Update: Highlights from the Out-of-School Time Database. Number 5.10. Baker, B.S., Nugent, G., Hampton, A. (2008). Examining 4-H Robotics In The Learning of Science, Engineering, and Technology Topics and the Related Student Attitudes. Journal of Youth Development: Bridging Research and Practice. 2(3) Spring 2008. Article 0803FA001.11. Daugherty, J.L. (2009). Engineering Professional Development Design for Secondary School Teachers: A Multiple Case Study. Journal of Technology Education.12. Basista, B. & Mathews, S. (2002). Integrated Science and Mathematics Professional Development Programs. School Science and Mathematics, 102 (7), 359-370.13. Brockway, D., McGrath, E., McKay, M, Schultz, D. (2009). Analysis of a Statewide K-12
Paper ID #6317Evaluation of a First-Year Retention Project: Findings at HalftimeProf. Alan D. Niemi, LeTourneau University Alan D. Niemi is a professor and chair of Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University. He re- ceived his B.S. in Electrical Engineering Technology from Lake Superior State University and his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Illinois Institute of Technology. He has taught courses in Electrical Engi- neering and Technology for 26 years. In addition to teaching, Mr. Niemi has spent seven years in industry designing digital and microcontroller systems.Dr. Matthew G. Green, LeTourneau University
Paper ID #7784The Reflective Engineering Advisor: A Paradigm for Learning-Centered Stu-dent AdvisingDr. Emily L. Allen, San Jose State University Dr. Emily Allen is Associate Dean of the Charles W. Davidson College of Engineering at San Jose State University. Her portfolio includes undergraduate programs and accreditation, student success programs, personnel and infrastructure, and K-14 outreach. She has been on the faculty at SJSU since earning her PhD in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University in 1992.Mr. Francisco Castillo, College of Engineering, San Jose State University Mr. Francisco Castillo has a
per the actuation fatigue behavior of SMAs shown in Fig. 1.The following sections present the various activities and the research work undertaken by theundergraduate student. The research work includes the specimen preparation, experimentalsetup, in-situ method development, results and discussion, and work in progress. Finally, thesummer research program is assessed and its implications on future academic and career plans. Page 23.725.4 Actuation Strain (A) (B)Fig. 1. SMA Actuation (A) Representative strain vs. temperature plot for an SMA correspondingto a complete
– 2011 participant Figure 4. a) Marker attachments on the right-arm; b) experiment procedures captured by a VICON 3D motion capturing systemFigure 5 shows snapshots of an REU project titled “Comparative analysis of pulse and activethermography for investigating hidden solder joint integrity.” Page 23.1040.8 (a) (b) (c) Figure 5. (a) Heating chamber; (b) printed circuit board (PCB) with solder joints with three different geometries; and (c) infrared image of PCB after heating experiment.Dissemination and Long-term Tracking of StudentsREU
” c l u s t e r “Beocat” eoc a t r o f “ B Tou Introducing HPC and Multi-Threaded Computing to Middle School Girls Using Scratch Russell Feldhausen, Scott Bell, and Daniel A. Andresen Kansas State UniversityIntroductionWe present details and outcomes from an outreach activity designed to spark interest in middle andhigh-school aged girls to consider a future in science. This
Page 23.491.2Several engineering programs engage in community through service learning. These programsfollow a structured format in developing community service. Barrington and Duffy summarizewhat service learning is through definition: There have been many definitions for service-learning in the literature over the years[e.g., (Jacoby, 1996), (Bringle, Hatcher, & Games, 1997), (Stanton, Giles, & Cruz, 1999), (Learnand Serve America, 2009). One of the earliest definitions is still widely accepted andcomprehensive: Service-learning is a “a course based, credit-bearing, educational experience inwhich students (a) participate in an organized service activity that meets identified communityneeds and (b) reflect on the service
and future plans for this research.3. Experimental SurveyTo collect feedback regarding the HPML approach, an informal experiment wasconducted using surveys with 95 undergraduate students at the University of CentralFlorida. The students were asked if they prefer such an approach, and if they think thatthis is a better approach to learning Software Engineering. The results were grouped into4 categories (shown in Figure 6) based on the students answers.Category A: Students who think that the approach is good, but prefer to be conservativein their answer until they know more about HPML, and observe an actual course taughtusing its structure.Category B: Students who valued the idea very much and hope to register for a classstructured using
