; communicated to peers and broader our academic lives,audiences; recognized, accepted, cited,adopted, or used by others. In other words, that • give more responsibility for learning to 6 the student, andit made a difference.” This scholarly work canvary in that it can include teaching, research • set measurable teaching goals,activities, and professional practice. However, establishing plans to meet these goals,it is required that “evidence that a significant and reviewing progress towards theseportion of a faculty member's scholarship has goals.been documented (i.e., communicated to andvalidated by peers beyond the university).”6The
sketchpad drawing tool. Students can manipulate and illustrate their own designs within the system. WISEngineering records all student data, so these initial ideas can be referenced at a later time. TheFigure 2. Engineering design cycle aligns with project steps for explicit navigation. design portfolio allows students to collect any of their work from the project unit and compile it into anelectronic portfolio that can be shared with both peers and instructors. This feature
, lower- and upper-level humanities literature courses, and honors seminars on the intersections of science and society. Her scholarship of teaching and learning, in the areas of writing, reading, and critical thinking, has been published in InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching and College English Association Forum.Chad Rohrbacher Chad Rohrbacher is an Associate Director for the Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach FL. He is currently embedded in the College of Engineering. His research interest include assessment of student learning and faculty peer observation to improve teaching and learning. © American Society for
learning techniques in classroom to teach introductory programming courses with a goal to improve the retention rate in the CS department. Dr. Rahman has published a book, two book chapters and around seventy articles in peer-reviewed journals and confer- ence proceedings, such as IEEE Transaction on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, etc. and presented his works in numerous conferences and workshops, such as ICPR, CBMS, CLEF, CIVR, HISB, SPIE, BIBE, IEEE FIE, etc. His current research is focusing on Crowdsourcing and Deep learning techniques and their application in medical fields, especially for retrieval and diagnostic purposes. Pursuing continuous financial support
moremanagerial and writing tasks (Strehl & Fowler, 2019). This type of behavior was only observedin non-technical tasks.Male Perceptions of Engineering TeamsTo understand team dynamics, researchers may ask male students about their experiences andobservations on sexism in their teams. In one study, male engineering students were seven timesmore likely than female engineering students to agree that their male peers treated female peersin engineering as equals (Osborne, 2008). This suggests that male students are less likely toobserve inequality in their own contexts and in their own teams, and they likely do not believethey play a part in gendered behavior and discrimination in engineering teams. Another studyobserved a man who had described himself
opportunities. In the 2012-13 academic year the unmet need for the average Wartburg student was $18,770 the $10,000 scholarship provided by the ACES program significantly reduces this. Cohort formation provides a support structure in a community of like-minded scholars with diverse backgrounds. Creating a small community in which students feel comfortable and supported has been found to increase students’ overall satisfaction with college [1] and retention in STEM fields. Mentoring connects students with peers, faculty, and alumni who can share experiences and direct them to resources. Effective mentoring has been shown to improve academic performance [2], improve retention rates for women and
the classroom time, resulting in students taking more responsibilityfor their own learning. Having open discussions with peers and time to critique allowed a shift inthe responsibility for learning, which in turn somehow enabled deeper learning. It makes me feel like I'm actually teaching them something because they're thinking for themselves. Finally, I think that I have breached the idea of what critical thinking is in technical writing for engineers. (Participant #9) Now I have the confidence behind me to know, even if it bothers them, even if they're struggling, that it isn't my failure (Participant #9)This interviewee points to a dramatic change in the role of the teacher in the learning process. I
products to market from mere concept stages. He also writes columns for The Huffington Post and Medium on various K-12 and higher education topics. A marathon runner and scuba diver, he has completed 25 marathons and has run across the Grand Canyon from rim to rim to rim.Nicole Gutzke, Cal Poly Pomona Ms. Nicole Gutzke is the Outreach Liaison with Cal Poly Pomona College of Engineering (CoE). As the Outreach Liaison, she is heavily involved in growing Cal Poly Pomona’s PLTW Summer Core Training Institute into a seven-week event that introduces hundreds of K-12 educators to the latest in STEM-related curriculum. As the Outreach Liaison, Nicole helps to recruit, retain, and graduate hundreds of female engineers each
