Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University; Jung Sook Kim, Ohio State University; Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Ebony Omotola McGee, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

UniversityMatilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Matilde Sanchez-Pena is a first year PhD student in the Engineering Education program at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research interests are diversity in engineering, education policy making and the effective teaching of statistics in engineering.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Ebony Omotola McGee, Vanderbilt University

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniela Faas, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Lucy Lenhardt, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Christi Patton Luks, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Beth A Myers, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Paper presented in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference (ed ASEE) (New Orleans, LA, 2016).4 Hatmaker, D. M. Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers. Gender, Work & Organization 20, 382-396 (2013).5 Settles, I. H. & O’Connor, R. C. Incivility at academic conferences: gender differences and the mediating role of climate. Sex Roles 71, 71-82 (2014).6 Gazley, B., Tschirhart, M. & Hager, M. A. Engagement motivations in professional associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43, 39S-60S (2014).7 Fink, A. How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide. (Sage Publications, 2012).8 Blair, J., Czaja, R. F. & Blair, E. A. Designing surveys: A

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kath Xu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Dawn Wendell, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Andrea S. Walsh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. 1999: n. pag. ​The Tech​. Web. 26 Jan. 2017. .Boyce, Mary C., Penny Chisholm, Edward F. Crawley, Lorna J. Gibson, Karen K. Gleason, Nancy A. Lynch, and John B. Vander Sande. ​Report of the School of Engineering​. Rep. N.p.: n.p., n.d. ​Report of the School of Engineering​. Committee on Women Faculty in the School of Engineering at MIT, Mar. 2002. Web. 26 Jan. 2017. .Caltech. "Fall Enrollment 2016-17." Office of the Registrar. Caltech, n.d. Web. 11 Feb. 2017. .Chin, Caroline, and Kamilla Tekiela. ​The Status of Undergraduate Women at MIT​. Rep. N.p., Feb. 2016. Web. 26 Jan. 2017. .Clance, Pauline R. "The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention." ​Psychology and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Lee Kemp Rynearson, Campbell University; Lynn A. Albers, Campbell University; Michele Miller, Campbell University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

through Service basedLearning. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA.10) Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2011, October). " Microaggressions" inengineering education: Climate for Asian, Latina and White women. In Frontiers inEducation Conference (FIE), 2011 (pp. S3H‐1). IEEE.11) Davies, A., Ramsay, J., Lindfield, H., & Couperthwaite, J. (2005). Building learningcommunities: foundations for good practice. British Journal of EducationalTechnology, 36, 615–628.12) Seron, C., Silbey, S.S., Cech, E., and Rubineau, B. (2015). Persistence is Cultural:Professional Socialization and the Reproduction of Sex Segregation. Work andOccupations, 43(2), 178-214.13) Klingbeil, N.W., High, K.A, Keller, M.W., White, I.M., Brummel, B.J

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gloria Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Lili Ma, New York City Colledge of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

). After school student club practices in U.S. kindergarten thru 12th grade educational institutions. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2(3), 235-244.4. S. Crowe, Robotics playing a bigger role in STEM education”, May 27, 2015,5. A. Welch and D. Huffman, "The Effect of Robotics Competitions on High School Students' Attitudes Toward Science”, School Science and mathematics, Vol. 111, No. 6, 12/2011.6. F.B.V. Benitti," Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review", Computers & Education, 2012.7. G Nugent, B Bruker, N Grandgenett, "The impact of educational robotics on student STEM learning, attitudes, and workplace skills", Robots in K-12 education: A

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ali Ahmad, Northwestern State University; Jerie Pedescleaux, Northwestern State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

-defined engineering technology activities b. An ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies c. An ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; and to apply experimental results to improve processes d. An ability to design systems, components, or processes for broadly-defined engineering technology problems appropriate to program educational objectives e. An ability to function effectively as a member or leader on a technical team f. An ability to identify, analyze, and solve broadly

