. Hatmaker, “Engineering Identity: Gender and Professional Identity Negotiation among Women Engineers,” Gender, Work, and Organization, vol. 20, no. 4, 2013.[23] S. Banchefsky, J. Westfall, B. Park, and C. Judd, “But You Don’t Look Like A Scientist!: Women Scientists with Feminine Appearance are Deemed Less Likely to be Scientists,” Sex Roles, vol. 75, no. 3-4, pp. 95-109, 2016.[24] S. Rankin, G. Weber, W. Blumenfeld, and S. Frazer, “2010 State of Higher Education for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, &. Transgender People,” Report. Charlotte, NC: Campus Pride.[25] D. Hill, “Genderism, transphobia, and gender bashing: A framework for interpreting anti- transgender violence,” in Understanding and dealing with violence: A
]. [7] S. Burgstahler, M. Cakmak, K. Steele, and B. Blaser, “Equal Access: Universal Design of Engineering Labs,” Access Engineering, n.d. [Online]. Available: https://www.washington.edu/doit/sites/default/files/atoms/files/EA_UD_Engineering_Labs.pdf. [Accessed: 02-Feb-2018]. [8] S. Burgstahler, M. Cakmak, K. Steele, and B. Blaser, “Making a Makerspace? Guidelines for Accessibility and Universal Design,” Access Engineering. [Online]. Available: https://www.washington.edu/doit/sites/default/files/atoms/files/Making_a_Makerspace_8_03_15.pdf. [Accessed: 02-Feb-2018]. [9] L. Hilliard, P. Dunston, J. McGlothlin, and B. S. Duerstock, “Designing Beyond the ADA-Creating an Accessible Research Laboratory for Students and Scientists with Physical
of Diversity and Inclusion The Millennial Influence for inclusion,” 2015.[9] B. A. Danielak, A. Gupta, and A. Elby, “Marginalized Identities of Sense-Makers: Reframing Engineering Student Retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 8–44, 2014.[10] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students,” Eng. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2011.[11] C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St Rose, Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. ERIC, 2010.[12] R. F. Baumeister and M. R. Leary, “The Need To Belong - Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human-Motivation,” Psychol. Bull
Paper ID #21733Translating Theory on Color-blind Racism to an Engineering Education Con-text: Illustrations from the Field of Engineering EducationDr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice Pawley is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Gender, Women’s and Sexuality Studies Program and the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. Prof. Pawley’s goal through her work at Purdue is to help people, including the engineering education profession, develop a vision of engineering education as more inclusive, engaged
Paper ID #23735Adding Diversity and Culture to the Engineer’s Toolkit: Evaluating a UniqueCourse Option for Engineering StudentsMs. Chelsea Nneka Onyeador, Stanford University I am a 4th year Mechanical Engineering B.S. student at Stanford University, planning to pursue graduate work in Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT next year. I am a Nigerian-American from central Texas, and I am a devoted advocate for diversity in engineering.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University Shannon K. Gilmartin, Ph.D., is a Senior Research Scholar at the Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research and Adjunct Professor in
Paper ID #15507Retaining Diverse Students in Civil Engineering and its Subdisciplines: Chal-lenges and OpportunitiesDr. Abbie B Liel P.E., University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Abbie B. Liel is an associate professor of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder.Eva Leong Ms. Eva Leong is a Staff Engineer at Big R Bridge. She earned her M.S. degree in civil engineering at University of Colorado Boulder in 2012. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Retaining Diverse Students in Civil Engineering and Its
Paper ID #16932Into the Light: Diffusing Ccontroversy and Increasing Transparency in theFaculty Salary Equity Study ProcessDr. Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Dr. Carol Marchetti is an Associate Professor of Statistics at Rochester Institute of Technology, where she teaches introductory and advanced undergraduate statistics courses and conducts research in statis- tics education, deaf education, and team work. She is a co-PI on RIT’s NSF ADVANCE IT project, Connect@RIT, and leads grant activities in the Human Resources strategic approach area.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester
Learn. 2012:1621-1623.44. Hidi S, Renninger KA, Krapp A. The present state of interest research. In: Renninger KA, Hidi S, Krapp A, eds. The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1992:433-446.45. Vygotsky L, Hanfmann E, Vakar G. Thought and Language. MIT press; 2012:252.46. Schreuders PD, Mannon SE, Rutherford B. Pipeline or personal preference: Women in engineering. Eur J Eng Educ. 2009;34(1):97-112. doi:10.1080/03043790902721488.47. Geisinger BN, Raman DR. Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors. Int J Eng Educ. 2013;29(4):914-925.48. Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and
