Paper ID #22321Reflections on a new community partnership: How does an engineering sum-mer camp evolve to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse student popula-tion? (WIP)Emily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow currently works at a tech startup accelerator in Cleveland OH where she manages a cowork- ing space and promotes community and diversity in the city’s entrepreneurship ecosystem. She served as an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo where she was involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the College of
Paper ID #12899The Impact of Federally Funded Scholarship Programs on the Success ofTransfer Students at a Public Engineering CollegeDr. David M. Ford, University of Massachusetts, Amherst David M. Ford is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at UMass Amherst. He is also on the Faculty Advisory Board for the Diversity Programs Office (DPO) in the College. The DPO provides academic and non-academic support to increase enrollment, retention, and graduation among under-represented minorities and women.Dr. Paula Rees, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
AC 2007-1910: USING A SERVICE-LEARNING PROJECT TO MAKE PROGRESSON BOTH RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OBJECTIVES FOR AMERICANINDIAN ENGINEERING STUDENTSSheree Watson, Montana State UniversityHeidi Sherick, Montana State UniversityCarolyn Plumb, Montana State University Page 12.1534.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Using a Service-learning Project to Make Progress on Both Recruitment and Retention Objectives for American Indian Engineering StudentsThe Designing our Community (DOC) program at Montana State University(MSU), which is supported by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, hasthree goals: (1) Increase the motivation and
AC 2011-722: IMPACTING THE SUCCESS OF UNDERREPRESENTEDMINORITIES AT LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: A DIVERSITY SCHOL-ARSHIP AND MENTORING PARTNERSHIP WITH EXXONMOBILSarah Cooley Jones, Louisiana State UniversityKelly A. Rusch, Ph.D., P.E., Louisiana State University Associate Dean College of EngineeringMs. Del H. Dugas, ExxonMobil Chemical Engineering Alumnae of Louisiana State University - Baton Rouge, LA. Page 22.802.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Impacting the Success of Under-represented Minorities at Louisiana StateUniversity: A Diversity Scholarship and Mentoring Partnership withExxonMobilThe
AC 2011-1742: ”SUCCESS IS DIFFERENT TO DIFFERENT PEOPLE”:A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF HOW AFRICAN AMERICAN ENGINEER-ING STUDENTS DEFINE SUCCESSQuintin S. Hughes, University of Oklahoma Quintin Hughes received both is B.S. (2004) and M.S. (2009) in Industrial Engineering from the Univer- sity of Oklahoma. He received a Bridge to Doctorate graduate fellowship to fund his Master’s research, which was centered in Engineering Education and sought to understand the pre-college influences of suc- cessful African American engineering students. He is currently an Industrial Engineering doctoral student with the same emphasis in Engineering Education. His doctoral research will take a further look at identi- fying common success
positions with Shell Chemicals in Louvain-la-Nueve Belgium and EVALCA in Houston TX. He joined the faculty at Auburn University in the fall of 2007. In 2014 he was promoted to Senior Lecturer. He has regularly taught courses in three different engineering departments. In 2015 he began his current position as an Assistant Professor in the Materials Engineering Program.Prof. Virginia A. Davis, Auburn University Dr. Virginia A. Davis’ research is primarily focused on using fluid phase processing to assemble cylin- drical nanomaterials into larger functional materials. Targeted applications include optical coatings, 3D printed structures, light-weight composites, and antimicrobial surfaces. Her national awards include selec
AC 2012-5340: CRITICAL QUESTIONS TO WHICH ENGINEERING STU-DENTS NEED ANSWERSDr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 technical papers in ref- ereed journals and conference proceedings. He has authored three engineering texts. Dr. Rodriguez has given over 70 invited presentations - 13 plenary - at international and national forums, conferences and corporations. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research program
