Session 3215 Incorporating Earth Systems Engineering Concepts throughout the Civil Engineering Degree to create the Engineer of the 21 st Century Angela R. Bielefeldt, Bernard Amadei, R. Scott Summers University of Colorado, Dept. Civil, Environmental, & Arch. EngineeringAbstractWe propose to integrate Earth Systems Engineering (ESE) into Civil Engineering (CVEN)curriculum at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU) by including ESE concepts in existingcourses. This will include every year of the B.S. degree and cross all of the sub-disciplines. Theinitiative emphasizes the role of civil, environmental and
] notes, that most engineers receive just one service course wherein theylearn the syntax of a language.This limited and language-centric education results in today’s engineer, someone who can causea program to print “Hello World”, count to ten in a loop, and sum the elements of an array, butwho does not know when to use an array or what to put into the array to solve a problem.There are two problems: one is the single course limitation, and the second is the content. Piper, Page 10.1235.1Castle, Fuller and Awyzio [3] address the second problem by proposing a hybrid approach to thecore curriculum for the University of Wollongong, which
the way.V. The Proposal of the ProjectThe present proposal of an Engineering Program of SENAC School of Engineering andTechnology has emerged inserted in a context of international integration, of deep and radicalchanges in producing systems and society. To defeat the demand of a changing work market,more than ever it is necessary to have a constant modernization of a curriculum. Attempt to that ,the Telecommunication Engineering Program was elaborated so that it is possible any change inthe curriculum that is necessary to modernize the program 3.This Program contains in its curriculum what was named "free period". It is called so because itis a time when the students have to attend classes in the several other areas of knowledge in oneof the
. Page 22.480.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Development of a Robotic Platform for Teaching Model-Based Design Techniques in Dynamics and Control Program AbstractThis paper describes an on-going project of undergraduate curriculum innovation in ourdepartment, which is sponsored by Mathworks Inc. and our engineering school. The mainpurpose of the project is to develop a FANUC robotic platform, by which we shall significantlymodify two existing undergraduate laboratory courses in dynamics and control: Senior ProjectsLaboratory (100-110 students per year), and Control Systems Laboratory
be the right assignment fortechnology classes.Bibliography1. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs,” ABET, Inc. November 2003, accessed online athttp://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/T001%2004-05%20TAC%20Criteria%2011-19-03.pdf.2. Nicklow, John W. (2000). “Technical Writing in an Undergraduate Design Course.” Proceedings of the 2000ASEE Conference.3. Carvill, Caroline, Susan L. Smith, Anneliese Watt, and Julia Williams. “Integrating Writing into TechnicalCourses: Steps toward Incorporating Communication Into the Engineering Classroom.” (2000) Proceedings of the2002 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. Harvey, Roberta, David Hutto, Kathryn Hollar, and Eric Constans. “Writing as a
. Taken as a whole, these systemcharacteristics provide an ideal modern laboratory setup for instruction in the use ofpositioning controllers and the development of supporting control methodologies.The development of several novel undergraduate laboratory modules devoted to the useand understanding of this modern servopneumatic system and implementation of fuzzybased control methods is presented. These modules include an introduction toservopneumatic systems, position control using a standard industry controller, NumericalControl (NC) programming, calibration of proportional flow control valve, results of animplementation of position control using proportional plus integral and derivative (PID)control and alternative control algorithms. The PID
other tasks which leave them little time to do any productivedesign work. Because of these extra responsibilities, it is critical that the technologist andtechnician be well versed in these topics. Technologists will be immersed in the integration andrelationships of these topics. They will spend time creating geometry, managing databases,integrating systems, and exploring down-stream uses for the model. They will be immersed inlaboratory exercises to emphasize these topics throughout their formal education. Techniciansmay not cover the breadth of material that engineers and technologists deal with, but they willexplore, with a great deal of depth, several of the topics of the aforementioned curriculum model,such as geometry creation techniques
parts of the university. Reflecting on the 1955 Grinter Report, Sheryl Sorby, Norman L. Fortenberry, and GaryBertoline suggest a need for a revolution in engineering education, writing: “Over the years, we educators have done some tinkering around the edges, such as adding in a capstone design project, or replacing Fortran with other programming languages – but the basic structure of the curriculum remains unchanged even though our students can now find information on their phones that might have taken us hours to track down in the library.”3There is no doubt about the need for technical training, but how engineering educatorsincorporate nontechnical skills also has an impact on creating a well-rounded
