reasons for selecting a pump test and PTC 8.2 for this exercise. Perhaps themost obvious is that there is a pump available and it had been used in the course many timesbefore! Another is that space constraints in the laboratory usually require that the pump testingset-up be disassembled after use in a given Spring semester so that it must be (can be)reassembled by the students for “their” pump test. Besides these, there are also reasons thatderive from PTC 8.2 itself. Unlike many other PTCs, PTC 8.2 provides for two levels of testing;a “Type A” test and a “Type B” test. Type A testing is similar to most other PTC tests; it isintended to be run on large equipment (in this case, a boiler feed pump) in the as-installedcondition and it requires
conductivity characterization of supported and suspended graphene while publishing in such journals as Nano Letters, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Heat Transfer, Physical Review B, and Science. As a Thermal Ad- visory Engineer for IBM’s Systems & Technology Group from 2011 to 2013 he designed and developed electronics thermal management solutions from the die level up to full server systems. Dr. Moore joined the mechanical engineering faculty at Louisiana Tech in September of 2013. He holds a joint appointment with the Institute for Micromanufacturing (IfM) where he works on advanced materials and devices for energy applications with an emphasis on nanoscale thermal energy transport. His graduate school focus
hiredto help run the study group. In these arrangements, the faculty-lead facilitated study groups forStatics and Thermodynamics have one faculty and two TAs, and each FSG is a weekly studysession open to all students who want to be involved in small peer group learning environment,get help for their homework, and improve their understanding of course materials. TAs arerecommended by the teaching faculty in the related subject areas, and those chosen all havepreviously completed the course with an earned grade of B+ and above.The paper presents our findings in running the faculty driven peer FSGs for Statics andThermodynamics. Of all eligible students who registered for these courses, more than 20% of thestudents participated in the FSGs. Post
of these tests Page 25.1027.8was to determine how efficiently the participants could complete each task. 72. A survey questionnaire was administered to students enrolled in the courses designedto assess the students' satisfaction with the website. (a) (b) Figure 7: (a) Some of the instruments (DMAs and impactors) to characterize particle losses during transportation. (b) Aerosol size distribution monitoring under workplace conditions. (a) (b)Figure
group then divides into two individual groups for thefirst C-Sketch sessions. The group is split by each participant taking a sheet of butcher paperfrom a back table in the room randomly labeled with either “A” or “B”. Before breaking theassembly into the individual groups, the facilitator reviews the rules for the C-Sketchingsessions, which will be identical for both sessions and are: (1) criticism is not allowed, (2) “wildideas” are welcomed, (3) build off each others’ ideas; similar rules to Osborn’s brainstorming[40,39]. Page 22.1350.11 Figure 3 - Figure Depicting the Design Problem
. Biomass suspensions collected from wastewater 10 treatment plants or laboratory nitrifying B bioreactors are aerated with pure oxygen gas 5 before aliquots of nanoparticles and 0 substrate (e.g., glucose, NH4+-N) are 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 injected into the vessels. A decrease in the Time, (h) dissolved oxygen (DO) level in the vessel due to substrate oxidation will be recorded
mechanical engineering program outcomes – what students are expected to know andbe able to do by the time of graduation. Old criteria simply required students to complete coursesin specific areas, new criteria requires departments to identify specific outcomes related to theprogram. It was critical at this step to identify outcomes that could be both measurable andassessable. After much discussion, faculty chose to approve the outcomes identified by ABET asa-k and mechanical engineering outcomes l-o.ABET Outcomes Our Mechanical Engineering graduates will have: (a) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) An ability to design a
Paper ID #16469Enabling Machine Design Innovation among Freshman Mechanical Engi-neering StudentsProf. Anurag Purwar, Stony Brook University Dr. Purwar received his Ph.D. from State University of New York at Stony Brook and his B. Tech from IIT Kanpur, both in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests are in machine design area with a focus on kinematic design of robots and mechanisms, CAD/CAM, and application of Computational Geometry, Virtual Reality (VR), Computer Graphics and Visualization in Design Engineering. Dr. Purwar’s research work has been published in several international journals and conferences and he