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chrysanthe Demetry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Suzanne Sontgerath, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

the Control group in 1997. ** In 2010 the program was enlarged to accommodate up to 40 participants. All 36 girls who applied were accommodated and completed the program.2) An automated method was used to cross-check the data gathered manually, using a combination of SQL, RStudio, and Python programming. An information analyst wrote a script to query the admissions database and filtered records of applicants who: a) identified as female; b) applied for admission in the fall of 2003 or later; and c) had birth years earlier than 1983. (Girls in the first cohort in 1997 would have applied for admission as an undergraduate in 2003 if following a typical schedule, and the earliest birth year

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Hillman, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Ghada Salama, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Emilio Ocampo Eibenschutz, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Saly Mohamed Ali Awadh, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Lara El Said, Texas A&M University at Qatar

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Based on the findings of the focus groups, we then designed an anonymous surveyto be sent to current TAMUQ female students (see Appendix B). 100 responses were recordedout of the 231 female engineering students, which resulted in a 43.29% response rate (seeAppendix C). The majority of the students who responded were Qatari (57%).Focus Group FindingsWhy our students chose engineering?In terms of why our students chose to study engineering, there were two main themes. Manymentioned a “passion” for fields such as mathematics or chemistry since a young age.Participants also discussed feeling the need “to prove” or “to show” something:Example 1: It’s like you want to do something different, to prove to everyone that you’re capable of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emma Kaeli, Northeastern University; Tyler Byrne Cole, Northeastern University; Bradley Joseph Priem, Northeastern University; Rachel Lauren Shapiro, Northeastern University; Paul DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

.[3] B. Artz and D. M. Welsch, "The effect of peer and professor gender on colelge student performance," Southern Economic Association, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 816-838, 2014.[4] M. S. Hyde and J. Gess-Newsome, "Adjusting educational practice to increase female persistence in the sciences," Journal of College Student Retention, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 335- 355, 1999.[5] K. B. Coletti, E. O. Wisniewski, R. L. Shapiro, P. A. DiMilla, R. Reisberg and M. Covert, "Correlating Freshmen Engineers' Performance in a General Chemistry Course to their use of supplemental instruction," in American Society of Engineering Education, Indianapolis, 2014.[6] A. S. Rosette, J. S. Mueller and R. D. Lebel, "Are male leaders penalized for seeking

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology; Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); DeLois Kijana Crawford, Rochester Institute of Technology (GCCIS)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Defense (DoD) In- formation Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP) awards to RIT. These scholarships enable students to study and do research in graduate programs in security, forensics and information assurance. To date, scholarships to RIT students total more than $800,000.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey teaches courses and conducts re- search related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology; Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); DeLois Kijana Crawford, Rochester Institute of Technology (GCCIS)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

where she has served on the faculty since 1997. Sharon has been involved in computing security education at RIT since its inception. She is the PI of for the Department of Defense (DoD) In- formation Assurance Scholarship Program (IASP) awards to RIT. These scholarships enable students to study and do research in graduate programs in security, forensics and information assurance. To date, scholarships to RIT students total more than $800,000.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey teaches courses and conducts re- search

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina S. Morton, University of Michigan ; Selyna Beverly, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

engineering efficacy measure with studentresponses from the 2013 cohort; that analysis produced two distinct factors. For this study, weused one of these factors—the engineering major confidence factor—which captures students’belief in their ability to succeed as an undergraduate majoring in engineering. Items in this factorare: § I can succeed in an engineering major § I can complete the math requirements for most engineering majors § I can succeed in an engineering major while not having to give up participation in my outside interests § I can excel in an engineering major during the current academic year § I can succeed (earn either an A or B) in an advanced physics course § I can complete any engineering

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne-Marie A Lerner, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Christopher Frayer, University of Wisconsin - Platteville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, somewhat, not at all, N/A did not attend] 9. To what degree did your participation in the New Faculty Learning Community encourage you to seek funding for research? [very much, somewhat, not at all, N/A did not attend] 10. To what degree did your participation in the New Faculty Learning Community encourage you to seek further knowledge related to pedagogical techniques? [very much, somewhat, not at all, N/A did not attend] 11. a. Have you submitted a publication or grant proposal in the past two years? [yes, no] b. Have you implemented a new pedagogical technique in your class room over the last two years? [yes, no] c. To what degree did your participation in the New Faculty

