awide range of K-12 classrooms and venues. This approach to outreach offers the opportunity toimpact the entire pipeline rather than limiting our influence to a few, individual grades.References1 Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. Advancing engineering education in P‐12classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education. 2008. 97(3), 369-387.2 DeGrazia, J. L., Sullivan, J. F., Carlson, L. E., & Carlson, D. W. A K‐12/UniversityPartnership: Creating Tomorrow's Engineers*. Journal of Engineering Education. 2001. 90(4),557-563.3 Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60-73.4 Lundstrom, K., Moskal
Listing (a) Engineering an Elementary School Environment to Enhance Learning 2008 -1487 (b) Integration of Elementary Engineering Elements into the Language Arts Program 2007 -1901 (c) Supporting Math and Science through Elementary Engineering in Elementary Ed. 2007 -1857 (d) Engineering is Elementary; An Engineering And Technology Curriculum for Children 2007 - 8 (e) Essential Element Examples of Elementary Engineering in Elementary Education 2006 -1158The engineering faculty member’s major reward is obvious, but ironic. As
Type Program Style Location A Urban, Private Stand alone class Southwest B Urban, Public Stand alone class Midwest C Suburban, Private Afterschool Midwest D Rural, Private In Class Midwest Table 1. Descriptions of the EPICS High Pilot SchoolsOf the students who completed the survey, 65.8% were female and 34.2% were male. The highpercentage of female respondents is due to the fact that two of the sites surveyed were all-girlsschools. Table 2 shows the ethnicity demographics. It should be noted that
werecorrelated more with negative reasons than positive ones. (In contrast, for middle school boys,the strength of correlations was about the same for the positive and negative reasons.) A finalsuggestion is to distribute highly rated activities throughout the week. Frustration is part oflearning and cannot be eliminated entirely. Activities, such as building, that are dependably funshould occur multiple times.AcknowledgmentThis work is supported by National Science Foundation under grant number 1426989.References 1. Veltman, M., Davidson, V. and Deyell, B. (2012) “Richer Connections to Robotics through Project Personalization,” Advances in Engineering Education, Summer 2012. 2. Chubin, D., Donaldson, K., Olds, B. and Fleming, L. (2008
. Shehab, University of Oklahoma Dr. Randa L. Shehab is a professor and the Director of the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. She was recently appointed as Director of the Sooner Engineering Education Center dedicated to engineering education related initiatives and research focused on building diversity and enhancing the educational experience for all engineering students. Dr. Shehab teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in ergonomics, work methods, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Her current research is with the Research Institute for STEM Education, a multi-disciplinary research group investigating factors related to equity and diversity in
? a. I enjoy learning new concepts and ideas b. Making a plan before I start to solve a problem is important c. Trying new methods to solve a problem when one does not work is important d. Carefully analyzing a problem before I begin to develop a solution is important. e. Listening to others when trying to decide how to approach a task or problem is important. f. I think understanding basic technology and engineering concepts behind building a robot is important. Short answer: 11. What do you hope to accomplish by the end of the
-research.com/instruments/hri_instrument.php?inst_id=10.12. Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., Birman, B. F. (2002) “Effects ofProfessional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-Year LongitudinalStudy,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24:2 pp. 81–112.
). The role of interest in learning and development. InK. A. Renniger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), Interest, learning, and development. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Marzano R. J., Pickering D., McTighe J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes: Performanceassessment using the dimensions of learning model. Alexandria, VA: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development.Montfort, D. B., Brown, S., & Whritenour, V. (2013). Secondary students' conceptualunderstanding of engineering as a field. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research(J-PEER), 3(2), 1-12.Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York, NY: BasicBooks
Experiencing Engineering, ASEE Annual Conference,Vancouver, Canada, June 2011.[18] Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation (2011). United States Department ofCommerce.[19] Cunningham, B. C., Mulvaney Hoyer, K., & Sparks, D. (2015). Gender Differences inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Interest, Credits Earned, andNAEP Performance in the 12th Grad (Publication No. NCES 2015075). Appendices:Pre-Survey Form: ……………………………………………………………………………1APost-Survey Form: …………………………………………..………………………………1BFlyer: …………………………………………………………………………………….…….21C
four accountability groups defined in No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Actof 2001 and the reauthorized Elementary and Secondary Education Act [ESEA], Section1111(b)(2)(C)(v): • economically disadvantaged students, • students from major racial and ethnic groups, • students with disabilities, and • students with limited English proficiency. (p. 2)Appendix D focuses on three additional groups: Girls, students in alternative educationprograms, and gifted and talented students. Appendix D devotes a chapter to each these sevengroups, interweaving a case study that draws from research conducted in formal classrooms withinstructional principles for working with students from each group. In these case studies, NGSScommunicates messages about
