[www.texastribune.org]. [www.texastribune.org]. This RET Site provides manufacturing experiences to teachers from middle and highschools with large numbers students from underrepresented groups and averaged academicachievement. The program objectives are to: a) Enhance the teachers' professional knowledge by providing unique research experiences in modern and advanced manufacturing, b) Use a design thinking approach to help teachers integrating new research knowledge into their class/laboratory activities while motivating young students to pursue engineering careers, c) Support the school infrastructure for long term partnership, and d) Enhance the schools' quality and
the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education [3,4, 5, 7, and 9].Most of the questions was directly involved with checking students’ knowledge and fewquestions was of Likert-type items from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Assessmentof Sustainability Knowledge and perception is given below. The percentages indicate resultsfrom the design engineering students from The Petroleum Institute.Sustainability Knowledge and Perception survey1. Why is it important to recycle? (Choose all that apply) a) Recycling decreases the amount of habitat lost due to resource extraction. (30%) b) Recycling typically takes less energy to process recycled materials than to use new materials. (35%) c) Recycling cuts down on the
RP Challenge and Lab ExamCourse Evaluation: Theory: Homework/Class Work 10% Quizzes 10% 2 Tests 30% Final Exam 20% Lab Work: 4 Open-ended Lab Projects 30% Total 100% (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Figure 1: a) Roland CNC mill; b) UP printer; c) MakerBot Replicator; d) Flashforge Creator Pro; e) Next Engine 3D scanner; and f) Hand-held 3D scannerOpen-ended Hands-on Lab ProjectsThe following open-ended lab projects have been designed for the AM
elements to besuccessful. These have to be based on realistic constraints imposed by each team as prescribed inABET student outcome c – where students design a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical,health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. The open-ended construction toyprojects used in this Rapid Prototyping and Reverse Engineering course accomplishes thisstudent outcome by incorporating the realistic constraints including the ones on economic,manufacturability, safety, environmental and sustainability. In these projects, ABET studentoutcomes a, b, d, e, g, h, and k are also addressed strongly. These open-ended constructionFigure
following ABET studentoutcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) anability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; and (c) anability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability. Each type of course module will be categorized into threedifferent levels, including freshmen (entry level), junior/senior (mid-level), and graduate students(advanced level). The course modules will cover both lecture and project. For manufacturingrelated material standards course module, the three levels include:1) Entry level
) manufacturing related program outcomes – 3 programs Others – 2 programsThis review shows that the favorite approach for defining outcomes for ManufacturingEngineering programs is to modify the generic ABET a-k outcomes to include wording thatintroduces manufacturing related terminology. This is the approach taken in defining theoutcomes for the new Manufacturing Engineering program at WWU. Table 3 lists the MFGEprogram outcomes as well as the mapping to the manufacturing specific criteria listed in Table 2.In addition to emphasizing manufacturing, the following changes have been made to the genericcriteria in creating these: Outcome “b” is tailored to focus on the ability to measure process variables, and to
MAT 125, MAT 119 Precalculus Mathematics 3 MAT 126 INF 120 Elementary Programming 3 CHE 120/131 CHE 120/120L General Chemistry with Laboratory I 4 Lab MAT 128 and Calculus A MAT 251 MAT 227 Calculus B
, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II:Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176.[12] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women Engineering Students and Self‐Efficacy:A Multi‐Year, Multi‐Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self‐Efficacy. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 98(1), 27-38.[13] Carberry, A. R., Lee, H. S., & Ohland, M. W. (2010). Measuring engineering design self-efficacy. Journal ofEngineering Education, 99(1), 71-79.[14] Sly, Dr. Dave, Bumblauskas, Dan, Peters, Dr. Frank, (2010) Developing of an Engineering Sales Programwith Industry. Proceeding of the
