successfully. The contributions of the present paperare: (a) to gather these resources together in one location, (b) the establishment ofa design procedure for counter-intuitive learning activities, and (c) testing of thedesign process.At the present time, only the design process has been tested to demonstrate that ityields new activities. Ultimately, these new activities must be used in a classroomto assess their effect on students. It is possible that the activities are too simple ortoo complex. If they are too simple, they may not be counter-intuitive to manystudents. If they are too complex, they may generate high frustration and actually Page 12.37.2be
study to carry out dynamics analysis or motion simulation. Kinematical andkinetic simulation of the case in a VP environment would provide motion envelop and dead locklocation check, and will further verify design. After the design is verified through VP, parts inthe designed system will be processed in a CAM environment. So, another course such asCAD/CAM may collaborate or be offered alongside with the CMD course to achieve this. Figure3 (a) represents preliminary contents covered in a CMD approach and Figure 3 (b) shows asimple thought flow between CMD and CAD/CAM courses. Introduction to &0∋ Solid modeling Multibody Dynamics design in CAD
. Page 26.127.4BadgingBadging, or microcredentialing, is a process by which students can be evaluated on skills and knowledgeat a more granular level than a whole course. In our current educational model, when an employerreviews the transcript of a student who received a B in a class, that employer cannot distinguish whetherthat student did everything in the course pretty well, or is particularly good at some skills yet unable tocomplete other tasks12. The concept with badges, and why there is increasing interest in the potential usein education, is the ability to measure particular skills that are encompassed in a class.Moreover, badging also works to incentivize students. In Kapp’s The Gamification of Learning andInstruction[14], the argument
already havelearnt at least the basics of the FEM.A different bracket model has been used each semester. Most of these brackets are similar ingeometry to brackets that support the engine of a car. But topology optimization can be carriedout on any type of structure.1. Reverse engineering of a bracketIn this work the following labs are proposed to design a lighter version of a known bracket: a) obtain the geometry of a bracket using a laser scanner, b) carry out a topology optimization to lighten the design of a bracket, checking that the new lighter design will not fail under a specified load, and c) experimental test using a universal machine to validate stress and topology optimization carried out using
: a) Formulation b) Concept Design c) Configuration Design d) Parametric Design e) Detail Design Key Concepts: a) Form is the solution to a design problem b) Design is the set of decision making processes and activities to determine the form of an object, given the customer’s desired function. 2 Chapter 1 Introduction to Mechanical Engineering Design 3 Chapter 2 Materials. 4 Chapter 3 Shear force diagram and bending moment diagram 5 Chapter 3 Shear force diagram and bending moment diagram 6 Chapter 3 Stress, strain, stress-strain diagram, stress-strain relationships 7 Chapter 3 stresses due to axial load, bending moment, shear force and torsion
assignments are important to learning.Students rated their agreement with this statement at 4.8/5. Thus, the laboratory instilled anunderstanding of the importance of hands-on learning in the students.In Figure 3(b) student assessment of the effectiveness of laboratory exercises in achieving theiracademic goals is shown. This data is a composite response from a number of statementsincluding: S5) The Rocket lab increased my belief that testing and revision are important. S6) The statistics lab increased my understanding of statistics. S7) The circuit and temperature lab helped me better understand electrical circuit testing equipment. S8) The Drill/Tool Dissection lab increased my understanding of the relationship
. TORGteam leaders are identified, responsibilities of each team member aredefined, etc.)Budget/Schedule - If appropriate, a project budget and schedule are clearly B/Sdescribed using appropriate tools (e.g. Gantt chart, spreadsheet, etc.) Page 25.223.4 Table 1 Performance Criteria for Oral Presentationsperformance criterion, to range from 0 to 3, which can be assigned by the course instructor basedon the importance of that criterion to the particular project. The rating given for eachperformance criterion is multiplied by the weighting factor, and then the weighted scores aresummed over all the criteria to
list of assignments (Appendix A) and content map (Appendix B) were created tohelp faculty see how the material was used in other classes and ensure that courses had minimaloverlap in reading assignments.The ImplementationThe communications curriculum was initially developed and tested in a sophomore levelmechanics course, ME222. This course was identified as a good starting point because it is oneof the first engineering courses taken by Mechanical Engineers at Michigan State University.This is the first place that the Mechanical Engineering department can create a student culture ofvaluing professional communication. Additionally, at Michigan State University, the sophomoreyear is often a year where students receive little or no writing or