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heather Lysbeth Henderson, West Virginia University; Karen E Rambo-Hernandez, West Virginia University ; Christina Paguyo, Colorado State University; Rebecca A Atadero, Colorado State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

with students embracing a growth mindset.Considering the dearth of literature about mindset, engineering identity, and gender, weexplore whether fixed or growth mindsets influence how students identify as engineers and seeif this relationship differs for women and men. Understanding whether mindset contributes toengineering identity can help engineering educators understand how to design and createlearning opportunities that cultivate engineering identities and promote engineering studentpersistence, particularly among women.The Current StudyThe purpose of this study is threefold: (a) to explore how does engineering identity developduring the first semester of engineering course work, (b) to determine if the development ofengineering identity

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin I. Tyler, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Nicole Johnson-Glauch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jessica A. Krogstad, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Educ Pract. 2004;130(2):95-108.11. Demetry C, Hubelbank J, Blaisdell SL, et al. Supporting Young Women To Enter Engineering: Long-Term Effects of a Middle School Engineering Outreach Program for Girls. J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2009;15:119-142. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i2.20.12. Dorst K. The core of “design thinking” and its application. Des Stud. 2011;32(6):521-532. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.13. Dym CL (Harvey MC, Agogino AM (University of C at B, Ozgur E (Stanford U, Frey DD (Massachussetts I of T, Leifer LJ (Stanford U. Engineering Design Thinking , Teaching , and Learning. J Eng Educ. 2005;(January):103-120.14. Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L. Design Thinking: Understand–improve–apply

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alandra Kahl, Pennsylvania State University, Greater Allegheny

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #17649Brewing Change: A Forum for Women in Engineering and the SciencesDr. Alandra Kahl, Pennsylvania State University, Greater Allegheny Dr. Alandra Kahl currently teaches engineering design and sustainable systems at The Pennsylvania State University, Greater Allegheny campus. She received her doctorate in environmental engineering from the University of Arizona in 2013, where her dissertation focused on the fate and transport of contaminants of emerging concern in an arid region. Dr. Kahl’s research interests include engineering of sustainable systems, treatment of emerging contaminants via natural systems and

Conference Session

Listening and Negotiation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kevin D. Hall, University of Arkansas; Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Amy J Moll, Boise State University; Janet Callahan, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

, before having any conversation with the faculty member, the Associate Deanbegan doing some research on the situation (Tactic 1: Do your homework). Grades for allgraduate courses in the M.S. program were examined, going back three years, by course and byinstructor. Results were pretty interesting and illuminated the situation. All the other faculty inthe program typically assigned grades of A and B to students enrolled in graduate courses. Onlyon an exceptional basis, was a grade of C assigned. Meanwhile, for the faculty member inquestion, his median grade was a B, with an equal number of A and C grades assigned each timehe taught a graduate course.In the next step, the Associate Dean scheduled a meeting with the faculty member in question

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Robert J Culbertson, Department of Physics, Arizona State University; James A Middleton, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

with other women: Sex segregation within organizations. Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies, 27-55.11 Hornsby, J. S., Benson, P. G., & Smith, B. N. (1987). An investigation of gender bias in the job evaluation process. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2(2), 150-159.12 Rice, L., & Barth, J. M. (2016). Hiring Decisions: The Effect of Evaluator Gender and Gender Stereotype Characteristics on the Evaluation of Job Applicants. Gender Issues, 33(1), 1-21.13 MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291-303.14 Cress, C. M., & Hart, J. (2009). Playing soccer on