change, and forthe most part, they remain intact. This strongly suggests that either a) the attempted solutions sofar have not address the root causes, or b) the solutions that worked, or worked partially, havenot been adapted by a sufficiently wide population of university instructors such that a clearimprovement in students’ performance at the national level is achieved. In general, none of theattempts seemed to be comprehensive- each targeted certain concepts and/or principles. Inaddition, engineering thermodynamics textbooks have not been affected by the attemptedsolutions described above.9. The Makeup and Root Causes of Thermodynamics Learning ProblemsBefore proposing more solutions, it is critical to diligently attempt to a) correctly
using a digital protractor and alsomeasure the lengths of the links. After they collected the necessary geometric data, they were tomake a sketch of the system and determine the Instantaneous Center of Rotation (ICR). Thelaboratory assignment gives the students the velocity of point B at an instant in time and thestudents were then asked to find the velocity at point C using the ICR. The purpose of thislaboratory was to present a real-world system that uses some theoretical concepts such asdetermining an Instantaneous Center of Rotation, Rigid Body Motion, Relative VelocityCalculation and Angular Velocity Calculation. The students seemed to enjoy this laboratory andworked very well in their groups to determine the solutions to the questions
0.10 0.00Since MMC condition is typically implemented in drawings when components are to befabricated using conventional subtractive manufacturing techniques/tools to reduce scrap, thebonus tolerance should be determined and the functional requirements of the component shouldbe assessed with this additional allowance in variation.3. 3D Computer ModelThe 3D computer model of the functional gage designed for this application is shown in Figure5. It is assumed the variation of the simulated cylindrical datum A and planar datum B are muchless compared to the variation of the surfaces of the part making contact with the simulateddatums of the functional gage. Datum A Gage pins at
toaccompany some of the weekly homeworks. A typical Livescript document includes a code thatproduces a dynamically adjustable figure either (a) of symbolically defined functions thatstudents can input, such as the components of a velocity field or the volumetric pressure functionas shown in Figure 1, or (b) of a mathematical model of an engineering system such as the rocketnozzle shown in Figure 2. With these activities students had to attend to the significance ofmathematical derivations and models and to consider how changes in the behavior of a system(of equations) is explainable.Figure 1. A snapshot of the livescript developed to accompany a homework problem on velocity field and volumetric pressure.Figure 2. A
the program outcomes2. Table 2 presents the relationshipbetween the seven mechanical engineering courses selected for this study and the programoutcomes.Table 1 Mechanical Engineering Program Outcomes ABET Criteria a. Apply knowledge of Mathematics, Science, and Engineering b. Ability to design and conduct experiments; Analyze and interpret data c. Design system, component, or process to meet needs d. Function on multidisciplinary teams e. Identify, formulate and solve engineering problems f. Understand professional and ethical responsibility g. Ability to communicate effectively h. Broad education necessary to understand impact of engineering solutions i
about students’undergraduate degree and in the second part questions were asked about students’ perception oftheir knowledge of the topics covered in a two-semester course sequence offered at UTSA.The first part of the survey asked the following questions: Please circle the appropriate answers o I am: (a) undergraduate student (b) MS student (c) PhD student o My undergraduate degree was/is in: (a) mechanical engineering (b) Other degree (specify) ______________ o As an undergraduate student I took (a) no (b) one or (c) two thermodynamic courses. o If a graduate student, I received my undergraduate degree at (a) UTSA (b) Other institution (specify
reads as follows:Original Problem and AnalysisA well-insulated rigid tank contains 6 lbm of saturated liquid-vapor mixture of water at 35 psia.Initially, three-quarters of the mass is in the liquid phase. An electric resistance heater placed inthe tank is turned on and kept on until all the liquid in the tank is vaporized. Assuming thesurroundings to be at 75°F and 14.7 psia, determine (a) the exergy destruction and (b) thesecond-law efficiency for the process.A simple schematic for the problem is shown in Figure 1, along with a (T-v) diagram illustrating Page 22.1120.4the thermodynamic process. (a