) student-faculty interaction b) communication c) feedback d) understanding of fundamentals e) engineering reasoningThe assessment activities have been received favorably by students. They felt that the activitieshelped them gain knowledge effectively and improved their learning curves significantly. Thatsentiment is well reflected in the final assessment surveys. The ratings have been improvinggradually since the course assessment has been implemented. The Course Assessment is one ofthe most efficient and economical assessment tools that a small or medium-sized engineeringprogram can effectively incorporate as a core assessment tool to achieve students’ learningoutcomes and the educational objectives of the program.Bibliography 1
(ASHRAE standards for example).4) The device must average the air velocity of the air in the duct with at least the number of points specified by ASHRAE standards.For this project, two teams of four students competed. To avoid replication, one requirement wasthat the physical principle of response of the device should be different. As a result, the projectshown in Figure 5-a was based on heat transfer and the prototype shown in Figure 5-b was basedon differential pressure. (a) (b)Fig. 5 Picture of Prototypes for the Duct Mounted Airflow Measurement System Project, (a)prototype based on heat transfer principles and (b) based on differential pressure.Project 2017
given application 6) Use modern engineering tools (MATLAB) to compute simulation of transient fluids problemsOther course objectives include: 7) Communicate effectively to produce professionally-quality technical reports a. Free from spelling & grammar errors and typos b. Professionally formatted with clear and consise communication c. Figures & Tables are used to convey information effectively 8) Design and Conduct Experiments, and Analyze and Interpret Data a. Attend all labs b. Complete all necessary measurements c. Complete all analysis of data (as shown in Lab Reports) 9) Be a valuable member of a team that successfully completes a group project. This
, Columbus, Ohio, USA, Paper ID #18477, pp.1-25.7. A. Mallik, S. M. M. Rahman, S. B. Rajguru, V. Kapila, “Examining the variations in the TPACK framework for teaching robotics-aided STEM lessons of varying difficulty,” in Proc. of 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 24 - 27, 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Paper ID #23190, pp.1-23.8. S. M. M. Rahman, V. J. Krishnan, V. Kapila, “Exploring the dynamic nature of TPACK framework in teaching STEM using robotics in middle school classrooms,” in Proc. of 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 25 - 28, 2017, Columbus, Ohio, USA, Paper ID #18463, pp.1-29.9. http://www.tpack.org/ Accessed April 22, 201910. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
did not respond to the postassignment.The pre and post Focus Group Interviews (Appendix B) were similar with the only differencebeing appropriate to whether the course was in progress or had been completed. After a warm upquestion, the discussion dealt with questions such as the organization of the course, working inteams, what they felt they had learned, and other parts of the experience. Four males and twofemales were in the first group and four males and one female were in the second. A summaryof the final course evaluations can be found in Appendix C.Results of AssessmentIn analyzing the pre-version of the Power Point assignment, more than 160 responses weregenerated for the first question. This is an approximation since several thoughts
different cross sections of the same shape.Evaluation of car-truck stands using Autodesk® Simulation MechanicalDesign Assumptions:Following the technical specifications for railway tracks [4], the following specificationsfor the car stand are used for the test stand. a. Distance between rails is 1435 mm. b. Distance between rail track and coach floor is 1300 mm. c. Car stand is 1000 mm long. d. Beam element type will be used for the analysis e. In order to eliminate any confusion in the strong vs. weak axis, a symmetrical cross section will be used for the optimization a. AISC 2005: Pipe Schedule 40 (STD) b. AISC 2005: Pipe Schedule 80 (XS) c. AISC 2005: Pipe XXS f. Weight of coach is 40 tons. So the
. Evans, G. L. Gray, S. Krause, J. Martin, K. C. Midkiff, B. M. Notaros, M. Pavelich, D. Rancour, T.Reed-Rhoads, P. Steif, R. Streveler and K. Wage. Progress on concept inventory assessment tools. in 33rdASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2003. Boulder, CO.8. B. M. Olds, R. A. Streveler, R. L. Miller and M. A. Nelson. Preliminary results from the development of aconcept inventory in thermal and transport science. in American Society of Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition. 2004. Salt Lake City, Utah.9. R. L. Miller, R. A. Streveler, D. Yang and A. I. S. Roman, Identifying and repairing studentmisconceptions in thermal and transport science: Concept inventories and schema training studies