, “Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction,” College Teaching, Taylor & Francis, 44:2, Spring 1996, pg. 43-47.3 Herreid, Clyde Freeman and Nancy A. Schiller, “Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom,” Journal of College Science Teaching, 42:5, 2013, pg. 62-66.4 Begg, Ian, Susanna Duft Paul Lalonde, Richard Melnick, and Josephine Sanvito, “Memory Predictions are Based on Ease of Processing,” Journal of Memory and Language, Elsevier, 28:5, Oct. 1989, pg. 610-632.5 King, Joseph F., Eugene B. Zechmeister, and John J. Shaughnessy, “Judgments of Knowing: The Influence of Retrieval Practice,” The American Journal of Psychology, University of Illinois Press, 93:2, Jun. 1980, pg. 329-343.6
Paper ID #11405Research Experiences for High School Teachers and College Instructors inMechatronics, Robotics and Industrial AutomationDr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the
3Dscanner.Without deep mathematics knowledge, students were able to conceptualize, customize andprototype their design. The visual nature of these tools (Autodesk Inventor) and the 3D printingtechnology enabled high-school students to grasp the technology and concepts very quickly(figure 1).On the last day of camp, each group of students gave a twenty-minute PowerPoint presentationon their design, followed by a ten-minute discussion during which the student is expected toadvocate the use of certain tools or features in their design. Parents were invited to thepresentations (figures 2 &3). 3Figure 1 (a): camp activities Figure 1 (b): camp activitiesFigure 2 (a): last day presentation
parts: arms, body, and legs; thenMeshMixer helped to fix the corner from the part using the tool, make it solid, that gave the finallook to the part. Figure 1 shows the CAD of the arm in the MeshMixer ready to print. Figure 1: CAD of the armThe four arms were printed in the MakerBot Replicator 2X11 3D printer using ABS material. TheABS has a good balance of strength and flexibility besides being very rigid and light, it was abetter choice for the arms than the PLA. The temperature used to print the arms was 230ºC; theplatform temperature was 110ºC; the layer height was 0.20mm; and the infill was 75%. Figures2(a) and 2(b) show details of dimensions and print setting respectively for the arm. (a) Dimensions
sections in the Course Content module on which theytested poorly. Afterward revisiting these sections, the student can retry the Post-Assessment. Anexample question from the Post-Assessment is shown in Figure 2B.Figure 2: Example of THORS interface for Course Content (A) and Post-Assessment (B) [9].*Used with permission from THORS eLearning Solutions.In lieu of homework assignments, students were assigned THORS courses (Tab. 1)corresponding to hands-on and active lecture components. Students were given 3 weeks tocomplete each course. Their Post-Assessment score was established as the grade for the self-learning component of the course.Table 1: THORS courses assigned during semester. Students were given 3 weeks to completeeach course
common cuts needed by Facility 1. A typical frogcontains two or more of the cuts shown in Table 1. Table 1. Twenty-Four Common Rail Cuts Used in Frog Manufacturing in Facility 1 16' 6 9/32" 54' 7" 38' 3" 36' 6 5/8" 32' 4" 49' 7" 29' 10 ½” 63' 1" 54' 10" 25' 1" 30' 2" 63' 2" 30' 6" 16' 6" 26' 0" 15' 0" 24' 0" 51' 4" 62' 0" 35' 0" 59' 6" 39' 7" 46' 10" 45' 5"Figure 4 shows cutting of an 80' long rail to yield the desired cut lengths. Figure 4. A Rail Being Cut into Required Lengths for Use in Frog ManufacturingSample Problem 1.29' 10 ½" (A), 36' 6 5/8" (B), 38' 3" (C), 54' 7" (D
learning activities within technology education. Theauthor concluded that the highest ranked strategy was the one with product-oriented andlaboratory-based content. The second highest rank was for strategy using technology focus, andthe lowest was for strategy that relied heavily on classroom orientation.Having hands-on laboratory is one condition, but the laboratory practices should be relevant toprepare graduates for their manufacturing career. Miller3 surveyed 25 department heads of USmanufacturing programs and concluded that an exemplary manufacturing program should: a) Require more technical coursework, b) Require or strongly encourage cooperation with industry, c) Maintain closer relationships with industry, d) Has more manufacturing
