mountedon the incident bar, is the specimen length prior to impact, and is the wave speed in theincident bar.As long as the stresses in the bars remain under the elastic limit, the specimen stress may becalculated from the recorded strain history collected from the strain gauge mounted on thetransmitter bar. Kolsky [2] developed the following relation to estimate the specimen stressas a function of time. A s (t ) Eb b T (t ) (3) As Page 26.474.8where is the bars’ elastic modulus, is the bars
. P., Sorensen, C. D., Swan, B. R., & Anthony, D. K. (1995). A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 165–174. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00163.x 7. Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. L. (1999
duration of time devoted to the students’presentations of the four different product ideas, as well as the free-form question-and-answersessions that followed each presentation. The quantity and distribution of verbal participationfrom individuals during each Q&A discussion was also calculated. Although limited in scope,results of this first study suggest a correlation between the duration of Q&A sessions,distribution of communication responsibility among individual team members, and final productselection. Furthermore, a total of 23 out of 24 students (96%) on Team A and 20 out of 24students (83%) on Team B asked and/or answered questions during the discussions throughoutthe meeting, suggesting that the stress and emotion of the high
fortwo and three mass systems, a single mass system was chosen for in-class implementation forsimplicity. Two and three mass virtual models are more appropriate for a senior level controlsystems or vibrations elective, and we plan to introduce the virtual laboratories into those classesin 2015. Page 26.1703.4We have also completed a model of the ECP-505 inverted pendulum for use in a senior levelcontrol systems course 38 . The ECP design is unlike other inverted pendulum models in that the (a) ECP rectilinear stage 37 (b) Simulink model of ECP rectilinear stage Figure 1: ECP-210 rectilinear stage and
. Page 26.127.4BadgingBadging, or microcredentialing, is a process by which students can be evaluated on skills and knowledgeat a more granular level than a whole course. In our current educational model, when an employerreviews the transcript of a student who received a B in a class, that employer cannot distinguish whetherthat student did everything in the course pretty well, or is particularly good at some skills yet unable tocomplete other tasks12. The concept with badges, and why there is increasing interest in the potential usein education, is the ability to measure particular skills that are encompassed in a class.Moreover, badging also works to incentivize students. In Kapp’s The Gamification of Learning andInstruction[14], the argument
: a) Formulation b) Concept Design c) Configuration Design d) Parametric Design e) Detail Design Key Concepts: a) Form is the solution to a design problem b) Design is the set of decision making processes and activities to determine the form of an object, given the customer’s desired function. 2 Chapter 1 Introduction to Mechanical Engineering Design 3 Chapter 2 Materials. 4 Chapter 3 Shear force diagram and bending moment diagram 5 Chapter 3 Shear force diagram and bending moment diagram 6 Chapter 3 Stress, strain, stress-strain diagram, stress-strain relationships 7 Chapter 3 stresses due to axial load, bending moment, shear force and torsion
this case a reciprocating internal combustion engine) work? What comes in? What goes out? • Air and fuel goes in, gas, heat, and work come out. b) How does air get into the engine? • Through the intake manifold, into the carburetor, then into the cylinder through the intake valve. c) How does fuel get into the engine? • From the gas tank into the carburetor where it is mixed with air. d) How does exhaust get out of the engine? • The exhaust valve opens and the piston pushes the exhaust out through the muffler
, students also learned fundamental multidisciplinary principles inorder to achieve a compact, portable, and an affordable system while taking consideration of cost,performance, and functionality.The final class grade confirmed effective learning outcomes of the project team. All five studentsof the team received class grade A or B while the course success was defined a grade C orhigher. In addition, a class survey administered to the team students showed the students' fullsatisfaction with the course on how their learning of multidisciplinary mechatronics engineeringimproved for their professional career development in the future. As a result, students learnedclear lessons on how a multidisciplinary engineering design project is implemented. In