differentmajors were put together to increase the diversity within each group as follows: Group A: 2robotics students, 2 mechanical engineering students and 2 masters students in mechatronicsystems and control. Group B: 2 robotics students, 1 Bio-medical engineering student, 1 masterstudent in automotive engineering and 2 masters students in mechatronic systems andcontrol.The students who took the course had taken various courses in the past that were not necessarilyneeded for their final project and more importantly there were skills that were new for somestudents. For example, robotics students had completed all their control and programming coursesand were familiar with the control strategies and robotics implementation needed for the project.For this
this case a reciprocating internal combustion engine) work? What comes in? What goes out? • Air and fuel goes in, gas, heat, and work come out. b) How does air get into the engine? • Through the intake manifold, into the carburetor, then into the cylinder through the intake valve. c) How does fuel get into the engine? • From the gas tank into the carburetor where it is mixed with air. d) How does exhaust get out of the engine? • The exhaust valve opens and the piston pushes the exhaust out through the muffler
ones. Figure 9b shows the velocityvector field at some sections of the domain. a) Pressure Contours b) Velocity Vector Field Figure 8. Sample simulations of blood flow in the human abdominal aorta.Course Web Effectiveness The effectiveness of the course (ME 437/537) website was assessed in two ways:1. Usability tests were conducted on an early version of the site and conducted again on arevised version of the site. In both tests, participants were given tasks to find coursematerial and use the calculation model available on the site. The purpose of these testswas to determine how efficiently the participants could complete each task.2. A survey questionnaire was administered to students
to evaluate the pressure-volume data from a single engine cycle for thesupermileage car. This MEA is introduced in the third week of the quarter to mostly third-yearundergraduate students. The students are told that they are to model this cycle with 4-6 simpleprocesses in order to evaluate the thermal efficiency of the engine cycle as well as recommend away to increase its efficiency. Appendix A contains the problem statement combined with thegraphic of the ‘real’ cycle plotted on a pressure and volume diagram seen in Figure 1. A pre-labwith helpful information for the students to learn beforehand is listed in Appendix B. The graphic Page
end plate. Plastic waschosen as the material for the screws to reduce heat transfer through the screws. The assembly isalso surrounded with rigid insulation (2” thick housing type insulation) on all sides except for thetop plate to ensure that the heat provided by the heater is transferred through the thermoelectricdevice and not dissipated elsewhere. The insulation is not shown on Figure 2, but it can be seenlater in Figure 4. Figure 2: (a) assembled view of thermoelectric testing device with dimensions in millimeters and (b) exploded view of thermoelectric testing device.A block diagram of the overall experimental setup is shown in Figure 3. In addition to thethermoelectric testing device
6 5 3 4 3 5 0 A B C D F Grades Figure 2: Grade distributionAs data from the recitation course is gathered, it will be compared to the baseline. Students withsimilar midterm 1 exam scores will be compared to measure the correlation between passingrates of those with and without the recitation course.Student SurveyA survey was
Undergraduate Students in Engineering through Freshman Courses, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec.2. Johnson, J., & Niemi, A. D. (2015). A First-year Attrition Survey: Why Do They Say They Are Still Leaving? ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.3. Meyer, M. & Marx, S., (2014). “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering”, Journal of engineering education, Vol. 103, Issue 4, Pages 525-548, October 20144. Skurla, C., Thomas, B., & Bradley, W., (2004). Teaching Freshman Using Design Projects and Laboratory Exercises to Increase Retention, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.5. Hall, D., et al., (2008). “Living with the Lab
following sections.A. Project Management AspectsMany of the rewarding aspects of this project were the direct result of the project’s schedule andfixed date of delivery. The student worker was given 6 weeks to design, build, and test the testbed so that it could be used as the last experiment in the Engineering Experimentation andInstrumentation course. The fact that this project was needed for a class lab experience, on adate that could not possibly change, resulted in only two possible outcomes for the project:success (operational test bed) or failure (non-operational test bed). This provided a uniqueexperience since most student projects are evaluated on degrees of success and failure (i.e. gradeof A, B, C, D, or F) instead of on overall success