met. Each interview lastedabout 15 to 30 minutes. Once the interviews were transcribed, each question response wasanalyzed. Thematic coding was performed to determine patterns between the instructors and toestablish any themes of the instructor’s experiences. The main focus of this study was tounderstand how VOH affected the course design and student learning. Institutional ReviewBoard (IRB) approval was issued prior to the beginning of the study.A recording of a session in one of the classes can be viewed here:https://boisestate.techsmithrelay.com/kJY4ResultsProfessor A taught Circuit Analysis and Design in Electrical and Computer Engineering,professor B taught Heat Transfer in Mechanical Engineering, and professor C taught twosections of
Computational Tools A. Spreadsheets B. Flow chartsTable 2: Learning objectives based on FE Mechanical Practice Test questions on ComputationalTools Question Learning objectives 10 Predict the contents of a spreadsheet cell when copied with automatic cell referencing. 11 Predict the result of algebraic calculations in spreadsheets. 12 Interpret pseudocode that employs if statements and loops. 13 Interpret flowcharts.subject is operationally defined on the FE, I wrote learning objectives to describe thecompetencies assessed in each FE Mechanical Practice Exam question on these subjects; thelearning objectives are shown
.ggpht.com/yKDLwvyFupAnpbdHd6vj5PWsshMoOFnLC16h9MLZE8nqd4xJL8znvsTB7IsWXM79Ag=w300.2 J. M. Shafritz et al., “A Theory of Human Motivation,” in Classics of Public Adminsitration, 5th ed., Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 2004, ch. 2, sec. 15, pp. 123-129.3 B. Bloom, “Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain,” in Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: McKay, 1956.4 R. C. Overbaugh, L. Shultz, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Norfolk, VA: Online. Available FTP:http://ww2.odu.edu/educ/roverbau/Bloom/fx_Bloom_New.jpg.5 Y. A. Ҁengel, M. A. Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 7th ed., Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill,2001.6 B. Gerstman, t Table, San Jose, CA. Online. Available FTP: http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/gerstman/StatPrimer/t-table.pdf
students to work backwards from an analysis of skid marks left onthe road to determine which driver was at fault and whether either driver had been speedingbefore the crash. The hypothetical crash site was situated at a familiar intersection just off-campus, and students were told that the two cars stuck together completely after crashing.OEMP-2 was broken into parts (a)-(d), assigned across three subsequent homework assignments(A & B were assigned together): A. Estimate reasonable ranges of parameters for the weight of the two vehicles involved in the crash and the coefficient of friction between the tires and ground, and justify those ranges B. Use the length of the skid marks and the parameters estimated in
12.1361.6available data in both courses was limited to course enrollment. Table 3 lists students’ writtencomments. Table 2. Grade Comparison for the Two Styles of Teaching Heat Transfer Semester A B C D F Fall 2005* 2 (14.3%) 4 (28.6%) 5 (35.6%) 3 (21.4%) 0 (without industrial partnership Fall 2006** (with 2 (18.2%) 5 (45.5%) 1 (9%) 3 (27.2%) 0 industrial partnership) Number of students in the course = 9.**Number of students in the course = 11. Table 3: Students’ Written Responses________________________________________________________________________What teaching strategies used by the professor helped
? • Heat transfers from a hotter object to a colder object.Prior Concepts Needed a) To compress a gas, the gas will be “pushed”, adding energy to the gas by work b) If allowed, a gas will expand from high pressure to low pressure, removing energy from the gas by workKEY CONCEPT 1: What happens to temperature and pressure when a gas iscompressed? Figure 1 (a): Energy Being Added Figure 1 (b): Increased velocity of molecules Figure 2: Increased velocity of molecules increases gas temperatureIn Figure 1(a), individual low velocity molecules are shown in blue. These molecules bouncearound inside the piston chamber, colliding with each other, the walls of the cylinder, and withthe piston. The
AC 2008-499: INTEGRATING APPLICATIONS IN THE TEACHING OFFUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTSPatricia Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc Patricia B. Campbell, President of Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc, has been involved in educational research and evaluation with a focus on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education and issues of race/ethnicity, gender and disability since the mid 1970's. Dr. Campbell, formerly a professor of research, measurement and statistics at Georgia State University, has authored more than 100 publications.Eann Patterson, Michigan State University Eann Patterson taught Mechanics of Solids for twenty years at the University of Sheffield