increases culturalcompetence and creates a graduate experience that enhances the success of diverse andinclusive graduates and future faculty: A variety of initiatives have been identified to addressdepartment concerns: (1) Develop a mentor-mentee work/communication styles learning moduleinto the graduate program core course required for all new graduate students, (2) Host aworkshop on how to write and evaluate a job application diversity statement that will trainfaculty and graduate students, (3) Develop a peer mentoring program for graduate students, and(4) Provide conference travel funds for graduate student(s) and/or faculty member(s) toparticipant in a conference URM program/event, (4) To revisit the doctoral qualifyingexamination in
Page 25.568.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Enhancing cross-cultural interaction in courses with a large component of visiting study-abroad studentsAbstractInternational student mobility programs enhance the global exposure of students, andrepresent a vital and increasing component in the offering of many universities worldwide.These programs often involve the travel of a group of students to an overseas location, wherethey, in addition to a variety of cultural activities, also register for a series of courses towardstheir degree completion. These courses are taken jointly with their local peers. Whilecollaborative exchange programs among different universities often
improve in their abilities to read and write about mathematicalproblems and their solutions, while collaborating with their peers. Finally, a fourth aim of thiscourse was for students to develop and enhance the algebra skills necessary to succeed in this Page 25.170.2course and in their next math course.To accomplish this ambitious set of goals, we designed the course around a sequence ofmodeling activities that would engage students in solving problems, working in small groups,and communicating their thinking throughout the modeling sequence. The central mathematicalidea around which this course was organized is a deep understanding of
the useof effective learning strategies [23]. Therefore, identifying appropriate strategies in the classroomto alleviate anxiety and enhance mathematical achievement is crucial [25]. Classroom-Level Factors Influencing Course Performance In addition to psychosocial factors, classroom-level factors also significantly impactstudents' performance in calculus courses.Active Engagement Practices A growing body of scholarship has advocated for the adoption of active learningstrategies in higher education, especially within STEM disciplines. Active learning refers to aneducational approach where students actively participate in activities such as reading, writing,discussions, or problem-solving that promote analysis
. The success of our programs in thepast does not necessarily mean that they will remain adequate for the changing needs of thefuture. We need to consider education, as not merely confined to the classroom and thelaboratory, but as a total system that encompasses in-class activities, out-of-class learningexperiences, peer-to-peer student interaction, faculty-student relations, and the school activitiesand environment as a whole.The main issues considered by the TQM Committee and included in this paper are: FacultyVision and Mission statements, programs’ educational objectives and outcomes; teachingmethodologies and the effectiveness of co-operative learning; proposed programs’ and courses’outcomes assessment methodologies and tools; developed
, students are engaged with others across disciplines. This interaction serves toenhance peer-to-peer education and build knowledge among student cohorts. The group projectsand debates enhance students’ knowledge and oblige them to analyze problems frommultidisciplinary perspectivesThe development and teaching of this multidisciplinary course presents challenges to thestudents and faculty in crossing the traditional academic silos. Lessons learned and the necessaryinstitutional infrastructure in sustaining the multidisciplinary efforts are presented and discussed.IntroductionEnergy is not only an economic and technological issue; it is also an environmental and nationalsecurity issue. The Department of Energy reports that the United States consumes
Organizational aspects Sep - Nov Application • Writing skills: one pager research- • Choose and describe case studies Phase #1 intention + CV • Organize mentor team • Knowledge increase: Get acquainted with • Publish application information online general research location and local flood • Select 25 students to write full proposal risk related issues Dec - Jan Application • Writing skills: full research proposal
