Conference Session

Issues of Diversity

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Moshe Hartman, Retired; Harriet Hartman, Rowan University; Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

math activities in high school; AP courses taken in math and science; (b) Role Models: having a sister or brother in engineering, math or science; having a female math or science teacher (role model for women); (c) Support of significant others for the student’s choice of engineering as a major and/or career. Hypothesis 1: Women who enter fields that have lower proportions of women will have stronger academic backgrounds, greater exposure to more role models, and stronger support from significant others for their choice of such a non-traditional major or career. (2) Self-confidence: (a) General academic skills; (b) Math-science academic skills; and (c) Engineering-related skills and subjects

Conference Session

WIED: Pre-College Student Experiences

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica R. McCormick, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Charles Feldhaus, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

outreach providedvia financial assistance and outreach that costs parents and/or students a significant amount ofmoney.Bibliography1. Artis, S., Friedman, R., & LaRue, G. (2010). Strengthening the engineering pipeline one field and one woman at a time: The role of single-discipline, single-sex engineering camps in the U.S. Proceedings from the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Louisville, KY: ASEE.2. AWE, Assessing Women and Men in Engineering Project. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.engr.psu.edu/awe/default.aspx.3. Baxter, K. B. (2010). Women in science and engineering: Thriving or surviving? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Technical Session 4: Environmental Issues and the Impacts of Intersectionality

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; JoAnn Silverstein P.E., University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering, Women in Engineering

Young-Green (14:34-15:00 min and 46:06-53:50 min) Concluding remarks by moderator Darshan Karwat (53:50-56:52 min). Assignment (a) Discuss two or three ethics canons (including specific sub-parts) that relate to the situation (300 to 500 described with the interstate highway system and local community in Tampa Florida. words in Summarize each canon, how it relates, and in what ways the situation appears ethical or length) unethical in relation to the codes. (b) It what ways does the code of ethics appear to fall short of considering the benefits/harms to the local community of the speaker? What did you find most compelling from Lean Young- Green

Conference Session

International and Sustainability Perspectives and Women in Engineering

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nina Dahlmann, Technische Universitat Berlin, Inst. f. Mathematik; Sabina Jeschke, Technische Universitat Berlin, Inst. f. Mathematik; Christian Thomsen, Technische Universitat Berlin; Marc Wilke, Technische Universitat Berlin

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

die Gewinnung von Gestaltungskompetenz. in: Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Medienwirtschaft, (8):31–40, 2003.9. J. Margolis, A. Fisher. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, 2002.10. H. Schelhowe. Interaktivität der Technologie als Herausforderung an Bildung. Zur Gender-Frage in der Informationsgesellschaft. in: Forschungsinstitut Arbeit, Bildung, Partizipation (FIAB): Jahrbuch Arbeit, Bildung, Kultur, (17):49–55, 1999.11. C. Schiersmann. Zugangsweisen von Mädchen und Frauen zu den neuen Technologien – eine Bilanz vorliegender Untersuchungsergebnisse. Frauenforschung, Jg. 5, H. 1/2. 1987.12. B. Schinzel, E. Ruiz Ben. Gendersensitive Gestaltung von Lernmedien und Mediendidaktik: von den Ursachen

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sami Ainane, Pertoleum Institute Abu Dhabi UAE; Ali Bouabid

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

1993-1998 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland, Baltimore County Mechanical Engineer 1989-1995 EEC Consulting Rockville, MD President, Dome Enterprises 1989 - 1993 Bethesda MD HONORS AND AWARDS Best Presentation Award, ICESEEI 2016 : 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective Educational Instructions. Paris France 2016 Outstanding Service and Commitment to the En- richment of the Science and Technology Program, Eleanor Roosevelt H.S., Greenbelt MD, 05/2003 SELECTED PUBLICATIONS 1. A. Bouabid, B. Bielenberg, S. Ainane, N. Pasha, ”Learning Outcomes Alignment across Engineering Core Courses”, 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder; JoAnn Silverstein P.E., University of Colorado Boulder; Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

percentages explicitly within engineering academia are difficult to obtainbecause the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics does not disaggregate thedoctoral workforce numbers of women, underrepresented minorities, and those with disabilitiesby discipline beyond S&E or provide a feature making data based on intersectional identitiesavailable [8].B. Approaches frequently used to diversify faculty demographicsStarting in 2001, the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded a program, called ADVANCE,designed to “increase the representation and advancement of women in academic science andengineering careers” in a systemic way [9, para. 1]. Under the auspices of the ADVANCEprogram, more than one hundred institutions of higher education