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin I Tyler, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Yanfen Li, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Nicole D. Jackson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Wan-Ting Chen, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign; Chaoyang Liu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Rohit Bhargava, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #19986Overcoming Difficulties in Research Statement Preparation for the AcademicJob Search: Expansion of a Peer-Focused Professional Development ProgramMs. Kaitlin I Tyler, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Kaitlin received her BS in Materials Science and Engineering with a concentration in biomaterials from Michigan State University in 2012. She is currently working on her PhD at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign under Professor Paul Braun. Her research focuses on manipulating eutectic material microstructures for optical applications. She is also one of the co-coordinators for Girls Learning About

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Agnes G. d'Entremont, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Hannah Gustafson, University of British Columbia; Katherine A. Lyon, University of British Columbia ; Jonathan Verrett P.Eng., University of British Columbia; Kerry Greer, Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia; Atif Shoukat Ali, University of British Columbia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #19095Gendered Words in U.S. Engineering Recruitment DocumentsDr. Agnes G. d’Entremont, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Dr. Agnes d’Entremont is an Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Her technical research in Orthopaedic Biomechanics is focused on joint motion and cartilage health with a particular concentration in pediatric hip disorders and MRI-based methods. Her teaching-related interests include team-based learning and the flipped classroom, as well as diversity and climate issues in engineering education.Dr. Hannah Gustafson, University of British Columbia Hannah Gustafson

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juebei Chen, Shanghai Jiaotong University; Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Tianyi Zheng, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

sympathy responses and help; express insecurity, personal confusion or depreciation of himself Special Cloak own prejudices in the stereotype for personal benefitUsing this typology as a framework, functional roles that female engineering studentstake on in group working can be effectively and efficiently detected.MethodParticipantsPurposeful sampling was employed in recruiting female engineering students asinterviewees. In order to guarantee the diversity of samples in different contexts, wechose two schools which offered the course of Introduction of Engineering in a leadingChinese university H. School A is composed of mainly Chinese students and faculty,while school B is a school that is cooperatively run by

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica J. Lofton, University of Evansville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Ranking 4 or 5 The Speed Mentoring event 4.33 91.7 Team Building Activities 4.25 91.7 Tour A 4.67 100 Tour B 4.50 100 Tour C 2.08 00.0 Workshop A 3.42 58.0 Workshop B 3.83 58.3 Workshop C 3.50 50.0 Staying at the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer S Gurski, Drexel University; Penny Louise Hammrich, Drexel Univeristy

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

2 3.5769 0.59832 0.653 Lower-middle income 4 3.5769 0.4594 Middle income 13 3.6568 0.4675 Upper-middle income 16 3.6683 0.47478 High income 5 3.9077 0.19911 a. Kruskal Wallis Test b. Grouping Variable: Would you describe your family as: (Mark one)MotivationGiven the respondents’ self-rating of average as compared to their peers, the researcher wasinterested in identifying university-level supports respondents utilized when they encounteredacademic difficulties. The small student-to- Table 10faculty ratio of 1:10 at

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole Yates, National Society of Black Engineers; Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #19212Minority Women in the Workplace: Early Career Challenges and Strategiesfor Overcoming ObstaclesNicole Yates, National Society of Black Engineers Nicole Yates currently serves as the Senior Research Analyst for the National Society of Black Engineers. She graduated from Stanford University with a Master’s degree in Psychology and completed a thesis that focused on gender differences in reasons for switching from STEM to non-STEM majors. Her background is in research and academia.Ms. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Rincon joined the Society of Women Engineers in February 2016 as the Manager of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina L. Carmen, University of Alabama, Huntsville; Deborah Lynn Fraley, Women in Defense, TN Valley Chapter

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

International Astronautical Congress Proceedings, Cape Town, ZA, Oct. 2011.15. Carmen C. and Groenewald B., “Initiation and Development of International Collaboration Among the Future Space Workforce Via the Design and Development of a STEM Tool,” 63rd International Astronautical Congress Proceedings, Naples, IT, Oct. 2012.16. Groenewald, B. and Carmen, C.L., “Establishment of a Multi-National University Effort to Promote International Cooperation and Develop the Future Space Workforce,” 64th International Astronautical Congress Proceedings, Beijing, CN, Sept. 2013.17. Dulz, D., Henslee, A., Hoang, T., Marks, D., Moreno, A., Latham, J, and Peusch, A., “Preliminary Design Review: Table Top Wind Tunnel,” MAE 490