, stereotype threat, and impostersyndrome [2], [3]. The systemic racism that BLI students experience manifests through STEMcurriculums that center the experiences of white1 people and exclude minoritized populations,BLI stereotypes that assume academic incompetence, persistent microaggressions, intersectionaloppression, exclusion and isolation, and lack of representation among faculty and peers of thesame race or ethnicity [4]–[7]. Systemic racism leads to heightened stereotype threat andimposter syndrome in BLI students, by increasing the pressure to prove one's academic ability,1 We deliberately chose to capitalize the terms Black, Latinx, and Indigenous while intentionally using lowercasewhen discussing whites and whiteness. In doing so, we resist
identities are closely tied toengineering as a choice [3]. Performance/Competence is related to students’ self-efficacy beliefswhich have been shown to be important for identity development and engineering as a major ofchoice [24], [25]. Last, recognition refers to how others (e.g., parents, teachers, peers,instructors) view students and how this is important to engineering identity [3], [8], [26]. Theseconstructs lay the groundwork for how we position this work in progress.3. MethodologyWe approached this exploratory study from a constructivist epistemological perspective [27]using narrative inquiry [28]. Narrative inquiry is a research methodology to understand theindividual experiences of participants via conversations that are situated and
this, we examine methods for promoting an individual team member’s skilldevelopment, confidence, and goal attainment while contributing positively to their team’scohesion and product. We include three data sources: timely surveys of students’ goals, progresstowards those goals, and how they align with their perceived contributions to the team; teamchecklists and manufacturing plans updated in real time to include specific tasks, ownership,status, and any assistance required; and students’ reflective documentation of shared knowledge,skills, and mental models. These data are complemented by peer assessments occurring at majorproject milestones [11]. Combined, these instruments are used to track student and team growthin the context of team
students have more time with the faculty member, more time to interact withand learn from their peers, and more time to ask questions and clarify concepts in class [17].Advantages for the faculty member are that they can witness in real-time where studentsstruggle, identify learning bottlenecks and address them with the class, and incorporate just-in-time teaching strategies [18]. There are also disadvantages documented in the literature. Facultylose some control over the presentation of content as they focus on student needs and just-in-timeinstruction where helping students learn may become more important than the content covered[19]. There are also disadvantages for students, because they must become more self-directedlearners and take more
stand-alone EC course.This trajectory is set to change rapidly with the rise of interdisciplinary, remote engineeringteams, increasingly visually-focused publication modes [25], and ChatGPT [26] and other AI-powered writing tools. It is beyond the scope of this paper to detail communication-supportingapproaches to integrating AI- and non-AI-powered tools in the EC course context [27]; however,selected emerging apps show clear promise for students for visual and presentation contexts(Tome.ai, Orai) [28-29] and written contexts (WordTune, ChatGPT) [30].The New EC CurriculumIdeally introduced in the second year of engineering curricula, an EC course is able to scaffoldand develop authentic communicative capacity grounded in students’ interests and
empathy into about design processes in me to get better at the skills I engineering can be a good engineering, you are writing a already use in my daily life. practice in reflective piece of your story. engineering. With how fast paced everything In my personal life, I think being Asking questions through each usually is, I get wrapped up in able to reflect on my behavior step in the process can also help routine without thinking about with my friends or family has in being more reflective and how I really feel about my helped me get to where I am in avoiding mistakes that can classes, my peers, or myself. my
,” “innovative learning environments,” and “a context-richapplication of English, Communications and Technology” 1. Specifically, this project aims toimprove students’ writing skills, oral communication skills, and presentation skills by reinforcingthe importance of these skills in realistic, project-based design contexts. Administrators andinstructors within all 3 departments hope the integration will improve students’ learning in alldisciplines, increase academic engagement overall, and create a stronger sense of communityamong students. Large-scale integration on this level is an intervention in the traditional university model,which often times includes strict discipline-based divisions of coursework. In this newarrangement, students in each
Mathematics), tutor (Math Support Center, Learning Strategic Center, Engineering Learning Initiatives). He has also served as a peer-counselor/tutor at Delaware State University (while participating in Intensive Summer Science Program, ISSP) and College Counselor/Mentor for National Society of High School Scholars (NSHSS). His research interests cover a range of science and engineering disciplines ranging from mathematics education, mathematical modeling and methods in Physical, Biological, Engineering; Political Science (Concentrating on African Continent); Nanobiotechnology with emphasis on Micro-fluidic device, biosensors, thin-film, and nano/micro-actuators; to Dynamical and theoretical
