, NY.[22] Highlander Research and Education Center and Gabriela Hurtado-Ramos (artist), Methodologies en Color (1), https://highlandercenter.org/our-story/mission/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[23] D. Boyd, Under the Radar: Popular Education in North America, A White Paper, COMM-ORG Papers, vol. 18, 2012, https://comm-org.wisc.edu/papers2012/boyd.htm (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[24] A. Frausto Aceves, B. Torres-Alave, and S. Tolbert, “On love, becomings, and true generosity for science education: honoring Paulo Freire,” Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 17, pp. 217-230, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10098-w.[25] Medibank, “Uncle Bob Randall,” Medibank, Jul. 15, 2016, https://www.medibank.com.au
Paper ID #38993Cultivating ”global competency” in a divided world: A collaborative autoethnographyof the cross-border curriculum designYiXiang Shawn Sun, National Taiwan UniversityDr. Sharon Tsai-hsuan Ku, University of Virginia Dr. Sharon Ku has dual background in physics and STS, specializing in the sociology of scientific knowledge, standardization, and science policy in the US and China. She works closely with scientists and engineers from academia, government and industry. Dr. Ku received her PhD from History & Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University in 2010, and is currently an assistant professor at Dept. of
ed ing ed el r lt n M Adv act al Te po R n Pa on pace an ol Le l D ds te a/B ent du ng os r e G d M l S rgy y al Pha rtai PR str ch en actu s es se os g ta Sc e ia rtis ing Tr chn rts/ etai
/s40594-023-00419-6[3] D. Gerrard, K. Newfield, N. Balouchestani Asli, and C. Variawa, “Are students overworked? understanding the workload expectations and realities of first-year engineering,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, May 2017. doi:10.18260/1-2--27612[4] U. Beagon and B. Bowe, “Understanding professional skills in engineering education: A phenomenographic study of faculty conceptions,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1109–1144, Sep. 2023. doi:10.1002/jee.20556[5] “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2022 - 2023,” ABET, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-20 23/ (accessed Feb. 8, 2024
Paper ID #49261Enginovation: A Social Experiment in Innovating TogetherDr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Dr. Brooke Coley, Assistant Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University, is a trailblazing scholar and disruptor, redefining engineering through equity-driven innovation. As the Founding Executive Director of RARE JUSTICE, she spearheads transformative efforts to dismantle systemic barriers, eradicate anti-Blackness in STEM, and amplify the voices of racially minoritized scholars. Her groundbreaking research critically examines graduate education while demanding
Committee on Personnel Methods (Eds. C.R. Mann, D.A. Robertson, M.E. Haggerty, J. B. Johnson; American Council on Education) (1930) Federal Relations to Education (American Council on Education) (1930) Manual for Teachers of Classes of Illiterate Adults: Tentative Suggestions (with National Advisory Committee on Illiteracy; American Council on Education) (1938) Living and Learning (American Council on Education)This list of publications and the range of subjects on which Mann published present aformidable challenge to any researcher who seeks to understand Mann’s career, but theyalso reflect the breadth of perspective that equipped Mann to be a systems thinker whograsps the intricacies of what
Engineering Education, 2024 10 2024 ASEE Annual ConferenceRiley, D., Slaton, A. & Pawley, A. (2014). Social justice and inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering. InCambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Jahiri and B. Olds (eds.), 335-356.Schuck, P.H. (2017). One National Undecided: Clear Thinking about Five Hard Issues That Divide Us. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.Schwarz-Plaschg, C. (2018). The power of analogies for imagining and governing emerging technologies.Nanoethics,12, 139-153.Sedlack, V. (n.d.). Fish don’t know they’re in the water. Almeda Education Foundation.https://AlamedaEducation.org.Slaton, A. (2022, July 7). Fast-track
Paper ID #49454Engineering Communication as an Area of Specialization and a FundamentallyInterdisciplinary Domain: What We Can Learn from Fred Newton ScottDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Engineering Communication as an Area of Specialization and a
Paper ID #42016Contextualizing Technological Stewardship: Origins and Implications of anApproach to Responsible Tech DevelopmentDr. Kari Zacharias, University of Manitoba Kari Zacharias is an Assistant Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education at the University of Manitoba. She studies intersections and meeting points between engineering ways of knowing, being, and making, and other ways of understanding the world.Mr. Renato B. Rodrigues, University of Manitoba Renato Bezerra Rodrigues is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education, with degrees in engineering and philosophy. He
