, Strategies for Success”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.4. Radian Belu, “Virtual Laboratory For Study of the Electric Machines Parameters and Characteristics”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, 20105. Radian G Belu, Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, “Using a Virtual Platform for Teaching Electrical Machines and Power Systems”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 20136. S. Ayasun and G. Karbeyaz, DC motor speed control methods using MATLAB/Simulink and their integration into undergraduate electric machinery courses, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 15, 2007, pp. 347 - 354.7. J.R
) (1)Carrier Signal:AC cos(2p fC )t (2)Modulated Signal: S AM (t ) [ Ac Am cos(2 f mt )]cos(2 f ct ) Ac [1 k cos(2 f mt )]cos(2 f ct ) (3)where, Am and Ac represent the amplitude of the message signal and carrier signal, respectively; fcand fc represent the frequency in Hertz of the message signal and carrier signal, respectively; trepresents time, in seconds, and k is a constant.These equations are written in JavaScript such that the end-user is able to modify the parametersof the equations via a graphical user interface. The mathematical equations for theaforementioned waveform along with the corresponding
peer group is that there are many problems for students towork, and each student throughout the course of a fifty minute class will work three problemsand “host” a problem as a peer tutor. In class, these progressive peer groups are called “FunkyFridays”; they were implemented on a weekly basis as a way to practice the topic(s) of the week.The name gave the cue that this was a regular, ongoing expectation.The progressive peer group is implemented as follows: the instructor prepares at least fourdifferent problems for students to work. Students are randomly grouped in threes and assigned anexercise to work. Playing cards are an easy way to help direct students to minimize time lostduring moves, and are an easy way to continually mix students
and Technology Policy, 2010.[3] National Academy of Engineering. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.[4] NGSS Lead States. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.[5] National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.[6] S. Purzer, T. Moore, D. Baker, and L. Berland
-student connections in STEM disciplines: A literature review,” J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 14, pp. 22-26, 2013.9. C. F. Brooks and S. L. Young, “Are choice-making opportunities needed in the classroom? Using self-determination theory to consider student motivation and learner empowerment,” Intl J. Teaching Learning Higher Educ., vol. 23, vol. 48-59, 2011.10. L. D. Fink, Creating Significant Learning Experiences, Revised and Updated. San Francisco: Wiley, 2013.
: Integrating social media and social work education. Journal of Social Work Education. 50(3): 387–390.Schmidt, H. (2013). Media literacy education from kindergarten to college : A comparison of how media literacy is addressed across the educational system. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 5(1), 295–309.Stewart, J., Antonenko, P., Robinson, S. and Mwavita, M. (2013). Intrapersonal Factors Affecting Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Agricultural Education Teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education. 54(3), pp. 157 – 170. DOI: 10.5032/jae.2013.03157Talley, K.G. (2013). Lights, camera, action! Peer-to-peer learning through graduate student videos. In Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education
market. https://jumpcloud.com/blog/comparing-three-directory-services/[2] M. Wahl, T. Howes, and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3)," IETF RFC 2251, Dec. 1997[3] CNSA at MTU. http://www.tech.mtu.edu/cnsa/[4] Microsoft Active Directory. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/ directory/activedirectory/default.mspx[5] OpenLDAP. http://www.openldap.org/[6] VMWare. http://www.vmware.com[7] Canvas. http://www.canvas.com[8] VirtualBox. https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads[9] Gerald Carter, “LDAP System Administration”. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
: Applications, Analysis &Measurement [per ASME Y14.5-2009],” James D. Meadows & Associates, Inc. and ASMEPress, 2009.[12] www.stratasys.com, "Dimension Elite User Guide," Document #204400-0002, 2007.[13] Ameta, G., Lipman, R., Moylan, S., Witherell, P., "Investigating the Role of GeometricDimensioning and Tolerancing in Additive Manufacturing," Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol.137(11), 2015.[14] Robbins, N. B., Heiberger, R. M., "Plotting Likert and Other Rating Scales," Joint StatisticalMeeting, Section on Survey Research Methods, 2011.