. The written report was evaluated using the WrittenCommunication VALUE rubric, which was developed by faculty experts sponsored by theAssociation of American Colleges and Universities. This VALUE rubric evaluates a writtenreport based upon five categories – context of and purpose for writing, content development,genre and disciplinary conventions, sources and evidence, and the control of syntax andmechanics5. The video infomercial was evaluated using the Elevator Pitch Evaluation Rubric,created by faculty at Rowan University for a sophomore-level design course. This rubricconsiders content, organization, style, delivery, and the overall presentation6. Both the writtenand oral assignments were double coded to ensure the quality of the
coding as being different from rating. Like rate, code has different definitions indictionaries and in qualitative coding guides (Saldaña, 2015; Thornberg & Charmaz, 2014). 2However, we understand coding to include descriptions that are not necessarily related to qualityand that do not necessarily have a numerical assignment. For example, in our previous research(Authors, 2018) we identified forms of capital that high school students mobilized towardsolving an engineering design problem. Our codes included Social Capital: Peer, defined as“other high school students who provided ideas or information regarding potential designelements” and
are something I can use to prepare for future presentations and meetings. By working with peers, professionals, and the community, this was an opportunity to improve my public speaking skills, management and organization, and writing techniques. Oral and written skills can be improved by practicing; it was a great chance to focus on these skills through our project and practice regularly…. For oral and written communication skills, I learned from my writing to be simple and clear in my ideas, know my audience and write on basis of how much they know, and write sentences that are related to the main point that I want to
forindividual engineers to prepare for their professional careers. The approachable writing style andreflective nature of the content make this text ideal for any level of engineering student, but it isparticularly salient for first- or second-year students.Giving Voice to Values (GVV)The GVV curriculum was pioneered by Mary Gentile, former professor with the University ofVirginia School of Business, for application in business. GVV takes an “action-orientedapproach” to values-driven leadership.11 We selected GVV for the Engineering Ethics coursebecause many graduating engineering students will one day step into leadership roles in businessorganizations. A significant body of GVV content is delivered by Gentile as pre-recordedmodules, developed for a
broaden the participation of underrepresented minorities that in engineering.Linda T Coats Dr. Linda T. Coats is a professor in the Department of Educational Leadership at Mississippi State University. Since joining the University faculty, Professor Coats has taught courses in curriculum development, teacher preparation, social justice, research, leadership, and writing. She has managed three NSF-funded projects as Project Investigator with a STEM education focus and has served as co-PI for two NSF-funded projects with an engineering focus. Professor Coats’ perspectives about teaching, learning, leadership, and life have been molded by a confluence of historical, social, and political forces. Professor Coats’ research
disquisition. This general description is commonly taken to apply to social sciences, humanities andphysical sciences, as well as to all engineering fields. However, the outcomes expected in thepost-degree careers of humanists, social and physical scientists, and engineers are quite different.The scientist and humanist are charged with discovery. Their task is to learn and, then, toexplain to their peers the nature of their discoveries. Quite to the contrary, the engineer isexpected to develop a command of a defined topical field and, more importantly, to apply thatknowledge in a very tangible way that benefits society -- and, then, explain both discovery andapplication to society.Core Competencies in Engineering: All engineers solve problems and
on the UMass Amherst campus to students whoare located together with their peers in classrooms abroad. The instruction is synchronous andallows for seamless two-way communication and active student engagement and thus provides anenvironment that is very similar to what students experience in a conventional residential program.By locating the studio on the main campus of the university, regular faculty members can be in-structors and thus ensure that the quality of the program is identical to what is normally taught oncampus. The cohort-based approach ensures that students can form a community, collaborate inthe classroom, and persist in the program.The technology is based on high-quality audio and video, interactive whiteboards, and a