rehabilitation engineering, medical device design, and design education. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationPERRY LI is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Minnesota. He received his B.A.degree in Electrical and Information Sciences from Cambridge University, his M.S. degree in BiomedicalEngineering from Boston University, and his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Berkeley. His interests are fluidpower, control of printing and imaging systems, paper manufacturing, robotics, and intelligent control.DAVID WALETZKO is pursuing his M..S degree in the Department of
and components mentioned above, and the specificmethod employed by the Allen-Bradley Series 500 Small Logic Controller (SLC500) networksystem will be part of the paper. The manuscript will focus on essential topics that should beincluded in an Industrial Networking Laboratory.Students who participate in Honors Program at the University of Cincinnati must maintain a 3.2Grade Point average and complete 36 Quarter credit hours of Honors level coursework. The 36Quarter credit hours must include a minimum of 9 credit hours of Honors Special Topicscourses. The remaining credit hours can be obtained by the Honors Contract or IndependentStudy courses. This project was part of the Honors Contact course for the student(s) whoparticipated in the Honors
., 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princeton University Press.4. Tsang, E., 1998. Why Service-Learning? in When Community Enters the Equation: Enhancing Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education Through Service-Learning, Ritter-Smith and Saltmarsh, editors. pgs. 13-28.5. Felder, R.M. and R. Brent, 2001. Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning. Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching, 10(2), 69-75.6. Nambisan, Shashi S. 2002. A Team Oriented, Case-based Approach for a Transportation Engineering Course. Paper Number 2002-1350, Session 2215. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering
,” SAE Transactions - Journal of Passenger Cars: Mechanical Systems, Vol. 110, Sec. 6, 2002, pp.482-485. 6. Nishizawa, S., et al., “Development of a Universal Spring Mechanism for Automobile Suspension System Design,” SAE Paper # 04AC-79. 7. Ostwald, P.F. and J. Munoz, Manufacturing Process and Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1997. 8. Priest, J.W. and J.M. Sanchez, Product Development and Design for Manufacturing, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 2001. 9. Rothaupt, R., “Industrial Projects in Manufacturing Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004-1006. 10. Setiadharma, S.H., Development of Automated Liquid
or engineering a PC cluster supercom-puter, along with a simple methodology for the design of a system optimized for specific applica-tion(s), are covered. To broaden the impact of this project, students from other areas of science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) at USU are also invited to attend the work-shop. As a result, for the summer 2004 workshop half of the participants were computer sciencestudents, the other half mechanical engineering students. For the hands on portion of the work-shop, interdisciplinary teams were created, allowing the students to learn from each others experi-ence. Some of the engineering students brought their own research code for the 4th and 5th day ofthe workshop which allowed the computer
).TONY S. KELLER received B.S. degrees in General Engineering and General Science from Oregon StateUniversity (Corvallis, OR, 1978), M.S.E. degree in Bioengineering from the University of Washington (Seattle,WA, 1983), and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Vanderbilt University in 1988. He is currently Professor ofMechanical Engineering at the University of Vermont. His research interests include experimental andcomputational biomechanics. Dr. Keller has received numerous awards, and has authored over 70 journalpublications, over 130 conference proceedings and a number of book chapters. Page 10.1474.7 Proceedings of the 2005
improvements in the number of interdisciplinaryteams formed with13 of 26 BME teams, 5 of 8 ME teams and 6 of 10 EE/CompE teamcomposed of interdisciplinary students for 2004-5. We plan to add additional in-classexercises to increase this percentage for 2005-6.5. The students were last asked “What topic(s) would you suggest adding? A samplingof the primary responses follows: • structure is ok, don’t add anything (3) • career paths (3) • law/medicine/business (2) • management and management skills (2)and entrepreneurship, consulting, sales, group dynamics, donuts, technology trends,government: private interactions, more cool lecturers, industry speakers, Meyers Briggs,synergy, design tools, manufacturing, drafting, networking
