. They were attempting to open the black box described in the National Academy ofEngineering’s Pathways (2018) study [1], which spoke of the different ways in which studentsexperienced engineering education, and used their experiences as a stepping stone to a variety ofcareers, including many outside of engineering.Undergraduate engineering education has almost always attempted to provide a professionaldegree, or at least the foundations of a professional degree, in just four years. This, along withthe US commitment to providing a strong general education component at the undergraduatelevel, has made it difficult to unpack how students navigate challenging curricula and providesan important context for changes in engineering education. This
COVID-19 outcomes hasengendered a global pandemic during the recent year and overwhelmed countries worldwide atan incendiary speed. The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 as being a deadlypandemic because of its infectious nature, its rapid spread across various countries, and itsimpact on medical and institutional communities [1]. Challenges were also observed within theeducational system and some are discussed here [2]. Overnight, universities and schools across the U.S and across the world had to transitionto some form of distance learning in order to satisfy the educational needs of students andprograms and keep faculty, staff, and students safe. Social distancing and the usage of newtechnological tools for remote learning
ofgrowth, technological innovation, and quality of life in theory where the model provides the context with which superstars engineering’s identity Externalthe U.S. As a result, the improvement of K-12 student develop an engineering teaching professional identity and Politicalachievement in STEM has broad national support [1]. narrative identity theory provides a mechanism for understanding
empathy has recently gained significant interest and most ofthis research is focused on developing and fostering empathy among engineering students.Teacher empathy is a relatively new direction yet to be taken in engineering education. In thisstudy, we are interested in developing a preliminary understanding of the views about teacherempathy among engineering faculty. The research question that guides this work is, how doengineering faculty members define, understand, and value teacher empathy? We used the Modelof Empathy Framework [1] as a lens to understand the perspectives of the faculty members.While the framework is developed specifically to understand various attributes of empathyamong engineers and engineering students, we used this
to the stay-at-home home orders and directivesissued by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to limit the spread of COVID-19. The U.S. education sector was also impacted and institutions across the globe had totransition to distance learning education and university students returned home to finish up theirspring 2020 coursework. Unfamiliar learning environments caused uncertainties in students andaffected academic performance, internships, and general expectations of the future [1]. Thelearning consistency of students was affected with the physical closing of schools as students didnot learn what they needed to learn, and possibly even lost previously gained knowledge [2],[3]. Institutions faced great challenges as
One of the overarching goals of an undergraduate engineering education is to give students theability to critically analyze and select tools to solve complex problems. We strive to develop students asself-regulated learners who are “metacognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally active participants intheir own learning processes” [1]. This awareness includes students’ ability to identify resources tosupport their learning and solve complex problems. Some engineering programs teach students studystrategies, which may include the use of resources; however, often times these lessons are general andstudents may struggle to translate these lessons into their courses. While there has been some work thatinvestigates students’ ability to use
gasproduction) are highly dependent on major engineering fields. However, the mentality of some inthe Arab society, especially in Qatar, strongly disapproves the idea of females entering field ofengineering. While the Middle East and North Africa region have fairly high numbers of femaleengineering students, many females do not go on to the workforce [1].As a young woman living in Qatar, I’ve received many disapprovals from my parents regardingthe idea of me studying engineering. Therefore, to create a community of practice thatencourages young Qatari females to study engineering, I chose to study the Qatari society andthe factors that contribute to females becoming engineers. My objective in this study is todevelop strategies for empowering other
. As a result, many spaces are utilized for multiple purposes, and classrooms are oftenused outside of class time. When not in use, classrooms can host student organization events,project team meetings, and students simply doing homework.The increase in student centered pedagogies has encouraged universities to renovate traditionallecture style classrooms to studio or flexible classrooms [1]. Increases in the number of flexibleand studio classrooms raise the question of how universities can design these spaces to alsosupport student informal learning beyond their intended use as classrooms.Studies have been conducted on the benefits of informal learning settings, but there are fewstudies on how the physical space itself can support the
the University of Michigan in 2008. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Critical Educational Theory: Applications in Engineering Education Corin L. Bowen 1 and Aaron W. Johnson, Ph.D. 2 1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, clbowen@umich.edu 2 Instructor, Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, aaronwj@colorado.edu Critical theory is
that of thestudents’ perceptions of engineering in regard to their own engineering identity and abilities. In a study by M. Besterfield-Sacre in 1997, incoming engineering students were surveyed ontheir perceptions of engineering as a field, their own abilities as engineers, and their confidencein their success [1]. The performance and retention of the students were then tracked for thefollowing three years and related back to their initial attitudes. Students who left engineering ingood academic standing had significantly different attitudes about themselves and engineeringcompared to students who stayed in engineering, or who left in poor academic standing. Theinitial attitudes of students who left in good standing reflected significantly
