning by Doing: Reflections of the EPICS Program”, Special Issue:University Engineering Programs That Impact Communities: Critical Analyses and Reflection, InternationalJournal for Service-Learning in Engineering, 2014, pp. 1-32.
and Assessing Engineering Professional Skills. iJEP, Volume 3, Special Issue 3: “EDUCON2013” June 2013, pp. 13-20.Barry, B. E. and Whitener, J. (Spring, 2014). Impact of professional skills on technical skills in the engineering curriculum and variations between engineering sub-disciplines. Teaching Ethics, pp. 105-122.Downey, G. (2005). Are engineers losing control of technology? From “Problem solving” to “problem definition and solution” in engineering education. Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83(A6): 583–595Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful
. Engineering by doing: Diversity, innovation and hands-on learning. In: Hyldgaard Christensen S, Didier C, Jamison A, Meganck M, Mitcham C, Newberry B, eds. International Perspectives on Engineering Education: Engineering Education and Practice in Context. Vol 1. Philosophy of engineering and technology. New York: Springer; 2015:261-278.21. Lucena JC. Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Scientists and Engineers from Sputnik to the “War against Terrorism.” Lanham, Md.: University of America Press; 2005.22. Valderamma Pineda AF. What Can Engineering Systems Teach Us about Social (In)justices? The Case of Pubic Transportation Systems. In: Lucena JC, ed. Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical
innovative behaviors. Page 26.740.2Research PurposeThis paper explores whether a specific trait or tendency may be connected to innovation:empathy. This quantitative study is guided by the following research questions:RQ1: What is the relationship between the empathy and innovation amongst engineering students?RQ2: To what extent are empathic tendencies predictive of innovative behavioral tendencies?Using a model developed out of social psychology,13 we define empathy as a multi-facetedphenomenon built upon four distinct sub-constructs: (a) fantasy, (b) perspective-taking, (c)empathic concern, and (d) personal distress. Here we explore whether
(Image 4d). In creating their stories, participants were supposed to link the cracked objects’photos to any other images or texts or illustrations they liked. An iPhone application was used tofacilitate linking these images. Participants took three days to two weeks to work on their stories. Image 4 - Left to right: (a) a liquid rubber-coated ceramic cup; (b) the break; (c) the paint; (d) the storyBefore going through the process of creating the stories, the participants had mentioned that thebroken objects have little or no value and they should be discarded. However, when they cameback to share their images and stories, they had changed their minds about those objects andsome of them saw the objects as an art piece and a “representative of a
inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the newly-formed Consortium for Promoting Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by a $4.4 million grant from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. She was director of the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), a national research center that was funded from 2003-2010. Dr. Atman is the author or co-author on over 115 archival publications. She has been invited to give many keynote addresses, including a Distinguished Lecture at the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2014 Annual Conference. Dr. Atman joined the
sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineeringcourses,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[6] B. Przestrzelski, E. Reddy, and S. Lord, “Teaching social responsibility in a circuitscourse,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, FL, 2019.[7] S. A. Claussen and J. M. Smith, “Incorporation of corporate social responsibility intoproblem-based learning in a semiconductor device course,” presented at 2019 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[8] E. Reddy and J. C. Lucena, “Engagement in practice paper: Engineering students vs.geological risk in the gold supply chain: Using geological risk in gold miningcommunities to overcome technical instrumentalism among engineering
to Teach Design. Submitted to Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 2016.7. Tonso, K. (2014) Engineering Identity. In Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. A. Johri & B.M. Olds, eds. Cambridge University Press.8. Johnson, B. (2016). Study of Professional Competency Development in a Project Based Learning (PBL) Curriculum (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark.9. Wasilewski, C.H. (2015).Men and Women in Engineering: Professional Identity and Factors Influencing Workforce Retention. Industrial-Organizational Psychology Dissertations. Paper 2. Available at http://digitalcommons.spu.edu/iop_etd/2/ accessed January 31, 2016.10
3400 or ENGR 3600 do not have a strong design component; however, these courses do teach systems as a sociological methodology, which can be applied to economic, environmental, social, political, and ethical issues relating science and engineering practice. ENGR3400 focuses one-third of the course on ethical and value issues as they relate to science and engineering. B. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility: One of three units in ENGR 3400 is dedicated to ethics as they relate to entrepreneurs involved in the development of the Internet. The course looks at ethics as part of a new business value system as well as the “hacker ethic,” which some speculate may be emerging in