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Creamer, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

full-time faculty members in engineering and full-timestudents from two departments identified by the institutional liaison as being the mostsupportive of women. The survey center at the home institution administered the on-linedistribution of a faculty and student questionnaire and oversaw the follow-ups. The Centerremoved personal identifiers before sharing the data set of questionnaire responses for eachinstitution.The Engineering Faculty Survey was designed by the research team and contains 134 questions,organized in five sections: (a) Involvement with Recruiting Activities, (b) Departmental andUniversity Environment, (c) Professional Development, (d) Involvement with Undergraduates,and (e) Personal Information. The analysis used in this

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Giannina Costa, Universidad Andres Bello; Juan Felipe Calderón, Universidad Andres Bello; David Ruete, Universidad Andres Bello; Danilo Leal, Universidad Andres Bello; Lilian Pamela San Martín Medina, Universidad Andres Bello

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. M. Paechter and B. Ertl. "Self-Concept and Support Experienced in School as Key Variables for the Motivation of Women Enrolled in STEM Subjects With a Low and Moderate Proportion of Females". Frontiers in Psychology. vol. 10. 2019. Available: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01242 [Accessed 19 January 2021].[8] S. Sinclair. A. Nilsson and E. Cederskär. "Explaining gender-typed educational choice in adolescence: The role of social identity. self-concept. goals. grades. and interests". Journal of Vocational Behavior. vol. 110. pp. 54-71. 2019. Available: 10.1016/j.jvb. [Accessed 19 January 2021].[9] H. Marsh. "The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model.". Journal of Educational Psychology. vol

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Erica Haugtvedt, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology; Duane Lewis Abata, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

an outreach activity, follow up with a discussion delving into the history of Ada Lovelace by using the following questions to scaffold responses. When necessary if discussion lags, ask students to either think-pair-share by sharing their ideas with a partner near them for 2-5 minutes before sharing with the larger class/group or ask students to write their thoughts freely for a 2-5 minutes and then share in conversation with the larger class/group. a. How was Ada Lovelace able to contribute to what would become computer science in 1843? What challenges did she encounter? How did she deal with these challenges? b. Does knowing about Ada Lovelace change

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Ilana Karpman, University of California San Diego

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the unique experiences that women faculty face as a gender minority in academicengineering programs. By situating this study within the context of three selective doctoral grantinginstitutions, this study was unique in that it uncovered how institutional processes and programs directlyinfluenced the success of women faculty in engineering. Although women at all three universities facedsimilar challenges including gender bias, work/family conflict, and the “two-body problem,” interviewees’perceptions of the effectiveness of the policies and programs differed significantly by site. This studyprovided insights into how women faculty perceive many of these programs as well as the factors thatinfluence the decision to utilize the policies that

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kimberly Ren, University of Toronto; Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Report 2018 - Reports - World Economic Forum," [Online]. Available: https://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2018/assessing-gender-gaps-in- artificial-intelligence/#view/fn-21.[10] L. M. Shore, B. G. Chung-Herrera, M. A. Dean, K. H. Ehrhart, D. I. Jung, A. E. Randel and G. Singh, "Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going?," Human Resource Management Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 117-133, 6 2009.[11] V. Hunt, D. Layton and S. Prince J A N U A, "Why diversity matters," 2015.[12] E. A. Deitch, A. Barsky, R. M. Butz, S. Chan, A. P. Brief and J. C. Bradley, "Subtle Yet Significant: The Existence and Impact of Everyday Racial Discrimination in the Workplace," Human Relations, vol