before they officiallytake office to ensure a smooth transition. In this paper, the common challenges that SWEsections face during the “changing of the guard” are presented along with some tips on how toachieve such a smooth transition, backed by examples of systems that some of those very activeand productive SWE sections have established and follow to make office transition a smootherprocess and to enable them to hit the ground running at the start of the academic year.IntroductionCampuses throughout the nation support student led pre-professional organizations. There aremany factors that ensure a successful student club. Evans et. al [1] presented seven keys toestablishing a successful American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE) student
research, we report the framework and anticipated outcomes ofa pilot study on NOE understanding of Vietnamese faculty.Keywords: Nature of Engineering, Engineering Education, Environmental Engineering,International Collaboration, NOE Instrument, Engineering Faculty 1Introduction For the last 10 years, there is a continuous increase in the number of research attempts inengineering education, and a relatively increased growth in emphasis on Nature of Engineering(NOE) research [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Although still a developing area, a handful of NOEresearch findings demonstrate that instructors and students hold an inadequate understanding ofNOE
. Implicit bias on student teams is often theorized to influence the prioritization of ideasexpressed by white male students over those expressed by their female counterparts orteammates of color [1]. In addition, a gender-correlated division of work often occurs onstudent-teams, with men doing the more technical tasks of the project, leaving women to oftenfill the remaining organizational and managerial positions on the team [2], [3], [4]. Reasoning forthis type of behavior is often linked to differences in student learning goals for a course, whetherthat be mastery orientation (motivation to understand the material), performance orientation(motivation to earn grades or favor) or performance-avoidance orientation (motivation to avoidappearing less
the open-source CFD code (OpenFOAM).Dr. Jason E. Butler, University of Florida c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 2018 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Work in Progress: Peer-Led Research Methods Workshop for First-Year Ph.D. Students (Student Paper) Vincent J. Tocco1, Kevin E. Buettner1, Madeline Sciullo2, Jennifer S. Curtis3 and Jason E. Butler1 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL; 2Department of Electrical andComputer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL; 3Department of Chemical Engineering, University of
, intended to capture the realities of student habits, notjust intention or knowledge of the “right answer.” The surveys were then analyzed andcorrelated to determine what strategies students agreed were successful, whether theydetermined the strategies’ merits prior to graduation or only in retrospect. The goal is thatuniversities and engineering programs can share these strategies with their incoming orretained students or develop similar survey studies based on their own student body, helpingstudents succeed in their respective programs and increase retention regardless of studentbackground. Finally, a study guide is presented, growing from the survey results and moldedby undergraduate students and the investigative team.1 IntroductionStudents
best answer their research question, hypothesis, orpurpose of the study [1]. A mixed methods research methodology that a researcher may select isQ methodology. Q methodology is a social science research methodology focused onsystematically studying subjectivity utilizing both qualitative and quantitative researchtechniques [2]–[6]. While Q methodology has had limited use in engineering education research,it has been used in studies regarding the career paths of engineering education doctoral graduates[7], competencies for nanotechnology [8] and IT [9], curriculum design for information systems[10], construction engineering technology program assessment [11], and undergraduateengineering students’ out-of-class activities [12]. However, Q
Mathematics(STEM) to inspire their female successors in this field.The following sections of the paper describe the literature review, the methodology adopted tocollect data, the results and analysis, and the conclusions drawn.Literature ReviewNumerous studies have been conducted in different parts of the western world to understand theimpact of faculty’s gender on students and how students of different genders perceive their maleand female professors. Bettinger and Long [1] investigated the data of 54,000 college students inOhio to find the impact of female faculty on students’ choices of course in their early collegeyears. The study concluded that female faculty have the potential to increase the interests offemale students in a subject. This was
their teaching on the expertise gained from the academic context where theywere educated and industry environment where they have worked. Even in current day UnitedStates, professions like structural engineering have fewer female and minority industry leadersthan those that are White Caucasian male [1], and the same follows for academics in this field.As a result, many faculty members have limited exposure to the notable published works,projects, and other contributions of under-represented individuals to share with students.Historically, entry to professions in the built environment have been riddled by barriers due togender, race, and class. This continues to negatively affect not only the number of women andminority students who choose to
, there was a learning curve when itcame to using these online tools, as well as technical difficulties such as connectivity issues andprinting and scanning [5].The concept of “change readiness” [1] was especially important during the emergency transition,as many faculty members were unfamiliar with online teaching. Change readiness is definedas someone’s “beliefs regarding the appropriateness of, support for, and value of a change” [1].If unprepared for a sudden change, students and faculty could face negative feelings towardsmotivation and focus, which some researchers observed to occur at their institutions during theemergency transition period [4]. Some researchers noticed that motivation was directly linked tostructure, which many students
real-worldexamples ultimately used in the tool are reflective of the engineering concentrations of the capstoneteam. The biomedical track used an example of controlling the glucose level within a human body;and the mechanical track used an example of controlling car speed. Figure 1. Screen capture of the track selection page 4The material covered is identical between the two tracks, and students can also easily flip betweentracks for maximum flexibility and to understand the same topics with different examples.There were many other areas of flexibility that the capstone team wanted to ensure. The curriculumitself was divided into 6 main modules based on the most prominent