-minute lesson incorporating active learning teachingmethods.18 Like the microteaching session that occurs prior to the start of the term, the TAspresent a lesson to a small group of their peers and receive feedback. Unlike the earliermicroteaching sessions, the TAs may have the opportunity to win a small prize (i.e., $5 giftcertificate) for the TA who incorporates active learning into their lesson most effectively. Sincethere are many active learning teaching strategies, for the purpose of this TA training,participants are asked to select one of six active learning teaching methods for their lessons: (1)the minute paper, (2) think-pair-share, (3) brainstorming, (4) case studies, (5) inquiry learning,and (6) cooperative groups (See Appendix B for
transformed. Bibliography1. Henwood, F. (1998). Engineering difference: Discourses on gender, sexuality and work in a college of technology. Gender & Education, 10(1), 35 – 49.2. Acker, S. (1994). Gendered education: Sociological reflections on women, teaching, and feminism. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.3. Baxter Magolda, M. (2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self- development. Sterling, VA: Stylus4. Beede, D.,Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Kahn, B., and Doms, M. 2011. “Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation”. Economics and Statistics Administration (ESA) Issue Brief 04-11 (August 2011). U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington D.C
). Snowstorm wreaks havoc, barrels east; Metrodome roof collapses. CNN News. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/12/12/winter.weather/index.html2. Spencer, T. (1994, January 18). Earthquake: Disaster before dawn: Scoreboard crashes onto seats in Anaheim stadium: Collapse: The 17.5-ton Sony 'Jumbotron' also destroyed a section of roof as it broke loose and fell to the left-field upper deck. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/1994-01-18/local/ me-13025_1_anaheim-stadium3. Online etymology dictionary. (2001-2012). Retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php4, Calvert, J. B. (2010, May 13). Old units of length. Retrieved from http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/tech /oldleng.htm5. Mehzer, J. F
refers to a technique used by physics educationresearchers where a demonstration of a particular phenomena is done for the intervieweeand then they are asked to predict what will happen given the initial conditions 18, 19.Figure 1: Example ranking task used in interviews The overall goal of the interview analysis was to code for student’s logic both intheir talk and their writing during the interviews. This approach can be considered to bethematic analysis 20, 21, with themes being consistent patterns of logic in studentreasoning. For example, in Figure 1 above, a large portion of students believed that thelargest normal stress was at locations A, B, and E, and within that group of students acommon rationale was either that those
31 Phase 1 – Project Planning and Design Phase 2 – Construction Engineering Phase 3 – Project Closeout Students are presented with a list of potential When awarded a project, students must Upon project completion, projects. Students must select methods for each monitor and control the project by balancing students are evaluated using activity. Methods vary by cost and schedule to the schedule, cost, and quality. several metrics. complete. Activity: Project C Activity: Project B Cost Project
retreated so far away that the residentshave to travel half an hour to collect firewood today (Figure 2B).One major cash crop of the Gambia is peanut. It counts up to 6.9% of the country’s grossdomestic product [3]. While peanut products are exported, the peanut shells are left in thecountry as an agricultural waste. The peanut shells are available in great quantity in manyareas of the Gambia. During our visit, we visited a dumping site where tons of peanutshells were left there useless (Figure 2C). Page 23.622.3 (A) (B
, Mississippi State University Dr. Hossein Toghiani is the Thomas B. Nusz Endowed professor and an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at Mississippi State. He received his B.S.Ch.E, M.S.Ch.E, and Ph.D. in Chemical Engi- neering from the University of Missouri-Columbia. A member of the Bagley College of Engineering Academy of Distinguished Teachers, Dr. Toghiani has taught a variety of courses at MSU, including Pro- cess Control, Transport Phenomena, Reactor Design, Engineering Materials, Thermodynamics, both Unit Operations Laboratories and graduate courses in Advanced Thermodynamics, Transport Phenomena and Chemical Kinetics. He performs research in the areas of catalysis, fuel cells and nanocomposite materials.Dr
