Conference Session

Strategies for Success and Sanity for Academic Parents

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

or are considering becoming parents.Summary of ideas to be explored and discussed:Raising children is one of the most challenging and opportunity-filled experiences most peoplewill take on in their lives. Raising children as a member of the Academy brings an additionallayer of complexity. This panel will present challenges and opportunities encountered by thepanelists while raising children and trying to succeed in the Academy. The panelists will alsoprovide concrete, achievable strategies that have worked for them to overcome those hurdles andhow they have leveraged opportunities available to them. The session will allow time for Q&Aduring which audience members can share their own challenges and success strategies with thebroader group

Conference Session

Institutional Transformations

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Christi McGeorge, North Dakota State University ; Cali L. Anicha, North Dakota State University; Ann Burnett, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

of impacts dialoguesStrategiesAdvocates /Allies Male Faculty Gender Equity M M M M M M M M MgroupsFaculty Advancement Lectures and Panels Q Q

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Agnes Germaine d'Entremont P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Kerry Greer, University of British Columbia; Katherine A. Lyon, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

545.5 545.5 2013 S University of South Carolina 1278.5 1212 2006 S University of Wyoming 1245.5 1243.5 2009 S Vanderbilt University 1272 928 2006 S Wayne State University 818.5 772.5 2010 S Wichita State University 1389.5 1315 2011 SAppendix B – Normality assumption checkingShown below are the Q-Q plots used for checking the normality assumption of the proportiondifferences before and after adding BME

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa J. Cutright, University of Akron; Lakiesha N. Williams, Mississippi State University; Linda T Coats; Debora F Rodrigues, University of Houston (CoE); Judit Eva Puskas; Frank "Fritz" J Claydon, University of Houston (CoE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

% 100% 83%The last session was the 'round table' discussion where participants could ask any question(s)they wanted. A few of the questions from the participants, and the corresponding answers arelisted below. Answers will be in an abbreviated form rather than a full discussion. Q: How to submit multiple proposals a year and still have them be different? Ans: Change the lead investigator to reflect focus of research and/or tasks. Can also expand area(s) of potential topics or focus more on one subset. For instance the focus of a task can change based on where it will be submitted. Q: How to choose/select grad students? Ans. Will change with time. A MS student from home institution is easier as you

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin A. Cech, Rice University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

Satisfaction Measures:question was missing). (m) Personal satisfaction from work (n) Satisfaction with quality of work unitSurvey respondents were asked “do you consider (o) Satisfaction with working conditionsyourself to be one or more of the following,” with (p) Employee empowermentthe following response categories offered: (q) Co-workers cooperation“Heterosexual or Straight,” “Gay, Lesbian, (r) Satisfaction with procedures (s) Overall job satisfactionBisexual, or Transgender,” or “Prefer not to say.”Respondents who answered “prefer not to say” were excluded from

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amrita Dhakal Ghimire, Mississippi State University; Litany H Lineberry, Mississippi State University; Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

of more complextechnical topics to freshmen level students. The increase in less positive perceptions of confidencein programming ability among female learners warrants further study and is particularly interestingsince the instructors for the classes surveyed were both female.AcknowledgementWork described in this paper supports the goals of NSF INCLUDES 1649312.References[1] G. W. Skelton., Q. Pang, W. Zheng, and H. Shih. “Using robotics for teaching critical thinking, problems solving and self-regulated learning for freshmen engineering students,” In proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2011.[2] Support K-12 Computer Science Education in Mississippi, 2019. Accessed on: Jan 20, 2020. [Online]. Available