Conference Session

Climate Issues for Women Students

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheryl Duggins, Southern Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. & Pollack, M.E., & Riskin, E. & Thomas, B. & Wolf, E. & Wu, A. (1990) “Becoming a ComputerScientist” Communications of the ACM 33(11) pg 47-579. Fisher, A. & Margolis, J. & Miller, F. (1997) “Undergraduate Women in Computer Science: Experience,Motivation and Culture”10. Blum, L. “Women in Computer Science: The Carnegie Mellon Experience”www.cs.cmu.edu/nlblum/PAPERS/women_in_computer_science.pdf11. Pearl, A. & Pollack, M.E., & Riskin, E. & Thomas, B. & Wolf, E. & Wu, A. (1990) “Becoming a ComputerScientist”12. Fisher, A. &Margolis, J. (June 2002) “Unlocking The Clubhouse: The Carnegie Mellon Experience” InroadsSIGCSE Bulletin, Women In Computing 34(2) pg 79-8313. Cuny, J. & Aspray, W

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer C Mallette, Boise State University; Harold Ackler P.E., Boise State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the preliminary findings reported onhere to improve and expand the approaches to collect more substantial data and to triangulate.In this paper, we focus on the findings from two sets of semi-structured interviews from thesenior project course: a preliminary interview that asked background questions about eachparticipant’s experiences with collaborative work and writing (see Appendix A for specificquestions), and a final interview that focused on the collaboration in the senior project course(see Appendix B for specific questions). A second round of interviews will be completed at theend of the Spring 2018 semester. While seven students initially signed up to participate, twostudents, both women, completed both interviews. Both women are

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Adithya Jayakumar, Ohio State University; Lucille Sheppard, Ohio State University; Amy Kramer P.E., Ohio State University; Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. 256-273, 2008.[4] S.C. Davis, N. Cheon, E.C. Moise, and S. B. Nolen, “Investigating Student Perceptions of anEngineering Department’s Climate: The Role of Peer Relations,” in 2018 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[5] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, “Introduction,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering EducationResearch, A. Joyride and B.M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-2,2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.002[6] C.A. Shapiro and L.J. Sax, “Major selection and persistence for women in STEM,” NewDirections for Institutional Research, vol. 2011(152), pp. 5-18, 2001.[7] Yang Yang and D. W. Carroll, “Gendered Microaggressions in Science, Technology, andMathematics,” Leadership and Research in

Conference Session

ADVANCE Grants and Institutional Transformation

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Grant, North Carolina State University; Jessica Decuir-Gunby, North Carolina State University; Barbara Smith, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

WOMEN ENGINEERING FACULTY ( “Navigating Your Journey on the Academic Sea”; NSF ADVANCE Conference, Over 60 URM Women Engineering Faculty @ Caltech Photo credit: B. Paz)AbstractAs they progress in their engineering faculty careers, Underrepresented Minority Women (URM)women are very familiar with unique issues at the intersection of race and gender (DeCuir-Gunby, Long-Mitchell, & Grant, 2009; Ranson, 2005; Ronen & Ronen, 2008). This familiarityresults from their own personal experiences in the Academy and provides a broad set ofresponses ranging from leaving the professoriate to a single-minded pursuit of success no matterwhat obstacles are presented (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cynthia Lester, Georgia State University; Sahithya Reddivari, Georgia State University; Forough Ansari, Georgia State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

=growth+mindset&ccag=growth+mindset&cckw=%2Bgrowth%20%2Bmindset&cccv=content+ad&gclid=Cj0KEQiAnvfDBRCXrabLl6-6t-0BEiQAW4SRUM7nekFnoTxc675qBMSJycFgwERohguZWVmNDcSUg5gaAk3I8P8HAQ [Access January 15, 2020].[3] USG Facts. https://www.usg.edu/news/usgfacts [Accessed January 15, 2020].[4] What is a Momentum Year? https://completega.org/sites/default/files/resources/Momentum_Year_Overview_2019.pdf [Accessed January 26, 2020].[5] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers” https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf. [AccessedJanuary 15, 2020].[6] P. Meiksins, P. Layne, K. Beddoes, B. Acton, M. Lewis, M, A. S. Masters, and M.Roediger, “Women in Engineering: A Review of the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina K. Lam , Arizona State University; Samantha N. Cruz, Arizona State University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, G. McKittrick, B. Khan, M.E. Doms, “Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation,” U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington D.C., ESA Issue Brief #04-11, 2011.[4] C.R. Forest et al., “The invention studio: A university maker space and culture,” in 121st American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE 2014, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15 – 18, 2014.[5] T. Barrett et al., “A review of university maker spaces,” in 122nd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE 2015, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14 – 17, 2015.[6] C. A. Moss-Racusin, J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. J. Graham, and J. Handelsman, “Science faculty’s subtle gender