Elizabethtown College, a Master’s degree in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University, eleven years of experience in industry as a software engineer, and three years as a full-time faculty in the department of engineering at a small Midwest engineering university.Dr. Susan McGrade, Indiana Institute of Technology Dr. McGrade is a Professor of English at Indiana Institute of Technology, where she teaches a range of classes from First-Year Composition to African American Literature. She often works closely with the College of Engineering, and has developed both an integrated model for English instruction within a Software Engineering program, and a problem-based learning curriculum for a First-Year
AC 2004-297: LEADERSHIP THROUGH THE BACKDOOR: EXERCISES FORINDIVIDUALS AND TEAMSDoug Schmucker, Trine University Page 9.843.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2004 Session 3615 Leadership through the Back Door: Exercises for Individuals and Teams Douglas Schmucker Western Kentucky University Some say leaders are born. Others believe that they can be developed. In taking the latter perspective, this paper documents the creative integration of
the range and range accuracy with bothcommercial and self-designed components. The final design review occurred in a public forumas part of the Engineering College’s “Design Day”. Design Day is an open house in whichstudents from multiple engineering departments display their projects to visitors that include highschool students, parents, and industry representatives.One unique aspect of the SAR design is that the low pass filters (see Figure 2) that were used forthe SAR system had been previously designed by students in the introductory EM course. Theuse of devices designed by students in previous courses was thought to support integration ofconcepts.Course Outcomes and EvaluationIn the first iteration of the course reported here, six senior
. and W. Fabrycky, Engineering Economy, Eighth Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ,1997.[11] Thuesen, H.G. and W.J. Fabrycky, Engineering Economy, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River,NJ, 1964.[12] Thuesen, G.J. and W.G. Sullivan “Integration of Economic Principles with Design in the Engineering ScienceComponent of the Undergraduate Curriculum,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June, 1991.[13] Wagner, H.M., Principles of Operations Research, Prentice Hall, New York, NY, 1975. Author BiographyJOSEPH C. HARTMAN is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing SystemsEngineering at Lehigh University. He received his Ph.D. and M.S. in Industrial
requirements are providedbelow.Education and training for engineering technicians: The description of education and training forengineering technicians is quite specific. It states that most engineering technicians enter theoccupations with an associate degree in engineering technology obtainable from technicalinstitutes, community colleges, vocational-technical schools, and extension divisions of collegesand universities. Page 14.681.3Education and training for engineers: The BLS states that the basic education and training forengineers is a bachelors degree in engineering. In addition, the BLS reported that many collegesoffer 2-year and 4-year degree
, June, 2009.3. Carl J. Spezia, “A Task-Oriented Design Project for Improving Student Performance,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Spring 2009.4. Stewart J. I., “Teaching and Assessing Using Project-based Learning and Peer Assessment,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Spring 1999.5. Akins, Leah, M. and Ellena E. Reda, “Implementation of an Integrated Project for the Electrical Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Fall 1998.6. Gerhard, Glen, C., “Teaching Design with Behavior Modification Techniques in a Pseudocorporate Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Education, November 1999.7. Wei Pan, S. Hossein Mousavinezhad, Kenyon Hart, “Digital Signal Processing: Theory and Practice, Hardware
, 2008.4. Gary B. Randolph, “Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2000, Vol. 89, 119—122.5. L. J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty, “The ABET “Professional Skills”–Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005, 41—55.6. S. Kumar and J. K. Hsiao, “Engineers Learn “Soft Skills the Hard Way”: Planting a Seed of Leadership in Engineering Classes,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, January 2007, 18—23.7. D. Shetty and R. A. Kolk, Mechatronics System Design, PWS, Boston, MA, 1997.8. C. W. de Silva, Mechatronics: An Integrated Approach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005.9. D. J