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maral Kargarmoakhar, Florida International University; Monique S. Ross, Florida International University; Zahra Hazari, Florida International University; Mark A Weiss, Florida International University; Michael Georgiopoulos, University of Central Florida; Ken Christensen P.E., University of South Florida; Tiana Solis, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support,” 2012.[9] R. W. Auger, A. E. Blackhurst, and K. Herting Wahl, “The Development of Elementary-Aged Children’s Career Aspirations and Expectations on JSTOR.” [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732626?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents. [Accessed: 27- Feb-2019].[10] L. S. Gottfredson and R. T. Lapan, “Assessing Gender-Based Circumscription of Occupational Aspirations,” J. Career Assess., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 419–441, Sep. 1997.[11] D. A. Jepsen and G. L. Dickson, “Continuity in life-span career development: Career exploration as a precursor to career establishment,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 217–233, 2003.[12] “Women Who

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Huma Shoaib, Purdue University ; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Number of Reviews 2012 Reviews 2018Mindware physics Physics Concepts 51 71WorkshopMindware Q-BA- Engineering and 51 717MAZE 2.0: Big Box ConstructionMindware Math & Science 50 124Microscopic kit &bookMindware Chaos Engineering and 43 68Tower ConstructionMindware Equate Math & Science 51 51Mindware KEVA Engineering and 50 70Contraptions (200 ConstructionPlank)Mindware Snap Physics Concepts 32 174Circuits (500piece)Mindware KEVA Engineering

Conference Session

Issues of Outreach and Interest in Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Sandrin, Arizona State University; Connie M Borror, Arizona State University West

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Diane Nicole Abdullah, Florida International University; Trina L. Fletcher, Florida International University; Ronald Quintero, Florida International University; Jade R. Moten, Florida International University; Brittany Nicole Boyd, Morgan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

al., “Racial/Ethnic Minority Community College Students’ Critical Consciousness and Social Cognitive Career Outcomes,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 302–317, 2020, doi: 10.1002/cdq.12238.[14] K. Crenshaw, “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics [1989],” Fem. Leg. Theory, pp. 57–80, 2018.[15] K. Cross, K. Clancy, R. Mendenhall, P. Imoukhuede, and J. Amos, “The Double Bind of Race and Gender: A Look into the Experiences of Women of Color in Engineering,” 2017 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo. Proc., 2017.[16] S. M. Malcolm, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown, “The double bind: the price of being a

Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joye Jepson, Antioch University; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority students. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 27-27-39.36. McCoy, L. P., & Heafner, T. L. (2004). Effect of gender on computer use and attitudes of college seniors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(1), 55-55-66.37. McLoughlin, L. A. (2005). Spotlighting: Emergent gender bias in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 373-373-381.38. Meyer, Diana. (2002). Wulf: Leading the NAE as it helps shape national policy. http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:aYFXqc2VAe4J:https://www.ece.uiuc.edu:4443/alumni/su02/wulf.html+ Dr.+William+A.+Wulf+%22engineering+is+a+creative+profession+that+thrives

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A Gatz, Stony Brook University ; Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University; Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the questionnaireadapted from the Engineering Student Survey and Students Persisting in Engineering Survey[30]. The self-reported ethnicities of WISE students indicated higher percentages of White andAsian students than the overall undergraduate population. GPA and percent of time studyingduring a typical week were normally distributed as assessed by histograms and q-q plots. Datawere self-reported and not available for undergraduate women STEM majors who did notparticipate in WISE.Table 1. Participant Characteristics from the WISE Mentee Survey (N = 51) Characteristic n Percentage Ethnicity Asian & Pacific American

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University; James Samuel Carter III, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

cannotcapture.References[1] L. Bottomley, K. Titus-Becker, and H. Smolensky-Lewis. Escape To Engineering: A SummerBridge Program For Women In Engineering: 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2009,Austin, Texas. Available: https://peer.asee.org/5254 [Accessed February 5, 2018].[2] Lavelle, Jerome P. and Richard F. Keltie, “Calculus Intervention for First-SemesterEngineering Students,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exposition.[3] Bauer, K., and Liang, Q., (2003) “The Effect of Personality and Precollege Characteristics onFirst-Year Activities and Academic Performance,” Journal of College Student Development,Vol. 44, No. 3, p. 277-290.[4] Hurtado, S., Carter, D. & Spuler, A. (1996). “Latino