a pilot attempt and opportunities exist for increasing participation andrefining overall program activities based on the survey results. 6Reference[1] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering By the Numbers,” 2012, [Available Online] http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/11-47.pdf[2] Electrical and Electronics Engineers. [Available Online] http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/electrical-and-electronics-engineers.htm[3] Computer Hardware Engineers. [Available Online] http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/computer-hardware-engineers.htm 7Appendix A: Students survey form for ECE-GIRLS
Paper ID #18763Middle School Math and Science Teachers Engaged in STEM and Literacythrough Engineering Design (Evaluation)Prof. Reagan Curtis, West Virginia University Reagan Curtis, Ph.D., is Professor of Educational Psychology and chair of the Department of Learning Sciences and Human Development at West Virginia University. He pursues a diverse research agenda in- cluding areas of interest in (a) the development of mathematical and scientific knowledge across the lifes- pan, (b) online delivery methods and pedagogical approaches to university instruction, and (c) research methodology, program evaluation, and data
Challenge for Science and Technology in the United States. Washington, DC: Ae A, Advancing the Business of Technology.Lambright, J., Johnson, W., & Coates, C. (2009). Attracting minorities to engineering careers: Addressing the challenges from k-12 to post-secondary education. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, pp. 11.Laut J., Bartolini T. & Porfiri M., (2015). “Bioinspiring an Interest in STEM,” IEEE transactions on education, vol. 58, no. 1, February 2015.Mohr-Schroeder, M., Jackson, C., Miller, M., Walcott, B., Little, D. L., Speler, L., & Schroeder, D. (2014). Developing Middle School Students' Interests in STEM via Summer Learning Experiences: See Blue
pins (six of which can produce PWMoutputs), 6 analog inputs, a USB mini-B connector that provides power and a serial connection toa PC for programming, a power jack for connecting external power, and a reset button. TheArduino Integrated Design Environment (IDE) contains a text editor for composing code, amessage area for displaying information during code compilation and upload, a text console, atoolbar with buttons for common functions, and a series of menus. The IDE connects to theArduino hardware to upload programs, known as “sketches”, and provide basic serial I/Ocommunications capability during program execution.The SparkFun Redboard is a pin-for-pin compatible version of the Arduino Uno that is producedby SparkFun Electronics7. The
student’s level of interest in student (a) who is completing the learning mathematics and science, the activities with relative ease, (b) who is adequately influence of the program on progressing through the program, and (c) who is their mathematics and science having trouble with the activities. motivation, and program highlights and low points. Interviews/Focus The semi-structured one-hour interview/focus Instructor feedback about Groups with groups during the site visit and at the end of curriculum planning and Teachers summer
). National Center for EducationStatistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.[2] Casey Foundation. Race For Results: building a path to opportunity for all children.http://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/AECF-RaceforResults-2014.pdf, page 9.[3] National Actions Counsel of Minorities in Engineering (2012). American Indians inEngineering. 2(2). Retrieved athttp://www.nacme.org/publications/research_briefs/NACMEAmerican_Indian.pdf[4] Education Week. High School Graduation Rate Approaching Milestone, Reaches HighestPoint in 40 Years. 2013. Education Research Center.http://www.edweek.org/media/diplomascount2013_release.pdf[5] Duran, E., Duran, B., Brave Heart, M., Yellow Horse-Davis, S. Healing the American
Paper ID #15050The Effectiveness of Software Development Instruction Through the Soft-ware Factory Method for High School Students (Work In Progress)Dr. Clemente Izurieta, Montana State University Dr. Izurieta is an Assistant Professor in the Computer Science department at Montana State University. Born in Santiago, Chile, his research interests include empirical software engineering, design and archi- tecture of software systems, design patterns, the measurement of software quality, pedagogical approaches to software engineering and technical debt quantification. Dr. Izurieta received a PhD in Computer Sci- ence from
scholarship is grounded in notions of learning as a social process, influenced by complexity theories, sociocultural theories, sociolinguistics, and the learning sciences.Ms. Mia DeLaRosa Mia DeLaRosa received her BA in in Elementary Education from Arizona State University in 2004. She went on to receive her Masters in Educational Leadership and Principal Certificate from Northern Arizona University in 2007. She is currently working on her EdD at Arizona State University. Mia is highly qualified to teach middle grades math, science, and language arts. Mia has taught middle school science in the Alhambra Elementary School District for nine years where she also leads after-school engineering clubs. Mia has been directly
Paper ID #16083Young Makers Compare Science Fairs and Maker FairesMiles J. Mabey, Arizona State University Miles Mabey (Yes that’s his real last name) is a second year student at Arizona State University studying Robotic Engineering. He joined the Maker Research team last year and has been to the Bay Area and New York maker Faires.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches human-centered engineering design
chapters that address issues of underrepresented populations participation in engineering programs and the integration of robotics and engineering into classroom instruction.Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology Roxanne Moore is currently a Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the school of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innovations from K-12 up to the collegiate level. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2012.Dr. Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Marion Usselman is a Principal Research Scientist and Associate Director for
