standard. The Standard that weare concerned with for this discussion is Standard 2 that addresses student learning anddevelopment. There are four sub-statements to this Standard dealing with a) interculturalunderstanding, b) language and communication, c) academic growth and d) student development.It is important to note here that the second sub-statement that deals with language is notapplicable to the WPI program being discussed. With the remaining 3, there are 24corresponding queries. Space does not permit a detailed presentation of each of the 24 queries and how the WPIprogram does or does not satisfy them. We present only a summary here. Copies of the completeset of standards and queries will be distributed at the presentation. Standard
-keycurricular plans for every supporteddegree program, routine supportfrom the college’s professionaladvising staff, and comprehensive Figure 1: GSEP spans all STEM degree programs planning and logistical support for on campus, and offers five language options. the year abroad. The overall aim isto maximize program accessibilityand volume by making the international tracks no more difficult to negotiate than conventionaldegree programs.GSEP scholars may choose from five supported languages: German, French, Spanish, Chinese,and Japanese. The choice of these particular GSEP languages was driven by a strategic aim to(a) maximize coverage of languages and regions with strong global STEM leadership; and (b)leverage
Paper ID #11034International Experiential Learning in Engineering: a Case Study of JuniorEnterprise in the United StatesMiss Morgan M. Bakies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Morgan Bakies is an undergraduate student in chemical engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and former British Exchange student at Swansea University in Swansea, Wales. During her studies as an undergraduate, she conducted research through a National Science Foundation-funded Re- search Experience for Undergraduates program at the University of Alabama and also interned at Lyon- dellBasell’s Houston Refinery.Karen
Paper ID #8263A Case for Student Led Global LearningDr. Robert O. Warrington Jr., Michigan Technological University Director, Institute for Leadership and Innovation, Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Dean at Michigan Tech from 1996-2007. Fellow ASME, AAASMs. Madelyn Marie Espinosa, Michigan Technological University - Pavlis InstituteHelena Keller, Michigan Technological University Page 21.1.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A Case for Student Led Global
9 field experience destination for US students because it requires no visa for US students, has English as its main language, is relatively safe, easy to get to and affordable. Figure 2: (a) Final Skype session where the secondary school students talked to each mini-‐team of biosystems undergraduate students (11/28/12). (b) Final land excavation of biodiversity pond at Edward P. Yorke with Belizean students and team of undergraduate students from University of Mount Union (05/20
Paper ID #11076Using Social Media to Create a Global Community of Sustainability-EngagedStudentsMatthew E Verbyla, University of South Florida Matthew Verbyla is a Ph.D. student of Environmental Engineering and NSF Graduate Research Fellow at the University of South Florida. Matthew worked for several years in the water and sanitation sector in Honduras, including one year with a Fulbright Fellowship. He currently studies pathogen removal in wastewater treatment ponds and microbial risk in wastewater irrigation systems in Bolivia.Ms. Colleen Claire Naughton Colleen Naughton is a doctoral student at the University of
Paper ID #8290The Harvard SEAS/Poli-USP Collaborative Field Course for InternationalEnvironmental Engineering EducationDr. Patrick D Ulrich, Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Patrick Ulrich has been the Assistant Director for Undergraduate Studies in Environmental Sciences & Engineering and a Lecturer on Environmental Sciences & Engineering in Harvard’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences since 2012. He earned a Ph.D. (2011) and M.S. (2006) in environmental engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, and a B.S. in Physics (2005) from the Pennsylvania State University.Prof. Chad
of instruction that will better match the cohort of students’ learning style to initiate ouradaptive teaching process.Cohort Cognitive ProfileThe different conglomeration of the Felder-Silverman learning scales for the students in a cohortforms a specific cognitive profile. We propose to use the Felder-Soloman index of learning styles(ILS) survey to determine the dominant learning styles within a cohort of students. The Felder-Soloman index of learning styles survey consists of 44 multiple choice questions. The survey has11 forced-choice questions that address each scale. Each item has only two possible choices (a)and (b) that corresponds to either one of the two categories in a specific scale. The (b) responsesare subtracted from the (a
, and engineering,(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data,(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability,(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams,(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems,(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,(g) an ability to communicate effectively,(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global & societal context,(i) a recognition of the need for, and ability to engage in, lifelong