Anthony Pezza P.E., Old Dominion University An adjunct assistant professor in the CEE Department, Old Dominion University. Retired in 2010 from U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Headquarters as Deputy Chief, Engineering and Construction after a 37 year career as a design engineer in geotechnical and coastal infrastructure. Also, a fellow and life member of ASCE and board certified Diplomate in ASCE’s Academy of Geo-professionals.Dr. Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at The University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
/virtualbench-all-in-one-instrument. [Accessed: 03- Feb-2019].[11] “Home : Tamuracorp.com.” [Online]. Available: http://www.tamuracorp.com/products/audio-transformers-data-sheets-met/. [Accessed: 03- Feb-2019].[12] “PhysioNet.” [Online]. Available: https://physionet.org/. [Accessed: 21-Mar-2019].[13] J. H. Martin, K. B. Hands, S. M. Lancaster, D. A. Trytten, and T. J. Murphy, “Hard But Not Too Hard: Challenging Courses and Engineering Students,” Coll. Teach., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 107–113, Apr. 2008.
theDepartment of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Teaching Team. Ethics approval wasgranted by the Imperial College London Educational Development Unit (EERP1819-014).References[1] D. Chadha and G. Nicholls, “Teaching Transferable Skills to Undergraduate Engineering Students: Recognising the Value of Embedded and Bolt-on Approaches,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 116–122.[2] I. Drummond, J. Wiltshire, and I. Nixon, “Personal transferable skills in higher education: the problems of implementing good practice,” Qual. Assur. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19–27, Mar. 1998.[3] S. Fallows and C. Steven, Integrating Key Skills in Higher Education: Employability, Transferable Skills and Learning for Life. Stylus Publishing, Inc
grade. Students,however, will be quizzed on a weekly basis to check their learning performance and the quizzesaccount for 30% of the final grade.Let us use a particle kinetics problem as an example to explain how this problem is presented tostudents as different assignments. Table 4 An example of different types of assignment on KD. Problem Statement: The smooth 2-kg cylinder 𝐶 has a pin 𝑃 through its center which passes through the slot in arm 𝑂𝐴. If the arm is forced to rotate in the vertical plane at a constant rate 𝜃̇ = 0.5 rad/s, determine the force that the arm exerts on the peg at the instant 𝜃 = 60∘ [1]. Online Assignment Choose a coordinate system for the problem. (Assigned
/detail?vid=0&sid=ff2ec3e5-713b-4476-b106-e9ec04288c99%40sessionmgr4006&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=pdh&AN=2018-03101-001 [Accessed: Jan. 8, 2019][4] R. M. Felder, “Reaching The Second Tier: Learning And Teaching Styles In College ScienceEducation,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 23, no. 5, 1993 [Online]. Available:https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/stem-resources/legacy-articles/education/. [Accessed Jan. 10, 2019]provides a model of learning and teaching styles that has been cited by numerous sources as theylook for more effective means of teaching.[5] J. T. Bell and H. S. Fogler, “The Investigation and Application of Virtual Reality as anEducational Tool,” June, 1995. [Online]. Available:https://www.cs.uic.edu/~jbell
/output, variables, assignments, expressions, branches, loops,functions, and arrays. Once learned, students are ready to transition to an industry language (ifdesired), wherein the student could focus more on syntax issues of the particular industrylanguage since the core concepts were already learned. Coral is intended as a step in learning, nota language for producing real applications (though future uses of Coral for real applications isnot beyond consideration).This paper describes the Coral language, including numerous examples of textual code andcorresponding flowchart(s). This paper also describes the Coral educational simulator, and sharesearly usage data from introductory programming students.2. Coral description and examplesThis section
: Kurtis Johnsonat UW-Platteville, Philip Armstrong at Villanova University, and Mustaki Ahmed at VillanovaUniversity. In addition, the authors are thankful for the helpful feedback about the activitiesprovided by Dr. Patricia Gallagher (Drexel University), Dr. Andrea Welker (VillanovaUniversity), Dr. Christina Curras (UW-Platteville), and Dr. Joseph Scalia IV (Colorado StateUniversity).References[1] J. Schultz, J. Wilson, and K. Hess, "Team-based classroom pedagogy reframed: the student perspective," American Journal of Business Education, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 17-24, 2010.[2] S. P. Sternberg, “Small Group, In Class Problem Solving Exercises,” in Proceeding of the 1997 Annual Conference, Milwaukee, WI, USA, June 15 -18, 1997.[3] H. G