AC 2011-2864: ENHANCING THE FUTURE OF AMERICA’S COMPETI-TIVENESS THROUGH ENTREPRENEURIAL ENGINEERINGCarolyn A Vallas, University of Virginia Carolyn Vallas is a General Faculty member and the Director of the Center for Diversity in Engineering (CDE), at the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS) since 1998. Her responsibility over the past twenty five years has focused on diversity initiatives with emphasis on outreach and retention programs for women and minorities in engineering. This involves a strong collab- orative working relationship with engineering faculty and other departments on campus as well as with school districts, governmental and private industry. In addition, she
Paper ID #7636ROSE-BUD (Rose Building Undergraduate Diversity) MAPS (Mentoring andProfessional Skills)Dr. Carlotta A Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Carlotta A. Berry is an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. from Vanderbilt University, her thesis was on the develop- ment of an enhanced human-robot interface for a mobile robot. Her master’s degree in control systems is from Wayne State University. She has two bachelor’s degrees; one in mathematics from Spelman College and one in electrical engineering from Georgia
, persistence, and success. BioScience, 64(7), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu076Andalib, M. A., Ghaffarzadegan, N., & Larson, R. C. (2018). The postdoc queue: A labour force in waiting. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(6), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2510Anfara, V. A., & Mertz, N. T. (Eds.). (2014). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.Beech, B. M., Calles-Escandon, J., Hairston, K. G., Langdon, S. E., Latham-Sadler, B. A., & Bell, R. A. (2013). Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers. Academic Medicine, 88(4), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828589e3Castañeda, M., Zambrana, R
, 2017, Vol. 87(3), pp. 456- 477[2] W. Evans, M. Kearney, B. Perry, and J. Sullivan, “Increasing Community College Completion Rates Among Low- Income Students: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of a Case- Management Intervention”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2020, Vol. 39(4), pp. 930-965[3] American Society for Engineering Education. (2020). Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019. Washington, DC. Available online at https://ira.asee.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/02/Engineering-by-the-Numbers-FINAL-2021.pdf Last retrieved March 4, 2021.[4] M. Jimenez, S. Bartolomei, L. Guillemard, A. Santiago, M. Suarez, N. Santiago, C. López, P. Quintero, N. Cardona, “Impacting
AC 2012-4444: IMPLEMENTATION OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING TECH-NIQUES TO INCREASE MINORITY STUDENT INTEREST IN RF/MICROWAVEENGINEERINGDr. Michel A. Reece, Morgan State University Michel A. Reece is currently a tenured professor and Research Director of the Center of Microwave, Satellite, and RF Engineering (COMSARE) in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Morgan State University. In this center, she pursues research in the areas of high frequency device char- acterization and modeling, highly efficient solid-state power amplifier design, and adaptable components design for software defined radio applications. She became the first female recipient at Morgan State to obtain her doctorate degree in
AC 2011-2224: WORKSHOP- ROBOTICS IN URBAN STEM EDUCATION:THE PHILADELPHIA MODELVelda V. Morris, M.S.Ed., School District of Philadelphia Velda Morris is the Robotics Education Specialist in The School District of Philadelphia’s Office of Sec- ondary School Reform/Division of College Readiness, she functions as a results-oriented administrator who excels in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) initiatives, and brings research experience in the STEM areas and robotics. She designed and oversees the Secondary Robotics Initiative (SRI), one of the District’s most promising initiatives. SRI is conducted in sixty-two schools; some of the neediest schools in The School District of Philadelphia, providing
, among others.Dr. Heidi A. Taboada, University of Texas, El Paso Heidi A. Taboada is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering at the University of Texas, El Paso. She holds M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in industrial and sys- tems engineering from Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. Her research strengths involve the de- velopment of multiple objective optimization models and evolutionary game theory algorithms, design of new biologically inspired algorithms, and renewable energy systems optimization. Taboada has published more than 30 refereed manuscripts in technical journals, book chapters, and conference proceedings. Her work has been published in IEEE