studentand university names provided in this paper are pseudonyms. The student pseudonyms werecreated to include the race and gender of the participant. For example, if a student indicated thatthey were Black on the demographic survey, their pseudonym would begin with the letter B. Inaddition, if they indicated that they are a female, we would give them a name that generallycorresponds with that gender. In the case of a student who indicated that they are female and Black,a name such as Becky would be used. If they checked more than one race, their name would beginwith the letter M to represent multiracial. Table 1-Student ethnicity by gender Table 1 Student Ethnicity by Gender
manufacturing or other related fields withincolleges of Engineering in a reasonably representative manner.Popescu (2012) outlines the following five attributes for engineering students to be successful ina global environment: a) ability to appreciate other cultures; b) ability to work in diverse teamenvironments; c) ability to communicate in cross culture environments; d) experience orexposure to engineering in a global context; and e) ability to deal with ethical issues emanatingfrom cultural and national differences. Specking et al. (2013) performed a comparative study oftwo universities (University of Arkansas, a public university, and Stevens Institute ofTechnology, a private university) to investigate as to what factor(s) is (are) keeping
.Stacked bar codes: Consists of multiple rows of conventional barcodes stacked on top of eachother, and 2. Matrix symbolizes; Consists of 2-D patterns of data cells that are usually square andare colored dark or white. (a) (b) Figure 2: (a) 2-D stacked bar code and (b) 2-D Matrix barcode (Data Matrix)QR code is a two-dimensional barcode defined by the industrial standard ISO/IEC18004:2006,developed and protected by the Japanese company Denso Wave Incorporated, which is a memberof Toyota group. Each QR code is structured by dark (logical ‘‘1’’) and light (logical ‘‘0’’)modules. The modules additional data from the database if needed, which the producers providedfor each
. Halverson, E. & Sheridan, K. The maker movement in education. Harv. Educ. Rev. 84, 495–504 (2014).27. Peppler, K., Maltese, A., Keune, A., Chang, S. & Regalla, L. The maker ed open portfolio project: Survey of Makerspaces, Part II. Open Portfolios (2015).28. NGSS Lead States. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. (2013).29. Meehan, R., Gravel, B. & Shapiro, B. Card-sorting task to establish community values in designing makerspaces. (2014). at 30. Morocz, R. et al. University Maker Spaces: Discovery, Optimization and Measurement of Impacts. 122nd ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. (2015).31. Sheridan, K. et al. Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harv. Educ
University of Arizona.Dr. Fei-Yue Wang, Chinese Academy of SciencesDr. Wangping Sun, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Wangping is a professor of Oregon Institute of Technology.Dr. Xisong Dong, Qingdao Academy of Intelligent Industries Xisong Dong received the B. Sc. degree in applied mathematics in 2001 and Ph. D. degree in control theory and control engineering in 2007 from the University of Science and Technology Beijing, China. He worked as a post-doctor at the Center of Information Security from 2007 to 2010 in Beijing University of Posts and Communications, China. He is currently an Assistant Professor at the State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of
innovative ways; and that requirea knowledge of standard operating procedures. Narrowly defined activities are those that involvelimited resources, that involve the use of conventional processes and materials in new ways, andthat require a knowledge of basic operating processes.For associate degree programs, these student outcomes must include, but are not limited to, thefollowing learned capabilities: a. an ability to apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to narrowly defined engineering technology activities; b. an ability to apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require limited application of principles but
, physical keys (e.g., smart cards andsmart card readers), the supporting server infrastructure, and the related locking mechanismsthemselves (e.g., magnetic or electromechanical locks). With careful planning, design, testing,and deployment, the advantage can be tilted back in favor of active defenders so long as theyare willing to consider the security of the system as a whole and not only its parts.REFERENCES 1. Das, S., and Beaman, J. Direct selective laser sintering of metals, January 2004. 2. Hull, C. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography, March 1986. 3. Laxton, B., Wang, K., and Savage, S. Reconsidering physical key secrecy: Teleduplication via optical decoding. 4. TOOOL. Assa twin