understanding of core science content and science and engineeringpractices. The informal learning space also allows teachers and students to learn together,providing a strong bond that is essential to excite students about engineering and allow girls tofeel that STEM fields are an option for them.References[1] E. Seymour, Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences / Elaine Seymourand Nancy M. Hewitt. Boulder, Colo.: Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1997.[2] S. L. Pruitt, “The Next Generation Science Standards,” vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 17–19, 2015.[3] “STEM Teaching Tools.” [Online]. Available: http://stemteachingtools.org/. [Accessed:2019]
presentation.Course Learning Outcomes: 1. Identify relevant topics from previous courses and then apply them to their project 2. Identify and specify design requirements from general problem descriptions 3. Communicate design ideas and information 4. Demonstrate creative thinking 5. Display information gathering skills 6. Demonstrate oral and written communication skillsTraits: Upon successful completion, students should have the following attitude(s)/traits: Confidence in their ability to design. Confidence in their ability to communicate technical information effectively.Our senior design course is structured as a collection of independent or group student projects.This capstone course is offered every semester
Identify appropriate materials and construction methods Design a system or process to solve technical problems Apply an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills, and tools of the disciplineAccreditation assessment: Student outcomes – An ability to design systems, components, processes, procedures, or programs meeting specified needs for broadly-defined engineering, technical, or scientific problems appropriate to Construction Management Engineering Technology [11] Performance Indicators Method(s) of Assessment Target for Performance Students will be able to Faculty members will complete 70% of students score 75% or design and install a full‐ the group dynamics
standard levels. They recommend building these kinds of rubrics from the outside in– that is, for each criterion, describe the highest standard level, then the lowest standard level,and then fill in the middle level(s). They note that this kind of rubric becomes more difficult togenerate with the more levels one desires. Stevens and Levi also present what they call a“scoring guide rubric,” which focuses more on the criteria and presents only the description ofthe highest standard level. Exploration of the use of rubrics in chemical engineering has beenpresented previously. Newell et al. [3] suggest applying four standards levels, rather than three orfive, to avoid there being a middle or “neutral” option.MethodsDevelopment and Implementation of
Control Laboratory. Inaddition, we would like to extend our deepest appreciation to all the MSOE support personneland our industrial partners for their dedication and generous donations. This work was supportedwith contributions from the NFPA Education and Technology Foundation and MSOE's OttoMaha Endowment Fund.References[1] N. F. P. Association, "Annual Report," 2017.[2] R. K. a. Robert MacCurdy, "Printable Hydraulics: A Method for Fabricating Robots by 3D Co-Printing Solids and Liquids," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden, 2016.[3] C. S. e. al., "Additive manufacturing for agile legged robots with hydraulic actuation," in International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), Istanbul
on 10 years of sponsored senior design projects: Students win–clients win!” The Journal of Systems and Software 80 (2007) 1209–1216. [6] Cliff Mirman, “Pathways for Integrating Industry into an Engineering Technology Program”, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, San Antonio, TX. [7] Kornecki, A.J., Khajenoori, S., Gluch, D., Kameli, N., 2003. “On a partnership between software industry and academia.” Proc. of the 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, Madrid, Spain, pp. 60–69. [8] Otieno, A. and Mirman, C., 2003, “Engineering Technology Capstone Experience: An Industry Based Partnership,” Proc. CIEC 2003 Conference