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Bazylak, University of Toronto; Ruth Childs, University of Toronto; Aimy Bazylak, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

(especially around gender), b) minimized the bias in the survey language, andc) was validated [18]. For the full details of the steps taken to design and validate the survey, thereader is referred to our previous paper [18]. A brief overview is provided here for readerconvenience. The survey tool was used to evaluate our hypothesis that there are three broaddecision factors used by secondary students when considering whether to study engineering.These decision factors are: Perceptions – of the profession and the undergraduate programs,Achievement – to meet programs’ entrance requirements, and Confidence – self-perception ofqualifications and traits (See Table 1). Our first research question was used to determine thelevel of importance that secondary

Conference Session

An International Perspective

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University; Bianca Bernstein, Arizona State University; Nancy Felipe Russo, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

AC 2007-2403: ENCOURAGERS AND DISCOURAGERS FOR DOMESTIC ANDINTERNATIONAL WOMEN IN DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN ENGINEERINGAND COMPUTER SCIENCEMary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R. ANDERSON-ROWLAND, PhD, is the PI of three academic scholarship programs and a program for transfer students. An Associate Professor in Industrial Engineering at Arizona State University, she was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Fulton School of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. She received the ASEE Minorities in Engineering Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005 and won the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by the AAAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Victoria Beth Sellers, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

oftentimes unintended, assumptions, lessons, values, beliefs, attitudes, andperspectives not openly acknowledged in an environment” [2, p. 1] HC is messaged as positiveor negative, but negative HC could result in undesired costs, such as attrition [2]-[3]. Previous researchers [4]–[7] have identified four predominant factors, (a) awareness, (b)emotions, (c) self-efficacy, and (d) self- advocacy, for how individuals recognize, react to, andrespond to situational HC. However, there is limited previous research about what strategieswomen use to cope with situational HC, principally in engineering environments. Thus, in thisstudy, we report on strategies that women engineers, including women engineers withintersectional identities, used to

Conference Session

K-12 Programs for Recruiting Women

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University; Susan Powers, Clarkson University; Mary Graham, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. 8: p. 255-284.8. Isaacs, B., Mystery of the Missing Women Engineers: A Solution. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2001. 127(2): p. 85-91.9. Huang, G., N. Taddese, and E. Walter, Entry and persistence of women and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Retention of Undergraduate Students

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elaine Zundl, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Laura Stiltz, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Helen M. Buettner, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

like living-learning communities, undergraduate research experiences, and leadership ex- periences. Her research interests include integrating gender into research methods as a way to improve outcomes and lead to greater diversity in STEM.Ms. Laura Stiltz, Rutgers University Laura Stiltz is Director of Douglass Project Research Programs and Advising for Undergraduate Women in STEM at Rutgers University’s Douglass Residential College. She led the committee charged with creating the Douglass Engineering Living-Learning Community and continues to coordinate the program at the Douglass Project. Laura earned her M.Ed. in College Student Affairs Administration from The University of Georgia and her B.S. in Applied

Conference Session

Mentoring

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Anakaorn Khan, North Dakota State University; David Wells, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor degree attainment. Jessup, MD: Education Publication Center. 4. Campbell, P., Jolly, E., Hoey, L., & Perlman, L. (2002). Upping the numbers: Using research-based decision making to increase the diversity in the quantitative disciplines. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc. 5. McDaniels, C., & Gysbers, N.C. (1992). Counseling for Career Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass. 6. Rayman, P. & Brett, B. (1993). Pathways for women in the sciences. Center for Research on Women, Wellesley College. 7. DeSantis, A. M., & Quimby, J. L. (2004, August). Self-efficacy as a mediator between contextual