Paper ID #16204Trash Sliders: The Latest UVA Engineering Teaching Kit (P12 Resource Ex-change)Dr. Larry G. Richards, University of Virginia Larry G Richards is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Virginia. He leads the Virginia Middle School Engineering Education Initiative, and is active in K 12 outreach and professional development activities locally and nationally. Larry’s research interests include creativity, entrepreneurship, engineering design, innovation, and K-12 engineering education. He is a founding member of the K-12 Division and is a Fellow of ASEE
program) curriculum constructor, lead trainer and lead on-site researcher. Additionally, Alison assists on and leads after-school engineering clubs at schools near the University.Noah Kasper, University of St. Thomas Sophomore at the University of St. Thomas studying Mechanical Engineering.Brett D. Gunderson, University of St. ThomasDr. AnnMarie Polsenberg Thomas, University of St. Thomas AnnMarie Thomas is a professor in the School of Engineering and the College of Business at the Univer- sity of St. Thomas where she is the director of the Playful Learning Lab, which focuses on engineering and design education for learners of all ages. AnnMarie is the co-founder, and former director, of the UST Center for Engineering
Paper ID #16421Impact of an Introductory Engineering Design Course on Minority Middleand High School Students’ Self-Efficacy and Interest in Engineering (Workin Progress)Dr. Tameshia Ballard Baldwin, North Carolina State University Dr. Tameshia Ballard Baldwin is a Teaching Assistant Professor working jointly in the College of En- gineering and the Department of STEM Education within the College of Education. She earned a B.S. in Biological Engineering from North Carolina State University and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Biological Systems Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Dr. Baldwin’s primary
Paper ID #17017Engineering Ambassadors: Bridging the Gap between Engineering and Ed-ucation Undergraduates and Middle and High Schools Students (Evaluation)Dr. Zahra Shahbazi, Manhattan College Zhahra Shahbazi is as an assistant professor of Mechanical engineering at Manhattan College. She earned a B.S. degree from the University of Tehran (mechanical engineering), M.S. from Amir Kabir Univer- sity of Techonology (biomedical engineering) and a Ph.D. degrees from the University of Conecticut (mechanical engineering). She also received a certificate in college instruction from the University of Connecticut. Her current
Paper ID #17360An Investigation of the Impact An ROV Competition Curriculum has on Stu-dent Interest in STEM, Specifically Technology and EngineeringMr. Daniel Gordon Mendiola Bates, Brigham Young University Graduate masters student. Research emphasis in technology and engineering education. For the past 4 years has taught jr. high CTE Technology and Engineering courses. Daniel has recently been accepted to NC State to pursue a doctorate degree in Technology Education.Dr. Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University Dr. Geoffrey A. Wright is a professor of Technology and Engineering Education in the Ira A. Fulton College of
Paper ID #14966P12 Resource Exchange – Electronics of Everyday ThingsDr. Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Jacquelyn K. Nagel is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Uni- versity. She has eight years of diversified engineering design experience, both in academia and industry, and has experienced engineering design in a range of contexts, including product design, bio-inspired de- sign, electrical and control system design, manufacturing system design, and design for the factory floor. Dr. Nagel earned her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Oregon State University and
Paper ID #19223The Long-term Impact of Including High School Students in an EngineeringResearch Experience for Teachers ProgramDr. Linda S. Hirsch, New Jersey Institute of Technology LINDA S. HIRSCH is the Assistant Director for Research, Evaluation and Program Operations for the Center for Pre-College programs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Dr. Hirsch has a degree in educa- tional psychology with a specialty in Educational Statistics and Measurement from the Graduate School of Education at Rutgers University. She has been involved in all aspects of educational and psychological research for over 20 years. Dr
precollege engineering education is to promote the viability ofengineering as a potential occupation, and there are myriad of programs, both formal andinformal, that are engaged in this endeavor (e.g. incorporation of engineering into statestandards, marketing campaigns such as Changing the Conversation, engineering outreachevents, etc.). Each program has different foci, but oftentimes the same goal – how do we getmore students to consider engineering? Many programs evaluate engagement, formation ofengineering identity and even persistence. However, the number of students completing degreesin engineering has seen limited growth, despite this national push.1 How then do we broadenparticipation in engineering? While it would be impossible to map all
Paper ID #19731Promoting Computational Thinking in children Using AppsMs. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking in differently abled students in informal and formal
University - Northridge Dr. Peter L. Bishay received his PhD in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from University of California, Irvine in 2014. He joined California State University, Northridge in 2015 as a Mechanical Engineering Assistant Professor. His research interests are in the fields of computational solid mechanics and smart materials & structures. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Using Career Pathways to Assimilate High School students into the Engineering ProfessionAbstractCareer Pathways is a Workforce Development (WFD) program that is supported by Stategovernment to instill specific skillsets in K-12 students. Career pathways generally consist ofpartnerships between K