sufficient understanding of the Body of Knowledge (Technical Materials Science Body content) in materials science necessary for practical application in the of Knowledge Mechanical Engineering profession. a. Basic classification, structure, properties, processing, and performance of engineering materials (metals, polymers, ceramics, composites) b. Periodic table of elements, atomic bonding, and crystalline structure. c. Grain structure, crystalline defects and strengthening mechanisms. d. Fundamental principles and mechanisms of diffusion in solids. e. Mechanical behavior of materials including stress-strain curves, elastic and
curator. a) b) Page 12.704.2Figure 1. a) The SciTechatorium at the Bellvue Santa-Fe K-6 Charter school in Avila,CA houses b) numerous demos and items that promote scientific inquiry for all ages.The SciTechatorium is open for a few hours per week (depending on docent volunteers),and is available to the K-6 students during recess and lunch. The children can come inand spend as much (or little) time as they wish to take out the reptiles, use the computers,look at displays, talk to Chick and the docents, and play with any of the numerousinteractive items at the museum. The museum is an amazingly fun and inviting
material based upon previous knowledge that they may have.To measure student learning, pre- and post- Materials Concept Inventory (MCI) exams wereadministered. The MCI is a 30-minute, multiple choice exam that is available on-line and measuresstudents’ conceptual knowledge and reasoning. A sample MCI question regarding electrical conductivitybetween aluminum and glass is as follows: Aluminum is a better electrical conductor than is glass becausealuminum: a) has more total electrons per volume b) has more conducting electrons per volume c) haselectrons which move faster d) has electrons which move slower e) has more conducting electrons pervolume and they move faster than those in glass. The topics in the MCI exams are as listed in Table 3
occurrence of thesefast motions within their sport that results in injury of the forearm muscles. After somebackground on the problem, it is recommended that the biology of the muscle be discussed, witha focus on explaining that tendons carry tensile forces from muscle to bone, with the collagenfibrils contained within tendons accounting for the mechanical resistance to tension.15 Finally,a See example introduction presentation in the supporting information (S1).b If the activity is used for women outreach purposes the project can be shifted to create an implant for female Page 26.1.3athletes.depending on the group of students, the
using a formula used for a similar process.They discovered that the formula does not hold, so they augmented it to account for losses due tothe oil flow between the electrodes. Thus, the discovery-based learning objectives dealing withthe production of carbon nanotubes using electric discharge machining are satisfied. Studentcomments are positive. The described experimental setup is inexpensive and reproducible.Acknowledgments This project was supported in part by NSF Grant 0407289.Bibliography1. M. Meyyappan, editor, Carbon Nanotubes Science and Applications, CRC Press, 2005.2. Wood, J., “The top ten advances in materials science,” Materials Today, vol. 11, No. 1-2, pp. 40-45, Jan-Feb. 2008.3. B. McCarthy, The 4MAT System
: Personality, well-being, and self-efficacy,” Scand. J. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 43–48, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00826.x.[9] Y. Tong and S. Song, “A study on general self-efficacy and subjective well-being of low SES-college students in a Chinese university.,” Coll. Stud. J., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 637–643, 2004.[10] M. Sherer, J. Maddux, B. Mercandante, S. Prentice-Dunn, B. Jacobs, and R. Rogers, “The Self-efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation,” Psychol. Rep., vol. 51, pp. 663–671, 1982.[11] P.-H. Hsieh, J. Sullivan, D. Sass, and N. Guerra, “Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Beliefs, Coping Strategies, and Academic Performance,” vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 196–218, 2012.[12] C. Vogt, D. Hocevar, and L. Hagedorn, “A
into curriculum. At this point in the discussion, manymainstream faculty metaphorically throw their hands up and say, “I do not have the time tochange everything, including all of my teaching and testing methods.” We claim that eachprofessor does not have to re-invent the wheel. In fact, by a limited literature search many topicsnow have active learning templates that are easy to follow and integrate.Two diverse student populations from two geographically distant campuses were surveyed.Faculty from two different universities, a mid-size HBCU population, University A and a largestate school, University B, implemented the following three easy-to-employ active learningtechniques: 1) Process Oriented class worksheets, 2) Concept-in-Context