Investigators are looking at new techniques Page 23.15.5for engineering writers to enhance the persuasiveness of proposals and cover letters.11 Someeducators, like Dr. Chad A. B. Wilson at University of Houston, have figured out how to usepopular, mainstream novels to teach engineering writing.12 These are exciting times. Somedaysoon, “engineering writing” might well become a brand name genre akin to “science writing”—accepted and known widely by academics and laypersons alike.Case StudyThis paper develops its case study, first, by presenting both the specifications for the subjectwriting assignment’s topic and document. Second, the case study describes
and lessons learned from this endeavorare summarized and conclusions are drawn through formative assessment activities conductedduring the summer camp. Solutions are proposed to rectify identified issues or challenges thatwere faced in this prototype case-study. In Section 4, we provide a summary and comment onour plans for future work.1. Pedagogical Model Through the proposed model we are trying to accomplish following learning objectives: a. Provide students with a view of Engineering as a unified profession and introduce them to key systems engineering principles. b. Introduce students to the product lifecycle and enhance their intuition of how today’s engineers use principles of Science and Mathematics to
Paper ID #5937Approaches to Integrating Policy into Engineering EducationDr. Ida B Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Ida Ngambeki is a Postdoctoral Researcher with a joint appointment in the Department of Technology, Leadership and Innovation and the Global Policy Research Institute at Purdue University. She has a B.S. in Engineering from Smith College and a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research interests include global engineering policy, motivation in engineering, and human-artefact interaction.Dr. Dennis R. Depew, Purdue University, West Lafayette From July, 2002 to June
Paper ID #7783Software and System Engineering Education: Commonalities and Differ-encesDr. Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Massood Towhidnejad is the director of NExtGeneration Applied Research Laboratory (NEAR), and a tenure full professor of software engineering in the department of Electrical, Computer, Software and System Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. His research and teaching interests include autonomous systems, and software and systems engineering with emphasis on software quality assurance and testing.Dr. Thomas B Hilburn, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ
1(b). The valves in Figure 1(a) arerequired in the dynamic simulation, because the source, sink, and vessel are pressure nodes thatmust be separated by flow resistances – valves. The valves could be replaced by pipes. The twocases shown simply demonstrate tank filling (Case 1) and subsequent tank emptying (Case 2).The transient history for Cases 1 and 2 are illustrated in Figure 2. The top diagram is for tankfilling and the bottom diagram is for tank emptying. It should be pointed out that there was aresidual level of water in the tank before the cases were run. The interesting point is that the tankneither overflows (maximum height = 1 m) nor does it drain completely for Cases 1 and 2,respectively. This result was surprising to the
flat.Answer the following questions: a) How much power, in horsepower, is required to accelerate the car? b) How much energy is required to push the Yaris the 1/4 mile to the service station? c) How long will it take to push the vehicle to the service station?Think-Aloud ProtocolExpanding on the work of Leonard et al. (1996) who categorized problem framing activities into(1) major principles and concepts that are relevant to the problem, (2) justification for includingthose principles and concepts, and (3) a procedure that can be applied to find the solution, wedefined the following categories based on initial data obtained from the Smart pens whenstudents solved statics and thermodynamics problems. Our protocol for problem framing wasdefined
Paper ID #6929Student Perceptions of Online Resources as Predictors of Performance in aHybrid Classroom: Exploratory Findings from a Large Engineering Eco-nomics CourseMs. Kellie Grasman, Missouri University of Science & Technology Kellie Grasman serves as an instructor in Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She holds graduate degrees in engineering and business admin- istration from the University of Michigan, and began teaching in 2001 after spending several years in industry positions. She was named the 2011-2012 Robert B. Koplar Professor of Engineering Manage