Multiple Identity science, (2) the rules that govern the behavior of an engineer, and (3) the Theory environmental setting of the institution in which one learns to become an engineer. It is this latter factor that we have examined in this study.”Godwin (no specific Identity is composed of students’ perceptions of their performance/competence, Hazari (2010)32,(2013a;b)29; 30 Identity theory) recognition, and interest in a domain. (p. 1) Cass (2011)23, Potvin (2011
large programs do. Proceedings of the 2008 Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY, October 2008. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4720658/Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Undergraduate Education: A Status Report. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.Froyd, J. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2005). Integrated Engineering Curricula. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 147–164.Gonzalez, H. B. (2012). An Analysis of STEM Education Funding at the NSF: Trends and Policy Discussion (Vol. 7–5700). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P
Society (APICS) and a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE). She is a licensed Professional Engineer in Kansas.Dr. Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology Cheryl B. Schrader became Chancellor of Missouri University of Science and Technology, formerly the University of Missouri - Rolla, in 2012. Prior to her current leadership position she served as Associate Vice President for Strategic Research Initiatives and as Dean of the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Schrader has an extensive record of publications and sponsored research in the systems, control and STEM education fields. She received the 2005 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and
factor analysis with a promax (non-orthogonal) rotation was then run withthe newly shortened set of items. From theory, we would expect three factors (attainment STV,utility STV, and intrinsic STV), so a three-factor analysis was run first. Results from the threefactor maximum likelihood analysis are provided in Appendix B. We note that all items meetrecommendations for minimum loading of 0.32 onto a factor [38], except for the item that asked“I am interested in learning how to communicate with people from different backgrounds”.However, factor correlations ranged from -0.51 to -0.81, indicating that two of the factors arehighly correlated. Therefore, the three factor solution is not appropriate based on our data.Additionally, we could not
groups.Prof. Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University Keith D. Hjelmstad is Professor of Civil Engineering in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment at Arizona State University.Dr. Yong-Seok Park, Arizona State University Yong-Seok Park is currently a postdoctoral associate at Arizona State University in the STEM education research group headed by Dr. Krause. He earned his Master’s degree at George Washington University and his Doctorate at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. His research interests lie in undergraduate STEM education research and engineering design education.Ms. Bethany B Smith, Arizona State University Bethany Smith is currently a master’s student in
with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey teaches courses and conducts re- search related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey is the Principal Investi- gator (PI
(McGee, Robinson, Bentley, & Houston, 2015), as well as a metaphor of ‘bait-and-switch’ (Lachney & Nieusma, 2015) as means to characterize classroom teaching strategies. Inorder to assist people searching for frameworks when pursuing future work, Table 3 shows someexamples of how authors used frameworks in our publication sample. We have also provided alist of a subset of the frameworks used along with their respective citations that could serve as aninitial selection from which to choose in Appendix B. Table 3. Examples of Frameworks in Publication SampleFramework ExampleSocial Cognitive “This research has used grounded theory and Social Cognitive CareerCareer Theory Theory to understand how
survey questions with the consent form were emailed to therespective population using the bulk email request. The interviews were arranged after analyzingsurvey responses.Faculty DemographicsTable A and Table B lists the collected demographic information about age, gender, work status,years of experience in U.S. and language knowledge. It is important to note that the greatestnumber of participants were in the 36-40 (21%) year age range: under 25 (1%), 26-30 (6%), 31-35 (8%), 41-45 (16%), 51-55 (9%), 56-60 (13%), 61-65 (9%), 65 and older (5%). In addition, 13% of participants indicated that they are international faculty members. This data shows thediverse slate of faculty who participated in the survey. Table A