bandwidth of 1000 Hz. The input range was set to its maximum value. Which of the following statements is most correct? a. The signal has an aliasing error b. The signal has a DC(+) offset c. The signal has a DC(-) offset d. The signal has quantization error e. a and b f. a and c g. c and d h. b and c i. b and dThe answer to this question is "g.", the signal suffers from quantization error are as well ashaving a negative DC offset. The answers to this question were compiled for both Group 2,those who performed the online laboratory experiment, and Group 3 those who did not see thisexperiment. Their answers are shown in Figure 6
questions to the instructor, engagement as shown in Table 2, and Figure 1. (a) (b) Figure 1. In-Class Work Submission for Semester I-Traditional classroom teaching (a) Number of Students Submission, (b) Student engagement percentage3.2 Semester II – Active LearningIntroduction of active learning, showed a considerable increase in student engagement up to82.5 % as shown in Table 2, and Figure 2, against 71.4 % in traditional classroom teaching.Students’ active participation established that, they learn in classroom via their discussion andexchange of questions with peers, teams and the instructor, while solving problems
' experience with FormulaSAE, SAE Mini Baja, and ASME's Human Powered Vehicle competitions.Responsibility for making the most effective educational use of a design competition is sharedbetween the students, the faculty advisor, and the competition organizers. Design competitionsbuild student enthusiasm; however, there are some things they learn that we may not want to beteaching. Some of the educational shortcomings of these activities are highlighted, withsuggestions on how to manage them. In particular, this article focuses on the risks of (a)distraction from classes, (b) a build-and-test approach, (c) advisor co-opted designs, and (d)design changes for their own sake. The influence of the advisor and the competition rules oneach of these concerns
a lathe (smooth end) and the other end cut with a torch (rough end).Figure 1 shows each of these two ends.The rod was drilled with five equally spaced temperature wells (1/8 inch diameter) to allow a K-type thermocouple to measure centerline temperature of the rod. One end of the rod was placed Page 25.15.6in contact with a bronze plate resting on a hot plate. Figure 2 shows this experimental setup.After the five thermocouple well temperatures were measured and the base plate temperaturecollected, the rod was flipped over and the temperature measurements repeated. Figure 1: a) smooth end of the rod; b) rough end of the rod
. Page 14.774.6 Joint 3, D (fixed) Joint 2, C 560 mm Joint 1, B Joint 4, A (fixed)Figure 1: Simplified mechanism of a wiper system (not to scale) D B C A Figure 2 – Path traveled by different links of the four bar crank rocker mechanism used to simulate a simplified windshield wiper system
the problem can be set such that iteration is required then this will also enhance theexercise. Appendix B is an example of such a sample question.Conclusion Engineering analyses packages are without doubt an invaluable part of the modernengineer’s armory. The ease of use of such packages combined with the ever more‘impressive’ post processing capabilities have seen a trend whereby engineers,particularly more junior engineers believe these packages can be used in isolation andtheir predictions believed in with absolute confidence. This paper re-emphasizes the importance that pre-analysis analysis or ‘guesstimation’must be given if catastrophic mistakes are to be avoided and the engineer is to retain a‘feel’ for the physical factors at
errors. Exceptionally detailed Detailed and engaging Presentation was not and engaging presentation. appropriately detailed. presentation.Fig. 2. Examples of student projects designed in TinkerCAD. (a) Medmory; (b) Smart AlarmClock; and (c) Pet Provider.Three student projects we highlight in this paper are as follows (see Fig. 2): Medmory (a) – An assistive pill dispenser for individuals with memory loss. Smart Alarm Clock (b) – A smart alarm clock for busy people has 3 different alarm settings, varying in pitch. Pet provider (c) – A device to feed, exercise and entertain pets while owners are away.The students found the projects to be both exciting and
Page 15.345.3introduction to aspects of internal and external fluid flows as well as the different formsof heat transfer and how they occur. Some of the final products can be seen in Figure 1. Figure 1. Heat exchanger designsUpon completion, the desalinators were used in a lab utilizing the first law ofthermodynamics and psychrometrics (Appendix B). During the lab student designed heatexchangers were attached to an evaporative cooler which was running with saltwater asopposed to freshwater. In the evaporative cooler air is blown through a membrane whichwas wetted with the saltwater causing water vapor to evaporate and the air temperature todecrease. This moist air then traveled over a heat exchanger through which