Love Identity and Ignore Inequality. New York: Metropolitan Press. Pawley, A.L. (2017). “Shifting the “Default:” The case for making diversity the expected condition for engineering education and making whiteness and maleness visible.” Journal of Engineering Education, 106:4, 531-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20181 Roberston, R.V & Mason, D. (2008). “What Works? A Qualitative Examination of the Factors Related to the Academic Success of African American Males at a Predominately White College in the South.” Challenge: A Journal of Research on African American Men, 14:2, 67-89. Seron, Carroll, Silbey, Susan S., Cech, Erin, and Rubineau, Brian (2016). “Persistence is Cultural: Professional
activities, living-learning communities, internships, etc.Research by Cech [33] characterized a culture of disengagement in engineering education. Thismight be expected to diminish commitment to sustainable engineering. However, educationalmodels such as Vanasupa et al.’s Four Domain Develop Diagram (4D) [34] indicate conditionsthat might impact affective domain learning, including social aspects of learning, motivation,context, and autonomy. Thus, it is difficult to predict how college might change students’attitudes toward sustainable engineering. Engineering students might become more or lessfavorable in their attitudes toward sustainable engineering, as a result of both formal curriculumand hidden curriculum.Research QuestionsGiven the new
legal representative of the recipient of the human-powered vehicle. • Formalize partnership relationships: Faculty course coordinator performs project management tasks for course project; recipient becomes known as the user; the recipient(s)’ legal representative becomes known as the client; and the first partner is the partner coordinator. • Vet all users and clients through their engagement in the Overcoming Barriers program run by the partner coordinator through the academic year. Users and clients are chosen by prior commitment in the Overcoming Barriers program, and agreement to at least one year of forthcoming commitment during the design-build process of the human-powered vehicle
Education and Outreach Programme.” European Journal of Engineering Education,vol. 42, no. 6, Jan. 2017, pp. 632–643.[3] Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's mathperformance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
: Case Studies and BestPractices, M. K. Hensley and S. Davis-Kahl, Eds. Chicago: Association of College and ResearchLibraries, 2017, pp. 157-172.
Proceedings. 3. Rapinder S. Sawhney, Sima Maleki, Joseph H. Wilck, and Pedraum Hashemian (2013) “Center for Productivity Innovation's Student Project with Industry Program at the University of Tennessee, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering,” INFORMS Transactions on Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.1120.0100 4. Ted Eschenbach (2010) “Why engineering economy professors should teach introductory corporate finance,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 5. Heather Nachtmann, Kim L. Needy, Jerome P. Lavelle, and Ted G. Eschenbach (2008) “How Do Engineering Managers Teach Engineering Economy?,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEM National Conference. 6. Ted G. Eschenbach and Neal A. Lewis (2019) “Risk
”, Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Seattle, WA[8] Hyeoun-Seong Kim, Sangmi-Park, Sunju-Han, Leen-Seok Kang, “AR-based 4D CADsystem using marker and markerless recognition method”, Procedia Engineering 2017; 196:29 – 35[9] Tumkor Serdar, “Mixed Reality Tools in Engineering Drawing Course”, Proceedings of the2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26-29, 2016, New Orleans, LA[10] Michael Fosmire, Amy S. Van Epps, Nastasha E Johnson, “Badging Your Way toInformation Literacy”, Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June14-17, 2015, Seattle, WA[11] Rob van Roy, Sebastian Deterding, Bieke Zaman, “Collecting Pokémon or receivingrewards? How people functionalise badges in
international educational experience, a greater richness ofexperiences in domestic offerings can bring some of the benefits of study abroad programs tothose domestic offerings.References[1] United Nations. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: OurCommon Future. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf[2] Allen, D., B. Allenby, M. Bridges, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, S. Matthews,C. Murphy, D. Pijawka. Benchmarking Sustainable Engineering Education. Center forSustainable Engineering.http://syracusecoe.org/csengine/images/allmedia/BSEE_Final_Report_31Dec08_No_Appen_D.pdf[3] Cisneros-Donahue, T., K.A. Krentler, B. Reinig, K. Sabol. Assessing the Academic Benefitof Study Abroad. Journal of Education and