]. The Chronicle of Higher Education, A57. 2. Brent, M. (2002). Selecting A Distance Education School. Retrieved from: http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/APR02_Issue/article05.html 3. Kadiyala, M & Crynes, B. L. (2000). A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education, Journal of Engineering Education, 82(2), 177- 189. 4. Coleman, J. N., Kinniment, D. J., Burns, F. P., & Kolemans, A. M. (1998). Effectiveness of computer-aided learning as a direct replacement for lecturing in degree-level electronics, IEEE Transaction on Education, 41(3), 177-184. 5. Zywano, M. S. & Waalen, J. K. (2001). Student outcomes and attitudes in technology-enables and traditional
Page 10.1257.7 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationsame institution (a.b.d.). Address: Old Dominion University, Department of Engineering Technology, 214 KaufmanHall, Norfolk, VA 23529; telephone: 757-683-6560, fax: 757-683-5655, iflory@odu.eduJOHN R HACKWORTHJohn R. Hackworth is Program Director for the Electrical Engineering Technology program at Old DominionUniversity. He holds a B. S. Degree in Electrical Engineering Technology and a Master of Science Degree inElectrical Engineering, both from Old Dominion University. Prior to joining the Old Dominion University faculty,John had
students' comments, they consistently enjoy the new teachingmethod and like the flexibility.Bibliography1 Orabi, I, A Comparison of Student Performance in an Online with traditional Based Entry Level EngineeringCourse, Proceedings of 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition2 Lo J., Gregg M., Waldron S. and Robinson R.. Blackboard Collaboration: Consolidation of On-Line CourseMaterials and Assessment, Proceedings of 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conferenceand Exposition.3 . Ko, Susan and Rossen, Steve. Teaching Online: A Practical Guide. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2001,p. 95.4 . Schweizer, Heidi. Designing and Teaching an On-line Course. Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 1999, p
Culture in thePostmodern Age. New York: Teachers College Press.Herkert, J. (2002). Continuing and Emerging Issues in Engineering Ethics Education, 2004). NationalAcademy of Engineering. Retrieved January 10, 2004.http://www.nae.edu/NAE/naehome.nsf/weblinks/MKEZ-5F7SA4Lewis, L. (2004). The Cultivation of Professional Ethics. Retrieved September 20, 2004.http://www.nspe.org/ethics/eh 1-lew.aspMarshall, J. (2001). Character Education in Preservice Education: One Institution’s Response. Journal ofCollege and Student Values, 9.Palmer, P. (1998). The Courage to Teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.Pfatteicher, S. (2001). Teaching vs. Preaching: EC200 and the Engineering ethics Dilemma. Journal ofEngineering Education, 1, 137-142.Ryan, K., Bohlin, K
accreditation cycle., accessedJanuary 5, 2005.2 Wankat, Phillip C., Oreovicz, Frank S., Delgass, W. Nicholas, “Integrating Soft Criteria into the ChECurriculum”, Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition, (2000)3 Felder, Richard M. and Rebecca Brent, “Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABETEngineering Criteria”, J. Eng. Ed., 92(1), 7 (2003)4 Miller, R.L., and B.M. Olds, “A Model Curriculum for a Capstone Course in MultidisciplinaryEngineering Design,” J. Eng. Ed., 83(4), 1 (1994)5 Fornaro, R.J., M.R. Heil, and S.W. Peretti, “Enhancing Technical Communication Skills in EngineeringStudents: An Experiment in Multidisciplinary Design,” Proceedings of the 31st Annual ASEE/IEEEFrontiers in
test score, and analysis of the link betweenthe reflective statement and improvement on subsequent exams.References1. “What Happens When Students Don’t Know that They Don’t Know”, keynote address delivered at the IndianaUniversity-Purdue University Fort Wayne Associate Faculty Teaching Conference, March 23, 2004.2. Isaacson, R. “Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring in Post-Secondary Education: The Consequences of PoorKnowledge Monitoring and a Program to Facilitate It.” Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 2005, pp. 29-36. 3. Tobias, S. & Everson, H. “Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring. In G. Schraw & J. Impara(Eds.), Issues in Measurement of Metacognition, 2000. (pp. 147-222). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of
, the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health (SPH), the Johns HopkinsApplied Physics Laboratory (APL), and the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division(IH). The final project for this successful collaboration requires that student teams define thetechnology and its applications, review applicable literature, analyze the strength of theprovisional patent application (with the assistance of students from the Intellectual Propertycourse), identify technology and market gaps, gauge the interest of potential customers andlicensees, define a business model, project the potential returns to licensees, evaluate spin-offpossibilities, value the technology from the perspective of its owner(s), and describe next steps.They hold extensive
a short paper on a researchquestion. In future years, we will run a trial section to tie the research question to the designchallenge. The objective is to ascertain whether the research activity improves the designsolutions. The success will be measured by the number of successful teams in the sections tyingthe research to the challenge verses those that do not.References 1. Marchese, A. J., R. P. Hesketh, K. Jahan, T. R. Chandrupatla, R. A. Dusseau, C. S. Slater, J. L. Schmalzel “Design in the Rowan University Freshman Engineering Clinic,” 1997 Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, Milwaukee, WI, June 15-18, 1997 Session 3225, Paper No. 4, 9 pgs. 2. Burton, J. D. and D. M. White, “Selecting