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mahaa Mayeesha Ahmed, Rowan University ; Melanie Basantis, Rowan University; Kauser Jahan, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Biofuel12:15-1:00 PM Lunch & Presentation by student chapter of Rowan University Engineers without Borders1:00-2:00 PM Chemical Engineering Hydrogels and Cross-Linking Reactions, Manufacture and Entrepreneurship of Lip Gloss, Consistency of Chocolate Coated Oreo Cookie Production2:00-3:00 PM Electrical Engineering Programming with Arduinos, Optics with Jell-O, Music Engineering, Robotic Arm Demonstration3:00-3:30 PM Biomedical Engineering Modeling an Aneurism, Exploring Fluid Flow, How to Fix Broken Bones3:30-4:00PM Q & A Session & Exit Survey 2.1 Biomedical Engineering Activities associated with biomedical engineering

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer Retherford P.E., The University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Sarah J Mobley P.E., The University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Kristen N. Wyckoff, The University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Teacher Quality, vol. 95, no. 2. pp. 152–157, 2005. [11] F. Hoffman and P. Oreopoulos, “A Professor Like Me: The Influence of Instructor Gender on College Achievement,” Cambridge, MA, 2007.[12] J. Price, “The Effect of Instructor Race and Gender on Student Persistence in STEM Fields,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 29, pp. 901–910, 2010.[13] S. E. Carrell, M. E. Page, and J. E. West, “Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap,” Q. J. Econ., vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 1101–1144, 2010.[14] National Center for Education Statistics, “Postsecondary Education: Faculty and Instructional Staff,” in Digest of Education Statistics, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/programs

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yang Yang, Kansas State University; Bette Grauer PE, Kansas State University; Jennifer Renee Thornburg, Kansas State University; Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #29051Engineering Students’ Views on the Effectiveness of Peer Tutors inScholars Assisting Scholars ProgramDr. Yang Yang, Kansas State University Yang Lydia Yang is Assistant Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at College of Education, Kansas State University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Florida International University. Her research interest include quantitative research design, Q methodology, recruitment and retention of women in STEM fields.Dr. Bette Grauer PE, Kansas State University Executive Assistant, Carl R. Ice College of Engineering, Kansas State UniversityMrs

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Strategies Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Evelyn R. Sowells, North Carolina A&T State University; Nina Exner, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University; Sherry F. Abernathy, North Carolina A&T State University; Rajeev K. Agrawal, North Carolina A&T State University ; Brenda S. Faison Ph.D., North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

accomplished through partnerships with community colleges, high schools, and the internal and external University community. Listed are a few initiatives that were implemented this year to increase female enrollment:  Counselors recommended 50 females students that were unsure of career plans from High Point Andrews and T. Wingate High School for a tour of the School of Technology, followed by an overview of our programs. We then had leading female students in their respective majors host a Q/A session. Our exit survey showed that the tour and overview stimulated interest in 51 percent of the females who had not been interested in Technology

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University; Vicki Stieha, Boise State University; Ann E. Delaney, Boise State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Potpourri II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Waterfall, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Elizabeth Albrecht, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Stephen Williams, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Owe Petersen, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981 9. Smith, J. S., “First-year student perceptions of academic advisement: A qualitative study and reality check,” NACADA Journal, 22(2), 40, 2002 10. Kadar, R. S., “A counseling liaison model of academic advising.” Journal of College Counseling, 4(2), 2001 11. Alexitch, L.R., “The role of help-seeking attitudes and tendencies in students’ preferences for academic advising,” Journal of College Student Development, 43 (1), p. 5-14, 2002 12. Schlossberg, N. K., Lynch, A. Q., & Chickering, A. W., “Improving higher education environments for adults: Responsive programs and services from entry to departure,” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1989 13. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates

Conference Session

Focus on Under-Represented Women

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Donohue, University of Virginia; Larry Richards, University of Virginia; Carolyn Vallas, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Jackson, C.L. and Nunn, E.F., Historically Black Colleges and Universities: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 2003.30. http://www.aamu.edu/portal/page/portal/images/AAMUHistory.pdf, accessed on 9 January 2008.31. http://www.aamu.edu/portal/page/portal/Office_of_Institutional_Planning_Research_Evaluation/q uick_facts, accessed on 9 January 2008.32. http://www.aamu.edu/portal/page/portal/Office_of_Institutional_Planning_Research_Evaluation/Fact_Boo k/EnrollmentbySchool.pdf, accessed on 9 January 2008.33. http://www.morgan.edu/about-msu/history.asp, accessed on 9 January 2008.34. http://www.morgan.edu/admin/Planning/data-enrlmnt.asp, accessed on 9 January 2008.35. http://www.morgan.edu/admin

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University; Jung Sook Kim, Ohio State University; Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Ebony Omotola McGee, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

).2. Hunt, J. Why do Women Leave Science and Engineering? ILR Rev. 69, 199–226 (2016).3. Malcom, L. & Malcom, S. The Double Bind: The Next Generation. Harv. Educ. Rev. 81, 8     162–172 (2011).4. Turner, C. S. V. Women of color in academe: living with multiple marginality. J. High. Educ. 73, 74–93 (2002).5. Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q. & Brown, J. W. The Double Bind: The Price of Being a Minority Woman in Science. Report of a Conference of Minority Women Scientists, Arlie House, Warrenton, Virginia. (American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1976).6. Hamilton, K. Faculty Science Positions Continue to Elude Women of Color. Black Issues

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ona Egbue, University of South Carolina Upstate; Arshia Khan, University of Minnesota Duluth; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

academic research”. Journal of Research Administration vol. 42, no. 1, pp.61–73, 2011.[9] D. E. Meyerson, & J. K. Fletcher , “A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling”. Harvard Business Review, pp. 127-136, 2000.[10] F. Trix, & C Psenka, “Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty”. Discourse and society, 14, pp. 191-220, 2003.[11] S. M. Malcom, J. W. Brown, and P. Q. Hall. “The Double Bind: The price of being a minority woman in science”. American Association for the Advancement of Science Publication, 76-R-3, 1976. Washington, DC.[12] J. C. Williams, , K. W. Phillips, and E. V. Hall. “Tools for change: Boosting the retention of women in the STEM pipeline”. Journal

Conference Session

Undergraduate Student Issues: Culture

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech; Courtney S Smith-Orr, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, values, achievement, and career plans." Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(4): p. 319-336.11. Jones, B.D., C. Ruff, and M.C. Paretti, "The Impact of Engineering Identification and Stereotypes on Undergraduate Women’s Achievement and Persistence in Engineering." under review.12. Schmader, T., "Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2001. 38: p. 194-201.13. Schmader, T., M. Johns, and M. Barquissau, "The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain." Sex Roles, 2004. 50(11/12): p. 835- 850.14. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Christina A. Pantoja, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, no. 3, pp. 385–419, 2005.[58] N. E. Betz, “Advances in vocational theories,” 4th ed., S. D. Brown and R. W. Lent, Eds. Wiley, 2008, pp. 357–374[59] N. E. Betz, “Self-concept theory in career development and counseling,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 1994.[60] D. Brown, “Summary, comparison, and critique of the major theories,” 2nd ed., D. Brown, L. Brooks, and Associates, Eds. Jossey-Bass, 1990, pp. 338–363.[61] J. L. Swanson and P. A. Gore, “Advances in vocational psychology theory and research,” D. D. Brown and R. W. Lent, Eds. Wiley, 2000, pp. 233-269.[62] G. Hackett, R. W. Lent, and J. H. Greenhaus, “Advances in vocational theory and research: A 20 year retrospective,” Journal of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maija A. Benitz, Roger Williams University; Lillian Clark Jeznach, Roger Williams University; Selby M. Conrad, Roger Williams University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