(n=24 students) and (B) stress relaxation lab (n=28students). Both post-tests scores were significantly higher (p<0.05) than the respective pre-test scores. The errors barsrepresent the 95% confidence interval.6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1245595.7. REFERENCES1. Williams D. The Williams Dictionary of Biomaterials. Liverpool: Liverpool UniversityPress; 1999.2. Polymer Characterization Techniques.247-56.3. Ratner B, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials Science: AMultidisciplinary Endeavor. Biomaterials Science: A Introduction to Materials in Medicine. SanDiego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 1-9.4. Moss A. Use of Selected
, 2015).6. Trenor, J. & Pierrakos, O. Utilizing a social cognitive theoretical framework to investigate the influences of a summer undergraduate research experience on participants’ academic and career plans. in 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 - June 24, 2008 (American Society for Engineering Education, 2008).7. Nadelson, L. S., Warner, D. & Brown, E. Life’s Lessons in the Lab: A Summer of Learning from Undergraduate Research Experiences. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 16, (2015).8. Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L. & Seymour, E. Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Sci. Ed. 91, 36–74 (2007).9
-College- Students-Need-Now/248882[2] B. Bayne. “Adjusted Syllabus.” https://docs.google.com/document/d/1- 6d_W8rdzE9mW2DvPi-dPvRxo4sekKlz3VqEpnu4Dwg/edit (retrieved March 30, 2020).[3] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[4] L. L. Wu et al., “Rapidly Converting a Project-Based Engineering Experience for Remote Learning: Successes and Limitations of Using Experimental Kits and a Multiplayer Online Game,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 4, 2020.[5] S. L. Leung, B. A. Hargrove, E. R. Marsh, A. R. Gregg, and K. A. Thole, “Prompting by COVID-19 to Rethink the
walker (they are distributed randomly in the y-direction to make it easier to see themall). The Displacement Distribution graph shows the distribution of displacements in the xdimension and shows the characteristic binomial distribution over time. The NetLogo code usedto run this model is shown in the bottom right of Figure 2. Each time step, agents are asked toface either to the left or the right and then to move forward by 0.5 units. Students predict whatthe distribution will look like and then run the model to check their predictions. a) b) c) d) Figure 2: A NetLogo model of random-walk in
Using a Flipped Classroom Model ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA. 10.18260/p.24811[5] Swift, T. M. and B. Jean Wilkins (2014). A Partial Flip, A Whole Transformation: Redesigning Sophomore Circuits. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN, ASEE.[6] Clemens, B. M., C. Nivargi, et al. (2013). "Adventures with a Flipped Classroom and a Materials Science and Engineering MOOC : “Fools Go Where Angels Fear to Tread”." Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 1583.[7] Marks, J., K. J. Ketchman, et al. (2014). Understanding the Benefits of the Flipped Classroom in the Context of Sustainable Engineering. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN, ASEE.[8] Mason, G. S., T. R
. Example problem videos by graduatestudents, 3. Cornell notes, note-taking framework handouts, 4. Tempered glass lecturedemonstration, 5. Online homework problems, and 6. New in-class slides for lectures. a. Online “Khan Academy Style videos (KSV)”Of the eight students who participated in the study, most found the fracture synopsis videos to beconcise and helpful for a quick review of challenging concepts. The fact that the videos wereshort was a distinct advantage. However, these videos were introduced later in the semester as ameans of review; students wished that they had been made available earlier to complement theirfirst experience learning the topic. b. Example problem videos by graduate studentsThe example video problems were
Teaching Innovation Professorship. The authors would like tothank the students for their feedback. This study complied with the University of Toronto’spolicies on research ethics.7.0 References[1] K. Barns , R. C. Marateo, and S. P. Ferris, “Teaching and Learning with the Net Generation,”Innovate: Journal of Online Education, vol. 3, no. 4, April 2007.[2] M. Prensky, “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants,” On the Horizon, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 67–85,Oct. 2001.[3] B. Mitra, J. Lewin-Jones, H. Barrett & S. Williamson, ‘The use of video to enable deeplearning”, Research in Post-compulsory Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 405- 414, July 2010[4] A. Clifton, and C. Mann, “Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning”, Nurse EducationToday, vol. 31, no. 4