the project. The second mechanism involvedcomparative analysis of the average performance of the students prior to and after the assignmentof the group project. The first questionnaire included the following questions:1) Which of the following has been the best source for learning concepts of thermodynamics? a) Text book b) Class notes c) Peer-to-peer mentoring d) Group discussion e) TA Recitation2) Which form of assessment has been the most useful in helping with self evaluation of performance in the course? a) In-class quizzes b) Home works c) Midterm exams3) Which form of assessment has been the most useful in helping with learning concepts of thermodynamics? a) In-class quizzes b) Home works c) Midterm examsThe
. Iterate Iteratea The difficulty of meeting the requirements will necessitate iteration.b The difficulty of manufacturing will necessitate iterative prototyping.c My team has minimal prototyping experience.3 For a high avg, use a virtual prototype; else, use physical models. Physical Virtuala Virtual prototype(s) will require less time than a physical one(s).b Virtual modeling will validate: physics, interfaces and/or requirements.c A CAD model is needed for analysis (FEA, CFD, etc.) or manufacture.d Time & budget allow pursuit of both virtual and physical prototypes
given by professors in the humanities. As the newFYS director in 2012, the second author inherited the challenge of a program staffed primarily bythe faculty in the college of the arts and sciences. In 2011-12 there were 74 sections of the then-equivalent of FYS 112;b only three of those sections were taught by faculty from the professionalschools (one from the college of engineering and two from the college of education and healthsciences). The second author was concerned that students perceived this lack of participation inFYS by the faculty of the professional schools as a lack of endorsement for the value of liberaleducation.c She wanted the lecture to emphasize the significance of FYS as a foundation for allareas of study at the University
the time of the demo, a syringe with a small tube was used to insert thedye. Page 26.33.8 Figure 6: Individual parts of the Stokes flow device2.1.7 Cavitation demo Like the Stokes flow demo, students attempted to create this demo, but it hasn’t beencompleted at this point. It is basically a piston/cylinder device filled with water. The piston islifted using a pneumatic cylinder, reducing the pressure and producing cavitation. Information,video, and directions can be found on the blog created by Nigel B. Kaye (see figure 7)8 If a livedemonstration of cavitation is too difficult to achieve, there are many images and
of 26 graduate students.Mr. Fanhe Shamus MengProf. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie did his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D., and postdoctoral work at the University of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State University faculty for 32 years and for the past 18 years has focused on innovative pedagogy research and technical research in biotechnology. His 2007-2008 Fulbright exchange to Nigeria set the stage for him to receive the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at Washington State University.Dr. Paul B Golter, Washington State University Paul B. Golter obtained an MS and PhD Washington State University and
. Caswell, Body language for competent teachers. 1993, London ; New York: Routledge. xvii, 206 p.19. Hartley, G. and M. Karinch, I can read you like a book : how to spot the messages and emotions people are really sending with their body language. 2007, Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press. 287 p.20. Matsumoto, D., Culture and nonverbal behavior, in The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication, V.L. Manusov and M.L. Patterson, Editors. 2006, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, Calif. p. 219-236.21. Neill, S.C., Chris, Body language for competent teachers. 1993: Routledge.22. Pease, A. and B. Pease, The definitive book of body language. Bantam hardcover ed. 2006, New York: Bantam Books. xiii, 386 p.23. Riggio, R.E. and R.S
. The supervisors consisted of a diverse set of junior and senior engineering studentsthat received a B or better in dynamics. At the beginning of the meeting the supervisor wouldlook over each student’s homework to ensure they attempted all the problems. Then eachstudent was asked to present a portion of their problem set. The problems selected by thesupervisors for students to present were those that required the application of important anddifficult concepts covered in the course.Each student in the group would be asked to present a portion of their solution using awhiteboard. The portion assigned was selected so that the presentation would require about tenminutes. Students were allowed to use their notes, but expected to explain each step