virtual teams during the rapid transition online due to COVID-19 Alexis Walsha, Sarah Norrisb, Nathaniel Blalockc, Daniel Mountainc and Courtney Faberd a) Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering; b) Department of Mechanical Aerospace Biomedical Engineering; c) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering; d) Cook Grand Challenge Honors Program University of Tennessee KnoxvilleIntroductionTeam projects are common in undergraduate engineering courses and have been shown toimprove self-efficacy, communication, and teamwork skills through group discussions andpresentations, preparing students for professional engineering practice [1], [2
revisited by the researchers until a universal consensus in the coding was reached.In completing the coding and analysis of the student responses, the codebook was finalized. Newcodes unique to the 2020 online student advice are indicated with asterisks. See Table 1: Codesand Themes for Online Student Advice. Table 1: Codes and Themes for Online Student Advice (* indicates a new code unique to 2020 Student Advice) Emergent Themes Code Descriptions Student advice related to... Time Management Due Dates Keep track of due dates, mark on calendar Routine* Work every day, keep a regular schedule
Florida International University (FIU). Her research interests span the fields of Computing and Engineer- ing Education, Human Computer Interaction, Data Science, and Machine Learning. Previously, Stephanie received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Neuroscience from the University of Miami, in addition to B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science from FIU.Dr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, designs research focused on broadening par- ticipation in computer science through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and disciplinary identity; 2) discipline
topics was evaluated using pre- and post- survey data to collect self-identified responses. Final reports were analyzed by qualitative thematic analysis for incorporation public health topics and compared to a previous semester’s assignments in which HD and SDOH modules were not a part of the curriculum.2. Introduction Health disparities (HD) are differences in health outcomes and their causes among groups of people. Often, HD are preventable, yet certain people have an extra burden of disease, injury, or violence [1]. Historically marginalized racial, ethnic, and other population groups (e.g., age, sex) experience differences in health outcomes and opportunities for optimal healthcare [1], even when groups and their
be a “good” engineer.IntroductionIn 2004, the National Academies of Engineering released the “The Engineer of 2020: Visions ofEngineering in the New Century” report in an effort to highlight the role engineers would hold inour future society [1]. A topic of discussion was the impact of the engineer on societal changes,focusing mainly on the importance of incorporating social contexts into engineering. TheNational Academy of Engineering envisioned an era of engineering education that resulted inengineers that are “leaders, able to balance the gains afforded by new technologies with thevulnerabilities created by their byproducts without compromising the well-being of society andhumanity” [1, p. 19]. However, as we move past 2020, it is
trust. Results indicate that designing ameeting structure with thorough planning documentation that designates time for socialinteractions to foster trust between team members is a powerful method for encouragingeffective communication and overall project success.IntroductionVirtual teams are growing in prevalence in industry for a number of reasons [1], includinglowering overall project costs, optimizing project time management, and expediting problemsolving [2]. In the modern workplace, working virtually allows teams to pool together resources,including people, regardless of physical location [2]. By employing virtual engineering teams,research claims companies strengthen their ability to compete on a global scale [3]. Companyinvestments in
our university community, the combination of these factors translated todeclining levels of engagement with our student, staff, and faculty members.As a combined result of stressors surrounding COVID-19 and racial injustice, many graduatestudents suffered a decline in their well-being as levels of anxiety, depression, and PTSDsymptoms rose [1]. While research on the impact of extracurricular involvement on graduatestudent well-being is limited, studies of undergraduate students have demonstrated that studentgroup and extracurricular involvement is associated with increased well-being and belonging [2].A few small-scale qualitative studies on graduate students have demonstrated that extracurricularinvolvement can enable graduate students to
concept of perfectionism, research methods and findingsof it, and a method to cope with it that can simplify our life.A brief overview on Perfectionism Terms and DefinitionsThe American Psychological Association (APA) defines perfectionism as “a tendency to demandof others or oneself an extremely high or even flawless level of performance, in excess of what isrequired by the situation” [1]. In this paper, the focus is on the demands of oneself that lead tomaladaptive behaviors and feelings like procrastination and paralyzing anxiety. This approachincludes perfectionism cognitions and perfectionistic self-representations.Perfectionism cognitions are the automatic thoughts that reflect the need to be perfect andawareness of imperfections whereas
withequipment in the lab. Large enrollment courses typically employ TAs to make the course moremanageable for the instructor. Depending on the institution and the course, TAs may be eitherundergraduate students or graduate students.TAs have many different kinds of responsibilities depending on the institution, the subjectmatter, the instructor, and the course structure. However, some common TA responsibilitiesinclude lecturing, leading discussions, leading review sessions, conducting labs, grading studentassignments, motivating students, helping students feel comfortable, providing feedback tostudents, assessing student prior and current knowledge and understanding, applying formativeassessments, and completing training programs [1]. Much literature
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Overcoming Comfort Zones to Better the Self-Efficacy of Undergraduate Engineering Students (Tricks of the Trade) (WIP)INTRODUCTIONCommunity College SuccessInvolvement in co-curricular activities, including participation in student and professionalorganizations, can significantly enhance the overall educational experience [1]. Engineeringprograms in community colleges strive to reinforce student engagement that increases studentacademic and extracurricular success. [2-5] One factor that reduces engagement amongststudents in co-curricular activities is low self-efficacy. [6] Students believe that participation inco-curricular activities will take time from their academics [7] regardless of the