PlanThe activities of the ASEE Diveristy Committee have been guided by a communal vision andhave informed and been informed by (a) the task force charge in 2009, (b) initial plans developedby the committee in 2011-12, (c) and a formal strategic action plan developed in 2015-16. TheASEE statement on diversity and inclusion describes the Society’s vision as to create and foster environments where every individual is respected and no one feels marginalized. ASEE believes that this can be achieved by supporting the education, recruitment, retention, and advancement of these groups in engineering education, engineering technology education, and the engineering profession. While ASEE recognizes that steady gains have been
. Indianapolis.8. Perez-Castilleos, R, & Santhanam, P. R. (2014). Student-led Mentoring Program Fostering Retention of FemaleUndergraduate Students in STEM Fields. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education. Indianapolis.9. Clark, J. I., Godd, S. L., Des Jardins, A. C., Foreman, C. M., Gunnink, B. W., Plumb, C., & Stocker, K. R. (2015).Peer Mentoring Program: Providing early intervention and support to improve retention and success of women inengineering, computer science, and physics. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education. Seattle.10. Kim, D. L., Lee, Y. H., & Oh, M. S. (2012). Effect of Women in Engineering Programs on the Retention ofFemale Engineering Students. Presented at the Inaugural International
Paper ID #15207Making Changes: Application of an NSF-ADVANCE PAID Grant at a Pre-dominantly Undergraduate Institution (PUI)Dr. Theresa M. Vitolo, Gannon University Theresa M. Vitolo is an Associate Professor in the Computer and Information Science Department, Gan- non University (Erie, PA). Teaching in systems-related fields since 1986, she joined the Computer and Information Science Department at Gannon University in 1999. In addition to teaching, she has worked as a systems analyst / programmer on a variety of systems development projects. Her academic background includes a B.S.E. in industrial engineering and a Ph.D. in
., & Reed, S. (2011). Social Outcomes of Students Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing in General Education Classrooms. Exceptional Children, 77(4), 489–504. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/877027156?accountid=108Behm, G. W., & Mondragon, A. F. (2014). A Teaching Model for Teaching Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing and Hearing Students with Course Accessibility and Real World Product Design. In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference (pp. 1–13).Dowaliby, F., & Lang, H. (1999). Adjunct aids in instructional prose: a multimedia study with deaf college students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4(4), 270–82. http://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/4.4.270Elliot, L. B., Stinson, M. S., Easton, D., & Bourgeois, J
Reisser’s theory relate to the interview data wehave collected. We may opt to use template analysis (King, 2004) to help us assess to whatdegree interviews from the female Middle Eastern engineering student in our study supportthis identity theory and what aspects of their development might be un-recognized orunder-recognized in this Western-based theory.ReferencesChance, S. M., Eddy, P., & Bowe, B. (2016). Implications for education policy: A comparative study of women’s experiences in engineering and physics education in Ireland and Poland. Joint conference of Irish Social Sciences Platform (ISSP) and National Economic and Social Council (NESC) in Dublin, Ireland.Charity-Leeke, P. C. (2012). Women in engineering: A
began as a collaboration between the Metallurgical and IndustrialEngineering programs and expanded to Mechanical Engineering in year 3 of the program. Thegrant provided scholarships for students who had an unmet need not covered by family support,and the university provided mentors, advisors, and professional development activities.The program was geared to prepare the scholars to graduate and be successful in the workforce orfor pursuit of a graduate engineering degree. Key components to make women successful inengineering included helping the participants to be a) confident in their discipline, b) confidentwith their overall abilities and self, c) able to flourish in a diverse team environment, d) able toutilize their acquired engineering
competitive. Just because your grades – I'm sure you guys are also graded – like your grades aren't A, B. It's more of a curve. So, if a 50 is an average and you got a C plus, then you pass. So, I've just felt like in the beginning, it was – like I have a good relationship with my peers now. But in thebeginning, I felt like I was working against them. Like you don't want to help them because ifthey do bad and you do great, you have an A. But if you guys all do average, that's like a Cplus. So, I just felt like – I mean, I know why they did it just to drive out everyone who couldn'thandle it. But I just felt like in the beginning it was really competitive. Like now, just becauseeverything's projects, we're all in it together because we're at the end