reinforced. The revision in 2011 aligned the program withthe current educative model of the UANL11, which is based on: (a) Learning-centered education(b) Competencies-based education, (c) Flexibility, (d) Internationalization and (e) Academicinnovation. This model aims at promoting the transition from a traditional knowledge-orientedapproach to a methodology that seeks the development of skills and competencies, the curriculumflexibility is reinforced, the internationalization processes are taken into account as well as thestudent exchange and mobility. The current version of the program consist of a total of 220credits distributed in 10 semesters. According to both the Educative and Academic Model of theUANL, one credit is equivalent to 30 hours of
Page 24.177.4of 48 hours. a b d c e Figure 2.Steps for creating the composite test specimen. Figure 4. The 3-point bending jig.Figure 3.The universal testing machine (Instron 5800 series). Then the sample was placed in the universal testing machine shown in Figure 3 (Instron Model 5567), using a 3-point bending jig with a span of 20 mm and a cross-head speed of 2mm/min Page
group has an especially high confidencein their understanding of class topics.Table 14 shows a breakdown of final grades in the course. The highest concentration of gradesfor distance students was at the ‘C’ grade, with over 10% of distance students in the D/F/Wcategory. In contrast, no on-campus students finished in the D/F/W range and over 80% finishedin the ‘A’ or ‘B’ ranges. With the exception of the semester project, the average grade forcampus students was higher in each of the grading categories than for distance students(homework, exams, final exam). The difference was smallest on the final exam (72.9% vs.72.5%) and largest in the homework category (108.1% vs. 91.4%). The greater than 100%average on homework for campus students reflects
aredependent upon leveraging the motivation and enthusiasm of materials professionalsrepresenting regional universities, professional organizations, business, and industry. This paper will provide an overview of the West Houston Center, and the REEMS andREEMS REU programs: 1. The West Houston Science and Engineering Center 2. REEMS Program Timeline, Student Demographics, and Activities a. Recruitment b. Demographics c. Academic Year Activities d. Transfer Guidance e. Networking f. REEMS REU 3. Evaluation Methodologies & Impacts a. Discussion of Evaluation Instruments b. REU Student Focus Group Remarks c. REU Faculty Focus Group
://www.blommer.com/_documents/Chocolate-Fat-Bloom-article.pdf [December 2, 2015][10] G. Talbot, Vegetable Fats in Chocolate, http://northamerica.ioiloders.com/images/papers/Vegetable_Fats_in_Chocolate_-_IFI_Dec_2003_tcm40- 3623.pdf [December 2, 2015][11] Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) Criteria: http://www.abet.org/eac-criteria-2015-2016/[12] A.Wexler, “Chocolate Makers Fight Melting Supply,” The Wall Street Journal. January 14, 2016.http://www.wsj.com/articles/chocolate-makers-fight-a-melting-supply-of-cocoa-1452738616 [January 30, 2016][13] Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 2, Subchapter B “Food for Human Consumption” Part 163 “Cacao Products” Subpart B “Requirements for Specific Standardized Cacao Products. 21CFR163.130
AC 2009-313: REDESIGNING A JUNIOR-LEVEL MATERIALS PROCESSINGLABORATORY COURSE TO AID STUDENTS IN APPLYING THEORY TOPRACTICEDiane Folz, Virginia Tech Diane Folz is a Senior Research Associate and Laboratory Instructor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Virginia Tech. She also is the faculty advisor for the Material Advantage Student Professional Organization and of the Journal of Undergraduate Materials Research (JUMR). In addition to teaching the materials processing laboratories, she mentors at least one team each year in their senior capstone project.Christine Burgoyne, Virginia Tech Christine Bala Burgoyne is the Assistant Director and Instructor of the
understandingof class topics.Final course grades are shown in Table 12. A much higher percentage of DEDP students fellinto the D/F/W category compared to the campus cohort. Over a third of campus studentsreceived grades of ‘A’ compared to about 22% for distance students. The average class grade inthe on-campus group was 84.5% and the average grade in the distance group was 80.3%. Thehighest grades in each cohort were 97.4% (campus) and 94.0% (distance), respectively.Table 12: Final grades in the course DEDP Campus D/F/W 26.1% 12.8% C 21.7% 10.6% B 30.4% 42.6
Page 15.830.11Bibliography1 Pijpers TFJ, Mathot VBF, Goderis B, Scherrenberg RL, van der Vegte EW, “High-speed calorimetry for the study of the kinetics of (De)vitrification, crystallization, and melting of macromolecules” Macromolecules 2002, 35, 3601-3613.2 Danley RL, Caulfield PA, Aubuchon SR, “A rapid-scanning differential scanning calorimeter” American Laboratory 2008, 40, 9-11. Page 15.830.12
2006-2496: A CASE STUDY OF MULTI-AGENT-BASED SIMULATION INUNDERGRADUATE MATERIALS SCIENCE EDUCATIONPaulo Blikstein, Northwestern University Doctoral student at the Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling at the School of Education and Social Policy (Northwestern University).Uri Wilensky, Northwestern University Associate Professor at the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and at the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwestern University. Director of the Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling (CCL). Page 11.11.1© American