Common Language as a Tool to Teach Engineering ‘Dialects’”, U449, 27049, 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC: ASEE, 2019.Clobes, A., and Wheeler, L., “SciComm: An Oral Communication Professional Development Program for STEM Graduate Students”, M528, 26824, 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC: ASEE, 2019.Cunningham, K., “Graduate Engineering Peer Review Groups: Developing Communicators and Community”, M528, 25266, 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC: ASEE, 2019.Degenhardt, D., and Woodard, B., “Applying Project-based Learning with an
Politics of Progress. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.7. MacInnis, B. and Krosnick, J.A. (2020). Climate Insights 2020: Partisan Divide. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. (https://www.rff.org/publications/reports/climateinsights2020-partisan-divide/); also see, Funk, C. (2021). Key Findings: How Americans’ Attitudes about Climate Change Differ by Generation, Party, and Other Factors. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/26/key-findings-how-americans- attitudes-about-climate-change-differ-by-generation-party-and-other-factors/); Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M., Goldberg, M., & Gustafson, A. (2019
Paper ID #13417Engineering a Humanities Education: Learning like an Engineer in a The-atre ElectiveMs. Lydia Wilkinson, University of Toronto Lydia Wilkinson is a lecturer in the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto, where she teaches courses on written, oral and visual communication. She has a Bachelor of Education, an MA in Drama and Performance Studies, and is pursuing a PhD in Drama that focuses on the intersections of engineering and theatre. Page 26.609.1 c
AC 2012-3854: THE MIT LEWIS SURVEY: CREATING A BLUEPRINTFOR A COLD WAR TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, 1947-1949Dr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor of history in the Department of Science and Technology Studies and the Director of First-year Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He has published Calculating a Natural World: Computers, Scientists and Engineers During the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research with MIT Press (2006) and is currently working on a book on the history of engineering education reform in the United States. Page 25.1322.1
AC 2012-3961: REVISITING A LIBERAL ACTIVITY IN A COLLEGE OFENGINEERING ENGINEERS AS POETS 10 YEARS LATERMr. Craig J. Gunn, Michigan State University Craig Gunn is the Director of the Communication Program in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. His duties include the integration of communication skill activity into all courses within the mechanical engineering program, including overseas experiences. He works closely with the Cooperative Engineering Education Division of the College of Engineering to monitor the com- munication skills of students who co-op during their college years. He is currently the Editor of the CEED Newsbriefs and is co-author of a number of textbooks focusing
up to a computer design,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, pp. 853–855, 1993, doi: 10.1109/FIE.1993.405385.[28] S. Shapiro, “Degrees of freedom: The interaction of standards of practice and engineering judgment,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 286–316, 1997, doi: 10.1177/016224399702200302.[29] A. Johri, B. M. Olds, and K. O’connor, “Situative frameworks for engineering learning research,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 47–66.[30] R. A. House, R. Layton, J. Livingston, and S. Moseley, “Engineering ethos in environmental public policy deliberation,” IEEE Int. Prof. Commun. Conf., vol. 2015- Janua, 2015, doi: 10.1109
courses. Admittance requiredobtaining a B or better in all four courses, passing a math readiness exam, and attending allrequired activities. STEP is run through the Center for the Enhancement of EngineeringDiversity (CEED) office and is separate from the first-year program at the current university.Evidence based curricular innovation is welcomed in the development of STEP courses,specifically the engineering fundamentals course. Additionally, this development is supported bythe administrators and instructors of STEP. The curriculum for STEP is revisited every year bythe program director and instructors in order to address new needs or areas of improvement, andin conjunction with the first-year engineering courses that the students will
Paper ID #15021The Case for Engineering as a Liberal ArtDr. R.F.A. Hamilton, Siena Heights University R.F.A. Hamilton is the Director of Engineering at Siena Heights University. His research interest primarily on improving student performance in entry level courses. His background is combination of Engineering, Physics, and Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Case for Engineering as a Liberal Art Engineering is often viewed as a highly specialized and exclusive field of study.Typically, only those pursuing engineering degrees receive any
Paper ID #8495Engineers Can Interact in a Liberal Arts WorldDr. Pete Hylton, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Pete Hylton is an Assistant Professor at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). He earned his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, M.S de- grees from Purdue University (Mechanical Engienering) and IUPUI (Applied mathematics) and Ed.D. from Grand Canyon University (Organizational Leadership). Dr. Hylton is currently the Director of Motorsports Engineering at IUPUI and his interests include motorsports safety, automotive performance
AC 2012-4961: REQUIRING A COURSE IN INFRASTRUCTURE FORALL GRADUATESDr. J. Ledlie Klosky, U.S. Military Academy J. Ledlie Klosky, P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at West Point, where he also serves as the Deputy Director of the Center for Innovation and Engineering. Klosky is the 2010 winner of the National Outstanding Teaching Medal from the society, and, in addi- tion to traditional engineering pursuits, he works in communication in education, course design, and the interface between engineering and other disciplines.Major Scott M. Katalenich, U.S. Military Academy Major Scott Katalenich is an instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at