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Morgan Irvin, University of Missouri, Columbia; Elizabeth Hiteshue, Bain & Company; Samantha Laurel Swanson; Caroline Missouri Wochnick, Augsburg College; Hannah Bech, AmeriCorps VISTA; Amanda Marie Kapetanakis, Augsburg College; Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Derrick Langley, Space and Missile Center, Enterprise Ground Services Office (SMC/ADZS); Michael Geselowitz, IEEE History Center at Stevens Institute of Technology; MaryAnn C. Hellrigel, IEEE, IEEE History Center; Gregory Alan Good, American Institute of Physics

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #17793Following in the Footsteps of Distinguished Leaders in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Narratives of the Next Generationof Young People Preserving key Oral Histories of our Societal HistoryMs. Kelsey Morgan Irvin, University of Missouri, Columbia Kelsey Irvin is a Clinical Psychology Ph.D. Candidate at the University of Missouri, Columbia. She is studying youth emotion dysregulation and how its physiological presentation correlates to depression.Ms. Elizabeth Hiteshue, Bain & Company Elizabeth graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in May 2015 with a degree in Systems Engi

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lesley Cremeans, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse P.E., Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80Balakrishnan, B. & Low, F.S. (2016). Learning experience and socio-cultural influences on female engineering students’ perspectives on engineering courses and careers. Minerva, 54(2), 219-239.Bandura, A. (1977). Sel-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.Brickhouse, N.W., Lowery, P., & Shultz, K. (2000). What kind of girl does science? The construction of school identities. Journal of Research in science teaching, 37(5), 441- 458

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sami Ainane, Pertoleum Institute Abu Dhabi UAE; Ali Bouabid

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

1993-1998 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland, Baltimore County Mechanical Engineer 1989-1995 EEC Consulting Rockville, MD President, Dome Enterprises 1989 - 1993 Bethesda MD HONORS AND AWARDS Best Presentation Award, ICESEEI 2016 : 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective Educational Instructions. Paris France 2016 Outstanding Service and Commitment to the En- richment of the Science and Technology Program, Eleanor Roosevelt H.S., Greenbelt MD, 05/2003 SELECTED PUBLICATIONS 1. A. Bouabid, B. Bielenberg, S. Ainane, N. Pasha, ”Learning Outcomes Alignment across Engineering Core Courses”, 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Bazylak, University of Toronto; Ruth Childs, University of Toronto; Aimy Bazylak, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

(especially around gender), b) minimized the bias in the survey language, andc) was validated [18]. For the full details of the steps taken to design and validate the survey, thereader is referred to our previous paper [18]. A brief overview is provided here for readerconvenience. The survey tool was used to evaluate our hypothesis that there are three broaddecision factors used by secondary students when considering whether to study engineering.These decision factors are: Perceptions – of the profession and the undergraduate programs,Achievement – to meet programs’ entrance requirements, and Confidence – self-perception ofqualifications and traits (See Table 1). Our first research question was used to determine thelevel of importance that secondary

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University; Vicki Stieha, Boise State University; Ann E. Delaney, Boise State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Mathematics and minor in Economics) with High Honors from Swarthmore College in 1980. She went on to earn an MS in Operations Research from Stanford University in 1981 and a Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University in 1984. After 30 years at Georgia Tech in a variety of roles, Donna became the Executive Director of the new Institute for STEM and Diversity Initiatives at Boise State University in January 2015. Donna’s current interests center around education issues in general, and in particular on increasing access and success of those traditionally under-represented and/or under-served in STEM higher education.Dr. Vicki Stieha, Boise State University Vicki Stieha, Ph.D. is a faculty member at Boise