;search_scope=01CALS&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine& tab=everything&query=any,contains,information%20seeking%20and%20communicating% 20behavior%20of%20scientists%20and%20engineers&sortby=rank&offset=0[8] G. J. Leckie, K. E. Pettigrew, and C. Sylvain, “Modeling the Information Seeking of Professionals: A General Model Derived from Research on Engineers, Health Care Professionals, and Lawyers on JSTOR,” Libr. Q., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 161–193, 1996.[9] W. B. Badke, “Can’t Get No Respect: Helping Faculty to Understand the Educational Power of Information Literacy,” Ref. Libr., vol. 43, no. 89–90, pp. 63–80, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1300/J120v43n89_05.[10] N. G. Kobzina, “A Faculty–Librarian
solutions. This is true even for the analysis of problems involvingsimple geometry. In addition to the modeling errors, finite element analysis involves solving theequations using numerical methods, which again yield approximate solutions. Depending up onthe type of analysis performed, namely, structural, thermal, dynamic, NVH, etc., validation ofresults by simple models and hand calculations is necessary.The goals in FEA are thus to (a) use correct formulations to attain results close to exact results orresults from testing, and (b) to achieve convergence of the such results in the fastest time. Thereare other goals in terms of the development of theory and constitutive relationships to modelcomplex geometries consisting of advanced materials
, MD.[2] Pape, D., “A Progressively Open Ended Laboratory to Promote Active Learning,” Proc. 2006 ASEEAnnual Conf., 2006.[3] Anagnos, T., Komives, C., Mourtos, N., and McMullin, K. M., “Evaluating Student Mastery of Design ofExperiment,” Proc. 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., 2007.[4] Sawyers, D., and Marquart, J., “The Use of Student-Generated Lab Plans in the Thermal Sciences,”Proc. 2006 ASEE Annual Conf., 2006.[5] Satish, J., Lakkundi, A., Gaitonde, V., Burli, S. B., Madhusudhana, H., “Attainment of ProgramOutcome ‘3b’ of ABET through Laboratory Experiment for the Undergraduate Program,” Journal ofEngineering Education Transformations, Jan. 2015, 182-187.[6] Alvarado, J. “Design Your Own Thermodynamics Experiment, a Problem
, students also learned fundamental multidisciplinary principles inorder to achieve a compact, portable, and an affordable system while taking consideration of cost,performance, and functionality.The final class grade confirmed effective learning outcomes of the project team. All five studentsof the team received class grade A or B while the course success was defined a grade C orhigher. In addition, a class survey administered to the team students showed the students' fullsatisfaction with the course on how their learning of multidisciplinary mechatronics engineeringimproved for their professional career development in the future. As a result, students learnedclear lessons on how a multidisciplinary engineering design project is implemented. In
Engineering graduates must demonstrate (a) an ability toapply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering; (b) an ability to design andconduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) an ability to design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs; (d) an ability to function inmultidisciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems;(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (g) an ability to communicateeffectively; (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global and societal context; (i) a recognition of the need for and an ability toengage in life-long learning; (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues; and (k
Paper ID #31009Design Course in a Mechanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Jamie Szwalek, University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Jamie Szwalek is currently a Clinical Assistant Professor at University of Illinois at Chicago in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering.Dr. Yeow Siow, The University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Yeow Siow has over fifteen years of combined experience as an engineering educator and practi- tioner. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. from Michigan Technological University where he began his teaching career. He then joined Navistar’s thermal-fluids system group as a senior engineer, and later brought
. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company,Inc., 1985.Davis, B.G., Tools for Teaching, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.Elliot, N. et al. "The Assessment of Technical Writing: A Case Study," Journal of Technical Writing andCommunication, Vol.24, No.1, Winter 1994, p.9.Foster, D. A Primer for Writing Teachers. Upper Monclair,New Jersey: Boynton/Cook, 1983.Houp, K.W., and T.E.Pearsall. Reporting Technical Information. New York: Macmillan, 1988.Lefferts, R. How to Prepare Charts and Graphs For Effective Reports. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 1981.Miller, R. L. and B. Olds, "A Model Curriculum for A Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary Engineering Design,"Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.83,No.4 October 1993, pp. 311-323.Peer commentary on