Paper ID #28260Defining first-generation and low-income students in engineering: AnexplorationDr. Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College Dr. Sara A. Atwood is an Associate Professor and Chair of Engineering at Elizabethtown College in Pennsylvania. She holds a BA and MS in Engineering Sciences from Dartmouth College, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr. Atwood’s research interests are in creativity, engineering design, first-generation and low-income students, internship experiences, and criterion-based course structures.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University
. Rosales, J. Haines, A. Benally, “Development of Undergraduate Students' Professional Skills” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 102-108, 2009.[11] D. D. Nulty, “The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?” Assessment & evaluation in higher education, vol. 33 no. 3, pp. 201-214, Apr. 2008.[12] T. J. Siller, A. A. Maciejewski, A. M. Leland, T. Chen, B. M. Notaros, A. Pezeshki, S. Roy, A. C. Hicks, “Using student video presentations to develop communication skills,” in ASEE 2018 Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE: Salt Lake City, UT, USA.[13] M. Ghorbani, A.A. Maciejewski, T.J. Siller, E. K. P. Chong, P. Omur
Paper ID #33699Engineering’s Systemic Marginalization and Devaluation of Students andProfessionals With DisabilitiesDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan Dr. Erin Cech is an associate professor of sociology and mechanical engineering (by courtesy) at the Uni- versity of Michigan. Before coming to Michigan in 2016, she was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University and was on faculty at Rice University. She earned her Ph.D. in Sociology in 2011 from UC San Diego and undergraduate degrees in Electrical Engineering and Sociology from Montana State University. Cech’s research
Paper ID #13566Communication as Both the Ultimate Interdisciplinary Subject and a Fieldof Specialization Encompassing More Than Technical Writing: Communica-tion Instruction Across DivisionsDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Department of Engi- neering & Society in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division and winner of the Sterling Olmsted Award for outstanding contributions to liberal education for engineers
Paper ID #10251Study Abroad as a Means to Achieving ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes: A CaseStudy in Course Design and AssessmentDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Department of Engi- neering and Society. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education Division of ASEE. Page 24.1136.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Study Abroad as a Means to Achieving ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes: A
listed in Table 1. Note that weuse the title “Professor” for all faculty members on our team, both teaching line and tenure line,without implying that this is their official university rank. Professors A, B, C, and D are allmembers of the academic faculty at their institutions. Professors A and B have reached thehighest teaching faculty rank at their university, Professor C is an early career non-tenure trackTable 1: Research team and roles. Research Team Role Selected Demographics Member Professor A Lead author and professor (teaching Female, white (non-Hispanic), faculty) teaching the third-year course heterosexual, cisgender, not
Rubric Criteria for“overall effectiveness” (see Appendix B).The writing instructor met with each team to share the feedback and discuss how the commentsmight be used to revise the proposal. Teams were encouraged to send working drafts of revisions 3to the writing instructor, who provided ongoing feedback during the revision process. Studentsscheduled follow-up meetings as individuals or teams to discuss revisions-in-progress or torequest additional resources.Data Collection and AnalysisData collection began during the Senior Design Presentation when each team was asked tocomplete a note card in response to two prompts: (1) How is the design process like the writingprocess? and (2) How did the
practice and Baxter Magolda’s Learning PartnershipsModel, which is based on self-authorship, was developed for ethnographic classroomobservation. The collected data will help us better understand the educational environment andeducational processes3, as well as the actors situated within them. In this paper, we offer ananalysis of pilot data to better understand how the classes might align with desired outcomes -such as student development of self-authorship, reflective practice, and capacity for innovation.Using this analysis, we identify possible implications for (a) adjustment of academic plans, and(b) evaluating and adjusting the educational environment, both described by Lattuca & Stark’smodel.Introduction / Purpose Statement
their present conditions.Research MethodsIn this paper, we describe findings from focus groups conducted over four semesters withinengineering programs at two public universities in the U.S. Rocky Mountain region. Over thecourse of the project, a total of eleven focus groups were conducted for three courses: a first-yearintroduction to engineering projects class at University B, a second-year introduction tomechanical engineering (ME) class at University A, and a third-year electrical engineering (EE)engineering science core course at University A. In all except one case, the courses were taughtby one of the members of our research team (these instructors are also all co-authors on thispaper) and included some elements of sociotechnical