integrating the makerspace into the existing curriculum are discussed, as well asthe guidelines for the revised class periods and final project.This paper also provides an analysis regarding whether integration of a makerspace into a first-year engineering course positively or negatively impacted first-year students developing: 1) anengineering or maker identity, 2) technical skills, and 3) general engineering skills such ascuriosity, problem solving, and/or teamwork. Students completed pre/post surveys regardingprior makerspace experience, their first-year makerspace experience, engineering identity, andgeneral engineering skills. The survey results of students who participated in the maker-sectionsof the course are compared with survey results of a
believe that an integrated approach to design and communication for freshmen justifiesthe effort and expense--and can indeed jump-start the engineering curriculum.AcknowledgmentsWe have been fortunate to have Clive Dym’s suggestions for EDC this year since he is a visiting faculty member atthe McCormick School and a member of the EDC planning committee. We are grateful to him and to CharlesYarnoff of Northwestern’s Writing Program for reading and responding to drafts of this paper.References1. T. Belytschko, A. Bayliss, C. Brinson, W. Kath, S. Krishnaswamy, B. Moran, J. Nocedal, M. Peshkin, “Mechanics in the Engineering First Curriculum at Northwestern University.” International Journal of Engineering Education, accepted for June 1997.2
demonstrated both the shortcomings ofgraduates in their ability to write and the demands of the workplace for improved performance.2However, what has been stated with insufficient clarity is what is the specific purpose of writing,and, therefore, how can one more effectively address this issue in a curriculum?We, like other programs, have both lofty and practical intents with our writing requirements.They are to enlarge and enrich the mind, to capture nuances as well as grand and complexconcepts and to convincingly demonstrate achievements. The challenge becomes one of havingstudents see writing as an integral part of their work as engineers, or their engineering practice
emergencyrepair of ruptured natural gas pipelines. University application of this interest includes instruction in thefollowing courses: Machine Design, Statics and Dynamics, Intro. to Design and Intro. to Product Design aswell as student Capstone Design Projects. He is also the Faculty Advisor for the Student’s Mini-Bajavehicle competition. He and his colleagues have instituted a Capstone Senior Design Project course forengineering technology students that includes an integrated group of Computer, Electrical and MechanicalEngineering Technology students. He has also structured an Intro. to Product Design course for non-engineering majors as part of the University’s new School of Technological Entrepreneurship .In 2002 Prof. Di Bella was awarded the
one of the founding faculty of the U. A. Whitaker College of Engineering. As an assistant professor from 2007-2012, she helped develop the curriculum for the bioengineering design courses and was involved in teaching courses from the sophomore to senior levels. Dr. Csavina received a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from University of Dayton in 1992 and a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Arizona State University in 2003. Her research interests range from motion analysis of human motion in move- ment disorders, orthopedics and sports to engineering education research in student learning, pedagogical approach, and K-12 outreach initiatives.Prof. Lisa Zidek, Florida Gulf Coast University Lisa A. Zidek is
. This is a very important point to emphasize, especially for engineeringstudents who are drawn to quantitative data and who tend to be less comfortable with qualitativedata and analyses. Hence, this “set up” for a discussion on analyzing the stories they receivedfrom their respondents is critical to a successful implementation of this exercise. Otherwise,students will take the “path of least resistance” and base most of their paper on the quantitativeassessments described below.When I introduce this phase, I spend a few minutes describing how strengths are holisticallydefined in this exercise (summarized on a PowerPoint) 16. Strengths are an integration of our (a)self-identities, which is how we express ourselves in a given situation, (b
modular fixturing components and samples of fixture configurationdesigns, therefore setup planning and fixture planning are not currently addressed inToolTRAIN© courseware. The implementation unit in ToolTRAIN© contains five projects basedon different part geometry (see Table 1). The use of animation series in the implementation unitis very helpful for student learning especially when several modular fixture components aremoved into a final configuration. Figure 4 shows an example screen of the implementation unit.Quiz UnitAssessment of student knowledge and its congruence with stated objectives is an integral part ofcourseware development7. Therefore, the last teaching unit in ToolTRAIN© is a quiz wherestudents test their knowledge through
AC 2012-5046: DEFINING THE CORE BODY OF KNOWLEDGE (COR-BOK) FOR A GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING: AWORK IN PROGRESSDr. Alice F. Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology Alice Squires is Manager of Systems Engineering at Aurora Flight Sciences and an adjunct systems engi- neering faculty for the School of Systems and Enterprises at Stevens Institute of Technology. She is one of many authors on the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (http://www.sebokwiki.org/) and the Graduate Curriculum for Systems Engineering (http://bkcase.org/grcse-05). She was previously a Senior Researcher for the Systems Engineering University Affiliated Research Center (SE UARC) and Online Technical Director for the School of