. Eddington, Kansas State University Sean Eddington (Ph.D., Purdue University) is an assistant professor of Communication Studies at Kansas State University. Sean’s primary research interests exist at the intersections of organizational communi- cation, new media, gender, and organizing.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Elmore Family School of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and (by courtesy) the School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Pur- due. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and a Ph.D. in
., Blacklock, J., & Johnson, K. (2019, January). Pain and gain: Barriers and opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses. In Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Cowan, R. S. (1985). How the refrigerator got its hum. In J. Wajcman & D. A. MacKenzie (Eds.), The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum (pp. 202–218). Open University Press.Day, M. (2021, September 21). Inside Amazon (AMZN) flagship fulfillment center where machines run the show. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-09-21/inside-amazon-amzn-flagship-ful fillment-center-where-machines-run-the-showDowney, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M
excluded studies targeting students with primary and secondary education students. Further,we excluded studies about individual development for students with disabilities as well asforeign language acquisition with students speaking English as a second language (or foreignlanguage or L2). Such keywords like childhood, secondary, disability, and ESL were entered asexclusion words. Because neither Boolean terms nor an asterisk function could be used in Google Scholar,we alternatively use the advanced search function embedded in Google Scholar, that is, (a) withall of the words, (b) with at least one of the words, and (c) without the words. As such, wegenerated 33 search queries in Google Scholar, by varying the keywords combination
creatively to build on existing assets in ways that invite context-specific,bottom-up cultural change.AcknowledgementsBoth authors would like to thank all members of the School of Biological & Health SystemsEngineering at ASU who have supported, participated in, or contributed to the Community Gardenin any way, with particular gratitude to the faculty who have joined our regular gatherings. EF alsoacknowledges support from the National Science Foundation (Award #2045925).References[1] S. Hall, “A mental-health crisis is gripping science — toxic research culture is to blame,” Nature, vol. 617, no. 7962, pp. 666–668, May 2023, doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-01708-4.[2] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence
engineering education. Journal ofCleaner Production, 345, 131129.[2] Faulkner, W. (2000). Dualisms, hierarchies, and gender in engineering. Social Studies ofScience, 30(5), 759–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030005005[3] Cech, E. A. (2013). The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticizationand meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices. In Philosophy ofEngineering and Technology (pp. 67–84). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_4[4] Leydens, J. A., & Lucena, J. C. (2017). Engineering justice: Transforming engineeringeducation and practice. Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118757369[5] Martin, M. J., Diem, S. J., Karwat, D. M. A., Krieger, E. M., Rittschof, C. C., Bayon, B
withengineering schools. References1 Hess, D. (1997). Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.2 Seabrook, B., K. A. Neeley, K. Zacharias, and B. Carron. “Teaching STS to Engineers: A Comparative Study of Embedded STS Programs,” 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: 2020.3 Sorby, S., Fortenberry, N., & Bertoline, G. “Stuck in 1955, Engineering Education Needs a Revolution.” Issues in Science and Technology. (September 13, 2021). Retrieved from https://issues.org/engineering- education-change-sorby-fortenberry-bertoline/4 National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions for a New Century
), Virtual, 2021, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/RESPECT51740.2021.9620612.[2] J. Jones. “LGBT identification in U.S. ticks up to 7.1%.” Gallup News. Accessed: May 1, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://news.gallup.com/poll/389792/lgbt-identification-ticks -up.aspx[3] S. E. James, J. L. Herman, S. Rankin, M. Keisling, L. Mottet, & M. Anafi, “The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey,” National Center for Transgender Equality, Washington, DC, 2016.[4] A. Menier, S. Sexton, B. Gutierrez, and J. Donoghue, “Nonbinary learners in state data: Implications for computing education research,” 2022 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology
in productive ways.References[1] b. hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York, NY,USA: Taylor & Francis Group, 1994.[2] D. Riley, “Employing liberative pedagogies in engineering education,” Journal of Womenand Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 137-258, 2003.[3] Office of Institutional Statistics. “Enrolment Reports | Institutional Analysis | University ofManitoba” umanitoba.ca. https://umanitoba.ca/institutional-analysis/enrolment-reports (accessed:Mar 27, 2024)..[4] A. Quan-Haase, Technology & Society: Social Networks, Power, and Inequality, 3rd ed. DonMills, Canada: Oxford University Press, 2020.[5] B. Arao and K. Clemens, “From safe spaces to brave spaces: A new way to frame
,” YouTube, Jun. 1,2023. [Online] Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvpGdoKTK_I[10] P. Bloom, “Against Empathy,” Boston Review, Aug. 20, 2014. [Online] Available:https://www.bostonreview.net/forum/paul-bloom-against-empathy/)[11] B. H. Fried, “Emotional Empathy Is Not the Culprit,” Boston Review, Aug. 20, 2014.[Online] Available: (https://www.bostonreview.net/forum_response/barbara-h-fried-response-against-empathy-fried/)[12] X. Tang, “From ‘Empathic Design’ to ‘Empathic Engineering’: Toward a Genealogy ofEmpathy in Engineering Education,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2018.[13] C. D. Batson, “These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena,” inThe Social Neuroscience of Empathy, J. Decety and W. Ickes, eds
Instrument 1 and Instrument 2. Ultimately, we undertookindividual case study interviews with two of these students.Survey QuestionsInstrument 1 and Instrument 2 are both quantitative and qualitative surveys administered throughQualtrics. The questions in the surveys are listed in Table 1. Table 1: Questions asked in Instruments 1 and 2 Question Response Type Instr. 1. What types of things are you most curious about? (free entry long-form) 1,2 2. How curious are you about this habit? a. Literacy, Dialogue, and Expression b. Religion, Faith, and Ethics
Development, Taylor & Francis Group 2015, pp. 142-160 6. b. hooks, Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge. 1994 7. X. Du, L. Su, J. Liu, “Developing sustainability curricula using the PBL method in a Chinese context”. J. Clean. Prod. 61, 80–88. 2013 doi: /10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.012. 8. S. Sivapalan, M.J. Clifford, S. Speight, “Engineering education for sustainable development: using online learning to support the new paradigms”. Australas. J. Eng.Educ. 21 (2), 61–73. 2016 doi: 10.1080/22054952.2017.1307592. 9. G. Moriarty, “Ethics, Ethos and the Professions: Some Lessons from Engineering”, Professional Ethics, 4(1), 1995, pp. 75–93 10. R. C. Campbell and D
Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice," WHO Press, Geneva, 2010.[13] G. V. Simone, M. Vessali, J. A. Pratt, S. Watts, J. S. Pratt, P. Raghavan and J. M. DeSilva, "The Importance of Interdisciplinary Research Training and Community Dissmeination," Clinical and Translational Science, pp. 611-614, 2015.[14] J. Davis and W. Newell, "Those Experimental Colleges of the 1960's: Where are They Now that We Need Them?," Chronical of Higher Education, p. 64, 1981.[15] S. Rafiq, F. Kamran and A. Afzal, "Investigating the Benefits and Challenges of Interdisciplinary Education in Higher Education Settings," Journal of Social Research Development, pp. 87-100, 2024.[16] B. Rodic-Trmcic, A. Labus, D. Barac, S. Popovic and B
. 8[5] L. L. Layne, S. L. Vostral, and K. Boyer, Feminist technology, vol. 4. University of Illinois Press, 2010.[6] F. Bronet and L. Layne, “Teaching Feminist Technology Design,” Fem. Technol.[7] J. A. Leydens and J. C. Lucena, Engineering justice: Transforming engineering education and practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.[8] C. B. Aranda Jan, S. Jagtap, and J. Moultrie, “Towards a framework for holistic contextual design for low-resource settings,” 2016.[9] K. Shilton, J. A. Koepfler, and K. R. Fleischmann, “Charting sociotechnical dimensions of values for design research,” Inf. Soc., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 259–271, 2013.[10] D. A. Norman and P. J. Stappers, “DesignX: complex sociotechnical systems
students’ equity orientations throughcourse experiences that affirm learners’ identities and lived experiences; center thesociotechnical nature of engineering; and prioritize equitable teaching and assessment practices.Our ultimate goal is for students to develop engineering equity-mindedness, involving thefollowing learning objectives: (a) Obj. 1: awareness and recognition of engineering as a sociotechnical field and occupation that requires understanding of micro-, meso-, and macro-level social contexts; (b)Obj. 2: capacity to identify and reflect on one’s positionality and the ways one’s engineering practice can affect societal (in)equity; (c) Obj. 3: capacity to consider, individually and with others, how societal (in
