, 2007 (Springer Science+Business Media, New York). 3. Dugan, John P., et al, Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership. International Leadership Association, November 2006, Maryland. 4. Herrington, J., et al, A Guide to Authentic e-Learning, 2014 (Routledge, London and New York). 5. Johrendt, JL., et al, A Learning Outcomes Survey of Engineering Cooperative Education Students: Preliminary Findings, 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, paper AC 2009-789, Austin, TX, USA. 6. Nelson, B. C., et al, Global channels of evidence for learning and assessment in complex game environments, 2011, British Journal of Educational Technology, 42:88-100. 7. Software Engineering
remainder of this sectionprovides a brief overview of the institutions involved in the study to provide context forunderstanding the study. Institution ID Institution Size Department Department Size A 1,500 undergrads Math & CS 25 CS and 40 Math majors 6,100 undergrads, 245 CS and IS majors B 800 grad students CS & IS 58 MIS graduate students 2,500 undergrads, 1,000 grad C students CS & IT 100 CS and IT majors D 6,100 undergrads CS 125 CS majors
need to betaken into consideration: (1) how to construct a program graph and handle compound conditionsautomatically. Compound condition consists of multiple simple conditions, e.g., (a>b) &&(b>c) contains two simple predicates a>b and b>c. Compound conditions need to be recog-nized automatically so that different paths can be derived from a program graph based on deci- Page 26.42.2sion, condition, and multi-condition coverages; (2) how to visualize program graphs. Visualizingprogram graphs is essentially a graph auto-layout problem, which arranges the positions of eachvertex and edge of a graph automatically. However
Programs in Software Engineering" Integrated Software & Systems Engineering Curriculum Project Stevens Institute (2009)[6] Laird, L., “Strengthening the ‘Engineering’ in Software Engineering Education: A Software Engineering Bachelor of Engineering Program for the 21st Century,” submitted November 2015.[7] Gallois, B., Sheppard, K., “The Design Spine: Revision Of The Engineering Curriculum To Include A Design Experience Each Semester.” (2009) Paper presented at 1999 Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina. https://peer.asee.org/755[8] Shackelford, R., Cross, J. II, Davies, G., Impagliazzo, J., Kamali, R., LeBlanc, R., Lunt, B., McGettrick, A., Sloan, R., Topi, H., “Computing Curricula 2005”, joint effort of the ACM and the
Paper ID #15728Work in Progress: A Student Activity Dashboard for Ensuring Project-basedLearning ComplianceSuhas Xavier, Arizona State UniversityChristian Murphy, Arizona State UniversityDr. Kevin A Gary, Arizona State University Dr. Gary is an Associate Professor in the School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. His interests are broad and deep in all areas of the professorate: research, teaching, and service. His research interests are in software engineering education, web & mobile applications (specifically mHealth
deliverable schedule, therefore we did not want to interrupt their activities on other projects with continuous interruption of the interns for every little obstacle. In addition to project personnel discussed above, there were number of products and other resources that was available to the students to complete their project. The following are some of resources that was used for the project. • LulzBot TAZ 5 3D printer, and SOLIDWORKS D CAD software • Two RC vehicle chassis, including wheels and Lithium polymer (LiPo) batteries and charger • Three Raspberry Pi B+'s • A Ubiquiti Rocket M2 • LS20031 GPS Receiver • Electronics (PCB boards, wire of various gauges, a soldering iron, and miscellaneous electrical
understanding of the scope of his/her career (b) teach the students the impact theirsoftware engineering solutions have in a global context, including environmental and social (c)help develop critical thinking and (d) improve the motivation and involvement the students willhave with activities related to their future profession.Some examples of the themes developed this semester were:• Comparative analysis of the use of augmented reality for the teaching of mathematics in primary education: USA and Europe.• Comparative analysis of the use of augmented reality in projects of Architecture and Urbanism: Japan and Europe.• Comparative analysis of the use of ubiquitous computing in Medicine: USA and Latin America• Comparative analysis of
introductory software engineering course with integrated mobile application development. Annual ASEE Conference. 2014.4. Subbian V, Purdy C. Redesigning an advanced embedded systems course: A step towards interdisciplinary engineering education. IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference. 2013.5. Subbian V, Beyette F. Developing a new advanced microcontrollers course as a part of embedded systems curriculum. Frontiers in Education Conference. 2013:1462-1464.6. Inozemtseva L, Holmes R. Coverage is not strongly correlated with test suite effectiveness. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering. 2014:435-445.7. Harder M, Morse B, Ernst MD. Specification coverage as a measure of test suite quality. ACM. 2001;25
Paper ID #15189Long-Term Effects of Partner Programming in an Introductory ComputerScience Sequence (Work in Progress)Dr. Andrew DeOrio, University of Michigan Andrew DeOrio is a lecturer at the University of Michigan. His research interests are in ensuring the correctness of computer systems, including medical devices, internet of things devices, and digital hard- ware. In addition to teaching software and hardware courses, he teaches Creative Process and works with students on technology-driven creative projects.Mr. Andrew Giugliano, University of Michigan Andrew Giugliano is a student at the University of Michigan. His