Paper ID #10893Pre-College Interactions, Early Expectations, and Perceived Barriers: AreThere Differences for Underrepresented Engineering Students?Dr. Sandra Loree Dika, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Sandra Dika is Assistant Professor of research methods in the Department of Educational Leadership at UNC Charlotte. Her current research is focused on college access and success for underrepresented and underserved student groups in higher education.Dr. Miguel A. Pando, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Miguel A. Pando is currently an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the
Paper ID #9336S-STEM: ENG2 Scholars for Success 2007-2013Ms. Sarah Cooley Jones, Louisiana State University Sarah Cooley Jones is an Associate Director, College of Engineering at Louisiana State University. Ms. Jones develops and manages student programs for undergraduate and graduate engineering students in- cluding programs focused on underrepresented student populations. These programs encompass scholar- ships, fellowships, and seminars/workshops that develop students academically and professionally. She joined LSU in 1992 as a College of Engineering research associate in the area of environmental analyses and worked
solving engineering problems. Dr. Mejia’s primary research interests lie at the intersection of engineering education, literacy, and social justice. He is particularly interested in engineering critical literacies, Chicanx Cultural Studies frameworks and pedagogies in engineering education, and critical consciousness in engineering through social justice.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Dr. Diana A. Chen is an Assistant Professor of General Engineering at the University of San Diego. She joined the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering in 2016. Her research interests are in areas of sustainable design, including biomimicry and adaptability in structural, city, and regional applications. She earned her MS and
institutions are also typically directed atthis particular group of students. This research used a survey, or a non-experimental research design to collect data foranalysis. Where this project diverges from prior research (e.g., Burger 2018; Pawley 2017; Robertson& Mason; 2008, Tomasko, Ridgway, Waller, & Olesik 2016) is in its consideration for thosevariables that might influence a students’ consideration for leaving, in conjunction with diversity andinclusion policies. As such, the Qualtrics survey that was developed for the pilot study leveragesquestions about student exposure to diversity and inclusion policies, as well as their perceptions andexperience with other influences to academic persistence. Appendix A and B is a
prepared in high school”.Participants’ mathematical performance: a comparison between 2008 & 2009AlgebraIn this study, which used six 2009 STP participants in the algebra class, none of the students had an A butthree passed with a B or C was observed. However, the 2008 STP participants only 2 took the algebraclass during fall 2008. None of them earned an A as well, see table 1. Table 1 Outcomes in the two groups for Algebra Outcome Group A B C D F Avg. total
whom they have regular academic or social interaction. The end-of-yearquestionnaire also provided space for any qualitative feedback regarding the peer mentoringprogram.For comparative purposes, two groups served as control to the mentees participating in the peermentoring program. Control group A comprised of the ten concurrent sophomore students whoopted not to participate in the program. Control group B comprised of students who weresophomores in the year prior to the establishment of the peer mentoring program. Assessment ofgroup A occurred concurrently with that of the mentees. Assessment of group B occurred in theprevious year.ResultsThe self-perceived interaction levels of the mentees and the control groups are tabulated in tables1a and
periods. Before stating Sarkovskii theorem which is afundamental2 theorem on periodicity, we need to define the Sarkovskii ordering ofintegers.Sarkovskii order of integers The following order of all positive integers defines theSarkovskii‘s order; here a <= b indicates that a precedes b in the order:3 <= 5 <= 7 <= 9 <= . . . <= 2 . . . 3 <= 2.5 <= 2 . . . 7 <= 2.9 <= . . . <= 22.3<= 22.5 <= 22.7 <= 22.9 <= . . . <= 2n.3 <= 2n.5 <= 2n.7 <= 2n.9 <= . . . <= 24 <= 23<= 22 <= 21 <= 20.That is, we start with the odd numbers in ascending (increasing) order, then 2 times theodds, 4 times the odds, 8 times the odds, . . ., and at the end we list the powers of 2 indescending