the subject of quality and productivity improvement. The list of companies includes well known names such as Alcoa, Caterpillar, and Subaru-Isuzu. Dr. Depew is also a senior member of the American Society for Quality, the American Association for Engineering Education, and Epsilon Pi Tau Honorary Society.Dr. Ida B Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ida Nagmbeki is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Technology, Leadership and Innovation at Purdue’s College of Technology and at Purdue’s Global Policy Research Institute. She has a B.S. in Engineering from Smith College and a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research areas include global engineering policy, human-artefact
Education at the NASA Langley Research Center. She is completing her PhD in Educational Policy, Planning, and Leadership with a focus on Higher Edu- cation Administration at the College of William and Mary. Her dissertation is focused on the preferences of women in an engineering internship as compared to those of men, specifically focusing on the elements and skills that support women’s persistence into an engineering field.Ms. Jeannine B. Perry, Continental Research Associates, Inc. Jeannine Perry joined Continental Research in 1984. As Sr. Project Director, she meets with each client to discuss their needs and outline the research project goals. She is then responsible for planning and monitoring all phases of the
Paper ID #6463Exploring Women Engineering Faculty’s Mentoring NetworksZiyu Long, Purdue University Ziyu Long is a doctoral student in organizational communication at Purdue University.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West LafayetteProf. Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West LafayetteRobyn F Wilson, Purdue UniversityJennifer C Batra, Purdue UniversityLindsey B. Anderson, Purdue University Page 23.6.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Exploring Women Engineering
Paper ID #7131Automated Text Analysis Facilitates Using Written Formative Assessmentsfor Just-in-Time Teaching in Large Enrollment CoursesDr. Luanna B Prevost, Michigan State University Dr. Prevost is a postdoctoral research associate with the Center of Engineering Education at Michigan State University. Her research interests are in student writing, problem solving, and technologies that can be used to assess and teach these skills.Dr. Kevin C Haudek, Michigan State UniversityEmily Norton Henry, Michigan State UniversityMr. Matthew C Berry, Michigan State UniversityDr. Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University Associate
Paper ID #7019Assessment Process Using the First Year Computer Graphics Course at Uni-versity of Arkansas at Little RockDr. Srikanth B Pidugu, University of Arkansas, Little Rock Dr. Pidugu is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology program at University of Arkansas at Little Rock. He obtained Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Old Dominion University in 2001.Prof. Mamdouh M. Bakr, University of Arkansas, Little RockDr. Swaminadham Midturi, University of Arkansas, Little Rock Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. he has been a member of ABET
beaker A so that excess solute could settle at the bottom while beaker B wasleft to evaporate; producing a supersaturated solution. Beaker B was left to evaporate until halfof its solvent remained; after which a string attached to a supporting rod was lowered into thesupersaturated solution so the excess solute in the solution could nucleate and crystallize on thestrong. At each step of this process, students were required to choose the most appropriate termthat best fit the definition that described the type of solution in a given beaker and then write anassociated explanation for their choice.ParticipantsThe participants in this study were the students enrolled in a section of an introductory materialscience class entitled "Structure and
of assessment are listedbelow.# 1 Communicate effectively through speaking, listening, and writing. These competencies will be measured by the ability to: Deliver clear, well-organizedverbal presentations that are appropriate for purpose and audience. Page 23.70.3 a) Use comprehensive listening skills to evaluate messages and respond appropriately. b) Demonstrate the ability to organize ideas, to write clearly and coherently, and to employ conventional mechanics, usage and grammar.#2 Use critical thinking to analyze and solve problems.These competencies will be measured by the ability to: a) Recognize the
defined the relevance of my project. The project and advisor were a package deal, as usual. I selected committee members who would give me a balanced dissertation committee. While most of my advisors are from my department, they have varying research interests, hence different contributions to make to my research. I have also included a recently retired industry professional in my committee. b. Write research proposals: At the start of my doctorate degree, I conducted a thorough literature search on my topic of interest, then identified a need and subsequently wrote a research proposal and presented the paper at the annual board meeting (ABM) of the JIP members. After the meeting the members voted 97% to fund