; b. identify the stakeholders for an engineering challenge and identify their needs; c. prioritize stakeholder needs and determine appropriate ways to engage them for a given engineering challenge; d. define a set of engineering requirements for an engineering challenge; Page 26.1466.6 e. articulate the functional and/or spatial basis of an engineering challenge; f. create a verification plan1
and that feedback given to students must beinterpreted by students themselves and internalized before it can impact on students’ learning andfurther study9-11. Guided reflective thinking can often be used to guide students through self-assessment activities. Guided reflective thinking is a systematic way of thinking about one’sactions and responses such that future actions and responses can be improved12. Dewey13 describesa reflective operation as having two essential elements “(a) a state of perplexity, hesitation, doubt;and (b) an act of search or investigation directed toward bringing to light further facts ….”. Otherestablished approaches for promoting reflective thinking include prompting students withquestions and worksheets to identify
2008. Licensed as a professional civil and structural engineer in California and Wash- ington. Seven plus years of industry experience in the field of structural engineering. Approximately 13 years of teaching experience in undergraduate engineering. Page 26.776.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Incorporating the Finite Element Method with Photoelasticity as a Useful Modern Engineering Tool to Enhance Learning of Deformation Concepts Qin Maa, Louie Yawb a, b Edward F. Cross School
established among faculty who teach the automatic controlscourse and the department is currently in the process of acquiring a few of the newer LEGO EV3 Page 26.1680.23kits. It is anticipated that such collaboration will help address the aforementioned challenges. Table 6. Technical Report Grading Rubric Title Page Table of Contents Table of Figures Objective 1. Uncompensated System – Theoretical Analysis a. Block Diagram (Simulink Model ) b. Root Locus Sketch and Hand-Computations c. Uncompensated Root Locus via rltool or sisotool d. Time-Response Plot 2. Uncompensated
specification. Once the designs were Page 26.1415.10complete, reviewed, and revised, manufacturing prints were created and the students eitherworked with vendors contracted to produce the parts or manufactured the parts themselves in themachine shop. A second example is the electrical and control system where students specifiedcomponents, created electrical prints, designed and prototyped the electrical panels, worked withthe supplier to produce the final electrical panels and cabinets, and programmed the systemcontroller.5.2 Outcome B: An Ability to Design and Conduct Experiments, as Well as Analyze and Interpret Data22The participating students
engineering courses? A) 1 B) 2 C) 3 D) More than 3 This data shows that nearly all of the students (94%) had at least one previous experience with a design project in their coursework, and 34 (67%) students had experience with at least 2 previous design projects. Page 26.937.72 - This design project was developed from a real-world graduate research activity rather thanfrom a textbook-based assignment. As such, what is your overall perception of this project ascompared to textbook-based assignments in the following ways:2a – Relevance of this project to youcompared to textbook-basedassignments: A) Much more
and profession. With respect to the impact the course had on theirdesire to remain in Mechanical Engineering, 76% of the respondents rated the course at a 4 or 5.Regarding the level of insight provided into the field of mechanical engineering and it’s practice,79% gave the course a rating of 4 or 5. As to the affect of the course on their self-confidence andsense of capability in engineering, their studies, and professional practice, 69% of the studentsrated the course at a 4 or 5.In addition to the numeric rating responses, students were also asked to comment on specificsrelated to the questions beginning with the question shown in Figure 6. The questionnaire in itsentirety is shown in Appendix B, and the questions with their respective
on 2/2/2015.4. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2015). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2012-2013. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3143.5. Garry, B. G. (2011). Relationship Between ABET-TAC Criterion 3 A-K Student Learning Outcomes Achievement. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada.6. Franklin, G. F., & Powell, J. D. (1989). Digital Control Laboratory Courses. Control Systems Magazine, IEEE, 9(3), 10-13.7. Thompson, J. G., Gorder, P. J., & White, W. N. (1995). Integration of flexible embedded control system design into the mechanical engineering curriculum