reference in the response to situations and events (knowledge). 2. Students understand, respect, and appreciate cultural differences (attitude about culture). 3. Students demonstrate understanding of themselves and their ability to cope and adapt (attitude about self). 4. Students apply their knowledge of intercultural communication to adapt to a different culture and to interact effectively with those from a different culture or cultural background (skill). 5. Students seek out opportunities to engage (action).Each of the GCOs has several explicit sub-goals (a), (b), (c), etc. as described more completelyin Appendix A. Moreover, our university suggests that these GCOs be assessed using acollection of quantitative and
., Löfström, A., McDermott, R., and Russell, L. Intercultural Competence in Global Collaboration Courses in Computer Engineering, Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, San Francisco, USA, 2012.[4] Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., McDermott, R and von Konsky, B. “Assessing Professional Skills in Engineering Education”, Australian Computer Science Communications, vol 33, no 2, pp 145-154, 2011.[5] Cajander, Å. Daniels, M. and McDermott, R. On valuing peers: theories of learning and intercultural competence. Computer Science Education, 22(4):319–342, 2012. [6] Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., Peters, A., and McDermott, R. Critical Thinking, Peer-Writing, and the Importance
Engineering and Construction students to network with and learn fromprofessionals, scholars, and high level decision makers from around the world. Figure 2 showsexamples of a number of innovative construction projects from around the world that werepresented at the conference and that students got a chance to learn about first hand from thepeople who were involved in them. Page 20.29.7 (a) (b) (c) Figure 2. Sample of the construction projects highlighted at ICIC 2006. (a) Japan’s Kansai International Airport; (b) the new San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge
and international undergraduate research experiencesThe National Council on Undergraduate Research defines undergraduate research as “An inquiry orinvestigation conducted by an undergraduate student that makes an original intellectual or creativecontribution to the discipline” and identifies six key benefits of these experiences: a) enhancingstudent learning through mentoring relationships with faculty, b) increasing retention, c) increasingenrollment in graduate education and providing effective career preparation, d) developing criticalthinking creativity, problem solving, and intellectual independence, e) developing an understandingof research methodology, and f) promoting an innovation-oriented culture.12 The NSF has fundedREU programs
discussion amongst experts were split in the twosets a) Coding Related and b) Generic. The former set consists of the factors C2, C4 and C10 and thelatter consists of the rest. Page 20.22.3 TABLE 1: TEN COMMANDMENTS OF EGOLESS PROGRAMMING Ten Commandments of Egoless Programming C1 Understand and accept that you will make mistakes. C2 You are not your code. C3 No matter how much "karate" you know, someone else will always know more. C4 Don't rewrite code without consultation
education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context1. The Royalacademy of engineering also has identified attributes required of graduate engineers, whichinclude team-work and multidisciplinary systems2. Male and Chapman3 have quoted EngineersAustralia accreditation board requiring its graduate engineers to have, among other attributes, (a)the ability to communicate effectively, not only with other engineers but also with the Page 20.32.2community at large, (b) the ability to function effectively as an individual contributor and inmulti-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams with the capacity to be
. 7-25, 2003. 9. Felder, R.M. Index of Learning Styles, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSpage.html, http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html 10. Felder, R.M., Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles. Engineering Education 78 (7), 674-681. 11. Herrmann, N. (1990). The Creative Brain. Lake Lure, North Carolina: Brain Books. 12. Kayes, Anna B., Kayes, D. Christopher, Kolb, David A. (2005). Experiential Learning in Teams. Simulation & Gaming, 36. 13. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall. 14. Kolb, A.Y. and Kolb, D.A. (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1, 2005 Technical
Paper ID #8277Presenting the NapoNet: Developing Global Competencies through Commu-nications Technology in the Peruvian AmazonMiss Christie Ritter, The University of Colorado at Boulder Christie Ritter is a Junior in Environmental Engineering with a focus in Engineering for Developing Communities at the University of Colorado at Boulder.Dr. Alan Rolf Mickelson, University of Colorado, BoulderDr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Pro- gram and Laboratory. He holds a BS in psychology from Louisiana State University
Spanish curriculum. She has developed specialized Spanish courses designed for engineers, as well as interdisciplinary courses that connect engineering to other fields of study. In her research she is equally versatile: her scholarship covers a wide range of topics relating to international education, languages across the curriculum, applied linguistics, materials development and literary and cultural studies.Dr. Sigrid – Berka, University of Rhode Island Dr. Sigrid Berka is the Executive Director of the International Engineering Program (IEP) at the Univer- sity of Rhode Island, and also the Director of the German and the Chinese IEP, responsible for building academic programs with exchange partners abroad, internship