under grants EEC#1929484 and #1929478. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] A. Danowitz and K. Beddoes, “Effects of COVID-19 on Stress and Mental Health of Community College Pre-Engineering Students,” in Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, Oct. 2022.[2] A. Danowitz and K. Beddoes, “How the COVID-19 pandemic reshaped demographic variation in mental health among diverse engineering student populations,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 67–76, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2023.2184912.[3] J. K. Hyun, B. C. Quinn, T
modules that all students take to acquire skills in civics education and designand engineering thinking. There are two PILLARS: Civics and Design Thinking. A module isdefined as lessons teachers implement that contain content and learning experiences organized tocreate a clear learning path for students. The civics education pillar will consist of 4 modules(1.a: What is an effective citizen; 1.b: Principles of democracy; 1.c: Democratic practices andinstitutions; 1.d: Authentic civic actions). The design thinking pillar will consist of 2 modules(2.a: Identifying problems and 2.b Addressing problems) that delineate iterative modes thatencourage students to empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test[5]. There are explicitempathy and ethics
: Jan. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using-design-norms-to-teach-engineering-ethics[2] N. Brown, B. Xie, E. Sarder, C. Fiesler, and E. S. Wiese, “Teaching Ethics in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review of ACM Computer Science Education Publications,” ACM Trans Comput Educ, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 6:1-6:36, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3634685.[3] C. Carson, A. Edmundson, R. Sridharan, A. Strang, and L. Yan, “Sociotechnical Integration in data science Education,” presented at the 2025 ASEE Annual Conference, Jun. 2025.[4] C. von Vacano et al., “Critical Faculty and Peer Instructor Development: Core Components for Building Inclusive STEM Programs in Higher Education,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, May
thatcommonly create hierarchies in engineering thought and practice, and embrace a culture that isholistic and integrated? a) characterize the current state of the departmental culture with regard to endorsement or rejection of historical binaries in engineering, b) describe the systemic conditions and processes that build capacity for students, staff, and faculty to co-create revolutionary change, c) examine how the culture shifts over time.R2. To what extent does our change model help students, staff, and faculty navigate, respond to,and engage in critical organizational change?R3. What are the impacts of a holistic environment on individual growth and social cohesion?To describe faculty members’ basic assumptions
Educators to Integrate Inclusive Design Across a 4-Year CS Degree Program. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.02748Leydens, J., Johnson, K., Claussen, S., Blacklock, J., Moskal, B., & Cordova, O. (2018). Measuring Change over Time in Sociotechnical Thinking: A Survey/Validation Model for Sociotechnical Habits of Mind. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 30794. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30794Loweth, R., Daly, S., Paborsky, L., Hoffman, S., & Skerlos, S. (2021). “You Could Take ‘Social’ Out of Engineering and Be Just Fine”: An Exploration of Engineering Students’ Beliefs About the Social Aspects of Engineering Work. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
toindependently construct a series of “Vignettes”, Appendix B, which contain our individualreflections on our backgrounds and motivations for participating in the course, the role ofcommunity, and our key takeaways. In our meetings, we also discussed how our individualexperiences related to others, the challenges we aimed to address in our Pilot Course, and the2025 LEES themes (i.e. Truth & Reconciliation, Conflict, Climate Change, and SociotechnicalIntegration). These individual vignettes and group discussions form the source material to whichwe refer frequently throughout the paper.The writing of the paper itself and the synthesis of ideas that it entailed was largely undertaken byJacque and Morgan (the lead, co-first authors) with methodological
Press, 2017.[2] P. Nagy, R. Wylie, J. Eschrich, and E. Finn. “Facing the Pariah of Science: TheFrankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists,” Science and EngineeringEthics, vol. 26, pp. 737-759, 2020.[3] J. Canino and K. B. Teichert. (2019, June). A Frankenstein-inspired Engineering DesignProject. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-frankenstein-inspired-engineering-design-project[4] H. Markus and P. Nurius, “Possible Selves,” American Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 9, pp.954-969, Sep. 1986.[5] M. Shelley, Frankenstein: Or, the Modern Prometheus, M. Hindle, Notes, E. Kostova,Introduction, New York, NY, USA: Penguin Books, 2007.[6