‐year, multi‐institution study of women engineering student self‐ efficacy," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 27-38, 2009.[9] Q. A. Blanco, M. Carlota, A. Nasibog, B. Rodriguez, X. V. E. Salana and F. Gagani, "Probing on the Relationship between Students' Self-Confidence and Self-Efficacy while engaging in Online Learning amidst COVID-19," Journal La Edusci, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 16- 25, 2020.[10] J. Heo and S. Han, "Effects of motivation, academic stress and age in predicting self- directed learning readiness (SDLR): Focuses on online college students," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 61-71, 2018.[11] N. Ramo, E. Hald and A. Huang-Saad, "Synchronous vs. asynchronous vs

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tracy L. Yother, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Geanie Umberger, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Mary E. Johnson PhD, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

May 20, 2021].[16] L. Dickerson, “Unmanned vehicles forecast – Airborne systems”, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.forecastinternational.com/fistore/prod.cfm?FISSYS_RECNO=99&title=Unm anned-Vehicles-Forecast---Airborne-Systems. [Accessed May 20, 2021].[17] Deloitte, “2021 aerospace and defense industry outlook”, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEw iL85PI59jwAhVUG80KHRKDBg4QFjACegQIAxAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww2.del oitte.com%2Fcontent%2Fdam%2FDeloitte%2Fus%2FDocuments%2Fenergy- resources%2Fus-eri-aerospace-defense-industry- outlook.pdf&usg=AOvVaw16JFR3s11cTRIWHJBpDyGp. [Accessed May 20, 2021].[18] M. O'Hair

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Gretchen A. Dietz, University of Florida; Kayla Julianna Kummerlen, The University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Commun. Q., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 350–380, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1177/0893318902153002.[36] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 13, 2012.[37] H. Stonyer, “Making engineering students-making women: The discursive context of engineering education,” TEMPUS Publ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2002.[38] K. L. Tonso, “Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 273–307, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2.[39] J. P. Martin and C. Garza, “Centering the Marginalized student’s voice through autoethnography: Implications for

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany-SUNY

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox,” Eng. Stud., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 169–189, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059.[8] K. Crenshaw, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Rev., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241–1299, 1991.[9] P. H. Collins, Black feminist thought : knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York ; London : Routledge, 2000., 2000.[10] J. S. Jordan-Zachary, “Am I a Black Woman or a Woman Who is Black?: Thoughts on the Meaning of Intersectionality,” Polit. Gend., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 254–263, 2007.[11] S. M. Malcolm, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown, The double bind: the price of being a minority

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Faculty and Gender Issues

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laila Guessous, Oakland University; Kathleen Moore, Oakland University; Julie Walters, Oakland University; Bradley J. Roth, Oakland University; Leanne DeVreugd, Oakland University; Jo Reger, Oakland University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

to teach new classes. They tend to vote with their feet, attending events as long as theyfind them valuable. On average, 60% of the junior STEM faculty attended each cohort event.Women STEM faculty represented 55% of the attendees. Meeting scheduling tools such asdoodle.com have helped us identify meeting times that suit the largest number of faculty.Table 2 – Responses of new STEM faculty involved in mentoring cohort program to survey questions New STEM Faculty Cohort Events (Luncheon Program) Rating* Introduction of new STEM faculty to recent cohorts & STEM guide distribution 4.9 Informal Q&A session with critical university grants administrator 4.1 Faculty

Conference Session

Faculty Career Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University; Lori L. Bakken, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

an opportunity to get their food, get settled, and socialize/network with other attendees. Thelast half of the session is used to give a presentation on a professional development topic(leadership, communication, time management, lab management, worklife balance, negotiation,networking) or gender issue (stereotype threat, student-incivility, implicit bias). Presentationsinclude hands-on activities, such as surveys, and Q&A, where participants are encouraged tocontribute, share, and reflect. All presentations are posted on the program website. Additionalinformation is available from resources in the Office for Women in Engineering Library (alsocatalogued on the program website) which participants can check out for free. A