teaching. John Wiley & Sons; 2010. 336 p.12. Darling-Hammond L, Barron B, Pearson PD, Schoenfeld AH, Stage EK, Zimmerman TD, Cervetti GN, Tilson JL. Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. John Wiley & Sons. 2015 288 p.13. Chi, M. T., Hutchinson, J. E., & Robin, A. F. How inferences about novel domain-related concepts can be constrained by structured knowledge. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1989. pp. 27-62.14. National Research Council. Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 200115. Koedinger KR, Roll I. Learning to think: Cognitive mechanisms of knowledge transfer. The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. 2012:789
test matrix in evaluating spatial visualizationability of students in mixed reality environment. The work will them involve the implementation of the Holo-MSE app in introductorymaterial science course to teach the selected concepts. Students will be asked to utilize theapp, interact with holograms and take built-in quizzes for each module (Crystal structures andMiller indices). Their performance will be compared with the historical student performancedata for the two concepts as well as with a control group where the mode of instruction willbe intentionally kept traditional, i.e. reliance on 2D drawings and video animations.5. References[1] G. M. Bodner and R. B. Guay, “The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test,” Chem. Educ., vol
, deforming the specimens at a greater rate is expected to lead to a morebrittle, elastic response overall while deforming the specimens at a reduced rate is expected tocause a more ductile, viscous response.Activity results and discussionTable 1 reports the average mechanical properties of the parallel and perpendicular PETEsamples, and representative stress-strain curves are shown in Figure 4 (with the full data setshown in Appendix B). In general, the parallel specimens displayed greater stiffness and strengthcompared to the perpendicular specimens. Parallel specimens consistently deformed in a ductilemanner, exhibiting relatively large deformation magnitudes following yielding and large εfvalues. An image of a parallel specimen following fracture
undergraduate, 104 post-graduate programs andthe remaining are diploma and certificate programs. The University has introduced severalemerging degree programs such as a B. Tech. in Biomedical, an M. Pharm. in Biotechnology anda Masters in Optometry. The continuous success of quality of the BVDU programs resulted inreaccreditation with a prestigious 'A' grade by the National Assessment and AccreditationCouncil (NAAC) in September 2011. The BVDU – JSNN partnership in nanotechnology is through its College of Engineering.Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University‟s College of Engineering, Pune (BVDUCOE) wasestablished in 1983. It is one of the oldest colleges in the Pune area and has the highestenrollment for freshman engineering in the state of
sourcedparts (e.g., from [20], [21]). The UMTK, including its three current test configurations, areshown in Figure 1. The technical specifications and price of the machine are summarized inTable 1. Image of an assembled UMTK is shown in Appendix A.Figure 1: Rendered CAD model of the UMTK, showing (A) the linear actuator, (B) load cell,(C) emergency stop, (D) linear scale, (E) the custom printed circuit board (PCB) from a topview. The red squares highlight different configurations of the UMTK. (F) is configured fortensile test, (G) for compression test, and (H) for three-point flexural test. Table 1: Technical Specifications of the UMTK Maximum Load 1.5 kN Stroke Length
Foundation (Grant#EEC- Page 12.367.140530760). The views expressed within this paper are solely those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Valuable contributions weremade to some of the project-based learning activities by Katherine Chen, Blair London, TrevorHarding and William Hughes.References1. Brito, C., and C. Tenente, “Working with Projects in Engineering Education,” Proceedings ofthe 1999 ASEE Annual Conference: Engineering Education to Serve the World, June 20-23,1999, pp. 5765-5773.2. London, B., Chen, K.C. and Vanasupa, L., "Materials Selection for the Life Cycle - A NewCourse
Manganin 48.2 x10-8 Silicon* 0.1-60 ... -8 Lead 22 x10 Glass 1-10000 x109 Hard rubber 1-100 x1013 Quartz (fused) 7.5 x1017 Stainless Steel 5 X10-5 b. Experiment Procedure: Thermal Conductivity and Specific Heat CapacityIn the next section, the concepts that relate heat, the material properties of thermal conductivityand molar heat capacity, and the ‘sea of electrons’. The equations that relate the power transmittedthrough the surface of a sample, the temperature of the surfaces of a sample