; Exposition Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering Education” Current Response of System Current (amps) 0.1 0.05 0 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05 Time (s) Figure 4. Time response of system current.Course Simulation and ModelingThe simulation software plays an integral role in facilitating student understanding ofmechanical, electrical, and mixed system response throughout the course. After the introductionto the software, usage is
execution of the project, while the instructor had supervisory andmonitoring roles. This approach enhanced the learning process. This paper outlined theelements of this approach, and it explained its effectiveness. Other instructors who teachsimilar or other engineering technology courses are encouraged to use this approach.However, they have to be aware of its limitations.Bibliography1. Ogot, M., Elliot, G., and Glumac, N., An Assessment of In-Person and Remotely Operated Laboratory, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 57-63, January 2003.2. Foulds, R., Bergen, M., and Mantilla, B., Integrated Biomedical Engineering Education Using Studio-Based Learning, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Vol. 22
arereinforced in senior lab. The content and structure of the introductory statistics course andefforts to integrate these concepts into senior lab will be discussed.1. IntroductionUndergraduate chemical engineering education emphasizes analysis and then design. In thetypical curriculum, the majority of the technical credit hours are devoted to fundamental science(e.g., general chemistry, physics, physical chemistry, and organic chemistry) and engineeringsciences (e.g., mass and energy balances, thermodynamics, transport processes, reactionengineering, process dynamics and control). The student is then asked to synthesize this materialin unit operations and then the capstone design course. However, the majority of graduates arehired as Process
., Newell, J. A., “Baseball stadium design: Teaching engineering economics and communication in a multidisciplinary setting.” J. SMET Education. 2001(2): 9–12.5. Sukumaran, B., Jahan, K., Dorland, D., Everett, J., Kadlowec, J., Gephardt, Z., Chin, S., (2006). “Engineering Clinics: An integration of research into the undergraduate engineering curriculum.” Published in Developing and Sustaining a Research-Supportive Curriculum: A Compendium of Successful Practices, Edited by Kerry K. Karukstis, Prof. of Chemistry, Harvey Mudd College and Timothy E. Elgren, Prof. of Chemistry, Hamilton College.6. Riley, D., Slaton, A., and Pawley, A.L. Inclusion and Social Justice: Women and Minorities in Engineering. Cambridge Handbook of Engineering
year plan to integrate practicallaboratories in semiconductor testing at all levels of the BSEE curriculum. Past approaches havetraditionally implemented a single technical elective in the senior year. The proposed approach isunique in this regard as the conjecture is that introducing laboratories in semiconductor testacross the curriculum is more effective. An outline of this plan and its rationale along withexpected program outcomes are described in this paper. The experience in the first year of thisplan, including design of the interface electronics, implementation of the first two laboratoryprojects, and interactions with applications engineers, are also discussed.IntroductionAs an increasing number of transistors continue to be
-line]. Available:http://www.cio.com/research/current/tools/[4] Center for US – Mexican Studies (2002). Virtual Collaboration. [On-line]. Available:http://www.usmex.ucsd.edu/research/virtual_collaboration.html[5] DirectorMX product information(2003) Macromedia Corporation [On-line] . Available:http://www.macromedia.com/director[6] Media services developer Information. (2002) Microsoft Corporation. [On-line] . Available:http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/en/developers/CARLOS R. MORALESCarlos R. Morales is an assistant professor of computer graphics at Purdue University. He holds a BA inTelecommunications and an MS Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction. Prior to working at Purdue University,Carlos worked as a Technical Director. His
the end of the first two courses, and a more prominent role in the last two courses.4.2 ToolsAlthough we wish our students to have an exposure to real-world standards, we recognize thatwe have an obligation to make sure that experience is presented in a pedagogically-soundfashion. We use a particular software development environment, jGRASP, across our computerscience, software engineering, and, now, wireless engineering, programs. jGRASP has beendemonstrated to be an effective tool for teaching13 and learning14, as indicated by its current userbase and its inclusion in a number of Java text books. As jGRASP is the intellectual property ofAuburn University, we had the ability to tightly integrate