Conference Session

Focus on High School Girls in Engineering

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Brake, Eastern Michigan University; Kaninka Bhatnagar, Eastern Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Education Statistics (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls & women: 2004, U.S.Department of Education. NCES 2005-016.7. PATT (1986). “What do girls and boys think of technology? Pupils’ attitudes towards technology”, PATTWorkshop report: March 6-11, 1986. Endhoven University of Technology, Netherlands.8. American Association of University Women (1991). “Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America: A nationwidepoll that assesses self-esteem, educational experiences, interest in math and science, and career aspirations of girlsand boys ages 9-15”, Washington DC: AAUW.9. Weiner, B., An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion, Psychological Review 92 (1985) (4),pp. 548–57310. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yang Yang, Kansas State University; Bette Grauer PE, Kansas State University; Jennifer Renee Thornburg, Kansas State University; Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the first mathematics course to retention and graduation.3, 11, 12 We also found thatSAS program worked equally well for both male and female students, and for both first-generation and non first-generation students in passing Calculus 1 course.The Current ResearchIn this follow-up study, we focused exclusively on students who utilized the peer tutoring SASprogram and examined these students’ perceptions of the peer tutoring and supplementalinstruction program across a wide range of core courses that implemented SAS tutoring.To become SAS program tutors, students must have successfully completed the core courses,receiving a grade of either an A or B in the course(s) they were hired to tutor. SAS tutors havesubstantial responsibilities as

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brianna Blaser, University of Washington; Katherine M. Steele, University of Washington; Sheryl Elaine Burgstahler, University of Washigton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

: Results of a longitudinal study. TheJournal of Higher Education, 69(6), pp. 589 – 620.8 Ambrose, S., Lazarus, B., & Nair, I. (1998). No universal constants: Journeys of women in engineering andcomputer science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 363 – 368.9 Diekman, A.B., et al. (2010) Seeking congruity between goals and roles a new look at why women opt out ofscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051 – 1057.10 Rhoten, D., & Pfirman, S. (2007). Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences.Research policy, 36(1), 56 – 75.11 National Center for Women and Information Technology. (n.d.). Top 10 ways to increase girls’ participation incomputing

Conference Session

Retention of Women Students II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Catherine F. Pieronek, University of Notre Dame; Leo H. McWilliams, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, institutional differencesand factors contribute to levels of commitment to engineering careers. Finally, currentengineering graduates entering the workforce do not consider a career choice as a lifetimecommitment.Building on prior literature, this study sought to answer the following research questions: 1. Do male and female students have similar experiences in terms of: a. Getting involved in engineering, campus, and the community? b. Taking on leadership roles in engineering? c. Considering leaving engineering? d. Do they consider the same factors to be encouraging / discouraging for continuation in engineering? 2. Do white and non-white students have similar experiences in terms of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leslie Potter, Iowa State University; Richard Stone, Iowa State University; Devna Fay Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Science Career Decisions andActive Learning,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol 6, pp. 297-306, Winter 2007.[12] Overath, R., Zhang, D., and Hatherill, J., “Implementing Course-based Research IncreasesStudent Aspirations for STEM Degrees,” Winter 2016 CUR Quarterly, Volume 37, Number 2.[13] Mendoza, B. and Brown, P.A., “Incorporating Undergraduate Research Experience in anEngineering Technology Curriculum, 2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic Section Spring Conference,Baltimore, MD, April 7, 2017.[14] Fyock, A., Potter, L., Stone, R., and Popejoy-Sheriff, D., “Filling the Graduate Pipeline ViaCourse-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs),” 2018 IISE National Conference,Orlando, Florida, May 2018.

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University ; Joel Alejandro Mejia, Angelo State University; Maja Husar Holmes, West Virginia University; Rachel R. Stoiko, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #14811Dialogues Toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering Faculty to Promotean Inclusive Department ClimateJ. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University Dr. J. Kasi Jackson is an Associate Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at West Virginia University. Her research covers supporting women faculty in STEM, STEM education, gendered impacts on animal behavior research, and the representation of science in popular culture. She completed her PhD in biology, with a focus on animal behavior, and graduate certificate in women’s studies at the University of Kentucky. She is a Co-Investigator on a National Science

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University; Michael Haungs, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

significant amounts of published research have focusedon the design and impact of blended “liberal studies in engineering” programs22, 23, 24, 25, 26(sometimes described as B.A. programs in Engineering Studies) similar to the program wedescribe at CPSU, surprisingly little of this research has attended to gender or the computingdisciplines. We believe that it is time to integrate the diverse research focused a) the relationshipsbetween liberal education and B.S. programs in engineering and computer science, b) theintegration of problem- and context-based education in B.S. programs in engineering andcomputer science, c) B.S. programs in engineering and computer science at liberal arts colleges,and d) the recruitment, retention, and success of women