, Utah State University, vol. 42, pp. 853‐859, 2008. [9] S. Lee, M. C. Harrison, G. Pell and C. L. Robinson, "Predicting Performance of First Year Engineering Students and the Importance of Assessment Tools Therein," Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44‐51, 2008. [10] J. F. Milem and J. B. Berger, "A modified model of college student persistence: Eploring the relationship between Astin's theory of involvement and Tinto's theory of student departure," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 38, pp. 387‐400, 1997. [11] M. Oja, "Supplemental Instruction Improves Grades But Not Persistence," College Student Journal, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 344‐349, 2012. [12] D. Arendale, "Increasing efficiency and
friends, so we mostly had task division. What he did—he wasn’t calling me or they were just doing it and when I was asking he said, “Okay, don’t worry. We just done it. We went to the lab and we just finished it.” I got so mad and I went to the professor and said, “He doesn’t—just share those projects, because I have to get a grade, too.” He said, “You chose him as a leader, so you have to go take care of it.” I sent him a few e-mails and asked him, “Okay, you should just give me more tasks, you have to just make—” I don’t know; he just never did. For the second semester of capstone I got B, because our professor said, “I didn’t see you doing those electrical engineering things,” and I said
, and Work Experiences of Adjunct and Other Non-Tenure-Track Faculty”, Washington, DC, USA, GAO Report No. GAO-18-49, 2017[2] C. Hollenshead, J. Waltman, L. August, J. Miller, G. Smith, and A. Bell, “Making the best of both worlds: Findings from a national institution-level survey on non-tenure-track faculty”, Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Education of Women, 2007[3] J. Levin, G. Shaker, “The Hybrid and Dualistic Identity of Full-Time Non-Tenure-Track Faculty”, American Behavioral Scientist, 2011[4] P. Umbach, “How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education” The Review of Higher Education, vol. 30, pp. 91–123, 2006.[5] C. Bland, B. Center, D. Finstad, K. Risby, and J. Staples
Paper ID #17699Managing Transformation to Crack Open Engineering EducationDr. Jennifer Karlin, University of Southern Maine Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now at the University of Southern Maine where she is a research professor of engineering and the curriculum specialist for the Maine Regulatory Training and Ethics Center.Dr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist
Paper ID #14579Women in Industrial Distribution: Emerging Opportunities and Challengesfor Female College GraduatesMrs. Allie Copeland, Texas A&M University Allie Copeland is the Vice President of Operations at Standard Supply & Distributing Inc., an indepen- dent privately owned industrial distributor of heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and related products. Allie has an Bachelor of Science in Organizational Leadership from Pennsylvania State University and is currently pursing a Masters of Industrial Distribution from Texas A&M University in College Station, TX.Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A
achievement and the hard work it demanded started with intentionalcommunications that students should expect to earn higher grades and work harder to achievethis goal (Yeager & Dweck, 2012). For instance, we frequently mentioned how companies seekengineering graduates with at least a B grades or greater, or a 3.0 grade point average (GPA).Students learn a variety of study and test-taking strategies to empower their efforts, many taughtby BOLD staff. We have found that forming personal relationships that open up communicationpathways about academic performance has led to better retention of students, especially thosefrom underrepresented minority populations. As shown in Figure 3, early gains in performanceare easily reversed, but in general, most
Paper ID #22667Native Hawaiians in Engineering: A Path to the ProfessoriateDr. Thanh Truc Thi Nguyen, University of Hawai’i at Mnoa Nguyen is a learning technologies faculty member at the Curriculum Research & Development Group in the College of Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa. Her work in organizational change and tech- nology is grounded in inquiry science, communities of practice, TPACK, and most recently improvement science.Dr. Oceana Puananilei Francis, University of Hawai’i at MnoaDr. Scott F. Miller, University of Hawai’i at Mnoa Scott Miller is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the