Paper ID #13778A Roller Coaster Project as Part of an Undergraduate Dynamics Course inMechanical EngineeringDr. Andrew R. Sloboda, Bucknell University Andrew Sloboda is a Visiting Assistant Professor at Bucknell University where he teaches a variety of mechanics-based courses, including solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, dynamics, system dynamics, and vibration. His research interests lie primarily in the fields of nonlinear dynamics, vibration, and fluid- structure interaction. Page 26.104.1
Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 17-28, 1997.5. Lackey, L.W., Jenkins, H.E., Mines, R.O., and Schultz, S.R., Utilizing Senior Capstone Design as an Instrument for Student and Faculty Assessment of Program Outcomes, 2009 ASEE Conference, Marietta, GA, paper, 2009006MIN, pp. 1-11, April 2009.6. Todd, R.H., Sorensen, C. D., and Magleby, C. D., Designing a Capstone Course to satisfy industrial customers, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, April 1993, pp. 92- 100.7. Paliwal, M., Sepahpour, B., A Revised Approach for better Implementation of Capstone Senior Design Projects, 2012 ASEE, San Antonio, TX, AC 2012-5442, June 2012.8. Marciniak, Z., Duncan, J.L., and Hu, S.J. Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, Oxford
. Simple Communication Radio Controllers.The course activities were then mapped to the desired project lab development and outcomes.Specifically, the process for integrating inquiry techniques into the lab projects, contained thefollowing phases: • Determine faculty goals and objectives; analysis of potential students (students, who take the course are juniors and do not have a prior knowledge in the field of mechanical design and it’s applications); • Determine faculty role in the learning process and develop an instructional plan; • Design lab activities, assignments, and assessments that are congruent with four major desired student outcomes: (a) improved critical thinking, (b) greater capacity for
Learning Cycle into this project are discussed elsewhere16, 21-22.Active Learning Module SummariesAs part of the NSF-funded grant, ALM’s have been developed and implemented into eight coursesat six different universities using five different software packages. All of the ALM’s have beendeveloped to meet various educational and instructional objectives. The educational objectives ofthe learning modules include the following: a) to provide a different insight into traditionally challenging concepts that are covered in a required undergraduate mechanical engineering course, b) to provide undergraduate engineering students with a basic understanding of FE theory as applied to thermal and structural analyses, and
displacement associate with mechanical components for realistic boundary conditions; (a, e, k) IV. assess the accuracy of computer-generated solutions by comparing them with experimental data and/or analytical predictions; (a, b, e, k) V. design a mechanical component to meet specific performance requirements, create associated CAD drawings to document the design in a professional format, and support the design by appropriate application of engineering analysis software and traditional engineering analyses. (a, e, g, k)(Letters in parentheses after each outcome above represent the ABET student outcomes that aresupported by that particular course learning outcome7.)A key instructional concern
pre-req for the design class, which is a pre-req for the capstone class.Students do not necessarily take these three classes in their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years as laid out in theideal curriculum flowchart, but they do take them in this order. We are able to look at therelationship between SDLRS score and class year. Also, because many students took themodules more than once, we are able to look at a relationship between number of exposures andSDLRS score.ResultsSDLRS Total Score Figure 3(a) shows how average SDLRS score changes with age or classyear. Again, students do not necessarily take the three classes in the ideal flowchart year, butthey do take them in succession in different semesters. Figure 3(b) shows how average SDLRSscore changes
Paper ID #11656Smartphone-Based Measurement of Acceleration: Development of a Smart-phone Application for Use in an Engineering Dynamics CourseDr. Scott Bevill, Colorado Mesa University Scott Bevill is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Colorado Mesa University in Grand Junction, CO. He completed his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2009 at Stanford University.Ms. Kelly Bevill, Colorado Mesa University Kelly Bevill, P.E., is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management at Colorado Mesa University in Grand Junction, CO. She completed her M.S. in Environmental Engineering in 2005 at Cornell University