include electronics,optoelectronics, microwave photonics, materials science, & first year engineering courses. She and severalcolleagues won the 2004 Helen Plants award for Best Nontraditional Session at FIE2004 for “Feminist Frontiers.” Page 10.1484.7 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationAppendix A: Revised “Fabulous Friday” guidelines including suggestions from students. TO: Students in EEE 194 FROM: Dr. S. M. Lord DATE: May 12, 2003 REVISED RE
Session 2548 VHDL and Small Format Color Displays ”Video Images Make Learning Fun” Jeffrey S. LillieAbstractRochester Institute of Technology requires a course in Principals of Design Automation for ElectricalEngineering Technology and Computer Engineering Technology students. At the completion of thecourse, students are expected to know the basics of coding for synthesis, test bench techniques,modelsim simulator, and the Xilinx tool flow for targeting complex programmable logic devices(CPLD’s) and field programmable gate arrays (FPGA’s).A quick
of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 2625. Available CD-ROM. 3. Davis, D.C., R.W. Crain Jr., D.E. Calkins, K.L. Gentili, and M.S. Trevisan. “Competency-Based Engineering Design Projects.” Proceedings of the 1996 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 1608. Available CD-ROM. 4. Davis, D.C., R.W. Crain, M.S. Trevisan, D.E. Calkins, and K.L. Gentili. “Categories and Levels for Defining Engineering Design Program Outcomes.” Proceedings of the 1997 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3530. Available CD-ROM. 5. Campbell, S., and C.L. Colbeck. “Teaching and Assessing Engineering Design: A Review of the Research.” Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3530
Session 1420 Evaluating the Impact of Real-time Systems Theory Course on a Multidisciplinary Embedded Systems Curriculum G. Singh1 , M. Mizuno1 , M. Neilsen1 , D. Lenhert2 , N. Zhang3 , A. Gross41 Department of Computing and Information Sciences, Kansas State University (KSU), fsingh,masaaki,neilseng@cis.ksu.edu2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, KSU, lenhert@ksu.edu3 Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, KSU, zhangn@ksu.edu4 The IDEA Center, 211 S. Seth Child Road, Manhattan, KS, agross@ksu.edu Abstract The ChERT project is
Tapias. Available at <> (1999).3. Bryant, R.E. & Irwin, M.J. Current and future Ph.D. output will not satisfy demand for faculty. Computing Research News, 2001, March, 5-11.4. Cambell, G. Jr., Denes, R. & Morrison, C. (Eds.) Access Denied: Race, Ethnicity, and the Scientific Enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2000).5. Cassell, J. & Jenkins, H. (Eds.) From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games. Cambridge: MIT Press (1998).6. Catsambis, S. Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1995, 32, 243-257.7. Clewell, B., Anderson, B. & Thorpe, M. Breaking the Barriers: Helping Female and Minority
analog transients andharmonic distortion. These tools are also being incorporated into ongoing research in mixed-signal anddigital test. Page 7.816.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography1. T. Hall, “Using Simulation Software for Electronics Engineering Technology Laboratory Instruction,” 2000 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 3547, St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000.2. S. Pisarski, “Using Simulation Software for Electronics Engineering Technology Laboratory
, 1999.2. Course website, www.ecs.umass.edu/ece/vspgroup/burleson/courses/197H/3. MATLAB website, www.mathworks.com4. Interactive MPEG-1 Video Demonstration web page in the WebDVD website, http://vsp2.ecs.umass.edu/mpeg/5. Cool Edit website, www.cooledit.com6. M. Stern, J. Steinberg, H.I. Lee, J. Padhye, J. Kurose, "MANIC: Multimedia Asynchronous NetworkedIndividualized Courseware", Proc. of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1997.7. RIPPLES website, http://ripples.cs.umass.edu8. S. Thampuran, W. Burleson, K. Watts, “Multimedia Distance Learning Without the Wait”, Proc. of Frontiers inEducation Conference, 2001.PROF. WAYNE BURLESON is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineeringat the University of
correctly answered. Ø The second type of charts represents the percent of students correctly answered each individual transfer question. The caption of this type indicates the number and type of question. For example, Q1, Q2, … and Q6 indicate question number 1, 2, … and so on. While C indicates a cylindrical object, S a sheet object, and B a block object.· In comparing the results from each case sections with those of the control section, one can conclude the followings: 1. Students in the case sections outperformed those in the control section in every aspect. 2. Students in all sections performed better when a cylindrical object was used. This is due to the fact that students in all sections have practiced on