to en- hance Drexel’s Engineering Technology course offerings. Eric is currently pursuing a Ph.D in Computer Engineering at Drexel, and is an author of several technical papers in the field of Engineering Technology Education.Prof. Brandon B. Terranova, Drexel University Dr. Terranova is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the College of Engineering at Drexel University. In his current role, he is the lead instructor for the freshman engineering program, and oversees activities in the Innovation Studio, a large-area academic makerspace. He has taught and developed courses in general engineering and mechanical engineering at Drexel. Prior to Drexel, he has taught and developed courses in physics and mathematics
summer camps will also be involved. 10Dr. A.C. Megri ASEE 2018 paper ID: 22318 (a) Presentation during the camp (b) Active learning (c ) Small 3D-printer (d) Student Presentation(e) Student Presentation (f) Student with an iPad price for best presentation 11Dr. A.C. Megri ASEE 2018 paper ID: 22318(d)(g) Sample of student work (h) Sample of student work Figure 3: Pictures from the Summer CampReferences:Lawrence E. Carlson, and Jacquelyn F
Paper ID #30461Preparing the Future Workforce in Advanced Manufacturing: The Case ofSouth KoreaMr. Sang Hoo Oh, Florida State University Sang Hoo Oh is a Ph.D. student at the Florida State University School of Information. Sang Hoo is also a research assistant at the Florida State University Information Institute. Prior coming to the Florida State University, he received B.S. in Public Policy from Indiana University and M.S. in Information Systems form Yonsei University, South Korea. His research interests include advanced manufacturing, information policy, and big data.Dr. Marcia A. Mardis, Florida A&M University
conditionis met. Make sure that the curve passes through the required intermediate points. B C A K E H D J I G F (a) sketch broken as curve segments (b) nodal points forming the polygon B C A K E
engineering and technology courses at undergraduate and graduate levels. His tremendous re- search experience in manufacturing includes environmentally conscious manufacturing, Internet based robotics, and Web based quality. In the past years, he has been involved in sustainable manufacturing for maximizing energy and material recovery while minimizing environmental impact.Dr. Michael G Mauk P.E., Drexel University Michael Mauk is Assistant Professor in Drexel University’s Engineering Technology program.Mr. carlos michael ruiz, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Senior Design Project in Fabrication of Microfluidic HIV/Zika Viral Load
Paper ID #18363Innovative Manufacturing Education Experience for First-Year EngineeringStudents: Using a Seminar Course and Volunteerism to Enhance Manufac-turing SkillsMr. Eric Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Eric Holloway currently serves as the Senior Director of Industry Research in the College of Engineering at Purdue University, where he focuses on industry research in the College of Engineering. From 2007-2013, Eric served as the Managing Director and the Director of Instructional Laboratories in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. As Director, he was in
(other questions) Indirect Assessment (Consider 5 being extremely well and 1 being not at all) Student Self-Assessment of Course Learning (a) (b) (c) (d) Objectives 9. Do you have access to a device for learning 6 6 0 0 virtually? 10. What device do you use for virtual 5 7 0 0 summer camp?Figure 1: the participant of the survey (parents and students)Figure 2: Presentation survey (content, and visual) responses Figure 3: Presentation survey (Presentation skills and organization) responsesConclusions:The summer camp took place virtually, due to the COVID pandemic. Our goal is not only toprepare for a successful summer camp but to create a summer camp model
Paper ID #22050MAKER: Designing and Building a Prosthetic Hand for a High School Engi-neering Design CourseMr. Seref Yagli, Harmony Public School I have coached four different robotics clubs this school year, which are: Wex’s robotics club, FTC (First Tech Challenge) club, FRC (First Robotics Competition), and SeaPerch Underwater Robotics. My teams have won championships, as well as technical and designing awards at FLL competitions. I also began teaching Robotics and Automation and Concepts of Engineering and Technology, classes in which stu- dents learn to apply engineering and designing skills as well as robotic coding