>>” prompt.The example below shows a single MatLab sin command entered to evaluate the sin of30 degree (pi/6) to produce 0.50: EDU>> sin(pi/6)Multi Plot Script: A script is used here to demonstrate the multi plot features of MatLab.A mesh plot, a surface plot, a contour plot, and a combination of surface and contour plotare shown all in one screen in Figure 2. Placing these plots next to each other should helpto better visualize the problem.clear % clear removes all variables from the workspace.clc %clear screen% The linspace function generates linearly spaced vectors. It is similar to the colon% operator ":", but gives direct control over the number of points.% y = linspace(a,b,n) generates a row vector y of n points
. Cordova, "Mentoring Women and Minorities in Higher Education," 1988.[3] K. E. Kram and L. A. Isabella, "Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development," Academy of management Journal, vol. 28, pp. 110-132, 1985.[4] J. L. Mondisa, "Examining the Mentoring Approaches of African-American Mentors," Journal of African American Studies, vol. 22, pp. 293-308, 2018/12/01 2018.[5] L. Eby, J. Rhodes, and T. Allen, "Definition and evolution of mentoring," in The Blackwell Handbook of Mentoring, L. Eby and T. Allen, Eds., ed Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007, pp. 7-20.[6] B. R. Ragins and K. E. Kram, "The roots and meaning of mentoring," in The handbook of mentoring at work
14% (Aerospace had onerespondent) with 18 non-engineering respondents. First generation college students comprised25% of the respondents (4 skipped the question), yet 81% of the respondents were firstgeneration engineering or science majors.Reflections are provided throughout the paper followed by the survey results and conclusions.Reflections are organized as follows:I. Opening a dialogue on diversity a. Developing a reputation for being approachable b. Talking with students about perceptions Page 22.1357.3 c. Obtaining feedback on climate in classes / departmental community d. Learning about
perceived their ability to resist oppressive structures inschools.” (p. 911). Else-Quest, Mineo, and Higgins (2013) also found influence of years living in Page 24.668.6the U.S. in attitudes and achievement among High School students. 5The solutionsConsequently, the solutions to the misrepresentation of Latinos in engineering found in theliterature are aligned with (a) Support and preparedness at the pre-college levels, starting at very early stages of development, (b) Grants and financial aid available for Latinos, (c
particular affinities (e.g., parents, employees) that are most salient to them. Indeed, theselearners, as we describe in the literature review, face personal or interpersonal situations (e.g., a need towork to support family members) that are largely misaligned with the framing of post-secondary educationfor traditional students.Considering the specific context of engineering and computing programs, we derive our definition ofnontraditional students in engineering from Minichiello (2018), who defines this population as students(see Figure 1) who would be classified in at least one of the following categories: “(a) Delaying collegeenrollment by one year or more; (b) attending college part-time, meaning they enroll in fewer than 12 creditsper semester
3.2 Preference for a Value 3.1 Acceptance of a Value 2.0 Responding 2.3 Satisfaction in Response 2.2 Willingness to Respond 2.1 Acquiescence in Responding 1.0 Receiving 1.3 Controlled or Selected Attention 1.2 Willingness to Receive 1.1 AwarenessAdapted from Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educationalobjectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York:David McKay
Engineering Mechanics course that agreed to participate in the MentoredLearning Environment met regularly with the tutor for approximately 9 weeks. All but one ofthe students participating in the tutoring passed the course and all of the participants (includingthe student that failed) experienced improved performance as a result of their effort. Oneparticipant asked that the program have mandatory attendance so that family demands to workinstead of study could be thwarted (work to support family vs. study to achieve self-improvement is a common conflict that students in this program have to resolve). Thedistribution of grades for participating students was: A(0), B(3), C(2), F(1). The student thatfailed showed improvement in understanding concepts
Education, 29(1), 53-63.2. DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157-197.3. Gorman, S. T., Durmowicz, M. C., Roskes, E. M., & Slattery, S. P. (2010). Women in the Academy: Female leadership in STEM education and the evolution of a mentoring web. In Forum on Public Policy Online, 2, 1- 21. Oxford Round Table: Urbana, IL.4. Herrera, C., DuBois, D. L., & Grossman, J. B. (2013). The role of risk: Mentoring experiences and outcomes for youth with varying risk profiles, executive summary. New York, NY: A Public/Private ventures project distributed by MDRC.5. Perna