isthe result of making contributions, of having meaningful projects that are personally exciting andcontribute to and bless the lives of others.” 1Bibliography 1. Covey, S., “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People,” Fireside, New York, NY, 1990. 2. American Association for Higher Education (AAHE): Series on Service-Learning in the Disciplines (adapted from the National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993) 3. University of San Diego department of Community Service Learning., www.sandiego.edu/csl. 4. Engineering Criteria 2000, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), www.abet.orgLEONARD A. PERRYLeonard A. Perry is an Assistant Professor of Industrial & Systems Engineering at the University
(2002) PTC Corporation. [On-line] . Available:http://www.ptc.com/[4] SolidWorks product information (2002) SolidWorks Corporation. [On-line] . Available:http://www.solidworks.com/[5] Greco, Joe. CADENCEWeb (2001). CMP Publishing. [On-line]. Available:http://www.cadenceweb.com/2001/0801/mcad0801.html[6] 3Dview and SpinFire product information (2001) Actify Corporation. [On-line] . Available:http://www.actify.com/v2/index.htm[7] Morales, C., & Meador, S. (2000). Trial results from a custom distance learning system based onhybridization of cd-rom, web, and active-x component technology. Proceedings of the InformationVisualization Conference IV’2000 (pp. 39-43). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA.[8] Morales, C. (2001). A method of
technology, acommercial turnkey solution for delivering streaming video content over a wireless IP network does notcurrently exist in the distance learning market. Technologically, the system is built around Microsoft’sActive Server Pages and Windows Media Services. ASP s used to implement the logic and WMS providesthe video streaming capabilities. The system also addresses on-site video delivery through the integration ofa intelligent mechanism capable of identifying users accessing the module from wireless PDA’s anddelivering alternate content through IEEE 802.11b Wireless LAN. Additionally, the system utilizes path-finding methodology and artificial intelligence algorithms to intelligently select the delivered instructional,user-specific
not have been possiblewithout definition of a reasonable goal for the program and a coherent structure for its projectmanagement. However, the team most definitely rose to the level of the expectations for them.Encouragement and support produced amazing results. And consistently throughout the project, itwas most fortunate that since the volunteers were self-motivated, the energy of the group wasalways positive.References1) Allen, M.L., Aldridge, M.D. and Burkhalter, B.B., “The Evolution of University and Industry ResearchRelationships”, Engineering Education, April 1989, pp 418-423.2) Sponable, Jess M., “Two Stage or Not To Stage”, Launchspace, July/August/September 1999, pp 35-37.3) Davis, H.P., Talay, T., and Wells, S., “An Evolutionary
; Dijkstra, Structured Program-ming, Academic Press (1972)[2] Dijkstra, E.W., “A Discipline of Programming”, Prentice Hall (1976)[3] Floyd, R., “Assigning Meaning to Programs”, pp.19-32, Mathematical Aspects of Computer Science XIX, Amer-ican Mathematical Society (1967)[4] Hoare, C.A.R., “An Axiomatic Approach to Computer Programing”, CommACM, pp.576-580,Vol.12#10,(1969)[5] Naur, P., “Proofs of Algorithms by General Snapshots”, BIT Vol.6 pp.310-316, (1969)[6] www.mozart-oz.org (2002)[7] Van Roy, P., Haridi, S., www.info.ucl.ac.be/people/PVR/book.html (2002)Biographical InformationJuris Reinfelds received his PhD from the University of Adelaide, South Australia, in 1963. Through the Universityof Edinburgh, University of Adelaide, Marshall Space
the problems addressed by each topic, thetools and techniques used to address those problems, and the shareware programs that can beused to facilitate the solving of those problems.Engineering EconomicsEngineers not only design projects, they also justify implementation of those projects. They mustconsider whether a project will offer some net benefit to the people who will be affected by it;and they must consider the cost of consuming natural resources, both in the price that must bepaid for them and the realization that once they are used for that project, they will no longer beavailable for any other project(s). In searching and selecting different programs for engineeringeconomics, certain features were deemed critical for effectiveness
Session 1451 Attitudes vs. Performance in the Engineering Classroom Crist S. Khachikian, Darrell W. Guillaume California State University Los AngelesIntroductionThe paradigm subscribed to by most people is that if one believes that a goal can be achieved,success is more likely. This is especially true in the pursuit of educational goals 1. A new trendin introductory texts focusing on orienting students to higher education, including those used inengineering courses, is to place a high degree of emphasis on this point. For example the widelyused text by Landis 1 is filled with phrases such as